Totally implantable vascular access devices in 131 pediatric oncology patients

Central Venous Catheter Consideration in Pediatric Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis From the American Pediatric Surgical Association Cancer Committee

BACKGROUND

Tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) are the cornerstone of modern oncologic practice. Establishing best practices for catheter management in children with cancer is essential to optimize care, but few guidelines exist to guide placement and management.

OBJECTIVES

To address four questions: 1) Does catheter composition influence the incidence of complications; 2) Is there a platelet count below which catheter placement poses an increased risk of complications; 3) Is there an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) below which catheter placement poses an increased risk of complications; and 4) Are there best practices for the management of a central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI)?

METHODS

Data Sources: English language articles in Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Databases.

STUDY SELECTION

Independently performed by 2 reviewers, disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.

DATA EXTRACTION

Performed by 4 reviewers on forms designed by consensus, quality assessed by GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 110 manuscripts. There was no significant difference in fracture rate, venous thrombosis, catheter occlusion or infection by catheter composition. Thrombocytopenia with minimum thresholds of 30,000-50,000 platelets/mcl was not associated with major hematoma. Limited evidence suggests a platelet count <30,000/mcL was associated with small increased risk of hematoma. While few studies found a significant increase in CLABSI in CVCs placed in neutropenic patients with ANC<500Kcells/dl, meta-analysis suggests a small increase in this population. Catheter removal remains recommended in complicated or persistent infections. Limited evidence supports antibiotic, ethanol, or hydrochloric lock therapy in definitive catheter salvage. No high-quality data were available to answer any of the proposed questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Although over 15,000 tunneled catheters are placed annually in North America into children with cancer, there is a paucity of evidence to guide practice, suggesting multiple opportunities to improve care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. This study was registered as PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019124077.

Risk Factors of the Totally Implantable Venous Access Device-Related Infection in Patients With Brain Tumors Undergoing Chemotherapy After Surgery

Background: The complication of totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) is an infection, which causes the death of patients. Therefore, it is critical to identify risk factors for TIVAD infection to prevent death. Patients and Methods: The enrolled patients were divided into two groups and subsequently divided into subgroups according to various factors in which the correlation between infection and risk factors was analyzed. Multivariable logistic analysis of odds ratios (ORs) for seven risk factors was performed, meanwhile, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of neutrophil and serum albumin was conducted for the prediction of TIVAD infection occurrence. Results: Catheter-related blood stream infection was the common infection type, which was dominantly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Removal of TIVAD and antibiotic therapy were the preferred approaches for the treatment of infection. Seven risk factors were closely associated with the TIVAD infection, however, two risk factors, including age and outpatient, were excluded according to the multivariate logistic analysis of ORs. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed neutrophil count and serum albumin could predict the occurrence of TIVAD infection. Conclusions: Five risk factors were positively related to TIVAD infection; neutrophil and serum albumin could be used to predict the occurrence of TIVAD infection.

Tunneled Central Venous Catheters in Young Children: Complication Profile Can Guide Choice of Line

INTRODUCTION

Placement of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) is one of the most common procedures performed in children and can either be externally accessed or internally accessed. However, there are no data-driven guidelines on when to offer each line type, particularly in small children aged less than 5 y. Our hypothesis is that the two types of lines have different complication profiles and indications that can guide providers and families in this decision.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed for patients aged less than 5 y who underwent initial placement of a tunneled CVC between 2014 and 2016. Patients were included if they underwent initial tunneled CVC placement within the study period and were excluded if line was emergently placed for hemodynamic instability or was a replacement catheter. Data were compared by type of CVC, weight more than or less than 10 kg, indications for CVC, complications, and duration of catheter.

RESULTS

We identified 148 patients who underwent initial tunneled CVC during study period. Seventy one patients (48%) received an externally accessed type and 77 (52%) received internally accessed type. The indications for line placement were TPN in 24 patients (16%), chemotherapy in 67 (45%), vascular access in 45 (31%), and nonchemotherapy infusions in 12 (8%). Externally accessed catheters had higher late complications (> 30 d) in patients > 10 kg compared to internally accessed catheters (63% versus 21%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

While some diagnoses determine line type, there are other indications that may qualify patients for either line. Our data demonstrate a lower long-term complication rate with internally accessed catheters and suggest they be considered over externally accessed lines in appropriate patients.

Complications associated with totally implantable access ports in children less than 1 year of age

BACKGROUND

Long term central venous access is necessary for the treatment of several conditions affecting young children. Totally implantable access ports (ports) offer the advantage of containing no external components, thus simplifying their care and maintenance. However, there is no consensus on the safety of port placement in infants (birth to 1-year of age). The aim of this study was to describe complications associated with port placement in infants, including which specific factors may be associated with risk for developing complications among these patients, and thereby assess the safety of port placement in this young population.

METHODS

A two-institution, retrospective cohort study identified patients under 1-year old who underwent port placement. Intraoperative, early postoperative (within 30 days), and late postoperative (greater than 30 days) complications were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to assess factors associated with port-related complications.

RESULTS

Among 121 patients who received a port, 36 (30%) experienced a complication with a median time to complication of 299.5 days [IQR 67.5-440.75]. Of those, 26 required unplanned port removal. Only 3 patients (2.5%) experienced an intraoperative complication, and 3 patients (2.5%) experienced a complication within 30 days of port placement. A diagnosis of cancer was found to be protective against early catheter malfunction (OR=0.31, p = 0.03). A non-statistically significant trend associated with increased complications for large caliber devices (>6.0Fr) and weight <7-kg (OR 2.20, p = 0.06 and OR=2.26, p = 0.11 respectively) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Port placement appears to be safe for most infants with low or acceptable rates of intra- or post-operative complications. Smaller patient size (< 7 kg) and larger-sized catheters (> 6.0Fr) may be associated with an increased risk for complications among this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Risk profile of subcutaneous port placement in small children

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Long-term central venous access is a safe and common procedure in children. However, complications with devices are a reality. Smaller children are thought to have a higher rate of complication after port placement, and some surgeons avoid placing ports with an arbitrary weight cutoff out of concern for surgical site morbidity.

METHODS

We performed a multi-institutional retrospective review of 500 patients less than 5 years of age undergoing port placement at three large volume children's hospitals from 2014 to 2018. Patients were divided by weight greater than or less than 10 kg at the time of insertion. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate for differences in outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

The majority of ports were placed for chemotherapy access (71.8%). Other indications included long-term infusions (18.8%) and difficult chronic IV access (9.4%). Of the 500 charts reviewed, 110 (22%) experienced some documented complication (28.9% <10 kg, 20.6% >10 kg, p = 0.096). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of the type or timing of complications. Overall, 16.3% of ports required removal prior to the end of therapy owing to a complication. Complication rate per day with the port in place was not different between the two groups (<10 kg: 0.68 complications/1000 port-days vs >10 kg 0.44 complications/1000 port-days, p = 0.068).

CONCLUSION

Weight less than 10 kg was not associated with a significantly higher incidence of any type of port complication in our cohort. This suggests that concern for complications should not exclude children less than 10 kg from port placement.

TYPE OF STUDY

Multi-institutional retrospective review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Long-term vascular access in differently resourced settings: a review of indications, devices, techniques, and complications

Central venous access is frequently essential for the management of many acute and chronic conditions in children. Millions of central venous access devices (CVADs) are placed each year. In this review article, we discuss the indications for long-term vascular access, the types of devices available, the state of the art of central venous cannulation and device placement, and the complications of long-term central venous access. We pay a special attention to the challenges of, and options for long-term central venous access, also those in developing countries, with limited financial, human, and material resources.

Complications and risk factors of infection in pediatric hemato-oncology patients with totally implantable access ports (TIAPs)

BACKGROUND

Totally implantable access ports (TIAPs) are widely used in pediatric hematology-oncology patients. We investigated the incidence of complications, causes of TIAP removal, and risk factors for infection.

PROCEDURE

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, demographic, and surgical characteristics in 225 pediatric hematology-oncology patients implanted with 238 TIAPs between January 2004 and December 2005.

RESULTS

Except for 20 patients lost to follow-up, the mean maintenance period was 724.8 +/- 500.6 days (range: 17-2,124). Mechanical complications occurred in seven patients (2.9%). The causes of TIAP removal were termination of use in 130 patients (59.6%), death from primary disease with TIAP in situ in 35 (14.7%), infection in 35 (14.7%), and obstruction in 4 (1.8%). Early infections occurred in nine patients at mean 37.77 +/- 16.44 days (range: 17-56). Late infections occurred in 26 patients at mean 334.5 +/- 257.82 days (range: 68-997). Univariate analysis showed that the risk factors of early infection were re-implantation (P = 0.022) and long operation time (P = 0.045). The risk factors of late infection were ANC <500/mm(3) (P = 0.011) and platelet count <50,000/mm(3) (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, re-implantation was a significant risk factor of early infection (P = 0.033, OR 4.528) and low platelet count (<50,000/mm(3)) was the independent risk factor for late infection (P = 0.005, OR 4.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Correct procedure and careful use decreases the incidence of early infection and leads to the prevention of re-implantation. Initial thrombocytopenia was attributable to bone marrow suppression caused by hematologic malignancies or severe infection. Thus, this condition is of value in predicting late infection.

Totally implantable central venous access devices in children with hemato-oncologic malignancies: evaluation of complications and comparison of incidence of febrile episodes with similar patients without central venous access devices

The incidence of mechanical and infectious complications of totally implantable central venous access devices (TIDs) must be related to underlying disease, intensity of the chemotherapy, and frequency of manipulations. Records of the patients hospitalized from January 2002 to May 2005 were evaluated. Patients with TIDs were matched with patients without TIDs having the same malignancy and the same anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. Catheter-related complications were documented and corresponding phases of the chemotherapy in matched pairs were compared with regard to infections. TIDs were inserted in 31 patients with a median age of 4.3 years (22 acute leukemia, 1 NHL, and 8 solid tumors). Total number of catheter days was 5268, with a median catheter life of 174 days (range 9-493 days). Nine catheters (29%) were removed due to mechanical and infectious complications. There was 13 catheter-related infections with a rate of 2.46/1000 catheter days. Total number of mechanical complications was 5 and overall rate of complications was 3.41/1000 catheter days. The rate of febrile episodes was 54 and 41 in the TID and no TID group, respectively (p: .11). Duration of neutropenia was 9.6 and 7.4 days and duration of fever per febrile attack was 5.6 and 4.4 days in the TID and no TID group, respectively (p: .047 and .56). Although most of the patients in this study had hematological malignancy and required frequent manipulation, the results were similar to those in developed countries. TIDs are essential for management of chemotherapy in pediatric malignancies with acceptable complications.

Totally implantable central venous access devices for paediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Totally implantable central venous access devices (ports) have been available for over 10 years but have not achieved widespread use in paediatric oncology patients. We reviewed our experience with these devices over 9 years to assess their safety and acceptability.

PROCEDURE

We conducted a retrospective review of insertion technique and reasons for removal of all ports placed in paediatric oncology patients in this hospital between 1989 and 1996, with follow-up until 1998. Acceptability of both ports and external catheters was assessed by a questionnaire in a subgroup of families attending the oncology clinic.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-nine ports were inserted during the study period. The median catheter life was 399 days (4-1,406), with a total of 69,342 catheter days. Sixty-nine percent of ports were removed electively at the end of treatment; 8% required removal because of infection and 5% because of blockage. No ports were accidentally dislodged or damaged. Children experienced significantly less restriction of activity with a port compared to an external catheter and greatly preferred the cosmetic appearance. The need for needle insertion to access the port was not seen as a disadvantage by most families.

CONCLUSIONS

Ports can provide satisfactory central venous access for the majority of paediatric oncology patients, with a low risk of line-related complications and a high degree of acceptability to children and their parents.