Electrophoretic screening for human apolipoprotein C-II variants: repeated identification of apolipoprotein C-II(K19T)

A review of the role of apolipoprotein C-II in lipoprotein metabolism and cardiovascular disease

The focus of this review is on the role of apolipoprotein C-II (apoC-II) in lipoprotein metabolism and the potential effects on the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We searched PubMed/Scopus for articles regarding apoC-II and its role in lipoprotein metabolism and the risk of CVD. Apolipoprotein C-II is a constituent of chylomicrons, very low-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Apolipoprotein C-II contains 3 amphipathic α-helices. The lipid-binding domain of apoC-II is located in the N-terminal, whereas the C-terminal helix of apoC-II is responsible for the interaction with lipoprotein lipase (LPL). At intermediate concentrations (approximately 4 mg/dL) and in normolipidemic subjects, apoC-II activates LPL. In contrast, both an excess and a deficiency of apoC-II are associated with reduced LPL activity and hypertriglyceridemia. Furthermore, excess apoC-II has been associated with increased triglyceride-rich particles and alterations in HDL particle distribution, factors that may increase the risk of CVD. However, there is not enough current evidence to clarify whether increased apoC-II causes hypertriglyceridemia or is an epiphenomenon reflecting hypertriglyceridemia. A number of pharmaceutical interventions, including statins, fibrates, ezetimibe, nicotinic acid, and orlistat, have been shown to reduce the increased apoC-II concentrations. An excess of apoC-II is associated with increased triglyceride-rich particles and alterations in HDL particle distribution. However, prospective trials are needed to assess if apoC-II is a CVD marker or a risk factor in high-risk patients.

Resequencing Genomic DNA of Patients With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia (MIM 144650)

Objective— The genetic determinants of severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG; MIM 144650) in adults are poorly defined. We therefore resequenced 3 candidate genes, namely LPL , APOC2 , and APOA5 , to search for accumulation of missense mutations in patients with severe HTG compared with normolipidemic subjects.

Methods and Results— We resequenced >2 million base pairs of genomic DNA from 110 nondiabetic patients with severe HTG and determined the prevalence of coding sequence variants compared with 472 age- and sex-matched normolipidemic controls. We found: (1) heterozygous mutations ( LPL p.Q-12E >11X, p.D25H, p.W86R, p.G188E, p.I194T and p.P207L; APOC2 p.K19T and IVS2–30G>A) in 10.0% of severe HTG patients compared with 0.2% of controls (carrier odds ratio [OR] 52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.6 to 319); and (2) an association of the APOA5 p.S19W missense variant with severe HTG (carrier OR 5.5 95% CI 3.3 to 9.1). Furthermore, either rare mutations or the APOA5 p.S19W variant were found in 41.8% of HTG subjects compared with 8.9% of controls (carrier OR 7.4, 95% CI 4.5 to 12.0). Also, heterozygotes for rare mutations had a significantly reduced plasma triglyceride response to fibrate monotherapy.

Conclusions— Both common and rare DNA variants in candidate genes were found in a substantial proportion of severe HTG patients. The findings underscore the value of candidate gene resequencing to understand the genetic contribution in complex lipoprotein and metabolic disorders.

Dyslipidaemia in a boy with recurrent abdominal pain, hypersalivation and decreased lipoprotein lipase activity

An 8-year-old boy with frequently recurring pancreatitis-like abdominal pain, Fredrickson type V dyslipidaemia, and significantly decreased post-heparin plasma lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity is described. In order to exclude familial LPL deficiency, the complete LPL coding gene sequence was analysed revealing compound heterozygosity for two mutations (Asp9Asn, Ser447Ter) which are not supposed to considerably impair lipolytic enzyme activity. However, until now the combination of both these mutations in one patient has not been observed. In addition to the common symptoms of LPL deficiency, a striking feature of unknown origin was hypersalivation. Treatment including a fat-restricted diet, omega-3 fatty acids, and nicotinic acid led to long symptoms-free intervals. Symptoms recurred however when the diet was not strictly adhered to.

CONCLUSION

LPL deficiency is a rare cause of abdominal pain in childhood and deserves careful treatment in order to avoid pancreatitis. The presented patients is a unique compound heterozygote for two mutations which do not abolish lipolytic activity in the homozygote state. Identification of other individuals with this genotype is necessary to understand the phenotype in our patient.