High-grade surface osteosarcoma of the humerus

A review of imaging of surface sarcomas of bone

Surface lesions of bone are uncommon. Although their imaging features generally mirror those of their intramedullary counterparts, surface lesions may demonstrate distinct characteristics which along with their unusual location present a diagnostic challenge. Surface sarcomas are usually of a lower grade compared with intramedullary variants, leading to differences in management. Osteosarcoma arising from the cortical surface of the bone is termed juxtacortical or surface osteosarcoma and includes three distinct entities: parosteal, periosteal, and high-grade surface osteosarcoma. We also review the features intracortical osteosarcoma, which some authors include under the umbrella term surface osteosarcoma. These lesions exhibit biologic features distinct from those of conventional intramedullary osteosarcoma, which underlines the importance of accurate imaging diagnosis. Periosteal chondrosarcoma and periosteal Ewing sarcoma also have distinctive imaging appearances. The purpose of this article is to review surface sarcomas of bone with regard to their clinical and radiological features and to discuss the differential diagnosis for each condition.

High-Grade Surface Osteosarcoma: Clinical Features and Oncologic Outcome

Background

High-grade surface osteosarcoma is an extremely rare subtype of osteosarcoma. The treatment outcome for this tumor varies in different centers.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of high-grade surface osteosarcoma; clinical, radiological, and histological materials were reviewed.

Results

We studied 23 patients (16 males, seven females); median age was 24 years old. All the tumors involved the lower limb, located at the diaphysis in 11 patients and at the metaphysis in 12 patients. Even though the majority of tumors were located at the surface of the bone, the medullary canal was involved in 10 patients. The microscopic findings were indistinguishable from conventional central osteosarcoma. All the patients were treated with a combination of surgery and systemic chemotherapy. Follow-up data were completed in 20 patients; follow-up duration ranged from 27 months to 182 months or until the patient died of the disease (5–104 months). Of the 20 patients, 12 died of the disease, and eight patients were alive at the time of the last follow-up. The 5-year overall survival rate was 37.6%.

Conclusions

Our study revealed that the treatment outcome for this tumor shows a poor survival rate.