Comparison of results and complications following combined ECCE-trabeculectomy versus small-incision-trabeculectomy and posterior chamber lens implantation

Small incision cataract surgery with trabeculectomy versus phacoemulsification trabeculectomy in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

Purpose:

This study aims to evaluate efficacy and outcomes of manual small incision cataract surgery with trabeculectomy (Group 1) and phacoemulsification with trabeculectomy (Group 2) in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG).

Methods:

In this retrospective comparative observational case series, All patients with PXG who underwent either small incision cataract surgery or phacoemulsification with trabeculectomy from 2011-2015 were studied. Data compared included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), total surgical time, and incidence of intra/postoperative complications.

Results:

A total of 82 (Group 1) and 64 (Group 2) subjects were included for the study. The baseline IOP and anti-glaucoma medications in both groups were comparable pre-operatively (group 1 = 26 ± 10.3 mmHg, group 2 = 23 ± 13.9 mmHg, P = 0.1). The IOP at final follow up between the two groups was not statistically significant (group 1 = 12 ± 3.2 mmHg, group 2 = 14 ± 1.8 mmHg, P = 0.2). The average total time of surgery (group 1 = 40 ± 21.6 min, group 2 = 34 ± 14.8 min, P = 0.4) was not statistical significant between groups. The incidence of post-operative complications were similar in both groups (P = 0.95).

Conclusion:

Manual small incision cataract surgery with trabeculectomy is noninferior in PXG patients with comparable surgical outcomes, when compared with phacoemulsification with trabeculectomy.

Effect of technique on intraocular pressure after combined cataract and glaucoma surgery: An evidence-based review

TOPIC

To analyze the literature pertaining to the techniques used in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery, including the technique of cataract extraction, the timing of the surgery (staged procedure versus combined procedure), the anatomic location of the operation, and the use of antifibrosis agents.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cataract and glaucoma are both common conditions and are often present in the same patient. There is no agreement concerning the optimal surgical management of these disorders when they coexist.

METHODS/LITERATURE REVIEWED

Electronic searches of English language articles published since 1964 were conducted in Pub MED and CENTRAL, the Cochrane Collaboration's database. These were augmented by a hand search of six ophthalmology journals and the reference lists of a sample of studies included in the literature review. Evidence grades (A, strong; B, moderate; C, weak; I, insufficient) were assigned to the evidence that involved a direct comparison of alternative techniques.

RESULTS

The preponderance of evidence from the literature suggests a small (2-4 mmHg) benefit from the use of mitomycin-C (MMC), but not 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery (evidence grade B). Two-site surgery provides slightly lower (1-3 mmHg) intraocular pressure (IOP) than one-site surgery (evidence grade C), and IOP is lowered more (1-3 mmHg) by phacoemulsification than by nuclear expression in combined procedures (evidence grade C). There is insufficient evidence to conclude either that staged or combined procedures give better results or that alternative glaucoma procedures are superior to trabeculectomy in combined procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

In the literature on surgical techniques and adjuvants used in the management of coexisting cataract and glaucoma, the strongest evidence of efficacy exists for using MMC, separating the incisions for cataract and glaucoma surgery, and removing the nucleus by phacoemulsification.

Combined cataract surgery, intraocular lens implantation, and viscocanalostomy

PURPOSE

To describe 2 techniques of combined viscocanalostomy and phacoemulsification and report the results.

SETTING

Gimbel Eye Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

METHODS

Combined viscocanalostomy, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation was performed in 83 eyes. A shared scleral incision was made in 46 eyes and a clear corneal incision separate from the viscocanalostomy site, in 37 eyes. A retrospective review of these cases was performed.

RESULTS

Intraocular pressure (IOP) was significantly lower in both groups 2 and 8 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. The decline in IOP postoperatively over time was also comparable. There were no cases of hypotony, choroidal detachment, filtrating bleb, or postoperative cystoid macular edema in either group. Complications included IOP spikes in 2 eyes in the shared-incision group at 1 day (to 43 and 30 mm Hg, respectively). In early shared-incision cases, there was 1 obvious Descement's puncture in 1 eye and a torn scleral flap requiring extra suturing in another eye.

CONCLUSION

Combined viscocanalostomy, cataract extraction, and IOL implantation was safe and efficacious in lowering IOP whether a shared scleral incision or a separate clear corneal incision was used for phacoemulsification.