Photoreceptor membrane breakdown in the spider Dinopis: the fate of rhabdomere products

Light-Driven Processes Control Both Rhodopsin Maturation and Recycling in Mosquito Photoreceptors

Many invertebrates carry out a daily cycle of shedding and rebuilding of the photoreceptor's photosensitive rhabdomeric membranes. The mosquito Aedes aegypti shows a robust response, losing nearly all Aaop1 rhodopsin from the rhabdomeric membranes during the shedding process at dawn. Here, we made use of Aaop1 antibodies capable of distinguishing newly synthesized, glycosylated rhodopsin from mature nonglycosylated rhodopsin to characterize the fate of Aaop1 during the shedding and rebuilding processes. The rhabdomeric rhodopsin is moved into large cytoplasmic vesicles at dawn and is subsequently degraded during the standard 12 h daytime period. The endocytosed rhodopsin is trafficked back to the photosensitive membranes if animals are shifted back to dark conditions during the morning hours. During the daytime period, small vesicles containing newly synthesized and glycosylated Aaop1 rhodopsin accumulate within the cytoplasm. At dusk, these vesicles are lost as the newly synthesized Aaop1 is converted to the nonglycosylated form and deposited in the rhabdomeres. We demonstrate that light acts though a novel signaling pathway to block rhodopsin maturation, thus inhibiting the deglycosylation and rhabdomeric targeting of newly synthesized Aaop1 rhodopsin. Therefore, light controls two cellular processes responsible for the daily renewal of rhodopsin: rhodopsin endocytosis at dawn and inhibition of rhodopsin maturation until dusk.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Organisms use multiple strategies to maximize visual capabilities in different light conditions. Many invertebrates show a daily cycle of shedding the photoreceptor's rhabdomeric membranes at dawn and rebuilding these during the following night. We show here that the Aedes aegypti mosquito possesses two distinct light-driven cellular signaling processes for modulating rhodopsin content during this cycle. One of these, endocytosis of rhabdomeric rhodopsin, has been described previously. The second, a light-activated cellular pathway acting to inhibit the anterograde movement of newly synthesized rhodopsin, is revealed here for the first time. The discovery of this cellular signaling pathway controlling a G-protein-coupled receptor is of broad interest due to the prominent role of this receptor family across all areas of neuroscience.

Expression and light-triggered movement of rhodopsins in the larval visual system of mosquitoes

During the larval stages, the visual system of the mosquito Aedes aegypti contains five stemmata, often referred to as larval ocelli, positioned laterally on each side of the larval head. Here we show that stemmata contain two photoreceptor types, distinguished by the expression of different rhodopsins. The rhodopsin Aaop3 (GPROP3) is expressed in the majority of the larval photoreceptors. There are two small clusters of photoreceptors located within the satellite and central stemmata that express the rhodopsin Aaop7 (GPROP7) instead of Aaop3. Electroretinogram analysis of transgenic Aaop7 Drosophila indicates that Aaop3 and Aaop7, both classified as long-wavelength rhodopsins, possess similar but not identical spectral properties. Light triggers an extensive translocation of Aaop3 from the photosensitive rhabdoms to the cytoplasmic compartment, whereas light-driven translocation of Aaop7 is limited. The results suggest that these photoreceptor cell types play distinct roles in larval vision. An additional component of the larval visual system is the adult compound eye, which starts to develop at the anterior face of the larval stemmata during the 1st instar stage. The photoreceptors of the developing compound eye show rhodopsin expression during the 4th larval instar stage, consistent with indications from previous reports that the adult compound eye contributes to larval and pupal visual capabilities.

The posterior median eyes of the dinopid spider Menneus

The posterior median (pm) eyes of the dinopid spider Menneus unifasciatus L. Koch are described and compared with the pm eyes of Dinopis, which are highly specialised for night vision. The lenses of Menneus have F-numbers of 0.72 compared to 0.58 in Dinopis, the distance between receptors is ca. 4.0 microns compared to 20-22 microns for Dinopis, and image quality is matched to receptor spacing. The lens of Menneus is simple, while that of Dinopis comprises two components of different refractive indices (Blest and Land 1977). Receptive segments of the pm eyes of Dinopis are hexagonal in transverse section and those of adjacent cells are tightly contiguous, allowing the possibility of both optical and electrical coupling (Blest 1978). Receptive segments of Menneus are separated from each other by glial processes containing little pigment, and each segment possesses two rhabdomeres on opposite faces of the cell. Rhabdomere volumes undergo a daily cycle similar to that described for Dinopis, but of relatively minor extent. It is shown that the pm eye of Dinopis could have evolved from that of Menneus by a simple series of transformations, and that a gain of two logarithmic units of sensitivity can be attributed to changes in optical design alone.

The sources of acid hydrolases for photoreceptor membrane degradation in a grapsid crab

Dawn photoreceptor breakdown in the crab Leptograpsus variegatus is analysed at the ultrastructural level. Coated vesicles derived from microvilli are assembled as mutlivesicular bodies (mvbs), which degrade to multilamellar bodies (mls) and are lysed. Cytochemical markers for hydrolases were a fluoride-inhibited beta-glycerophosphatase and a fluoride-insensitive p-nitrophenyl phosphatse, with indistinguishable distributions when localised at pH 5.0. These enzymes are injected into the secondary lysomes from two sources: (i) immediately after dawn Golgi bodies are highly active, and differentiate a transtubular network, from which tubules and vesicles detach, and can be seen fusing with mvbs and mlbs. (ii) Saccules derived from the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) provide a second source and are most often seen in association with late mlbs. Both kinds of primary lysosome rare give AcPh-positive responses when free in the cytosol, but are seen to do so as they make contact with their secondary lysosomal targets. Lipid droplets and lipofuscin bodies are interpreted as the residual products of breakdown. These results are discussed in relation to previous findings on photoreceptor membrane breakdown in a dinopid spider. Attention is drawn to the implied diversity of organisation of lysosomal compartments in receptors which internalise membranes of similar compositions.

Extracellular shedding of photoreceptor membrane in the open rhabdom of a tipulid fly

The compound eyes of the Australia tipulid fly, Ptilogyna, shed the bulk of their rhabdomeral membrane to extracellular space during turnover. The rhabdomeres of the retinulae lie in a common extracellular space (ECS), which is subdivided in the proximal retina. Before dawn, a distal region of the microvilli in each rhabdomere differentiates and becomes less electron-dense after conventional fixation. The differentiated region then dilates and develops an irregular profile. A few hours after dawn, the transformed tips break off and form a detritus in the ECS. The degraded membrane is internalised back into the retinula cells by mass endocytosis. Retinulae develop pseudopodia at sites bordering the ECS and engulf the membrane detritus, which comes to lie first of all in vacuoles within the receptor cells and then forms very large multivesicular bodies. The latter transform to multilamellar and residual bodies and are, presumably, lysed. Surrounding these secondary lysosomes are rough endoplasmic reticulum and smooth tubular systems, tentatively considered on comparative grounds to provide hydrolases. The literature concerning the ultrastructure of compound eyes offers a small number of instances where extracellular shedding can be suspected for morphological reasons. Attention is drawn to analogies with the shedding of photoreceptor membranes in vertebrate retinae.