Excitation of lateral reticular nucleus neurones by collaterals of the pyramidal tract

Regional (14C) 2-deoxyglucose uptake during forelimb movements evoked by rat motor cortex stimulation: pons, cerebellum, medulla, spinal cord, muscle

Electrical stimulation of the right forelimb motor (MI) sensory (SI) cortex in normal, adult rats produced repetitive left forelimb movements. Regions of increased (14C) 2-deoxyglucose (2DG) uptake were mapped auto-radiographically during these movements. MI stimulation activated the ipsilateral reticular tegmental pontine nucleus (RTP) and the middle (rostral-caudal) third of the pontine nuclei including pyramidal (P), medial (POM), ventral (POV), and lateral (POL) pontine nuclei. The ipsilateral inferior olivary complex was activated including dorsal accessory olive (DAO), principal olive (PO), and medial accessory olive (MAO). The contralateral lateral reticular (LR) nucleus and nucleus cuneatus (CU) were activated. Lateral vermal, paravermal, and hemispheric portions of the contralateral cerebellum were also activated. Parts of vermian lobules IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII, and lobulus simplex, crus I, crus II, paramedian lobule, and copula pyramidis were activated. Granule cell layers were activated much more than molecular layers. Discrete microzones of high granule cell 2DG uptake alternated with zones of low uptake in left paramedian lobule and copula pyramidis and may correlate with the fractured cerebellar somatotopy described physiologically by Welker and his associates. Portions of the left lateral and interpositus nuclei were metabolically activated. Medial portions of laminae I-VI were activated in the dorsal horn of cervical spinal cord. The 2DG uptake was either unchanged or decreased in the ventral horn. Thoracic and lumbar spinal cord were not activated. Monsynaptic MI and SI connections to P, POM, POV, POL, RTP, DAO, PO, MAO, LR, CU, and spinal cord could account for activation of those structures. However, there are no direct MI or SI connections to the deep cerebellar nuclei, the cerebellar hemisphere, or the muscles. Activation of these structures must be due to activation of polysynaptic pathways, sensory feedback from the moving forelimb, or both. The present experiments cannot distinguish these possibilities. Comparison of the regions activated during forelimb MI stimulation (FLMIS) to those activated during vibrissae MI stimulation (VMIS) suggests that the pontine nuclei, cerebellar hemisphere, and possibly the deep cerebellar nuclei are somatotopically organized. RTP, LR, CU, and spinal cord were activated during FLMIS but were not activated during VMIS. The failure to activate the ventral horn of cervical spinal cord may be due to known inhibition of alpha-motor neurons during motor cortex stimulation.

Primary motor cortex influences on the descending and ascending systems

The motor cortex plays a crucial role in the co-ordination of movement and posture. This is possible because the pyramidal tract fibres have access both directly and through collateral branches to structures governing eye, head, neck trunk and limb musculature. Pyramidal tract axons also directly reach the dorsal laminae of the spinal cord and the dorsal column nuclei, thus aiding in the selection of the sensory ascendant transmission. No other neurones in the brain besides pyramidal tract cells have such a wide access to different structures within the central nervous system. The majority of the pyramidal tract fibres that originate in the motor cortex and that send collateral branches to multiple supraspinal structures do not reach the spinal cord. Also, the great majority of the corticospinal neurones that emit multiple intracraneal collateral branches terminate at the cervical spinal cord level. The pyramidal tract fibres directed to the dorsal column nuclei that send collateral branches to supraspinal structures also show a clear tendency to terminate at supraspinal and cervical cord levels. These facts suggest that a substantial co-ordination between descending and ascending pathways might be produced by the same motor cortex axons at both supraspinal and cervical spinal cord sites. This may imply that the motor cortex co-ordination will be mostly directed to motor responses involving eye-neck-forelimb muscle synergies. The review makes special emphasis in the available evidence pointing to the role of the motor cortex in co-ordinating the activities of both descending and ascending pathways related to somatomotor integration and control. The motor cortex may function to co-operatively select a unique motor command by selectively filter sensory information and by co-ordinating the activities of the descending systems related to the control of distal and proximal muscles.

Anatomy, development and lesion-induced plasticity of rodent corticospinal tract

In this review the current knowledge of the anatomy, development and plasticity of the rodent corticospinal tract is summarised. Recent technical advancements, especially in neuronal tracing methods, have provided much new data concerning the anatomy of the corticospinal tract. The rodent corticospinal axons project to the subcortical nuclei via collateral branches. These collateral branches of corticospinal axons are formed by delayed interstitial budding during early postnatal periods. Corticospinal neurons are generated in the ventricular zone during a short time lag, migrate into the cortical plate, and settle in layer V of the cerebral cortex. The migration of corticospinal neurons is experimentally deranged by prenatal exposure to alcohol or genetically affected by the reeler genetic locus (rl), resulting in generation of ectopic corticospinal neurons. Such experimentally or genetically induced ectopic corticospinal neurons are a good model for examining whether target recognition and path finding are affected by the intracortical position of corticospinal neurons. Some chemical molecules (e.g. L1 and B-50/GAP43) are transiently expressed in the corticospinal tract during the perinatal period, while others (e.g. protein kinase C gamma subspecies and alpha CaM kinase II) are permanently expressed in the adult corticospinal tract. The only chemical marker specific for layer V corticofugal neurons is an antibody to a soluble protein, protein 35. Since the corticospinal tract in the rodent is an easily identified group of fibers situated in the most ventral portion of the dorsal funiculus of the spinal cord and exhibits considerable postnatal development, it has often been utilized in the neurological studies on plasticity and regenerative capacity of the lesioned central nervous system. Recently, it has been clarified that growing corticospinal fibers have the ability to penetrate and traverse across the lesion sites under certain special conditions.

Cortical influences on neurons of the lateral reticular nucleus responding to noxious stimuli

The effect of frontoparietal sensorimotor (FPSM) cortex stimulation on both the spontaneous and the noxious evoked activity of neurons in the lateral reticular nucleus (LRN) was tested in barbiturate-anesthetized rats. Ninety-three LRN neurons that responded to a noxious heat stimulus (HS) were recorded (72% antidromically fired from the cerebellum). Of these, 66 neurons altered their spontaneous firing rates in response to cortical stimulation. Two patterns of responses were found: either an excitation followed by a suppression of spontaneous activity (52 neurons), or a pure suppression of spontaneous activity lasting 50-400 msec (14 neurons). In 46 of these neurons, it was found that cortical stimulation reduced HS-evoked activity to near the baseline level. Furthermore, it was found that when applied after a prolonged cortical stimulation, the HS was ineffective. It is concluded that FPSM cortex can influence nociceptive information in LRN neurons that respond to its stimulation, possibly interfering with the mechanisms underlying stimulation-produced analgesia (SPA). In this context, it is proposed that the cortex can modulate the activity of LRN neurons that activate, through local loops, a descending antinociceptive system and also a separate projection system to the cerebellum.

Topography of the corticofugal projection to the lateral reticular nucleus in the monkey

The cortical projection to the lateral reticular nucleus (LRN) was explored in monkeys prepared for autoradiography and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) histochemistry. An unambiguous projection was revealed only in cases with injections of the precentral forelimb and hindlimb areas. The forelimb area projection occupied centromedial segments, the hindlimb area projection occupied ventrolateral segments of the LRN with very little overlap. Some sparse labeling was also seen with injections of the supplementary motor area (SMA), but only when the lectin-bound tracer HRP was injected and not when autoradiography was used. Retrogradely labeled cortical cells occupied a larger cortical area in one case with injection of free HRP into the LRN. Since the additional expanse of cortex, however, was not examined in anterograde cases, and since the injected marker substance had diffused to neighboring structures, the significance of the labeled cells outside the precentral motor cortex is questionable. There was no evidence for a projection from the precentral face area with either anterograde tracing method. The corticoreticular projection was bilateral and only slightly more marked contralateral to the injection. The labeling was largely confined to the magnocellular division with minor amounts in the parvicellular division (especially in the hindlimb cases). The subtrigeminal portion was spared in all cases. It is concluded that the LRN constitutes another somatotopically organized precerebellar nucleus relaying signals from the motor cortex to the cerebellum. Compared with the corticopontocerebellar pathway in monkeys, however, the LRN is only a minor component of the corticocerebellar transmission system.

Cortical and peripheral effects on single neurons of the lateral reticular nucleus in the monkey

The aim of this study was to extend the anatomical study of the corticoreticular organization in the monkey by means of microelectrophysiological techniques. Considering the relatively modest projection (see companion paper, Wiesendanger and Wiesendanger, '87), it was surprising to see that over 70% of the investigated LRN neurons were influenced from at least one cortical stimulation site. Many neurons responded, however, with long latencies suggesting an indirect transmission line. In line with the anatomical tracing study, most short-latency responses were obtained from the motor cortex. Postcentral cortex and the SMA were, in general, less effective sites for evoking responses in the LRN. LRN neurons with similar cortical inputs tended to be clustered together suggesting that the corticoreticular projection is discretely organized with an "intermingled somatotopy". The majority of the 87 tested LRN neurons were not reactive to any peripheral stimulus (33%) or responded only to nociceptive peripheral stimulation (31%). Very large receptive fields were seen in 8% of the units. However, a significant proportion of LRN neurons (10%) had restricted receptive fields and reacted to gentle cutaneous stimuli, and others (17%) responded to discrete passive rotations of one or more joints. There was often a somatotopical correspondence between the peripheral and the cortical inputs. It is concluded that the LRN in monkeys is under the influence of the motor cortex, which, however, may be exerted to a major extent via indirect pathways. The electrophysiological data suggest a discrete rather than a diffuse relationship with the LRN.

A light microscopic investigation of the afferent connections of the lateral reticular nucleus in the cat

The topographical organization of the projections to the lateral reticular nucleus (LRN) of the cat was investigated using the horseradish peroxidase (HRP), silver-impregnation and autoradiographic tracing methods. Following injection of HRP into the LRN, labelled cells were found mainly within Rexed's laminae VII and VIII of the spinal cord, the contralateral red nucleus, the ventro-rostral aspect of the contralateral fastigial nucleus and the contralateral anterior sigmoid and coronal gyri of the cerebral cortex. Animals with injections of tritiated amino acids placed within the pericruciate cortex, red nucleus or fastigial nucleus were processed for autoradiography. In a corresponding series of animals, electrolytic lesions were placed selectively into the above sources of reticular afferents, and terminal degeneration within the LRN was studied by light microscopy. An extensive input from the spinal cord was found to terminate predominantly on the ipsilateral side throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the LRN, except for a small ventromedial area of the rostral parvocellular division and a small rostromedial area of the magnocellular division. The cortical projection terminated diffusely within the middle one-half of the contralateral magnocellular division, while the rubral projection terminated extensively within the contralateral subtrigeminal division and the dorsolateral region of the rostral magnocellular and neighbouring parvocellular divisions. The rubral projection did not overlap the cortical projection. The fastigial nucleus projected sparsely to the contralateral LRN, mainly to the medial aspect of the rostral two-thirds of the magnocellular division, with less to the parvocellular and subtrigeminal divisions. The LRN therefore receives spinal and supraspinal projections within at least its rostral one-half, and these terminate within specific areas in a partially overlapping fashion, whereas the caudal one-half is primarily a spinal receiving region. No convergence of the rubral and sensorimotor cortical projections was evident.

Motor responses evoked by microstimulation of restiform body in the cat

Motor effects produced by microstimulation of restiform body (RB) were studied in acute unanesthetized cats, using tungsten electrodes for stimulating the peduncle and bipolar steel electrodes for recording muscular activity (EMG). The main results were the following. 1. Threshold microstimulation (18.24 microA +/- 8.77 S.D.) of effective foci within RB elicited single muscle contractions of ipsilateral limbs, primarily of forelimb; overthreshold activation (32.83 microA +/- 9.25S.D.) of the same points produced complex movements in 61.54% of cases that involved muscles of shoulder, neck, and trunk. 2. Single muscle contractions exhibited a mean latency (20.09 msec +/- 2.04 S.D.) which was significantly longer than that shown by complex movements (10.00 msec +/- 3.10 S.D.). Furthermore, a decrease in frequency of stimulating train below 300 Hz and a reduction in duration below 30 msec caused a steep rise of threshold for single muscle responses that was not observed when studying complex movements. 3. Acute RB interruption between stimulating electrode and cerebellum abolished single muscle contractions; conversely, complex movements remained unmodified even when the RB was lesioned in cats chronically submitted to interruption of brachium conjunctivum (BC). 4. The pathway involved in promoting RB induced single muscle activation includes interpositus nucleus, BC and rubrospinal tract. Possible modalities of RB afferent participation to the motor control are briefly discussed.