Sequential moderate-dose methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma

Randomized phase II study of second-line chemotherapy with the best available 5-fluorouracil regimen versus weekly administration of paclitaxel in far advanced gastric cancer with severe peritoneal metastases refractory to 5-fluorouracil-containing regimens (JCOG0407)

BACKGROUND

This randomized phase II study compared weekly administration of paclitaxel (wPTX) with the best available 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastasis refractory to fluoropyrimidine.

METHODS

In the best available 5-FU arm, continuous infusion of 5-FU (800 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5, every 4 weeks) was given to patients with prior chemotherapy including bolus 5-FU, and methotrexate and 5-FU sequential bolus injection (methotrexate at 100 mg/m(2) followed by bolus 5-FU at 600 mg/m(2) with leucovorin, weekly) was given to those who had previously received continuous infusion of 5-FU or oral administration of fluoropyrimidine. In the wPTX arm, paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) was administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks. This study adopted a screening design (one-sided α = 30 %) with the primary end point of overall survival.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were randomized to the 5-FU arm (n = 49) or the wPTX arm (n = 51). Although the median survival time was 7.7 months in both arms, the 2-year survival rates were 2.9 % in the 5-FU arm and 9.1 % in the wPTX arm [hazard ratio 0.89 (95 % confidence interval 0.57-1.38), one-sided p = 0.298}. The median progression-free survival was longer with wPTX than with 5-FU [3.7 months vs 2.4 months; hazard ratio 0.58 (95 % confidence interval 0.38-0.88), one-sided p = 0.005]. The incidences of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, and treatment-related death were 6 %, 4 %, 10 %, and 2 %, respectively, in the 5-FU arm and 2 %, 0 %, 0 %, and 0 %, respectively, in the wPTX arm.

CONCLUSIONS

As second-line chemotherapy, wPTX appears feasible and promising. This regimen can be included in a test arm in future phase III trials for treatment of advanced gastric cancer with severe peritoneal metastasis.

Randomized Phase III study of 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion vs. sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy in far advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (JCOG0106)

OBJECTIVE

Owing to the risks of serious and sustained toxicity, anticancer drugs such as cisplatin and irinotecan cannot be readily administered to patients with gastric cancer and severe peritoneal metastasis. Therefore, a standard chemotherapy regimen has yet to be established for these types of patients. This randomized study investigated the utility of sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy vs. 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

METHODS

Eligible patients had radiologically confirmed peritoneal metastasis with intestinal stenosis, peritoneal tumor or ascites. Treatment with 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion (800 mg/m(2)/day, ci, d1-5, q4w) or methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy (methotrexate, 100 mg/m(2), bolus infusion, followed 3 h later by 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m(2), bolus infusion, with leucovorin rescue, q1w) was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The projected sample size was 236, providing 80% power to detect a 40% increase in median overall survival in methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy with a one-sided α of 0.05.

RESULTS

All 237 randomized patients were included in the primary analysis. The methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy arm was not superior to the 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion arm (median survival time, 9.4 months in the 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion arm, 10.6 months in the methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy arm; hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.22; one-sided P = 0.31). Frequencies of Grade 3 or higher neutropenia, Grade 3 or higher anorexia and treatment-related deaths were 0.9, 27.4 and 1.7%, respectively, in the 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion arm, and 31.9, 33.6 and 0.9%, respectively, in the methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy is not suitable for use as standard therapy for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

Pilot study of a combination of S-1 and paclitaxel for patients with peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This pilot study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer or positive lavage cytology diagnosed by staging laparoscopy.

METHODS

Sixteen patients were enrolled. Paclitaxel was administered at 120 mg/m(2) on day 1 and S-1 was administered orally at 80 mg/m(2) for 14 consecutive days, followed by a 1-week rest, as one course. After five courses of this therapy, the primary gastric tumors were evaluated and second-look laparoscopy was performed for patients showing partial response or stable disease with clinical benefit.

RESULTS

Partial response or stable disease with clinical benefit was confirmed in seven and five patients, respectively, and these patients underwent second-look laparoscopy. No viable cancer cells were detected on cytopathological investigation during second-look laparoscopy in 9 patients who underwent surgical treatment. The intent-to-treat response rate for gastric tumor was 44% and the rate of disappearance of peritoneal metastasis was 38% (6 cases) at surgery. The median survival time was 555 days. Leucopenia of grade 3 and neutropenia of grade 3 were recognized in two and three patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This chemotherapy regimen may be an acceptable option for patients with peritoneal dissemination. We plan to study this regimen further in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination.

A phase II study of sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in previously treated gastric cancer: a report from the Gastrointestinal Oncology Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group, JCOG 9207 trial

OBJECTIVE

As prognosis of advanced gastric cancer is still poor, a standard regimen after first-line fluorouracil (FU)-based chemotherapy has not yet been established. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of sequential treatment with methotrexate (MTX) and also 5-FU as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Treatment consisted of weekly doses of MTX (100 mg/m(2), i.v. bolus), followed by 5-FU (600 mg/m(2), i.v. bolus) 3 h after MTX administration. Leucovorin rescue therapy (six doses of 10 mg/m(2), given at 6-h intervals) was commenced 24 h after a treatment with MTX. The primary endpoint was the response rate.

RESULTS

Between December 1992 and June 1995, 56 patients were registered in this study and one was ineligible. All registered patients were included in all analyses. The median age of the patients was 60 years (20-75 years). Most patients (75%) had a performance status of 0 or 1, and 51 (90%) received 5-FU-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. The major adverse events were myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 6.3% of the patients. The overall objective response rate was 9.0% [five partial responses among 56 patients, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.0-20%]. The median overall survival time was 237 days, and the 1-year survival proportion was 21.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential MTX/5-FU therapy provides good survival outcomes with tolerable toxicity despite a limited response in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. This regimen is now being evaluated in a randomized study in patients with pretreated advanced gastric cancer, by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group.

A phase II study of combined chemotherapy with methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and low-dose cisplatin (MFP) for histologically diffuse-type advanced and recurrent gastric cancer (KDOG9501)

BACKGROUND

Histologically diffuse-type gastric cancer is well known to have a poor prognosis and is often complicated with abdominal and pleural effusions. We evaluated the efficacy of a low dose of cisplatin combined with methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MFP therapy) in diffuse-type advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

The study group comprised 47 patients. Patients with pleural effusion or ascites were actively enrolled. Methotrexate (30 mg/m(2) per day) plus 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2) per day) was administered on days 1 and 8. Cisplatin (6 mg/m(2) per day) was given daily for 14 days after which there was 14 day's rest. Calcium leucovorin (15 mg) was administered after methotrexate.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 38.3%. Ascites disappeared or decreased in 15 of 23 patients (disappeared in 9). Pleural effusion disappeared or decreased in 6 of 8 patients (disappeared in 4). Of the 21 patients with poor oral intake at study entry, 15 (71.4%) were able to orally ingest food. Hematologic toxicity of grade 3 or higher comprised leukopenia in 10 patients (21.3%) and neutropenia in 9 (19.1%). Nonhematologic toxicity included anorexia and nausea/vomiting, in 1 patient each (2.1%). The median survival time was 211 days.

CONCLUSION

MFP therapy is useful for the management of diffuse-type inoperable and recurrent gastric cancer, even in patients with conditions such as pleural effusion, ascites, or lymphangitis carcinomatosa who have a poor prognosis or cannot eat solid food.

Phase II Study of Sequential Methotrexate and 5-Fluorouracil Chemotherapy Against Peritoneally Disseminated Gastric Cancer with Malignant Ascites: a Report from the Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group, JCOG 9603 Trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of systemic chemotherapy against peritoneal dissemination from advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains unclear, because the peritoneal dissemination was not defined as a measurable lesion in conventional phase II studies. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sequential MTX and 5FU therapy (MF) in chemotherapy-naive patients with AGC accompanied by malignant ascites in a phase II setting.

METHODS

The treatment schedule comprised weekly administration of MTX (100 mg/m2, i.v. bolus) followed by 5FU (600 mg/m2, i.v. bolus) with a 3 h interval. Leucovorin rescue (10 mg/m2 every 6 h, for a total of six times) was commenced 24 h after MTX administration.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven chemotherapy-naive patients with AGC presenting with malignant ascites were enrolled in this trial. The median age was 60 years (range, 25-74 years) and most patients (86%) had a performance status of 0-1. In total, 355 administrations of the sequential MTX/5FU therapy were performed. Major toxicity consisted of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 10.8% of the patients. The overall objective response rate was 5.7% (two partial responses in 35 patients; 95% confidence interval: 0.7-19.2%). However, the response rate of ascites was 35.1% (complete disappearance in three patients and apparent decrease in 10 patients; 95% confidence interval: 20.2-52.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential MTX/5FU therapy is effective against AGC with malignant ascites with acceptable toxicity and warrants further investigations in a phase III setting.