Phase II study of mitoxantrone in unresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatitis B infection

Medical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Any Progress?

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the most common neoplasms worldwide. Curative treatment options include liver transplantation or resection. Unfortunately, most patients still have unresectable or untransplantable HCC due to disease extension or comorbid factors and are therefore candidate only for palliative treatments.

Methods

In this review we have analyzed the different medical approaches employed in the treatment of HCC in an attempt to better define their roles.

Results

Palliative medical treatments including systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy or hormonal manipulation rarely influence survival of the patients. Although a high response rate is often reported with new local therapies such as transcatheter arterial embolization, intraarterial chemotherapy or percutaneous ethanol injection, the real impact of these treatment modalities on patient survival remains to be determined.

Conclusion

One way to improve the diagnosis of HCC patients would be an appropriate approach to evaluate new drugs or treatment modalities. To answer all the open questions, further trials, possibly randomized, should be conducted on a substantial number of patients with homogeneous prognostic factors.

Modified cisplatin/interferon α-2b/doxorubicin/5-fluorouracil (PIAF) chemotherapy in patients with no hepatitis or cirrhosis is associated with improved response rate, resectability, and survival of initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with response rate, resectability, and survival after cisplatin/interferon α-2b/doxorubicin/5-fluorouracil (PIAF) combination therapy in patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

The study included 2 groups of patients treated with conventional high-dose PIAF (n = 84) between 1994 and 2003 and those without hepatitis or cirrhosis treated with modified PIAF (n = 33) between 2003 and 2012. Tolerance of chemotherapy, best radiographic response, rate of conversion to curative surgery, and overall survival were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups, and multivariate and logistic regression analyses were applied to identify predictors of response and survival.

RESULTS

The modified PIAF group had a higher median number of PIAF cycles (4 versus 2, P = .049), higher objective response rate (36% versus 15%, P = .013), higher rate of conversion to curative surgery (33% versus 10%, P = .004), and longer median overall survival (21.3 versus 10.6 months, P = .002). Multivariate analyses confirmed that positive hepatitis B serology (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-2.59) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2 (HR = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.04-2.93) were associated with worse survival whereas curative surgical resection after PIAF treatment (HR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.07-0.35) was associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, the modified PIAF regimen in patients with no hepatitis or cirrhosis is associated with improved response, resectability, and survival.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin in patients with unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent hepatocellular cancer: a California Cancer Consortium Trial

PURPOSE

Prolonged survival for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is consistently reported at lower than 6 months. Oxaliplatin has recently demonstrated activity in HCC. The objective of this study was to determine the response rate, survival, time to progression, and toxicity in patients with poor prognosis HCC when treated with oxaliplatin.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were required to have measurable recurrent, metastatic or unresectable HCC, and to have previously been exposed to no more than 2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Karnofsky performance of 70% or above and adequate organ and hematologic function were required. All patients received treatment with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m on day 1 and 15 as a 2-hour intravenous infusion and were pretreated with antiemetics. Treatment was repeated every 28 days.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were enrolled and evaluated, although 6 expired before the first planned evaluation. Karnofsky performance status was 70/80/90/100% in 5/9/9/13 patients, respectively. The median time to progression was 2 months; median survival was 6 months. The 6-month overall survival was 55% (95% confidence interval 41%-74%), and the 6 month event-free survival was 11% (95% confidence interval 4%-28%).

CONCLUSION

Single agent, oxaliplatin, has produced one partial response of good duration in 36 patients, but failed to meet the a priori criterion for promise in this trial. Sixteen patients were observed to have stable disease with a well tolerated toxicity profile. The combination of oxaliplatin and other agents should be considered to treat HCC in those patients with good functional status.

The diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease in cancer patients

Cardiovascular disease is commonly found in cancer patients. The co-existence of heart disease and cancer in a patient often complicates treatment, because therapy for one disease may negatively affect the outcome of the other disease. In addition, guidelines for the treatment of cardiovascular disease are often based on studies, which exclude patients who have cancer. In this review we will discuss the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease in cancer patients. We will focus on cancer-related causes of cardiovascular disease and special treatment options for cardiovascular disease in cancer patients. The cardiac complications of cancer therapy will be discussed according to common syndromes: left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial ischemia, blood pressure changes, thromboembolism, bradyarrhythmias, and prolonged QT interval.

Systemic Therapy of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Hopeful Should We Be?

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. In the U.S., 18,510 new cancers of the liver and intrahepatic bile duct are expected in 2006, with an estimated 16,200 deaths. The incidence rates for HCC in the U.S. continued to rise steadily through 1998 and doubled during the period 1975-1995. Unresectable or metastatic HCC carries a poor prognosis, and systemic therapy with cytotoxic agents provides marginal benefit. A majority of HCC patients (>80%) presents with advanced or unresectable disease. Even for those with resected disease, the recurrence rate can be as high as 50% at 2 years. Because of the poor track record of systemic therapy in HCC, there has been a sense of nihilism for this disease in the oncology community for decades. However, with the arrival of newly developed molecularly targeted agents and the success of some of these agents in other traditionally challenging cancers, like renal cell carcinoma, there has recently been renewed interest in developing systemic therapy for HCC. This review attempts to concisely summarize the historical perspective and the current status of systemic therapy development in HCC.

Systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

For the minority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), surgical or locally ablative therapies may offer the prospect of cure. However, the majority of patients present with advanced disease such that treatment with curative intent is no longer possible. For some of these patients, with good hepatic reserve and a patent portal venous system, chemoembolisation may afford a modest survival benefit. The remainder of patients are frequently treated with systemic therapies with palliative intent. This review aims to summarise the current systemic treatment approaches for HCC in the adjuvant and palliative setting before reviewing the evidence for novel therapies emerging in this field. At present there are a number of interesting therapeutic agents with potential activity in HCC. The challenge now is the design of clinical trials to optimally evaluate these agents.

The effect of megestrol acetate on growth of HepG2 cells in vitro and in vivo

PURPOSE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is generally considered as a sex hormone-dependent tumor, and hormonal therapy has been proposed as a strategy for the treatment of HCC. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of megestrol acetate, a synthetic progesteronal agent, on growth of HepG2 cells in vitro and in vivo.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Cell growth in vitro was assessed by a colormetric method, and cell growth in vivo was assessed by tumor volumetrics.

RESULTS

Megestrol acetate was shown to inhibit the growth of HepG2 cells in vitro in dose- and time-dependent manners with an IC (50) of 260 microm (24-h incubation). The growth of HepG2 cell-transplanted tumors in nude mice was also inhibited by i.p. injection of megestrol acetate (10 mg/kg/day). The tumor volumes of the megestrol acetate-treated group regressed to 59% of controls by week 6 and to 41% of controls by week 13. Apoptosis following G(1) arrest was observed in megestrol acetate-treated cells and may be a mechanism through which megestrol acetate inhibits HepG2 cells. Megestrol acetate was also demonstrated to have a beneficial effect on the weight gain of tumor-bearing nude mice, and the mean weight of the megestrol acetate-treated animals was higher than that of controls from week 4 of the treatment period, and the differences were statistically significant in week 5 and 6 (P < 0.05, compared with controls). No significant survival advantage was, however, demonstrated in the treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that megestrol acetate inhibited the growth of HepG2 cells grown in vitro and in vivo. These data provide useful information for clinical study of megestrol acetate for the treatment of HCC.

Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Whilst local treatments are useful in selected patients, they are not suitable for many with advanced disease. Here, we review phase II and III trials for systemic therapy of advanced disease, finding no strong evidence that any chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or immunotherapy regimen trialled to date benefits survival in this setting. Many trials were inadequately powered, single centre, and enrolled highly selected patients. From this review, we cannot recommend any therapeutic approach in these patients outside of a clinical trial setting. Including an untreated control arm in clinical trials in HCC is still justified. Every effort should be made to enroll these patients into adequately powered trials, and promising phase II results must be tested in a multicentre phase III setting, preferably against a placebo control arm. Prevention of hepatitis B and C remains vital to decrease deaths from HCC.

Phase II and pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common lethal disease in Asia and there is no effective chemotherapy. Identification of new effective drugs in the treatment of inoperable HCC is urgently need. This is a phase II clinical study to investigate the efficacy, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in HCC patients. Twenty patients with measurable, unresectable HCC, normal serum bilirubin, normal bone marrow and renal functions were studied. Paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) was given intravenously over 3 h every 3 weeks. No complete or partial responses were observed. Five patients had stable disease. Major treatment toxicities (grade 3-4) were neutropenia (25%), thrombocytopenia (15%), infection (10%) and allergy (10%). Treatment-related deaths occurred in two patients. The median survival was 12 weeks (range 1-36). Paclitaxel is metabolized by the liver and the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in cancer patients with liver involvement or impairment may be important clinically. Pharmacokinetic study was completed in 13 HCC patients. The paclitaxel area under the curve was significantly increased (P < 0.02), clearance decreased (P < 0.02) and treatment-related deaths increased (P = 0.03) in patients with hepatic impairment. In conclusion, paclitaxel in this dose and schedule has no significant anti-cancer effect in HCC patients. Paclitaxel should be used with caution in cancer patients with liver impairment.

A phase I-II trial of mitoxantrone by hepatic arterial infusion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver

BACKGROUND

Mitoxantrone is an anthraquinone derivative that has demonstrated encouraging preclinical and clinical activity against a variety of human carcinoma cell lines and malignancies. Three Phase II studies of systemically administered mitoxantrone in patients with colorectal carcinoma failed to demonstrate any therapeutic activity, as did four Phase II studies of intravenous mitoxantrone in hepatocellular carcinoma. Two additional trials demonstrated limited activity when administered intravenously to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, because this drug exhibits a steep dose-response curve, a Phase I-II trial of mitoxantrone by hepatic arterial infusion was initiated.

METHODS

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal carcinoma with liver only or liver-predominant disease were eligible for therapy. All patients underwent the placement of a percutaneous hepatic arterial catheter before each course of therapy, and the first cohort of patients was treated at 10 mg/m2/course on day 1 on a 28-day cycle. Dosages were escalated in increments of 2 mg/m2/course based on side effects and tolerance.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with bidimensionally measurable unresectable, liver-predominant disease were entered into this trial. The therapy was well tolerated, with only 5 courses of 55 being complicated by neutropenia and none associated with fever. Only one patient required a dosage reduction on the basis of toxicity (neutropenia). No complete or partial responses were observed.

CONCLUSION

These data are consistent with a lack of therapeutic activity of mitoxantrone when administered by hepatic arterial infusion for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Systemic therapies for unresectable primary hepatic tumors

Clinical trials evaluating systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) must take into consideration prognostic factors that influence survival. Clinical features such as poor performance status, older age, and the presence of jaundice may be predictive of short survivals. Because patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels have short survivals, randomized clinical trials of therapy for HCC should stratify patients based on AFP levels. Numerous clinical trials of single-agent chemotherapy for HCC have examined alkylating agents, antitumor antibiotics, anthracyclines, hormonal therapies, and interferons. However, these trials have failed to demonstrate an agent that consistently produces response rates greater than 20% or that improves survival. Similarly, effective combination chemotherapy regimens for HCC have not been identified. Clinical trials have also failed to identify effective systemic therapies for cholangiocarcinomas, although these trials have had limited numbers of patients. These dismal results mandate an examination of phase II agents in untreated good-performance patients with HCC. Novel approaches to drug delivery should also be pursued.

Non-surgical treatment of hepatocarcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common tumors affecting man. It is the general feeling that only hepatectomy can give a chance for cure. However, less than 20% of patients can be resected, and other treatment modalities are required. Systemic (chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, immunotherapy) and loco-regional (intratumoral injection of alcohol, intra-arterial chemotherapy embolization, internal radiotherapy) approaches have been developed. In view of the small number of patients, tumor and patient heterogeneity, and difficulties in assessing tumor response, the real place of these treatments is difficult to evaluate. A review of the literature suggests that embolization with Gelfoam, even when given without chemotherapy, has an effect on response rate and on survival, and could be considered, at the present time, as the most attractive treatment in non-operable HCC. Chemotherapy seems effective only if combined with embolization. When administered alone by the systemic or the intra-arterial hepatic route, no clinically significant activity can be found. Unexpectedly, Lipiodol by itself seems inactive, and the co-administration of chemotherapy does not improve activity. Other approaches such as intratumoral injection of alcohol, immunotherapy, hormonotherapy, and radioimmunotherapy are still experimental, and well-designed studies are needed to identify their role.

Phase I/II study of liposome-complexed mitoxantrone in patients with advanced breast cancer

The toxicity of escalating doses of liposome-complexed mitoxantrone (LCM) was evaluated in 22 women with histological/cytological diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer (21 pts) or adenocarcinoma of unknown primary origin (1 pt). All patients but one had been pretreated with chemotherapy. LCM was given IV as a 1h-infusion, repeated every 3 weeks, from a starting dose of 3 mg/m2, corresponding to 1/3 of the MELD10. An intra-patient dose escalation scheme, with an increase per cycle of 3 mg/m2 up to 12 mg/m2, and then by 2 mg/m2 was applied, treatment being continued until tumour progression, or toxicity, or up to a maximum of 6 cycles, whichever occurred first. Granulocytopenia was dose-limiting, with a GNC count of less than 0.5 x 10(3)/microliters after 30%, 28%, 50% and 50% of the cycles given at 16, 18, 20 and 22-24 mg/m2, respectively. The lowest GNC count occurred usually 2 weeks after treatment, with recovery in the following week. Gastro-intestinal toxicity, mucositis and alopecia were rare and of mild degree. Two patients, with a subtotal neoplastic involvement of the liver and a pretreatment grade 4 liver impairment, died because of acute liver failure a few days after treatment. The maximum tolerable dose was defined at 22 mg/m2 and 18 mg/m2, given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, was the regimen recommended for phase II studies. Seven previously untreated patients with metastatic breast cancer have been so far treated. The pattern of toxicity of LCM (specific, short-lasting granulocytopenia; negligible, non cumulative non hematological toxicity) was confirmed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer

Mitoxantrone is a dihydroxyanthracenedione derivative which as intravenous mono- and combination therapy has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy similar to that of standard induction and salvage treatment regimens in advanced breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia and chronic myelogenous leukaemia in blast crisis; it appears to be an effective alternative to the anthracycline component of standard treatment regimens in these indications. Mitoxantrone is also effective as a component of predominantly palliative treatment regimens for hepatic and advanced ovarian carcinoma. Limited studies suggest useful therapeutic activity in multiple myeloma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Regional therapy of malignant effusions, hepatic and ovarian carcinomas has also been very effective, with a reduction in systemic adverse effects. Mitoxantrone inhibits DNA synthesis by intercalating DNA, inducing DNA strand breaks, and causing DNA aggregation and compaction, and delays cell cycle progression, particularly in late S phase. In vitro antitumour activity is concentration- and exposure time-proportional, and synergy with other antineoplastic drugs has been demonstrated in murine tumour models. Leucopenia may be dose-limiting in patients with solid tumours, whereas stomatitis may be dose-limiting in patients with leukaemia. Other adverse effects are usually of mild or moderate severity although cardiac effects, particularly congestive heart failure, may be of concern, especially in patients with a history of anthracycline therapy, mediastinal irradiation or cardiovascular disease. Mitoxantrone displays an improved tolerability profile compared with doxorubicin and other anthracyclines, although myelosuppression may occur more frequently. Thus, mitoxantrone is an effective and better tolerated alternative to the anthracyclines in most haematological malignancies, in breast cancer and in advanced hepatic or ovarian carcinoma. Further studies may consolidate its role in the treatment of these and other malignancies.