A partially deficient mutant, recA1730, that fails to form normal nucleoprotein filaments

Engineered RecA Constructs Reveal the Minimal SOS Activation Complex

The SOS response is a bacterial DNA damage response pathway that has been heavily implicated in bacteria's ability to evolve resistance to antibiotics. Activation of the SOS response is dependent on the interaction between two bacterial proteins, RecA and LexA. RecA acts as a DNA damage sensor by forming lengthy oligomeric filaments (RecA*) along single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in an ATP-dependent manner. RecA* can then bind to LexA, the repressor of SOS response genes, triggering LexA degradation and leading to induction of the SOS response. Formation of the RecA*-LexA complex therefore serves as the key "SOS activation signal." Given the challenges associated with studying a complex involving multiple macromolecular interactions, the essential constituents of RecA* that allow LexA cleavage are not well defined. Here, we leverage head-to-tail linked and end-capped RecA constructs as tools to define the minimal RecA* filament that can engage LexA. In contrast to previously postulated models, we found that as few as three linked RecA units are capable of ssDNA binding, LexA binding, and LexA cleavage. We further demonstrate that RecA oligomerization alone is insufficient for LexA cleavage, with an obligate requirement for ATP and ssDNA binding to form a competent SOS activation signal with the linked constructs. Our minimal system for RecA* highlights the limitations of prior models for the SOS activation signal and offers a novel tool that can inform efforts to slow acquired antibiotic resistance by targeting the SOS response.

The SOS Error-Prone DNA Polymerase V Mutasome and β-Sliding Clamp Acting in Concert on Undamaged DNA and during Translesion Synthesis

In the mid 1970s, Miroslav Radman and Evelyn Witkin proposed that Escherichia coli must encode a specialized error-prone DNA polymerase (pol) to account for the 100-fold increase in mutations accompanying induction of the SOS regulon. By the late 1980s, genetic studies showed that SOS mutagenesis required the presence of two “UV mutagenesis” genes, umuC and umuD, along with recA. Guided by the genetics, decades of biochemical studies have defined the predicted error-prone DNA polymerase as an activated complex of these three gene products, assembled as a mutasome, pol V Mut = UmuD’₂C-RecA-ATP. Here, we explore the role of the β-sliding processivity clamp on the efficiency of pol V Mut-catalyzed DNA synthesis on undamaged DNA and during translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). Primer elongation efficiencies and TLS were strongly enhanced in the presence of β. The results suggest that β may have two stabilizing roles: its canonical role in tethering the pol at a primer-3’-terminus, and a possible second role in inhibiting pol V Mut’s ATPase to reduce the rate of mutasome-DNA dissociation. The identification of umuC, umuD, and recA homologs in numerous strains of pathogenic bacteria and plasmids will ensure the long and productive continuation of the genetic and biochemical journey initiated by Radman and Witkin.

The SOS system: A complex and tightly regulated response to DNA damage

Genomes of all living organisms are constantly threatened by endogenous and exogenous agents that challenge the chemical integrity of DNA. Most bacteria have evolved a coordinated response to DNA damage. In Escherichia coli, this inducible system is termed the SOS response. The SOS global regulatory network consists of multiple factors promoting the integrity of DNA as well as error-prone factors allowing for survival and continuous replication upon extensive DNA damage at the cost of elevated mutagenesis. Due to its mutagenic potential, the SOS response is subject to elaborate regulatory control involving not only transcriptional derepression, but also post-translational activation, and inhibition. This review summarizes current knowledge about the molecular mechanism of the SOS response induction and progression and its consequences for genome stability. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 60:368-384, 2019. © 2018 The Authors. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Environmental Mutagen Society.

Nonfilament-forming RecA dimer catalyzes homologous joint formation

Homologous recombination is essential to genome maintenance, and also to genome diversification. In virtually all organisms, homologous recombination depends on the RecA/Rad51-family recombinases, which catalyze ATP-dependent formation of homologous joints—critical intermediates in homologous recombination. RecA/Rad51 binds first to single-stranded (ss) DNA at a damaged site to form a spiral nucleoprotein filament, after which double-stranded (ds) DNA interacts with the filament to search for sequence homology and to form consecutive base pairs with ssDNA (‘pairing’). How sequence homology is recognized and what exact role filament formation plays remain unknown. We addressed the question of whether filament formation is a prerequisite for homologous joint formation. To this end we constructed a nonpolymerizing (np) head-to-tail-fused RecA dimer (npRecA dimer) and an npRecA monomer. The npRecA dimer bound to ssDNA, but did not form continuous filaments upon binding to DNA; it formed beads-on-string structures exclusively. Although its efficiency was lower, the npRecA dimer catalyzed the formation of D-loops (a type of homologous joint), whereas the npRecA monomer was completely defective. Thus, filament formation contributes to efficiency, but is not essential to sequence-homology recognition and pairing, for which a head-to-tail dimer form of RecA protomer is required and sufficient.

Insights into the complex levels of regulation imposed on Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V

It is now close to 40 years since the isolation of non-mutable umu/uvm strains of Escherichia coli and the realization that damage induced mutagenesis in E.coli is not a passive process. Early models of mutagenesis envisioned the Umu proteins as accessory factors to the cell's replicase that not only reduced its normally high fidelity, but also allowed the enzyme to traverse otherwise replication-blocking lesions in the genome. However, these models underwent a radical revision approximately 15 years ago, with the discovery that the Umu proteins actually encode for a DNA polymerase, E.coli pol V. The polymerase lacks 3'→5' exonucleolytic proofreading activity and is inherently error-prone when replicating both undamaged and damage DNA. So as to limit any "gratuitous" mutagenesis, the activity of pol V is strictly regulated in the cell at multiple levels. This review will summarize our current understanding of the myriad levels of regulation imposed on pol V including transcriptional control, posttranslational modification, targeted proteolysis, activation of the catalytic activity of pol V through protein-protein interactions and the very recently described intracellular spatial regulation of pol V. Remarkably, despite the multiple levels at which pol V is regulated, the enzyme is nevertheless able to contribute to the genetic diversity and evolutionary fitness of E.coli.

A RecA protein surface required for activation of DNA polymerase V

DNA polymerase V (pol V) of Escherichia coli is a translesion DNA polymerase responsible for most of the mutagenesis observed during the SOS response. Pol V is activated by transfer of a RecA subunit from the 3'-proximal end of a RecA nucleoprotein filament to form a functional complex called DNA polymerase V Mutasome (pol V Mut). We identify a RecA surface, defined by residues 112-117, that either directly interacts with or is in very close proximity to amino acid residues on two distinct surfaces of the UmuC subunit of pol V. One of these surfaces is uniquely prominent in the active pol V Mut. Several conformational states are populated in the inactive and active complexes of RecA with pol V. The RecA D112R and RecA D112R N113R double mutant proteins exhibit successively reduced capacity for pol V activation. The double mutant RecA is specifically defective in the ATP binding step of the activation pathway. Unlike the classic non-mutable RecA S117F (recA1730), the RecA D112R N113R variant exhibits no defect in filament formation on DNA and promotes all other RecA activities efficiently. An important pol V activation surface of RecA protein is thus centered in a region encompassing amino acid residues 112, 113, and 117, a surface exposed at the 3'-proximal end of a RecA filament. The same RecA surface is not utilized in the RecA activation of the homologous and highly mutagenic RumA'2B polymerase encoded by the integrating-conjugative element (ICE) R391, indicating a lack of structural conservation between the two systems. The RecA D112R N113R protein represents a new separation of function mutant, proficient in all RecA functions except SOS mutagenesis.

Structural model of the Y-Family DNA polymerase V/RecA mutasome

To synthesize past DNA damaged by chemicals or radiation, cells have lesion bypass DNA polymerases (DNAPs), most of which are in the Y-Family. One class of Y-Family DNAPs includes DNAP η in eukaryotes and DNAP V in bacteria, which have low fidelity when replicating undamaged DNA. In Escherchia coli, DNAP V is carefully regulated to insure it is active for lesion bypass only, and one mode of regulation involves interaction of the polymerase subunit (UmuC) and two regulatory subunits (UmuD') with a RecA-filament bound to ss-DNA. Taking a docking approach, ∼150,000 unique orientations involving UmuC, UmuD' and RecA were evaluated to generate models, one of which was judged best able to rationalize the following published findings. (1) In the UmuD'(2)C/RecA-filament model, R64-UmuC interacts with S117-RecA, which is known to be at the UmuC/RecA interface. (2) At the model's UmuC/RecA interface, UmuC has three basic amino acids (K59/R63/R64) that anchor it to RecA. No other Y-Family DNAP has three basic amino acids clustered in this region, making it a plausible site for UmuC to form its unique interaction with RecA. (3) In the model, residues N32/N33/D34 of UmuC form a second interface with RecA, which is consistent with published findings. (4) Active UmuD' is generated when 24 amino acids in the N-terminal tail of UmuD are proteolyzed, which occurs when UmuD(2)C binds the RecA-filament. When UmuD is included in an UmuD(2)C/RecA-filament model, plausible UmuD/RecA contacts guide the UmuD cleavage site (C24/G25) into the UmuD proteolysis active site (S60/K97). One contact involves E11-UmuD interacting with R243-RecA, where the latter is known to be important for UmuD cleavage. (5) The UmuD(2)C/RecA-filament model rationalizes published findings that at least some UmuD-to-UmuD' cleavage occurs intermolecularly. (6) Active DNAP V is known to be the heterotetramer UmuD'(2)C/RecA, a model of which can be generated by a simple rearrangement of the RecA monomer at the 3'-end of the RecA-filament. The rearranged UmuD'(2)C/RecA model rationalizes published findings about UmuD' residues in proximity to RecA. In summary, docking and molecular simulations are used to develop an UmuD'(2)C/RecA model, whose structure rationalizes much of the known properties of the active form of DNA polymerase V.

Homologous Recombination-Enzymes and Pathways

Homologous recombination is an ubiquitous process that shapes genomes and repairs DNA damage. The reaction is classically divided into three phases: presynaptic, synaptic, and postsynaptic. In Escherichia coli, the presynaptic phase involves either RecBCD or RecFOR proteins, which act on DNA double-stranded ends and DNA single-stranded gaps, respectively; the central synaptic steps are catalyzed by the ubiquitous DNA-binding protein RecA; and the postsynaptic phase involves either RuvABC or RecG proteins, which catalyze branch-migration and, in the case of RuvABC, the cleavage of Holliday junctions. Here, we review the biochemical properties of these molecular machines and analyze how, in light of these properties, the phenotypes of null mutants allow us to define their biological function(s). The consequences of point mutations on the biochemical properties of recombination enzymes and on cell phenotypes help refine the molecular mechanisms of action and the biological roles of recombination proteins. Given the high level of conservation of key proteins like RecA and the conservation of the principles of action of all recombination proteins, the deep knowledge acquired during decades of studies of homologous recombination in bacteria is the foundation of our present understanding of the processes that govern genome stability and evolution in all living organisms.

The active form of DNA polymerase V is UmuD'(2)C-RecA-ATP

DNA-damage-induced SOS mutations arise when Escherichia coli DNA polymerase (pol) V, activated by a RecA nucleoprotein filament (RecA*), catalyses translesion DNA synthesis. Here we address two longstanding enigmatic aspects of SOS mutagenesis, the molecular composition of mutagenically active pol V and the role of RecA*. We show that RecA* transfers a single RecA-ATP stoichiometrically from its DNA 3'-end to free pol V (UmuD'(2)C) to form an active mutasome (pol V Mut) with the composition UmuD'(2)C-RecA-ATP. Pol V Mut catalyses TLS in the absence of RecA* and deactivates rapidly upon dissociation from DNA. Deactivation occurs more slowly in the absence of DNA synthesis, while retaining RecA-ATP in the complex. Reactivation of pol V Mut is triggered by replacement of RecA-ATP from RecA*. Thus, the principal role of RecA* in SOS mutagenesis is to transfer RecA-ATP to pol V, and thus generate active mutasomal complex for translesion synthesis.

Molecular Design and Functional Organization of the RecA Protein

The bacterial RecA protein participates in a remarkably diverse set of functions, all of which are involved in the maintenance of genomic integrity. RecA is a central component in both the catalysis of recombinational DNA repair and the regulation of the cellular SOS response. Despite the mechanistic differences of its functions, all require formation of an active RecA/ATP/DNA complex. RecA is a classic allosterically regulated enzyme, and ATP binding results in a dramatic increase in DNA binding affinity and a cooperative assembly of RecA subunits to form an ordered, helical nucleoprotein filament. The molecular events that underlie this ATP-induced structural transition are becoming increasingly clear. This review focuses on descriptions of our current understanding of the molecular design and allosteric regulation of RecA. We present a comprehensive list of all published recA mutants and use the results of various genetic and biochemical studies, together with available structural information, to develop ideas regarding the design of RecA functional domains and their catalytic organization.

Mechanism of homologous recombination from the RecA-ssDNA/dsDNA structures

The RecA family of ATPases mediates homologous recombination, a reaction essential for maintaining genomic integrity and for generating genetic diversity. RecA, ATP and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) form a helical filament that binds to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), searches for homology, and then catalyses the exchange of the complementary strand, producing a new heteroduplex. Here we have solved the crystal structures of the Escherichia coli RecA-ssDNA and RecA-heteroduplex filaments. They show that ssDNA and ATP bind to RecA-RecA interfaces cooperatively, explaining the ATP dependency of DNA binding. The ATP gamma-phosphate is sensed across the RecA-RecA interface by two lysine residues that also stimulate ATP hydrolysis, providing a mechanism for DNA release. The DNA is underwound and stretched globally, but locally it adopts a B-DNA-like conformation that restricts the homology search to Watson-Crick-type base pairing. The complementary strand interacts primarily through base pairing, making heteroduplex formation strictly dependent on complementarity. The underwound, stretched filament conformation probably evolved to destabilize the donor duplex, freeing the complementary strand for homology sampling.

The SOS Regulatory Network

All organisms possess a diverse set of genetic programs that are used to alter cellular physiology in response to environmental cues. The gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli, mounts what is known as the "SOS response" following DNA damage, replication fork arrest, and a myriad of other environmental stresses. For over 50 years, E. coli has served as the paradigm for our understanding of the transcriptional, and physiological changes that occur following DNA damage (400). In this chapter, we summarize the current view of the SOS response and discuss how this genetic circuit is regulated. In addition to examining the E. coli SOS response, we also include a discussion of the SOS regulatory networks in other bacteria to provide a broader perspective on how prokaryotes respond to DNA damage.

Lessons from 50 years of SOS DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis

This historical perspective integrates 50 years of research on SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli with the proverbial '3R' functions--replication, repair and recombination--that feature DNA polymerase V. Genetic and biochemical data are assimilated to arrive at a current picture of UV-damage-induced mutagenesis. An unprecedented DNA polymerase V transactivation mechanism, which involves the RecA protein, sheds new light on unresolved issues that have persisted over time, prompting us to reflect on evolving molecular concepts regarding DNA structures and polymerase-switching mechanisms.

DNA polymerase V and RecA protein, a minimal mutasome

A hallmark of the Escherichia coli SOS response is the large increase in mutations caused by translesion synthesis (TLS). TLS requires DNA polymerase V (UmuD'2C) and RecA. Here, we show that pol V and RecA interact by two distinct mechanisms. First, pol V binds to RecA in the absence of DNA and ATP and second, through its UmuD' subunit, requiring DNA and ATP without ATP hydrolysis. TLS occurs in the absence of a RecA nucleoprotein filament but is inhibited in its presence. Therefore, a RecA nucleoprotein filament is unlikely to be required for SOS mutagenesis. Pol V activity is severely diminished in the absence of RecA or in the presence of RecA1730, a mutant defective for pol V mutagenesis in vivo. Pol V activity is strongly enhanced with RecA mutants constitutive for mutagenesis in vivo, suggesting that RecA is an obligate accessory factor that activates pol V for SOS mutagenesis.

Two distinct modes of RecA action are required for DNA polymerase V-catalyzed translesion synthesis

SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli requires DNA polymerase V (pol V) and RecA protein to copy damaged DNA templates. Here we show that two distinct biochemical modes for RecA protein are necessary for pol V-catalyzed translesion synthesis. One RecA mode is characterized by a strong stimulation in nucleotide incorporation either directly opposite a lesion or at undamaged template sites, but by the absence of lesion bypass. A separate RecA mode is necessary for translesion synthesis. The RecA1730 mutant protein, which was identified on the basis of its inability to promote pol V (UmuD'(2)C)-dependent UV-mutagenesis, appears proficient for the first mode of RecA action but is deficient in the second mode. Data are presented suggesting that the two RecA modes are "nonfilamentous". That is, contrary to current models for SOS mutagenesis, formation of a RecA nucleoprotein filament may not be required for copying damaged DNA templates. Instead, SOS mutagenesis occurs when pol V interacts with two RecA molecules, first at a 3' primer end, upstream of a template lesion, where RecA mode 1 stimulates pol V activity, and subsequently at a site immediately downstream of the lesion, where RecA mode 2 cocatalyzes lesion bypass. We posit that in vivo assembly of a RecA nucleoprotein filament may be required principally to target pol V to a site of DNA damage and to stabilize the pol V-RecA interaction at the lesion. However, it is only a RecA molecule located at the 3' filament tip, proximal to a damaged template base, that is directly responsible for translesion synthesis.

The synaptic activity of HsDmc1, a human recombination protein specific to meiosis

Human Dmc1 protein, a meiosis-specific homolog of Escherichia coli RecA protein, has previously been shown to promote DNA homologous pairing and strand-exchange reactions that are qualitatively similar to those of RecA protein and Rad51. Human and yeast Rad51 proteins each form a nucleoprotein filament that is very similar to the filament formed by RecA protein. However, recent studies failed to find a similar filament made by Dmc1 but showed instead that this protein forms octameric rings and stacks of rings. These observations stimulated further efforts to elucidate the mechanism by which Dmc1 promotes the recognition of homology. Dmc1, purified to a state in which nuclease and helicase activities were undetectable, promoted homologous pairing and strand exchange as measured by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Observations on the intermediates and products, which can be distinguished by FRET assays, provided direct evidence of a three-stranded synaptic intermediate. The effects of helix stability and mismatched base pairs on the recognition of homology revealed further that human Dmc1, like human Rad51, requires the preferential breathing of A small middle dotT base pairs for recognition of homology. We conclude that Dmc1, like human Rad51 and E. coli RecA protein, promotes homologous pairing and strand exchange by a "synaptic pathway" involving a three-stranded nucleoprotein intermediate, rather than by a "helicase pathway" involving the separation and reannealing of DNA strands.

At the birth of molecular radiation biology

Rational thinking builds on feelings, too. This article starts with a tribute to Richard Setlow, an eminent scientist; it retraces as well some studies in molecular genetics that helped to understand basic questions of radiation biology. In the mid-1950s, the induction of a dormant virus (prophage) by irradiation of its host was an intriguing phenomenon. Soon, it was found that prophage induction results from the inactivation of the prophage repressor. Similarly, a score of induced cellular SOS functions were found to be induced when the LexA repressor is inactivated. Repressor inactivation involves the formation of a newly formed distinctive structure: a RecA-polymer wrapped around single-stranded DNA left by the arrest of replication at damaged sites. By touching this RecA nucleofilament, the LexA repressor is inactivated, triggering the sequential expression of SOS functions. The RecA nucleofilament acts as a chaperone, allowing recombinational repair to occur after nucleotide excision repair is over. The UmuD'C complex, synthesized slowly and parsimoniously, peaks at the end of recombinational repair, ready to be positioned at the tip of a RecA nucleofilament, placing the UmuD'C complex right at a lesion. At this location, UmuD'C prevents recombinational repair, and now acts as an error-prone paucimerase that fills the discontinuity opposite the damaged DNA. Finally, the elimination of lesions from the path of DNA polymerase, allows the resumption of DNA replication, and the SOS repair cycle switches to a normal cell cycle.

Analysis of Escherichia coli RecA interactions with LexA, lambda CI, and UmuD by site-directed mutagenesis of recA

An early event in the induction of the SOS system of Escherichia coli is RecA-mediated cleavage of the LexA repressor. RecA acts indirectly as a coprotease to stimulate repressor self-cleavage, presumably by forming a complex with LexA. How complex formation leads to cleavage is not known. As an approach to this question, it would be desirable to identify the protein-protein interaction sites on each protein. It was previously proposed that LexA and other cleavable substrates, such as phage lambda CI repressor and E. coli UmuD, bind to a cleft located between two RecA monomers in the crystal structure. To test this model, and to map the interface between RecA and its substrates, we carried out alanine-scanning mutagenesis of RecA. Twenty double mutations were made, and cells carrying them were characterized for RecA-dependent repair functions and for coprotease activity towards LexA, lambda CI, and UmuD. One mutation in the cleft region had partial defects in cleavage of CI and (as expected from previous data) of UmuD. Two mutations in the cleft region conferred constitutive cleavage towards CI but not towards LexA or UmuD. By contrast, no mutations in the cleft region or elsewhere in RecA were found to specifically impair the cleavage of LexA. Our data are consistent with binding of CI and UmuD to the cleft between two RecA monomers but do not provide support for the model in which LexA binds in this cleft.

Modulation of RecA nucleoprotein function by the mutagenic UmuD'C protein complex

The RecA, UmuC, and UmuD' proteins are essential for error-prone, replicative bypass of DNA lesions. Normally, RecA protein mediates homologous pairing of DNA. We show that purified Umu(D')2C blocks this recombination function. Biosensor measurements establish that the mutagenic complex binds to the RecA nucleoprotein filament with a stoichiometry of one Umu(D')2C complex for every two RecA monomers. Furthermore, Umu(D')2C competitively inhibits LexA repressor cleavage but not ATPase activity, implying that Umu(D')2C binds in or proximal to the helical groove of the RecA nucleoprotein filament. This binding reduces joint molecule formation and even more severely impedes DNA heteroduplex formation by RecA protein, ultimately blocking all DNA pairing activity and thereby abridging participation in recombination function. Thus, Umu(D')2C restricts the activities of the RecA nucleoprotein filament and presumably, in this manner, recruits it for mutagenic repair function. This modulation by Umu(D')2C is envisioned as a key event in the transition from a normal mode of genomic maintenance by "error-free" recombinational repair, to one of "error-prone" DNA replication.

Specific RecA amino acid changes affect RecA-UmuD'C interaction

The UmuD'C mutagenesis complex accumulates slowly and parsimoniously after a 12 Jm(-2) UV flash to attain after 45 min a low cell concentration between 15 and 60 complexes. Meanwhile, RecA monomers go up to 72,000 monomers. By contrast, when the UmuD'C complex is constitutively produced at a high concentration, it inhibits recombinational repair and then markedly reduces bacterial survival from DNA damage. We have isolated novel recA mutations that enable RecA to resist UmuD'C recombination inhibition. The mutations, named recA [UmuR], are located on the RecA three-dimensional structure at three sites: (i) the RecA monomer tail domain (four amino acid changes); (ii) the RecA monomer head domain (one amino acid change, which appears to interface with the amino acids in the tail domain); and (iii) in the core of a RecA monomer (one amino acid change). RecA [UmuR] proteins make recombination more efficient in the presence of UmuD'C while SOS mutagenesis is inhibited. The UmuR amino acid changes are located at a head-tail joint between RecA monomers and some are free to possibly interact with UmuD'C at the tip of a RecA polymer. These two RecA structures may constitute possible sites to which the UmuD'C complex might bind, hampering homologous recombination and favouring SOS mutagenesis.

Mutagenesis and more: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS response

The cellular response to DNA damage that has been most extensively studied is the SOS response of Escherichia coli. Analyses of the SOS response have led to new insights into the transcriptional and post-translational regulation of processes that increase cell survival after DNA damage as well as insights into DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis, i.e., SOS mutagenesis. SOS mutagenesis requires the recA and umuDC gene products and has as its mechanistic basis the alteration of DNA polymerase III such that it becomes capable of replicating DNA containing miscoding and noncoding lesions. Ongoing investigations of the mechanisms underlying SOS mutagenesis, as well as recent observations suggesting that the umuDC operon may have a role in the regulation of the E. coli cell cycle after DNA damage has occurred, are discussed.

Differential cleavage of LexA and UmuD mediated by recA Pro67 mutants: implications for common LexA and UmuD binding sites on RecA

In Escherichia coli, RecA-mediated cleavage of LexA repressor is a key regulatory event required for expression of SOS genes involved in the repair of DNA damage. RecA also mediates the cleavage of UmuD protein to UmuD, a form active in SOS mutagenesis. To determine whether LexA and UmuD have common binding determinants on RecA, we have compared the ability of several recA mutants to function in the cleavage of LexA versus UmuD in vivo. The data reveal that while some recA mutations at Pro67 have a similar effect on LexA and UmuD cleavage, others have striking differential effects. For example, a Pro67-->Trp mutation results in a high level of constitutive cleavage of both proteins. However, Pro67-->Asp and Glu mutations promote constitutive cleavage of LexA and reduce induction of UmuD cleavage to just 5 to 10% of wild-type activity. In contrast, Pro67-->Arg prevents LexA cleavage while allowing nearly 50% of wild-type induction of UmuD cleavage. These results are consistent with the idea that Pro67 is located at a site in the nucleoprotein filament where both LexA and UmuD contact RecA.

Quantitation of the inhibition of Hfr x F- recombination by the mutagenesis complex UmuD'C

The UmuD'C complex and RecA protein are two essential components in mutagenic repair of gaps produced by the replication of damaged DNA. In this process, the UmuD'C complex might help DNA polymerase to synthesize DNA across a lesion. Besides, a RecA polymer wrapping around single-stranded DNA could function as a directional chaperone to target the UmuD'C complex at the lesion. It was shown in our laboratory that the UmuD'C complex prevents homologous recombination and recombinational repair when expressed at elevated levels. To find out whether the UmuD'C complex inhibits recombination by interfering directly with RecA, we measured the kinetics of inhibition of Hfr x F- recombination in F- recipients in which either RecA or UmuD'C were made to vary. The cell concentrations of RecA and UmuD'C proteins were adjusted by having the recA and the umuD'C genes regulated by the arabinose P(BAD) promoter. In the absence of the UmuD'C complex, recombination was a function of RecA concentration and then reached a plateau when the RecA concentration was above 9000 monomers/cell. At a fixed RecA concentration, the yield of Hfr x F- recombinants decreased as a function of the UmuD'C cell concentration. At a given UmuD'C/RecA ratio, recombination inhibition by UmuD'C was reversed by increasing the RecA cell concentration. RecA1730, a mutant protein impaired in the chaperone activity, was insensitive to UmuD'C inhibition. We propose a model accounting for the RecA chaperone function in SOS mutagenesis and for the UmuD'C inhibitory effect on homologous recombination. We suggest that the UmuD'C complex is placed at the tip of a RecA polymer as a result of a treadmilling process. This would position the UmuD'C complex right at a lesion while the capping by UmuD'C would destabilize a RecA polymer and thereby abort the recombination process.

Mutant RecA proteins which form hexamer-sized oligomers

We have analyzed the oligomeric properties of a number of mutant RecA proteins containing single amino acid substitutions within one region of the subunit interface. In contrast to wild-type RecA, which forms a heterogeneous population of different-sized oligomers, we find that many of these mutant proteins exist in a more homogeneous oligomeric form, which approximates to the size of a RecA hexamer. Some of these mutants have a significant level of activity in vivo for recombinational DNA repair and thus represent the first mutant RecA proteins identified which retain activity yet can exist in a discrete oligomeric state as free protein.

Characterization of a RecA/RAD51 homologue from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus sp. KOD1

The Pk-rec gene, encoding a RecA/RAD51 homologue from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcussp. KOD1, was expressed in Escherichia coli. The recombinant Pk-REC was purified to homogeneity and was shown to be in a dimeric form. A striking property of the purified recombinant Pk-REC was the unusual DNase activity on both single- and double-stranded DNAs along with the ATPase activity. The reaction product of this DNase activity was mononucleotides. The optimum temperature and pH for the DNase activity were 60 degrees C and 8-8.5, respectively. In addition, the metal ion requirement for DNase activity was different from that for the ATPase activity. The protein exhibited no DNase activity in the presence of Zn2+ion, which was one of the most preferable divalent cations for ATPase activity. Another unique characteristic of the recombinant protein was that the reaction product of ATPase activity was AMP instead of ADP.Pk-REC may represent a common prototype of the RecA family proteins with high RecA-like activity.

The UmuD' protein filament and its potential role in damage induced mutagenesis

BACKGROUND

Damage induced 'SOS mutagenesis' may occur transiently as part of the global SOS response to DNA damage in bacteria. A key participant in this process is the UmuD protein, which is produced in an inactive from but converted to the active form, UmuD', by a RecA-mediated self-cleavage reaction. UmuD', together with UmuC and activated RecA (RecA*), enables the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme to replicate across chemical and UV induced lesions. The efficiency of this reaction depends on several intricate protein-protein interactions.

RESULTS

Recent X-ray crystallographic analysis shows that in addition to forming molecular dimers, the N- and C-terminal tails of UmuD' extend from a globular beta structure to associate and produce crystallized filaments. We have investigated this phenomenon and find that these filaments appear to relate to biological activity. Higher order oligomers are found in solution with UmuD', but not with UmuD nor with a mutant of UmuD' lacking the extended N terminus. Deletion of the N terminus of UmuD' does not affect its ability to form molecular dimers but does severely compromise its ability to interact with a RecA-DNA filament and to participate in mutagenesis. Mutations in the C terminus of UmuD' result in both gain and loss of function for mutagenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

The activation of UmuD to UmuD' appears to cause a large conformational change in the protein which allows it to form oligomers in solution at physiologically relevant concentrations. Properties of these oligomers are consistent with the filament structures seen in crystals of UmuD'.

Specific in vivo protein-protein interactions between Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins

One of the components of the RecA-LexA-controlled SOS response in Escherichia coli cells is an inducible error-prone DNA replication pathway that results in a substantial increase in the mutation rate. It is believed that error-prone DNA synthesis is performed by a multiprotein complex that is formed by UmuC, UmuD', RecA, and probably DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. It is postulated that the formation of such a complex requires specific interactions between these proteins. We have analyzed the specific protein-protein interactions between UmuC, UmuD, and UmuD' fusion proteins, using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid system. In agreement with previous in vitro data, we have shown that UmuD and UmuD' are able to form both homodimers (UmuD-UmuD and UmuD'-UmuD') and a heterodimer (UmuD-UmuD'). Our data show that UmuC fusion protein is capable of interacting exclusively with UmuD' and not with UmuD. Thus, posttranslational processing of UmuD into UmuD' is a critical step in SOS mutagenesis, enabling only the latter protein to interact with UmuC. Our data seem to indicate that the integrity of the entire UmuC sequence is essential for UmuC-UmuD' heterotypic interaction. Finally, in our studies, we used three different UmuC mutant proteins: UmuC25, UmuC36, and UmuC104. We have found that UmuC25 and UmuC36 are not capable of associating with UmuD'. In contrast, UmuC104 protein interacts with UmuD' protein with an efficiency identical to that of the wild-type protein. We postulate that UmuC104 protein might be defective in interaction with another, unknown protein essential for the SOS mutagenesis pathway.

The isfA mutation inhibits mutator activity and processing of UmuD protein in Escherichia coli recA730 strains

Further studies on the isfA mutation responsible for anti-SOS and antimutagenic activities in Escherichia coli are described. We have previously shown that the isfA mutation inhibits mutagenesis and other SOS-dependent phenomena, possibly by interfering with RecA coprotease activity. The isfA mutation has now been demonstrated also to suppress mutator activity in E. coli recA730 and recA730 lexA51(Def) strains that constitutively express RecA coprotease activity. We further show that the antimutator activity of the isfA mutation is related to inhibition of RecA coprotease-dependent processing of UmuD. Expression of UmuD' from plasmid pGW2122 efficiently restores UV-induced mutagenesis in the recA730 isfA strain and partially restores its mutator activity. On the other hand, overproduction of UmuD'C proteins from pGW2123 plasmid markedly enhances UV sensitivity with no restoration of mutability.

SOS-regulated proteins in translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis

Studies of Escherichia coli have revealed that most mutagenesis resulting from exposure to UV radiation and various chemicals (SOS mutagenesis) requires the operation of a specialized system involving the UmuD', UmuC, RecA and DNA polymerase III proteins, which allows translesion synthesis to occur on damaged DNA templates. The SOS mutagenesis system is induced by DNA damage and is subject to elaborate regulatory control involving both transcriptional derepression and post-translational activation and inhibition. The implications of the E. coli SOS mutagenesis system for mutagenesis in other organisms are discussed.

Characterization of the umu-complementing operon from R391

In addition to conferring resistances to antibiotics and heavy metals, certain R factors carry genes involved in mutagenic DNA repair. These plasmid-encoded genes are structurally and functionally related to the chromosomally encoded umuDC genes of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Three such plasmid operons, mucAB, impCAB, and samAB, have been characterized at the molecular level. Recently, we have identified three additional umu-complementing operons from IncJ plasmid R391 and IncL/M plasmids R446b and R471a. We report here the molecular characterization of the R391 umu-complementing operon. The nucleotide sequence of the minimal R plasmid umu-complementing (rum) region revealed an operon of two genes, rumA(R391) and rumB(R391), with an upstream regulatory signal strongly resembling LexA-binding sites. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the RumAB(R391) proteins are approximately equally diverged in sequence from the chromosomal UmuDC proteins and the other plasmid-encoded Umu-like proteins and represent a new subfamily. Genetic characterization of the rumAB(R391) operon revealed that in recA+ and recA1730 backgrounds, the rumAB(R391) operon was phenotypically indistinguishable from mucAB. In contrast, however, the rumAB(R391) operon gave levels of mutagenesis that were intermediate between those given by mucAB and umuDC in a recA430 strain. The latter phenotype was shown to correlate with the reduced posttranslational processing of the RumA(R391) protein to its mutagenically active form, RumA'(R391). Thus, the rumAB(R391) operon appears to possess characteristics that are reminiscent of both chromosome and plasmid-encoded umu-like operons.

In vitro inhibition of RecA-mediated homologous pairing by UmuD'C proteins

The process of SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli requires: i) the replisome enzymes; ii) RecA protein; and iii) the formation of the UmuD'C protein complex which appears to help the replisome to resume DNA synthesis across a lesion. It has recently been shown that the UmuD'C complex, if overproduced, inhibits recombinational repair of a UV-damaged plasmid DNA as well as homologous recombination in an Hfr x F- cross. Since UmuD'C proteins might inhibit an early recombination step by interacting with a RecA nucleo-protein filament, we checked whether UmuD'C proteins will inhibit RecA promoted homologous pairing in vitro. We tested the inhibitory action of UmuD'C proteins in a crude bacterial extract containing possible cofactors such as chaperone proteins that ensure the proper folding of UmuC and the assembly of the UmuD'C complex in vivo. We used a novel recombination assay in which RecA protein promotes the formation of a stable plectonemic joint between a circular single-stranded DNA immobilized onto a membrane and an incoming homologous linear duplex DNA. Under these conditions we show that UmuD'C proteins inhibit the formation of joint molecules.

Analysis of recA mutants with altered SOS functions

The Escherichia coli RecA protein has at least three roles in SOS mutagenesis: (1) derepression of the SOS regulon by mediating LexA cleavage; (2) activation of the UmuD mutagenesis protein by mediating its cleavage; and (3) targeting the Umu-like mutagenesis proteins to DNA. Using a combined approach of molecular and physiological assays, it is now possible to determine which of the three defined steps has been altered in any recA mutant. In this study, we have focused on the ability of six particular recA mutants (recA85, recA430, recA432, recA433, recA435 and recA730) to perform these functions. Phenotypically, recA85 and recA730 were similar in that in lexA+ and lexA(Def) backgrounds, they exhibited constitutive coprotease activity towards the UmuD mutagenesis protein. Somewhat surprisingly, in a lexA(Ind-) background, UmuD cleavage was damage inducible, suggesting that the repressed level of the RecA* protein cannot spontaneously achieve a fully activated state. Although isolated in separate laboratories, the nucleotide sequence of the recA85 and recA730 mutants revealed that they were identical, with both alleles possessing a Glu38-->Lys change in the mutant protein. The recA430, recA433 and recA435 mutants were found to be defective for both lambda mutagenesis and UmuD cleavage. lambda mutagenesis was fully restored, however, to the recA433 and recA435 strains by a low copy plasmid expressing the mutagenically active UmuD' protein. In contrast, lambda mutagenesis was only partially restored to a recA430 strain by a high copy UmuD' plasmid, suggesting that RecA430 may also be additionally defective in targeting the Umu proteins to DNA. Sequence analysis of the recA433 and recA435 alleles revealed identical substitutions resulting in Arg243-->His. The recA432 mutation had a complex phenotype in that its coprotease activity towards UmuD depended upon the lexA background: inducible in lexA+ strains, inefficient in lexA(Ind-) cells and constitutive in a lexA(Def) background. The recA432 mutant was found to carry a Pro119-->Ser substitution, a residue believed to be at the RecA subunit interface; thus this complex phenotype may result from alterations in the assembly of RecA multimers.

Kin17, a mouse nuclear zinc finger protein that binds preferentially to curved DNA

Kin17 is a 45 kDa protein encoded by the KIN17 gene located on mouse chromosome 2, band A. The kin17 amino acid sequence predicts two domains, which were shown to be functional: (i) a bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) that can drive the protein to the cell nucleus, (ii) a bona fide zinc finger of the C2H2 type. The zinc finger is involved in kin17 binding to double-stranded DNA since a mutant deleted of the zinc finger, kin17 delta 1, showed reduced binding. Single-stranded DNA was bound poorly by kin17. Interestingly, we found that kin17 protein showed preferential binding to curved DNA from either pBR322 or synthetic oligonucleotides. Binding of kin17 to a non-curved DNA segment increased after we had inserted into it a short curved synthetic oligonucleotide. Kin17 delta 2, a mutant deleted of 110 amino acids at the C-terminal end, still exhibited preferential binding to curved DNA and so did kin17 delta 1, suggesting that a domain recognizing curved DNA is located in the protein core.

Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli

Homologous recombination is a fundamental biological process. Biochemical understanding of this process is most advanced for Escherichia coli. At least 25 gene products are involved in promoting genetic exchange. At present, this includes the RecA, RecBCD (exonuclease V), RecE (exonuclease VIII), RecF, RecG, RecJ, RecN, RecOR, RecQ, RecT, RuvAB, RuvC, SbcCD, and SSB proteins, as well as DNA polymerase I, DNA gyrase, DNA topoisomerase I, DNA ligase, and DNA helicases. The activities displayed by these enzymes include homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange, helicase, branch migration, Holliday junction binding and cleavage, nuclease, ATPase, topoisomerase, DNA binding, ATP binding, polymerase, and ligase, and, collectively, they define biochemical events that are essential for efficient recombination. In addition to these needed proteins, a cis-acting recombination hot spot known as Chi (chi: 5'-GCTGGTGG-3') plays a crucial regulatory function. The biochemical steps that comprise homologous recombination can be formally divided into four parts: (i) processing of DNA molecules into suitable recombination substrates, (ii) homologous pairing of the DNA partners and the exchange of DNA strands, (iii) extension of the nascent DNA heteroduplex; and (iv) resolution of the resulting crossover structure. This review focuses on the biochemical mechanisms underlying these steps, with particular emphases on the activities of the proteins involved and on the integration of these activities into likely biochemical pathways for recombination.

Isolation and characterization of novel plasmid-encoded umuC mutants

Most inducible mutagenesis in Escherichia coli is dependent upon the activity of the UmuDC proteins. The role of UmuC in this process is poorly understood, possibly because of the limited number of genetically characterized umuC mutants. To better understand the function of the UmuC protein in mutagenic DNA repair, we have isolated several novel plasmid-encoded umuC mutants. A multicopy plasmid that expressed UmuC at physiological levels was constructed and randomly mutagenized in vitro by exposure to hydroxylamine. Mutated plasmids were introduced into the umu tester strain RW126, and 16 plasmids that were unable to promote umuC-dependent spontaneous mutator activity were identified by a colorimetric papillation assay. Interestingly, these plasmid mutants fell into two classes: (i) 5 were expression mutants that produced either too little or too much wild-type UmuC protein, and (ii) 11 were plasmids with structural changes in the UmuC protein. Although hydroxylamine mutagenesis was random, most of the structural mutants identified in the screen were localized to two regions of the UmuC protein; four mutations were found in a stretch of 30 amino acids (residues 133 to 162) in the middle of the protein, while four other mutations (three of which resulted in a truncated UmuC protein) were localized in the last 50 carboxyl-terminal amino acid residues. These new plasmid umuC mutants, together with the previously identified chromosomal umuC25, umuC36, and umuC104 mutations that we have also cloned, should prove extremely useful in dissecting the genetic and biochemical activities of UmuC in mutagenic DNA repair.

The appearance of the UmuD'C protein complex in Escherichia coli switches repair from homologous recombination to SOS mutagenesis

The process of SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli requires (i) the replisome enzymes, (ii) RecA protein, and (iii) the formation of the UmuD'C protein complex which appears to help the replisome to resume DNA synthesis across a lesion. We found that the UmuD'C complex is an antagonist of RecA-mediated recombination. Homologous recombination in an Hfr x F- cross decreased as a function of the UmuD'C cell concentration; this effect was challenged by increasing RecA concentration. Recombination of a u.v.-damaged F-lac with the lac gene of an F- recipient was reduced by increasing the UmuD'C concentration while lac mutagenesis increased, showing an inverse relationship between recombination and SOS mutagenesis. We explain our data with the following model. The kinetics of appearance of the UmuD'C complex after DNA damage is slow, reaching a maximum after an hour. Within that period, excision and recombinational repair have had time to occur. When the UmuD'C concentration relative to the number of residual RecA filaments, not resolved by recombinational repair, becomes high enough, UmuD'C proteins provide a processive factor for the replisome to help replication bypass and repel the standing RecA filament. Thus, at a high enough concentration, the UmuD'C complex will switch repair from recombination to SOS mutagenesis.

Novel mechanism for UV sensitivity and apparent UV nonmutability of recA432 mutants: persistent LexA cleavage following SOS induction

The recA432 mutant allele was isolated (T. Kato and Y. Shinoura, Mol. Gen. Genet. 156:121-131, 1977) by virtue of its defect in cellular mutagenesis (Mut-) and its hypersensitivity to damage by UV irradiation (UVs), which were phenotypes expected for a recA mutant. However, we found that in a different genetic background (lexA51 sulA211 uvrB+), recA432 mutants expressed certain mutant phenotypes but not the Mut- and UVs phenotypes (D.G. Ennis, N. Ossanna, and D.W. Mount, J. Bacteriol. 171:2533-2541, 1989). We present several lines of evidence that these differences resulted from the sulA genotype of the cell and that the apparent UVs and Mut- phenotypes of the sulA+ derivatives resulted from lethal filamentation of induced cells because of persistent derepression of sulA. First, transduction of sulA(Def) mutations into the recA432 strains restored cellular mutagenesis and resistance to UV. Second, recA432 sulA+ strains underwent filamentous death following SOS-inducing treatments. Third, cleavage of LexA repressor in a recA432 strain continued at a rapid rate long after UV induction, at a time when cleavage of the repressor in the recA+ parental strain had substantially declined. Fourth, we confirmed that a single mutation (recA432) conferring both the UVs and Mut- phenotypes mapped to the recA gene. These findings indicate that the RecA432 mutant protein is defective in making the transition back to the deactivated state following SOS induction; thus, the SOS-induced state of recA432 mutants is prolonged and can account for an excess of SulA protein, leading to filamentation. These results are discussed in the context of molecular models for RecA activation for LexA and UmuD cleavage and their roles in the control of mutagenesis and cell division in the SOS response.

Targeting of the UmuD, UmuD', and MucA' mutagenesis proteins to DNA by RecA protein

In addition to its critical role in genetic recombination, the Escherichia coli RecA protein plays a pivotal role in SOS-induced mutagenesis. This role can be separated genetically into three steps: (i) depression of the SOS regulon by mediating the posttranslational cleavage of the LexA repressor, (ii) activation of UmuD'-like proteins by mediating cleavage of the UmuD-like proteins, and (iii) a direct step, possibly to interact with and to target the Umu-like mutagenesis proteins to lesions in DNA. We have analyzed RecA's third role biochemically using protein affinity chromatography and an agarose-based DNA mobility-shift assay. RecA730 protein from a crude cell extract was specifically retained on UmuD and UmuD' protein affinity columns, suggesting that these proteins physically interact. Normally, neither UmuD nor UmuD' shows any affinity for DNA. In the presence of RecA protein, however, UmuD and UmuD' were targeted to DNA. RecA1730 protein, which is defective for UmuD' but proficient for MucA'-promoted mutagenesis, showed a dramatically reduced capacity to target UmuD' to DNA but was able to target a significant portion of MucA' to DNA. These data support the suggestion that the direct role of RecA protein in SOS-induced mutagenesis is to interact with and target the Umu-like mutagenesis proteins to DNA.

Homologous pairing between single-stranded DNA immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane and duplex DNA is specific for RecA activity in bacterial crude extract

Reaction between a circular single stranded and a linear double stranded DNA molecule (ssDNA and dsDNA) provides an efficient system to study recombination mediated by RecA protein. However, classical assays using reaction in solution require highly purified enzymes. This limits biochemical studies of mutant RecA proteins from Escherichia coli or of RecA proteins from other organisms. We describe here an assay that is specific for RecA activity even in bacterial crude extracts. In this assay, the ssDNA is bound to a nitrocellulose membrane, proteins are loaded on this membrane and it is then incubated with a labeled homologous dsDNA. Joint molecules are visualized by autoradiography. We have shown that, despite the reduced mobility of the DNA due to its binding to the membrane, RecA protein is able to promote formation of stable plectonemic joints, in a homology dependent manner. Fourteen other proteins involved in DNA metabolism were checked and did not produce a signal in our assay. Moreover, in Dot blot analysis as well as after native electrophoresis and electrotransfer on a ssDNA coated membrane, production of a signal was strictly dependent on the presence of active RecA protein in the bacterial crude extracts used. We named this assay Pairing On Membrane blot (POM blot).

Induction of only one SOS operon, umuDC, is required for SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli

The actions of UmuDC and RecA proteins, respectively in SOS mutagenesis are studied here with the following experimental strategy. We used lexAl (Ind-) bacteria to maintain all SOS proteins at their basal concentrations and then selectively increased the concentration of either UmuDC or RecA protein. For this purpose, we isolated operator-constitutive mutations oc in the umuDC and umuD'C operons and also used the oc98-recA mutation. The oc1-umuDC mutation prevents LexA repressor from binding to the operator and improves the Pribnow box consensus sequence. As a result, 5000 UmuD and 500 UmuC molecules per cell were produced in lexAl bacteria. This concentration is sufficient to restore SOS mutagenesis. The level of RecA protein present in the repressed state promoted full UmuD cleavage. Overproduction of RecA alone did not promote SOS mutagenesis. Increasing the level of RecA in the presence of high concentrations of UmuDC proteins has no further effect on SOS mutagenesis. We conclude that, after DNA damage, umuDC is the only SOS operon that must be induced in Escherichia coli to promote SOS mutagenesis.