Transient expression of a ventricular myosin heavy chain isoform in developing chicken intrafusal muscle fibers

Evolutionary significance of myosin heavy chain heterogeneity in birds

This article reviews the complexity, expression, genetics, regulation, function, and evolution of the avian myosin heavy chain (MyHC). The majority of pertinent studies thus far published have focussed on domestic chicken and, to a much lesser extent, Japanese quail. Where possible, information available about wild species has also been incorporated into this review. While studies of additional species might modify current interpretations, existing data suggest that some fundamental properties of myosin proteins and genes in birds are unique among higher vertebrates. We compare the characteristics of myosins in birds to those of mammals, and discuss potential molecular mechanisms and evolutionary forces that may explain how avian MyHCs acquired these properties.

Proportions of slow myosin heavy chain-positive fibers in muscle spindles and adjoining extrafusal fascicles, and the positioning of spindles relative to these fascicles

Chicken leg muscles were examined to calculate the percentages of slow myosin heavy chain (MHC)-positive fibers in spindles and in adjacent extrafusal fascicles, and to clarify how the encapsulated portions of muscle spindles are positioned relative to these fascicles. Unlike mammals, in chicken leg muscles slow-twitch MHC and slow-tonic MHC are expressed in intrafusal fibers and in extrafusal fibers, suggesting a close developmental connection between the two fiber populations. In 8-week-old muscles the proportions of slow MHC-positive extrafusal fibers that ringed muscle spindles ranged from 0-100%. In contrast, proportions of slow MHC-positive intrafusal fibers in spindles ranged from 0-57%. Similar proportions in fiber type composition between intrafusal fibers and surrounding extrafusal fibers were apparent at embryonic days 15 and 16, demonstrating early divergence of extrafusal and intrafusal fibers. Muscle spindles were rarely located within single fascicles. Instead, they were commonly placed where several fascicles converged. The frequent extrafascicular location of spindles suggests migration of intrafusal myoblasts from developing clusters of extrafusal fibers toward the interstitium, perhaps along a neurotrophic gradient established by sensory axons that are advancing in the connective tissue matrix that separates adjoining fascicles.

Type and regional diversity in the distribution of myosin heavy chains in chicken intrafusal muscle fibers

BACKGROUND

Chicken intrafusal fibers were classified on the basis of their myosin heavy chain (MHC) composition, which was compared to that of mammalian nuclear bag and nuclear chain types.

METHODS

Immunoreactivities of intrafusal fibers from leg muscles of 8-week-old chickens were evaluated in serial cross-sections after incubation with monoclonal antibodies against slow-twitch, slow-tonic, or fast-twitch MHC and fast muscle C-protein.

RESULTS

Four categories of slow intrafusal fiber could be distinguished on the basis of differential expression of slow-twitch and slow-tonic MHC. Segregation into types was most evident at the motor axon supplied pole, followed by the sensory region of the equator. Fiber types were least distinct at the juxtaequator where sensory and motor axons meet. Intrafusal fibers negative for slow myosins reacted with anti-fast myosins. Fast fibers were best viewed as a single group without subdivisions. Immunostaining for fast muscle C-protein paralleled in large part reactivities for neonatal/fast MHC, indicating that proteins other than MHC are useful fiber type markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite regional changes along the length of intrafusal fibers and some variation within fiber types, the concept of separate MHC-based fiber types was valid as long as typing of fibers was restricted to the proximal polar region. Comparisons of MHC profiles revealed similarities between chicken fast intrafusal fibers and mammalian nuclear chain fibers and between some chicken slow intrafusal fibers and mammalian nuclear bag fibers.