Characterization of heterochromatin in Schistocerca gregaria by C- and N-banding methods

A step to the gigantic genome of the desert locust: chromosome sizes and repeated DNAs

The desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria) has been used as material for numerous cytogenetic studies. Its genome size is estimated to be 8.55 Gb of DNA comprised in 11 autosomes and the X chromosome. Its X0/XX sex chromosome determinism therefore results in females having 24 chromosomes whereas males have 23. Surprisingly, little is known about the DNA content of this locust's huge chromosomes. Here, we use the Feulgen Image Analysis Densitometry and C-banding techniques to respectively estimate the DNA quantity and heterochromatin content of each chromosome. We also identify three satellite DNAs using both restriction endonucleases and next-generation sequencing. We then use fluorescent in situ hybridization to determine the chromosomal location of these satellite DNAs as well as that of six tandem repeat DNA gene families. The combination of the results obtained in this work allows distinguishing between the different chromosomes not only by size, but also by the kind of repetitive DNAs that they contain. The recent publication of the draft genome of the migratory locust (Locusta migratoria), the largest animal genome hitherto sequenced, invites for sequencing even larger genomes. S. gregaria is a pest that causes high economic losses. It is thus among the primary candidates for genome sequencing. But this species genome is about 50 % larger than that of L. migratoria, and although next-generation sequencing currently allows sequencing large genomes, sequencing it would mean a greater challenge. The chromosome sizes and markers provided here should not only help planning the sequencing project and guide the assembly but would also facilitate assigning assembled linkage groups to actual chromosomes.

The pattern of histone H4 acetylation on the X chromosome during spermatogenesis of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria

We have used antibodies directed against histone H4 acetylated at lysine residue 5, 8, 12, or 16 and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy to probe chromosomes from spermatogonia and spermatocytes of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. The autosomes showed bright overall fluorescence, indicative of high levels of H4 acetylation. In contrast, the X chromosome, which is facultatively heterochromatic during spermatogenesis of the locust, remained completely unstained in spermatogonia and secondary spermatocytes and showed only a small terminal fluorescent band in primary spermatocytes. This band probably corresponds to centromere associated constitutive heterochromatin. Thus, underacetylation is a cytogenetic marker for facultative heterochromatin, but not necessarily constitutive heterochromatin, during spermatogenesis of the locust. Scanning electron microscopy of chromosomes from prophase spermatogonia and prophase I spermatocytes revealed that underacetylation of histone H4 in the X chromosome was not accompanied by a chromatin organization visibly different from that of the autosomes. Transmission electron microscopy of mitotic spermatogonia showed that the X chromosome is separated from the autosomes in a small nuclear compartment of its own in prophase and telophase and associated with membranes in metaphase. In prophase I spermatocytes, autosomes and the sex univalent were in the same compartment. This compartmentalization may be responsible for the underacetylation and (or) transcriptional silencing of the X chromosome in spermatogonia mitosis.

Scanning electron microscopy of heterochromatin in chromosome spreads of male germ cells in Schistocerca gregaria (Acrididae, Orthoptera) after trypsinization

Chromosome spreads, prepared from testes of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria, were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after varying periods of preincubation in trypsin. The emphasis of the study was on the appearance of heterochromatin. A trypsin pretreatment of 5 sec resulted in a smooth surface on the chromatin throughout and the heterochromatin was highly electron-emissive. The facultatively heterochromatic X chromosome was clearly visible in interphase spermatogonia and in pachytene and late prophase I spermatocytes. Chromomeres of autosomal bivalents could be recognized in pachytene cells. Centromeric heterochromatin segments were very prominent in autosomes of late prophase I spermatocytes and some chromosomes showed interstitial and telomeric bands. Longer trypsin treatment (10 sec) resulted in a fine globular surface on the chromatin; however, the electron emission of heterochromatic chromosome segments was lower under these conditions. The result of trypsin pretreatment of euchromatin differed only slightly from that of the heterochromatin. Extensive trypsin treatment (20 sec) did not alter further the relative electron emission of heterochromatin and euchromatin, but the regular globular appearance was lost, apparently owing to damage on the chromatin surface. The loss of electron emission from the centromeric heterochromatin of the autosomes and the facultatively heterochromatic X chromosome after extended trypsin treatment suggests a central role of proteins in mediating the heterochromatic status in meiotic chromosomes of the locust. Information obtained using scanning electron microscopy of chromosome spreads is complementary to that obtained by C-banding in that facultative heterochromatin is visualized with particular clarity.

Correlation between constitutive heterochromatin and restriction enzyme resistant chromatin in Arcyptera tornosi (Orthoptera)

Fixed mitotic chromosomes of A. tornosi have been analysed by means of C-banding, DA-DAPI and Chromomicin A3 fluorescence, as well as by digestion in situ with Alu I, Hae III, Hinf I and Hind III restriction endonucleases. From the results obtained at least nine types of chromatin can be distinguished in A. tornosi. Some C-band positive areas (constitutive heterochromatin) which show a characteristic fluorescence pattern are digested by specific endonucleases, whilst others are undigested. C-band negative areas (euchromatin) are digested by some restriction endonucleases but not by others. Regions digested are supposed to contain highly repetitive DNAs. It is noteworthy, however, that the heterochromatin associated with NORs is not attacked by any of the enzymes we used, while regions believed to contain AT-rich DNA (DA-DAPI positive) are digested by Hae III that cleaves the GG decreases CC base sequence target.

The chromosomes of two Drosophila races: D. nasuta nasuta and D. n. albomicana. I. Distribution and differentiation of heterochromatin

Heterochromatin distribution and differentiation in metaphase chromosomes of two morphologically identical Drosophila races, D. nasuta nasuta and D. n. albomicana, have been studied by C- and N-banding methods. -- The total heterochromatin values differ only slightly between these races. However, homologous chromosomes of the two Drosophila forms show striking differences in the size of heterochromatin regions and there is an alternating pattern in D. n. nasuta and D. n. albomicana of chromosomes which contain more, or respectively less heterochromatin than their counterparts in the other race. -- Three different N-banding patterns could be obtained depending on the conditions of the method employed: One banding pattern occurs which corresponds to the C-banding pattern. Another pattern is the reverse of the C-band pattern; the euchromatic chromosome regions and the centromeres are stained whereas the pericentric heterochromatin regions remain unstained. In the Y chromosomes of both races and in chromosome 4 of D. n. albomicana, however, the heterochromatin is further differentiated. In the third N-banding pattern only the centromeres are deeply stained. Furthermore, between the races, subtle staining differences in the pericentric heterochromatin regions can be observed as verified in F1 hybrids. On the basis of C- and N-banding results specific aspects of chromosomal differences between D. n. nasuta and D. n. albomicana are discussed.