Effects of different growth conditions on the in vivo activity of the tandem Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA promoters P1 and P2

De novo Synthesis and Assembly of rRNA into Ribosomal Subunits during Cold Acclimation in Escherichia coli

During the cold adaptation that follows a cold stress, bacterial cells undergo many physiological changes and extensive reprogramming of their gene expression pattern. Bulk gene expression is drastically reduced, while a set of cold shock genes is selectively and transiently expressed. The initial stage of cold acclimation is characterized by the establishment of a stoichiometric imbalance of the translation initiation factors (IFs)/ribosomes ratio that contributes to the preferential translation of cold shock transcripts. Whereas de novo synthesis of the IFs following cold stress has been documented, nothing was known concerning the activity of the rrn operons during the cold acclimation period. In this work, we focus on the expression of the rrn operons and the fate of rRNA after temperature downshift. We demonstrate that in Escherichia coli, rRNA synthesis does not stop during the cold acclimation phase, but continues with greater contribution of the P2 compared to the P1 promoter and all seven rrn operons are active, although their expression levels change with respect to pre-stress conditions. Eight hours after the 37°→10 °C temperature downshift, the newly transcribed rRNA represents up to 20% of total rRNA and is preferentially found in the polysomes. However, with respect to the de novo synthesis of the IFs, both rRNA transcription and maturation are slowed down drastically by cold stress, thereby accounting in part for the stoichiometric imbalance of the IFs/ribosomes. Overall, our data indicate that new ribosomes, which are possibly suitable to function at low temperature, are slowly assembled during cold acclimation.

Upstream binding of idling RNA polymerase modulates transcription initiation from a nearby promoter

The bacterial gene regulatory regions often demonstrate distinctly organized arrays of RNA polymerase binding sites of ill-defined function. Previously we observed a module of closely spaced polymerase binding sites upstream of the canonical promoter of the Escherichia coli fis operon. FIS is an abundant nucleoid-associated protein involved in adjusting the chromosomal DNA topology to changing cellular physiology. Here we show that simultaneous binding of the polymerase at the canonical fis promoter and an upstream transcriptionally inactive site stabilizes a RNAP oligomeric complex in vitro. We further show that modulation of the upstream binding of RNA polymerase affects the fis promoter activity both in vivo and in vitro. The effect of the upstream RNA polymerase binding on the fis promoter activity depends on the spatial arrangement of polymerase binding sites and DNA supercoiling. Our data suggest that a specific DNA geometry of the nucleoprotein complex stabilized on concomitant binding of RNA polymerase molecules at the fis promoter and the upstream region acts as a topological device regulating the fis transcription. We propose that transcriptionally inactive RNA polymerase molecules can act as accessory factors regulating the transcription initiation from a nearby promoter.

Differential stringent control of Escherichia coli rRNA promoters: effects of ppGpp, DksA and the initiating nucleotides

Transcription of rRNAs in Escherichia coli is directed from seven redundant rRNA operons, which are mainly regulated by their P1 promoters. Here we demonstrate by in vivo measurements that the amounts of individual rRNAs transcribed from the different operons under normal growth vary noticeably although the structures of all the P1 promoters are very similar. Moreover, we show that starvation for amino acids does not affect the seven P1 promoters in the same way. Notably, reduction of transcription from rrnD P1 was significantly lower compared to the other P1 promoters. The presence of DksA was shown to be crucial for the ppGpp-dependent downregulation of all P1 promoters. Because rrnD P1 is the only rrn promoter starting with GTP instead of ATP, we performed studies with a mutant rrnD promoter, where the initiating G+1 is replaced by A+1. These analyses demonstrated that the ppGpp sensitivity of rrn P1 promoters depends on the nature and concentration of initiating nucleoside triphosphates (iNTPs). Our results support the notion that the seven rRNA operons are differentially regulated and underline the importance of a concerted activity between ppGpp, DksA and an adequate concentration of the respective iNTP.

6S RNA-dependent inhibition of RNA polymerase is released by RNA-dependent synthesis of small de novo products

6S RNA from Escherichia coli is known to bind to RNA polymerase, preventing interaction with many promoters during stationary growth. The resulting repression is released under conditions of nutritional upshift, when the growth situation improves. 6S RNA, which binds to the active site of RNA polymerase, has the particularly interesting feature to act as a template, causing the transcription of defined de novo RNAs (dnRNA) that are complementary to a specific sequence region of the 6S RNA. We analyzed the conditions of dnRNA synthesis and determined their effect on the 6S RNA-mediated inhibition of RNA polymerase in vitro and in vivo. Upon nutritional upshift the RNA polymerase/6S RNA complex induces the rapid synthesis of dnRNAs, which form stable hybrids with the 6S RNA template. The resulting structural change destabilizes the inactivated RNA polymerase complex, causing sigma subunit release. Both dnRNA and 6S RNA are rapidly degraded after complex disintegration. Experiments using the transcriptional inhibitor rifampicin demonstrate that active transcription is required for the disintegration of the RNA polymerase/6S RNA complex. Our results support the conclusion that 6S RNA not only inhibits transcription during stationary growth but also enables cells to resume rapid growth after starvation and help to escape from stationary phase.

Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery

BACKGROUND

6S RNA from E. coli is known to bind to RNA polymerase interfering with transcription initiation. Because 6S RNA concentrations are maximal at stationary phase and binding occurs preferentially to the holoenzyme associated with sigma(70) (Esigma(70)) it is believed that 6S RNA supports adjustment to stationary phase transcription. Previous studies have also suggested that inhibition is specific for sigma(70)-dependent promoters characterized by a weak -35 recognition motif or extended -10 promoters. There are many exceptions to this precept, showing that other types of promoters, including stationary phase-specific (sigma(38)-dependent) promoters are inhibited.

RESULTS

To solve this apparent ambiguity and to better understand the role of 6S RNA in stationary phase transition we have performed a genome-wide transcriptional analysis of wild-type and 6S RNA deficient cells growing to mid-log or early stationary phase. We found 245 genes at the exponential growth phase and 273 genes at the early stationary phase to be > or = 1.5-fold differentially expressed. Up- and down-regulated genes include many transcriptional regulators, stress-related proteins, transporters and several enzymes involved in purine metabolism. As the most striking result during stationary phase, however, we obtained in the 6S RNA deficient strain a concerted expression reduction of genes constituting the translational apparatus. In accordance, primer extension analysis showed that transcription of ribosomal RNAs, representing the key molecules for ribosome biogenesis, is also significantly reduced under the same conditions. Consistent with this finding biochemical analysis of the 6S RNA deficient strain indicates that the lack of 6S RNA is apparently compensated by an increase of the basal ppGpp concentration, known to affect growth adaptation and ribosome biogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis demonstrated that the effect of 6S RNA on transcription is not strictly confined to sigma(70)-dependent promoters. Moreover, the results indicate that 6S RNA is embedded in stationary phase adaptation, which is governed by the capacity of the translational machinery.

Unique roles of the rrn P2 rRNA promoters in Escherichia coli

In bacteria, genes are often expressed from multiple promoters to allow for a greater spectrum of regulation. Transcription of rRNA genes in Escherichia coli uses two promoters, rrn P1 and rrn P2. Under the conditions examined previously, the P1 and P2 promoters were regulated in response to many of the same changes in nutritional conditions. We report here that rrn P2 promoters play unique roles in rRNA expression during transitional situations. rrn P2 promoters play a dominant role in rRNA synthesis as cells enter into and persist in stationary phase. rrn P2 promoters also play a role in the rapid increases in rRNA synthesis that occur during outgrowth from stationary phase and during the initial stages of rapid shifts to richer media. We demonstrate that rrnB P2 directly senses the concentrations of guanosine 5'-disphosphate 3'-diphosphate (ppGpp) and the initiating nucleoside triphosphate (iNTP), thereby accounting, at least in part, for the observed patterns of regulation. Our work significantly extends previous information about the regulators responsible for control of the rrn P2 promoters and the relationship between the tandem rRNA promoters.

Regulation of the Escherichia coli rrnB P2 promoter

The seven rRNA operons in Escherichia coli each contain two promoters, rrn P1 and rrn P2. Most previous studies have focused on the rrn P1 promoters. Here we report a systematic analysis of the activity and regulation of the rrnB P2 promoter in order to define the intrinsic properties of rrn P2 promoters and to understand better their contributions to rRNA synthesis when they are in their natural setting downstream of rrn P1 promoters. In contrast to the conclusions reached in some previous studies, we find that rrnB P2 is regulated: it displays clear responses to amino acid availability (stringent control), rRNA gene dose (feedback control), and changes in growth rate (growth rate-dependent control). Stringent control of rrnB P2 requires the alarmone ppGpp, but growth rate-dependent control of rrnB P2 does not require ppGpp. The rrnB P2 core promoter sequence (-37 to +7) is sufficient to serve as the target for growth rate-dependent regulation.

Transcriptional regulation of fis operon involves a module of multiple coupled promoters

The transcription of the Escherichia coli fis gene is strongly activated during the outgrowth of cells from stationary phase. The high activity of the promoter of the fis operon requires the transcription factor IHF. Previously, we identified a divergent promoter, div, located upstream of the fis promoter. In this study we demonstrate that at least two additional promoters, designated fis P2 and fis P3, are located in the control region of the fis operon. The fis P2 and div promoters overlap completely, whereas fis P3 and div P are arranged as face-to-face divergent promoters. We show that the div and the tandem fis promoters counterbalance each other, such that their activity is kept on a lower than potentially attainable level. Furthermore, we demonstrate an unusual activation mechanism by IHF, involving a coordinated shift in the balance of promoter activities. We infer that these coupled promoters represent a regulatory module and propose a novel "dynamic balance" mechanism involved in the transcriptional control of the fis operon.

Regulation of rRNA transcription correlates with nucleoside triphosphate sensing

We have previously shown that the activity of the Escherichia coli rRNA promoter rrnB P1 in vitro depends on the concentration of the initiating nucleotide, ATP, and can respond to changes in ATP pools in vivo. We have proposed that this nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) sensing might contribute to regulation of rRNA transcription. To test this model, we have measured the ATP requirements for transcription from 11 different rrnB P1 core promoter mutants in vitro and compared them with the regulatory responses of the same promoters in vivo. The seven rrnB P1 variants that required much lower ATP concentrations than the wild-type promoter for efficient transcription in vitro were defective for response to growth rate changes in vivo (growth rate-dependent regulation). In contrast, the four variants requiring high ATP concentrations in vitro (like the wild-type promoter) were regulated with the growth rate in vivo. We also observed a correlation between NTP sensing in vitro and the response of the promoters in vivo to deletion of the fis gene (an example of homeostatic control), although this relationship was not as tight as for growth rate-dependent regulation. We conclude that the kinetic features responsible for the high ATP concentration dependence of the rrnB P1 promoter in vitro are responsible, at least in part, for the promoter's regulation in vivo, consistent with the model in which rrnB P1 promoter activity can be regulated by changes in NTP pools in vivo (or by hypothetical factors that work at the same kinetic steps that make the promoter sensitive to NTPs).

Role and mechanism of action of C. PvuII, a regulatory protein conserved among restriction-modification systems

The PvuII restriction-modification system is a type II system, which means that its restriction endonuclease and modification methyltransferase are independently active proteins. The PvuII system is carried on a plasmid, and its movement into a new host cell is expected to be followed initially by expression of the methyltransferase gene alone so that the new host's DNA is protected before endonuclease activity appears. Previous studies have identified a regulatory gene (pvuIIC) between the divergently oriented genes for the restriction endonuclease (pvuIIR) and modification methyltransferase (pvuIIM), with pvuIIC in the same orientation as and partially overlapping pvuIIR. The product of pvuIIC, C. PvuII, was found to act in trans and to be required for expression of pvuIIR. In this study we demonstrate that premature expression of pvuIIC prevents establishment of the PvuII genes, consistent with the model that requiring C. PvuII for pvuIIR expression provides a timing delay essential for protection of the new host's DNA. We find that the opposing pvuIIC and pvuIIM transcripts overlap by over 60 nucleotides at their 5' ends, raising the possibility that their hybridization might play a regulatory role. We furthermore characterize the action of C. PvuII, demonstrating that it is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that binds to the pvuIIC promoter and stimulates transcription of both pvuIIC and pvuIIR into a polycistronic mRNA. The apparent location of C. PvuII binding, overlapping the -10 promoter hexamer and the pvuIICR transcriptional starting points, is highly unusual for transcriptional activators.

5S rRNA gene deletions cause an unexpectedly high fitness loss in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, ribosomal RNAs (16S, 23S and 5S) are co-transcribed in a highly regulated manner from seven genomically dispersed operons. Previous studies on the cellular effects of altered levels of two of these rRNAs (16S and 23S) have been useful in better understanding the regulation of rRNA expression. Furthering these studies, we have investigated the effect of 5S rRNA deficiencies on cell fitness through the sequential deletion of 5S rRNA genes. Our findings indicate that the loss of 5S rDNA from multiple genes decreases cell fitness more rapidly than loss of a similar number of 16S and 23S rRNA genes. These results suggest that the cell's innate ability to up-regulate rRNA operons does not compensate for 5S rRNA deficiencies, as was previously shown for 16S and 23S rRNAs. A plasmid-borne 5S rRNA gene is able to compensate for the deleted 5S rRNA genes.

Effects of the Escherichia coli DNA-binding protein H-NS on rRNA synthesis in vivo

The Escherichia coli DNA-binding protein H-NS is known to interact specifically with the upstream region of ribosomal RNA transcription units, where it causes transcriptional repression in vitro. Here, we present results demonstrating the effect of H-NS on rRNA transcription in vivo. rRNA synthesis rates were compared in cells that differ in the expression of functional H-NS or FIS molecules. We could show that in the absence of H-NS derepression of rRNA synthesis occurs at low growth rates. During the cell cycle H-NS is responsible for the rapid shut-off of rRNA synthesis at the end of the exponential phase. As it is known for FIS-dependent activation, the inhibitory function of H-NS is specific for P1, the first of the tandem rRNA promoters. The effect of H-NS on rRNA synthesis was further assessed under stress conditions. While under osmotic upshift the reduction in rRNA synthesis is clearly H-NS-dependent, no such influence could be detected at cold shock. Determination of the cellular ppGpp concentrations revealed that H-NS does not mediate its function via alterations in the synthesis of the global effector ppGpp.

Guanosine 3',5'-bis(diphosphate) (ppGpp)-dependent inhibition of transcription from stringently controlled Escherichia coli promoters can be explained by an altered initiation pathway that traps RNA polymerase

An in vitro analysis was performed to investigate the inhibitory mechanism of the global regulatory substances guanosine 3',5'-bis(diphosphate) (ppGpp) and guanosine 3'-diphosphate 5'-triphosphate (pppGpp) during initiation of transcription. Three promoters with well known differential ppGpp sensitivities in vivo were studied: the Escherichia coli rrnB P2 promoter that is only weakly ppGpp dependent; a P2 base change variant (P2F) that confers both stringent and growth rate regulation; and the completely unregulated PtacI promoter. The in vivo ppGpp dependency for all three promoters was verified in vitro in multiple round transcription reactions, reflecting a combination of the effects at initiation, promoter clearance, and elongation. In the main part of our study, we concentrated on the contribution of initiation complex formation to the overall inhibition of transcription. Kinetic measurements of complex association and dissociation revealed that at sensitive promoters (p)ppGpp triggered an alternative initiation pathway by RNA polymerase. This involved the stabilization of the initial closed complexes, and impeded open complex formation. Subsequently formed ternary complexes were structurally altered. Based on the above findings, we propose a model which suggests that ppGpp-altered RNA polymerases are preferentially bound and enter the alternative pathway. Thus, discrimination is obtained at early steps of initiation, which causes efficient inhibition at later steps of the transcription cycle probably involving promoter clearance and elongation.

Transcriptional pausing of RNA polymerase in the presence of guanosine tetraphosphate depends on the promoter and gene sequence

We have studied the response of the effector molecule guanosine 3',5'-bisdiphosphate (ppGpp) on RNA polymerase pausing during in vitro transcription elongation. Pausing was followed during single round extension of stalled ternary complexes excluding possible ppGpp effects on initiation. The ppGpp dependences of early pausing sites within different transcription systems controlled by promoters with known response to enhanced ppGpp levels in vivo were quantitatively characterized. Transcription of stable RNAs and mRNA genes were analyzed. In addition, the in vitro pausing behavior of two promoter variants directing the same sequence but differing in their in vivo ppGpp sensitivity were compared. In the presence of ppGpp we noted a slight general enhancement of specific pauses in all transcription systems. However, genes known to be under stringent or growth rate control in vivo revealed a notably stronger pausing enhancement. The sites of pausing are not changed by the presence of ppGpp but appear to be sequence-specific. The effect of ppGpp on the extent of pausing depends on the particular promoter and closely adjacent sequences that the RNA polymerase has passed during initiation. Pausing enhancement requires the presence of ppGpp during elongation but not during initiation. The results underline the importance of pausing for transcription regulation and offer a plausible explanation for inhibition of stable RNA expression under conditions of elevated concentrations of ppGpp.