Detection of biochemical mutants in mice

Comparison of types of chemically induced genetic changes in mammals

The present paper reviews the currently available in vivo systems for detection of chemically induced mutations and chromosome aberrations and summarizes the data of the relevant tests for mammalian germ-cell mutations (specific-locus test and heritable translocation test). The value of in vivo screening tests (somatic mutations and sperm abnormalities) for predicting specific-locus mutations is illustrated by comparing doubling doses. The results from the mammalian germ-cell mutation tests (specific-locus test and heritable translocation test) constitute the base-line for an assessment of predictability. Radiation and chemically induced specific-locus mutations differ in a number of respects, suggesting a need for caution in making risk estimates for chemical mutagen exposures in terms of radiation-equivalent doses. In vivo nondisjunction tests are discussed. Finally, unsolved problems and difficulties in generalizing qualitative and quantitative correlations between test systems are outlined. It is concluded that even qualitative predictions from data on somatic cells to germ cells are at best insecure because germ-cell specificity cannot be foretold, not to mention the fact that quantitative extrapolations from the results of in vivo screening tests, in general, are fraught with even more uncertainties. There is an acute need for collection of more data from studies involving germ cells.

The heritable translocation assay: its relationship to assessment of genetic risk for future generations

The Heritable Translocation Assay (HTA) is an in vivo mammalian mutation test which measures specific clastogenic damage. It can be subjected to rigorous statistical scrutiny and detects a type of heritable genetic damage that is known to contribute to the human disease burden. Because of these factors the HTA is one of the major tests of the battery used in regulatory evaluation of potential environmental mutagens. Although tests for detecting inherited translocations have been developed and improved over the past 40 years, further emphasis on several statistical considerations affecting the precision and reliability of HTA animal model data applied to regulatory hazard evaluation and risk assessment seems warranted. In this paper we have presented a brief history and the basic methodology for the HTA. Statistical concepts related to the design and implementation of HTA studies, such as the incorporation of false classification error probabilities in determination of required sample size and use of the single sample binomial versus Fisher's exact test for analysis of data, hory and the basic methodology for the HTA. Statistical concepts related to the design and implementation of HTA studies, such as the incorporation of false classification error probabilities in determination of required sample size and use of the single sample binomial versus Fisher's exact test for analysis of data, hory and the basic methodology for the HTA. Statistical concepts related to the design and implementation of HTA studies, such as the incorporation of false classification error probabilities in determination of required sample size and use of the single sample binomial versus Fisher's exact test for analysis of data, have been examined in detail. We have also suggested a simplified method of extrapolating HTA animal data to man similar to that used with carcinogenesis data and propose other developmental needs and perspectives for application of this assay to regulatory assessment of environmental mutagens.

Whole-mammal mutagenicity tests: evaluation of five methods

Transmitted genetic changes in mammals can be used to study all of the main endpoints of mutagenesis: point mutations, chromosome breakage, with or without rearrangement, and chromosome nondisjunction. Four methods most commonly employed in whole-mammal germ-line mutagenicity tests as well as an in vivo somatic prescreen, are summarized. Genetic basis, historical background, description of the test, limitations, and strengths are presented for each of the five systems. The specific-locus test using visible markers is the most reliable and practical method for detecting heritable point mutations, including small deficiencies, and does not require very large numbers of animals for risk extrapolations, if a relatively high dose can be administered without killing germ cells. For the detection of chromosome-breakage events, dominant lethals are useful to determine relative sensitivities of different germ-cell stages of the male, but the heritable-translocation test is more sensitive when the exposed cells are male meiotic and postmeiotic stages. Chromosome breakage events in the female are best revealed through a sex-chromosome loss test, which utilizes genetically marked X chromosomes. The same method can also be employed to detect nondisjunction in either sex. The in vivo somatic mutation test is useful as a prescreen for both point mutations and losses of chromosomal material. The reliability and efficiency of whole-mammal mutagenicity tests must be considered in two contexts: in the assessment of mutagenicity per se (as this applies to genetic changes transmitted to future generations), and in the use of mutagenicity as a possible indicator of carcinogenicity. In the former context, the whole-mammal tests are irreplaceable because they provide the closest practicable approach to the metabolic pathways existing in man, and because there is no array of lower-system tests that can predict the complexity of the response of the different mammalian germ-cell stages (which differ greatly with respect both to their absolute and their relative sensitivities to the induction of various genetic endpoints). In the second context, i.e., the use of mutagenicity as a screen for carcinogenicity in the exposed individual, most of the whole-mammal tests are of more limited utility, because they require several weeks or months for completion. Of the methods discussed, the spot test appears most suitable, because it provides a relatively rapid in vivo system capable of detecting both gene mutations and chromosomal changes of various kinds in somatic cells, including some that have been suggested to be involved in tumor promotion.

Mutagenicity testing and risk estimation with mammals

Mammalian test systems are currently used for mutagenicity screening. The necessity and the limitations of standardizing these methods are discussed for dominant-lethal assay. In addition to the refinement of standard methods, the development of new systems in mammals is emphasized. One promising approach is the detection of presumed somatic mutations. Another new development takes advantage of electrophoretic methods for detecting induced structural alterations of gene products. Mammalian experiments will be essential for the assessment of risks from chemical mutagens. The development of standards for the controlled use of chemical mutagens should be guided by the experience accumulated in radiation genetics. Two methods, the measurement of specific-locus mutation rates in mice and the direct determination of the phenotypic damage of dominant genes affecting the skeleton of mice, are recommended for the assessment of the hazard of chemical mutagens.