Total and regional bone mineral content and fracture rate in postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with salmon calcitonin: a prospective study

Insights and implications of sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis

Osteoporosis, a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, has led to a high risk of fatal osteoporotic fractures worldwide. Accumulating evidence has revealed that sexual dimorphism is a notable feature of osteoporosis, with sex-specific differences in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Specifically, females are more susceptible than males to osteoporosis, while males are more prone to disability or death from the disease. To date, sex chromosome abnormalities and steroid hormones have been proven to contribute greatly to sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis by regulating the functions of bone cells. Understanding the sex-specific differences in osteoporosis and its related complications is essential for improving treatment strategies tailored to women and men. This literature review focuses on the mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis, mainly in a population of aging patients, chronic glucocorticoid administration, and diabetes. Moreover, we highlight the implications of sexual dimorphism for developing therapeutics and preventive strategies and screening approaches tailored to women and men. Additionally, the challenges in translating bench research to bedside treatments and future directions to overcome these obstacles will be discussed.

Bone loss induced by cancer treatments in breast and prostate cancer patients

Cancer and cancer therapies are a major factor risk for osteoporosis due to bone loss and deterioration of bone microarchitecture. Both factors contribute to a decrease in bone strength and, consequently, increased bone fragility and risk of fracture. Cancer-associated bone loss is a multifactorial process, and optimal interdisciplinary management of skeletal health, accurate assessment of bone density, and early diagnosis are essential when making decisions aimed at reducing bone loss and fracture risk in patients who have received or are receiving treatment for cancer. In this document, a multidisciplinary group of experts collected the latest evidence on the pathophysiology of osteoporosis and its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment with the support of the Spanish scientific society SEOM. The aim was to provide an up-to-date and in-depth view of osteoporotic risk and its consequences, and to present a series of recommendations aimed at optimizing the management of bone health in the context of cancer.

The Effects of Osteoporotic and Non-osteoporotic Medications on Fracture Risk and Bone Mineral Density

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent bone disease affecting more than 37.5 million individuals in the European Union (EU) and the  United States of America (USA). It is characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD), impaired bone quality, and loss of structural and biomechanical properties, resulting in reduced bone strength. An increase in morbidity and mortality is seen in patients with osteoporosis, caused by the approximately 3.5 million new osteoporotic fractures occurring every year in the EU. Currently, different medications are available for the treatment of osteoporosis, including anti-resorptive and osteoanabolic medications. Bisphosphonates, which belong to the anti-resorptive medications, are the standard treatment for osteoporosis based on their positive effects on bone, long-term experience, and low costs. However, not only medications used for the treatment of osteoporosis can affect bone: several other medications are suggested to have an effect on bone as well, especially on fracture risk and BMD. Knowledge about the positive and negative effects of different medications on both fracture risk and BMD is important, as it can contribute to an improvement in osteoporosis prevention and treatment in general, and, even more importantly, to the individual's health. In this review, we therefore discuss the effects of both osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic medications on fracture risk and BMD. In addition, we discuss the underlying mechanisms of action.

Molecular-Based Treatment Strategies for Osteoporosis: A Literature Review

Osteoporosis is an unavoidable public health problem in an aging or aged society. Anti-resorptive agents (calcitonin, estrogen, and selective estrogen-receptor modulators, bisphosphonates, anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand antibody along with calcium and vitamin D supplementations) and anabolic agents (parathyroid hormone and related peptide analogs, sclerostin inhibitors) have major roles in current treatment regimens and are used alone or in combination based on the pathological condition. Recent advancements in the molecular understanding of bone metabolism and in bioengineering will open the door to future treatment paradigms for osteoporosis, including antibody agents, stem cells, and gene therapies. This review provides an overview of the molecular mechanisms, clinical evidence, and potential adverse effects of drugs that are currently used or under development for the treatment of osteoporosis to aid clinicians in deciding how to select the best treatment option.

The treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis : a review of current and emerging therapeutic options

Several chemical entities have shown their ability to reduce axial and/or appendicular fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Since patients who have experienced a previous fracture are at high risk for subsequent vertebral or hip fracture, it is of prime importance to treat such patients with medications that have unequivocally demonstrated their ability to reduce fracture rates in patients with prevalent fractures. Results obtained with calcium and vitamin D, in this particular population, are not fully satisfactory and these medications are probably better used in conjunction with other therapeutic regimens. Bisphosphonates have shown their ability to reduce vertebral (alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate) and non-vertebral (alendronate, risedronate) fractures in patients with established osteoporosis. Raloxifene has also shown similar properties, notwithstanding its effect on non-vertebral fractures, which has only been derived from a post hoc analysis limited to patients with prevalent severe vertebral fractures at baseline. This compound also has interesting non-skeletal benefits, including effects on the breast and heart. Teriparatide, a bone-forming agent, promptly reduces the rate of vertebral and all non-vertebral fractures, without significant adverse effects. Strontium ranelate, the first agent shown to concomitantly decrease bone resorption and stimulate bone formation, has also shown its ability to reduce rates of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in patients with established osteoporosis. It significantly reduces hip fractures in elderly individuals at high risk for such events. Its safety profile is also excellent.

[Austrian guidance for the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women--update 2009]

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by diminished bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, leading to increased fragility and subsequent increased fracture risk. Therapeutic measures therefore aim at reducing individual fracture risk. In Austria, the following drugs, all of which have been proven to reduce fracture risk, are currently registered for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: alendronate, risedronate, etidronate, ibandronate, raloxifene, teriparatide (1-34 PTH), 1-84 PTH, strontium ranelate and salmon calcitonin. Fluorides are still available, but their role in daily practice has become negligible. Currently, there is no evidence that a combination of two or more of these drugs could improve anti-fracture potency. However, treatment with PTH should be followed by the treatment with an anticatabolic drug such as bisphosphonates. Calcium and vitamin D constitute an important adjunct to any osteoporosis treatment.

Pulmonary Absorption Enhancement of Salmon Calcitonin

The aim of this work was to develop formulations of calcitonin for pulmonary delivery to enhance the absorption and study the comparative pharmacodynamic behavior of developed formulations in rats. Formulations with different pH, absorption promoters of different classes and combination thereof at three concentration levels were prepared and instilled intratracheally in anesthetized rats. The absorption of calcitonin was measured by its hypocalcemic effect in blood collected at specific time points. The formulations having least concentration of absorption promoter with significant blood calcium reduction were selected out from three concentration levels of absorption promoters used. The relative pulmonary bioactivity of calcitonin in acetate buffer pH 6.0 and pH 3.9 was 21.0+/-1.5% and 53.9+/-2.8%, respectively, compared to subcutaneously administered calcitonin in equivalent dose. When sodium tauroglycocholate, dimethyl beta-cyclodextrin, chymostatin, and bacitracin were co-administered in acetate buffer pH 3.9 solution, the relative bioactivity of 139.1+/-7.3% was obtained. Only 72.0+/-2.7%, 79.2+/-3.9%, 83.0+/-2.1% and 87.0+/-3.9% were obtained, respectively, upon incorporation of these absorption promoters individually. It was concluded that absorption promoters in combination significantly increase the pulmonary bioactivity of calcitonin. These studies proves that calcitonin administered through the pulmonary route can yield higher systemic absorption for enhanced bioactivity.

Calcitonin: a drug of the past or for the future? Physiologic inhibition of bone resorption while sustaining osteoclast numbers improves bone quality

Postmenopausal osteoporosis results from a continuous imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation, favoring bone resorption. An increasing number of treatments for osteoporosis are in development and on the market. A range of differences and similarities are found between these treatment options, and these need to be carefully evaluated before the initiation of treatment. This article summarizes data from in vitro and animal studies, as well as clinical trials, on the effect of calcitonin on bone turnover. Calcitonin was found to exert its antiresorptive effects via directly reducing osteoclastic resorption, and thus leads to an increase in bone mineral density and bone strength. Furthermore, calcitonin appears to mainly target the most active osteoclasts, and in contrast to most other antiresorptive agents it does not reduce the number of osteoclasts. Finally, in humans, while attenuating resorption, calcitonin treatment does not interfere markedly with bone formation, in contrast to other currently available antiresorptive agents. Thus, we speculate that calcitonin treatment will lead to a continuously positive bone balance in contrast with other antiresorptive agents currently on the market and thereby, in a physiologic manner, result in improved bone quality. Calcitonin is currently only available in injectable and nasal formulations. An oral formulation may, however, improve patient acceptance and compliance. Currently, several different routes are being pursued to identify an optimal oral formulation, of which the technology based on 5-CNAC is the most advanced. There are promising clinical data available for this formulation from both osteoarthritis and osteoporosis clinical trials, although the antifracture efficacy is not yet known.

Salmon calcitonin reduces food intake through changes in meal sizes in male rhesus monkeys

Amylinergic mechanisms are believed to be involved in the control of appetite. This study examined the effects of the amylin agonist, salmon calcitonin, on food intake and meal patterns in adult male rhesus monkeys. Fifteen minutes before the onset of their 6-h daily feeding period, monkeys received intramuscular injections of various doses of salmon calcitonin (0.032, 0.056, 0.1, 0.32, and 1 microg/kg) or saline. Salmon calcitonin dose dependently reduced total daily and hourly food intake, with significant decreases at the 0.1, 0.32, and 1 microg/kg doses. Daily food intake was reduced by approximately 35%, 62%, and 96%, at these doses, respectively. An analysis of meal patterns revealed that size of the first meal was significantly reduced across the dose range of 0.056 to 1 microg/kg, while average meal size was reduced with the 0.32 and 1 microg/kg doses. Meal number was only affected at the 1 microg/kg dose. Repeated 5-day administration of the 0.1 microg/kg dose resulted in a reduction in daily food intake only on injection day 2, while significant reductions in food intake were observed on all five injection days with a 0.32 microg/kg dose. Daily food intake was also reduced for 1 day after the termination of the 5-day injections of the 0.32 microg/kg salmon calcitonin dose. These sustained reductions in intake were expressed through decreases in meal size. These data demonstrate that salmon calcitonin acutely and consistently decreases food intake mainly through reductions in meal sizes in nonhuman primates.

The diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in men on androgen deprivation therapy for advanced carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for advanced prostate cancer increases the risk of osteoporosis. Thus, the practicing urologist should be aware of the appropriate assessment and management. In this article we review the tests designed to diagnose osteoporosis as well as treatment options. We also review methods to monitor the response to therapy and make recommendations for management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a MEDLINE (1966 to 2004) search for the terms male, osteoporosis, bone mineral density, prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy, bisphosphonates, estrogen and the combinations thereof. We then constructed a management algorithm based on the best evidence available.

RESULTS

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of the hip is the gold standard test for osteoporosis. Biochemical markers of bone turnover are not suitable for diagnosis but they have been shown to be useful for monitoring the response to treatment. Smoking cessation, weight bearing exercise, and vitamin D and calcium have been shown to help improve bone mineral density (BMD). Bisphosphonates have been demonstrated to increase BMD and decrease fracture risk in men with osteoporosis. Estrogens have also recently been shown to decrease bone turnover and increase BMD in men on ADT.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip dual energy x-ray absorptiometry should be performed in all men who are anticipated to be on long-term ADT. In addition, all men on ADT should receive vitamin D and calcium supplementation, and perform regular weight bearing exercise. The value of smoking cessation cannot be overstated. In men who have osteopenia or osteoporosis bisphosphonate therapy should be initiated. Estrogen therapy has shown promise but specific recommendations cannot be made at this time.

Calcitonin therapy in osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is the most prevalent metabolic bone disease and is characterized by diminished bone strength predisposing to an increased risk of fracture. Its incidence is particularly high in postmenopausal women but it can also affect other groups, such as men and patients receiving corticosteroid therapy. Calcitonin is a naturally occurring peptide which acts via specific receptors to strongly inhibit osteoclast function. It has been used in the treatment of osteoporosis for many years. Historically, calcitonin was administered as a parenteral injection, but the intranasal formulation is now the most widely used because of its improved tolerability. New approaches are currently being investigated to enhance the bioavailability and effects of calcitonin, including oral, pulmonary, and transdermal routes of administration, and novel allosteric activators of the calcitonin receptor. Several controlled trials have reported that calcitonin stabilizes and in some cases produces a short-term increase in bone density at the lumbar spine level. The most relevant clinical trial to evaluate the effect of calcitonin in the prevention of fractures was the Prevent Recurrence of Osteoporotic Fractures (PROOF) study, a 5-year double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial showing that salmon calcitonin nasal spray at a dosage of 200 IU/day can reduce the risk of vertebral osteoporotic fractures by 33% (relative risk [RR] = 0.67; 95% CI 0.47, 0.97; p = 0.03). However, the 100 and 400 IU/day dosages did not significantly reduce vertebral fracture risk. Effects on nonvertebral fractures were not significant (RR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.59, 1.09; p = 0.16). There is mounting evidence to show that calcitonin diminishes bone pain in osteoporotic vertebral fractures, which may have clinical utility in vertebral crush fracture syndrome. A recent study suggests that nasal salmon calcitonin appears to be a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of men with idiopathic osteoporosis, although long-term trials are necessary to confirm these results and evaluate fracture rate as an endpoint in men. The role of calcitonin in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis remains controversial, hence it can only be considered a second-line agent for the treatment of patients with low bone mineral density who are receiving long-term corticosteroid therapy.

Comparing therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis prevention and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature concerning the efficacy of calcium, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and calcitonin in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were identified through searches of the MEDLINE (1966-July 2002), EMBASE (1980-July 2002), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-July 2002) databases using the key words osteoporosis, postmenopausal, fracture, calcium, vitamin D, hormone replacement therapy, bisphosphonates, alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, and calcitonin. Additional references were located through review of the bibliographies of the articles cited. Searches were not limited by time restriction, language, or human subject.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Experimental and observational studies of the use of calcium and antiresorptive therapies for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis were selected. Articles evaluating bone mineral density (BMD) or fracture efficacy were included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

HRT, bisphosphonates, raloxifene, and calcitonin have demonstrated stabilization of and improvement in BMD. Randomized clinical trials have shown fracture risk reduction with bisphosphonates, raloxifene, HRT, calcium, and calcitonin. The largest risk reductions have been reported with use of bisphosphonates in several trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Several therapeutic options with well-documented improvements in BMD and reductions in fracture risk are available to women for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Calcitonin

Calcitonin is FDA approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis but not for prevention. The preferred delivery system is nasal. Nasal calcitonin is safe and well tolerated. The vertebral fracture efficacy of calcitonin is less robust than the two approved bisphosphonates (alendronate and risedronate) but is similar to raloxifene in the treatment of established osteoporosis. Calcitonin has not been demonstrated to reduce hip fracture risk, although a post-hoc pooled analysis suggests potential effectiveness of nasal calcitonin. Calcitonin produces small increments in bone mass of the spine and modestly reduces bone turnover in women with osteoporosis. Calcitonin may have analgesic benefit in patients with acute painful vertebral fractures. Treatment with calcitonin should be considered for older women with osteoporosis with painful vertebral fractures and for women who fail to respond to or cannot tolerate bisphosphonates. Calcitonin may also be indicated for women who are unable to take bisphosphonates because of impaired renal function.

Bioavailability and biological efficacy of a new oral formulation of salmon calcitonin in healthy volunteers

Salmon calcitonin (SCT) is a well-tolerated peptide drug with a wide therapeutic margin and is administered parenterally for long-term treatments of bone diseases. Its clinical usefulness would be enhanced by the development of an orally active formulation. In this randomized crossover double-blinded phase I trial, controlled by both a placebo and a parenteral verum, we have tested a new oral formulation of SCT associated with a caprylic acid derivative as carrier. Eight healthy volunteers received single doses of 400, 800, and 1200 microg of SCT orally, a placebo, and a 10-microg (50 IU) SCT intravenous infusion. SCT was reliably absorbed from the oral formulation, with an absolute bioavailability of 0.5-1.4%, depending on the dose. It induced a marked, dose-dependent drop in blood and urine C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), a sensitive and specific bone resorption marker, with the effects of 1200 microg exceeding those of 10 microg intravenously. It also decreased blood calcium and phosphate, and increased the circulating levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and, transiently, the urinary excretion of calcium. It was well-tolerated, with some subjects presenting mild and transient nausea, abdominal cramps, diarrheic stools, and headaches. This study shows that oral delivery of SCT is feasible with reproducible absorption and systemic biological efficacy. Such an oral formulation could facilitate the use of SCT in the treatment of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.

Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. VI. Meta-analysis of calcitonin for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

To review the effect of calcitonin on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women.

DATA SOURCE

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 to 2000 and examined citations of relevant articles and the proceedings of international osteoporosis meetings. We contacted osteoporosis investigators to identify additional studies and primary authors for unpublished data.

STUDY SELECTION

We included 30 studies that randomized women to calcitonin or an alternative (placebo or calcium and/or vitamin D) and measured bone density or fracture incidence for at least 1 yr.

DATA EXTRACTION

For each trial, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and abstracted data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Calcitonin reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures, with a pooled relative risk (RR) of 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.87, P = 0.02, n = 1404, 4 trials]. However, the RR from the one relatively large randomized controlled trial (RCT) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.62-1.00, P = 0.05, n = 1108). For nonvertebral fractures, the pooled RR was 0.52 (95% CI 0.22-1.23, P = 0.14, n = 1481, 3 trials). Once again, the single large trial showed a less impressive effect than the smaller trials (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.09, P = 0.16, n = 1245). For bone density of the lumbar spine, the pooled weekly dose of 250 to 2800 IU per week resulted in significant increase in the weighted mean difference (WMD) of 3.74 (2.04-5.43, P < 0.01, n = 2260, 24 trials). The combined forearm showed a similar effect, with a WMD of 3.02 (95% CI 0.98-5.07, P < 0.01, n = 468, 9 trials). At the femoral neck, the pooled weighted mean difference showed a nonsignificant trend toward benefit, WMD 3.80 (95% CI -0.32-7.91, P = 0.07, 9 trials, n = 513). Methodologically weaker studies tended to show greater effects on bone density, and the lumbar spine results suggested the possibility of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcitonin likely increases bone density in postmenopausal women predominantly at the lumbar spine and forearm for weekly doses of greater than 250 IU, although the true effect may be smaller than the pooled estimate would suggest. Calcitonin likely reduces the risk of vertebral fracture; its effect on nonvertebral fracture remains uncertain.

Nonoperative treatment of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur

Of 2776 intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur, 18% of the patients were treated nonoperatively. Included in the group of patients who were treated conservatively were children, patients with cardiac problems or mental problems, stroke, renal failure, multiple disseminated malignancies, and patients who chose nonoperative treatment. The medical treatment protocol can be divided into two stages: Initially, (1) nursing of a bedridden patient with emphasis on the prevention of complications; and (2) once partial bone union has occurred, the attempted rehabilitation to independent ambulation. Paramedical services provide a major contribution during inpatient therapy and during the preparation for returning the patient to the community. A multidisciplinary medical team evaluates and assesses the patient's needs and rehabilitation potential and in cooperation with the patient and the family, an operative plan then is established.

Selecting Appropriate Pharmacotherapy for Patients with Osteoporosis: Holistic Risk—Benefit Analysis

In the US, the major pharmacotherapeutic approaches for the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis in women are estrogen-based hormone replacement therapy, selective estrogen receptor modulators, salmon calcitonin, bisphosphonates, calcium, and vitamin D. All of these treatments are beneficial in increasing bone mineral density and reducing fractures in patients with osteoporosis. However, each of the therapies possesses a unique mechanism of action and other potential benefits and side effects. Estrogen replacement therapy may lower the risk of cardiovascular disease, but it increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and may increase the risk of breast cancer. Unopposed estrogen therapy is associated with increased risk for endometrial cancer, but the addition of progestins virtually eliminates this adverse event. The selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene is associated with positive cardiovascular effects and demonstrates a protective effect against some types of breast cancer. Like estrogen, raloxifene increases the risk of VTE. Salmon calcitonin has a strong analgesic effect and is not associated with any serious long-term adverse events, but some individuals may not be able to tolerate the nasal formulation. Bisphosphonates are associated with serious upper GI effects. The concomitant administration of calcium and vitamin D in all patients being treated for osteoporosis is generally recommended.

Selecting optimal treatment relies on an individualized risk–benefit analysis that takes into account the patient's medical history, concomitant diseases, current medications, general physical and mental well being, and personal feelings about the various therapies. Careful consideration of the various treatment options may lead to improved compliance and more effective management of osteoporosis.

Calcitonin for the long-term prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Calcitonin is a powerful inhibitor of osteoclast activity that exerts a rapid, transient, and reversible inhibition of bone resorption. Prolonged administration of parenteral calcitonin, by injections of 100 IU every 1 or 2 days, can prevent postmenopausal or postovariectomy bone loss, and is also able to increase trabecular bone mass among patients presenting an established osteoporosis. Prolonged treatment with calcitonin injections is, however, difficult to maintain over the long run. In addition to the ease of administration compared with the injectable forms, nasal calcitonin is much better tolerated, the side effects being rare and generally negligible. A prolonged administration of 200 IU intranasal calcitonin acutely inhibits parameters of bone resorption and can increase lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) by 1.7%-3.3% after 1 year. Lower doses also appear to be efficient to prevent early postmenopausal bone loss, but the data are conflictual. The results are more consistent in patients who already suffer from established osteoporosis. The increase in lumbar spine BMD is in the order of 1%-2% after 1 year with 200 IU daily. A therapeutic benefit of calcitonin at the level of the cortical bone has been less well demonstrated than for the trabecular bone. As for other antiosteoporotic therapies, the effect of calcitonin on the reduction of fracture risk has been examined less than the beneficial effect on trabecular bone mass. Currently, there is still no prospective, placebo-controlled study with a sufficient number of patients that demonstrates that long-term parenteral calcitonin administration reduces the risk of osteoporotic fractures. The efficacy of nasal calcitonin treatment to reduce vertebral fracture rate has been best examined in the PROOF (Prevent Recurrence of Osteoporotic Fractures) study. This was a prospective 5-year, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of nasal calcitonin (100, 200, or 400 IU daily). The increase in lumbar spine BMD was modest but significant and not clearly dose dependent, as was the reduction in bone turnover. The relative risk of developing new vertebral fractures was reduced by 33% at the end of the study in the 200-IU dose group (relative risk = 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.97, p = 0.03). There was also a nonsignificant reduction in the risk of hip fracture in this dose group. The doses of 100 and 400 IU of calcitonin also reduced the vertebral fracture risk, but the difference did not reach the classical level of statistical significance. A possible effect of calcitonin to enhance bone quality, which cannot be assessed by routinely available methods, is currently being investigated in a prospective placebo-controlled trial that could provide a rational explanation for these effects of calcitonin on the reduction in the vertebral fracture rate without much increase in bone mass or a marked reduction in bone turnover.

How to prevent fractures in the individual with osteoporosis

The high rate of osteoporotic fracture in Western populations has resulted in a significant burden in terms of morbidity, mortality and health care costs. The use of DXA has made the diagnosis of osteoporosis easier and identified a subgroup of individuals who are at a higher risk of fracture. It is a useful tool in determining therapy in those at greatest risk of fracture. However, widespread use of such treatments is low and greater uptake remains an elusive goal. There are now many different treatments that reduce fracture rate, and can accompany lifestyle measures such as smoking cessation, diet and exercise. Dietary supplementation with calcium has been shown to reduce the risk of vertebral fracture, and the combination of calcium with vitamin D has been shown to reduce fracture at non-vertebral sites, including the hip. Although ERT, SERMs and tibolone all retard bone loss, prospective fracture prevention has only been shown for SERMs and then only at the spine. Bisphosphonates represent a class of potent anti-resorptive agents, which have been shown to reduce fracture rate at vertebral and non-vertebral sites. Other agents such as calcitonin, PTH and fluoride are of less certain benefit in preventing fracture.

Comparative safety of bone remodeling agents with a focus on osteoporosis therapies

This article reviews the different treatments currently available for osteoporosis and examines the benefits and adverse events that are associated with each. While emphasizing safety considerations, this review summarizes the following treatments for osteoporosis: calcium supplements, fluoride, hormone replacement therapy, raloxifene, bisphosphonates, salmon calcitonin, and calcitriol. Before prescribing any of these agents, the clinician should review the risk/benefit profile of each drug in the context of the individual patient's history, concomitant diseases, concurrent medications, and general physical condition.

Osteoporosis: evaluation and treatment

Osteoporosis is a common and costly disease. This article discusses the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis, including hormone replacement, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, raloxifene, and alternative therapies. As our population ages, osteoporosis will become an even more common disease.

Calcitonin

Calcitonin reduces the risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Calcitonin produces small increments in the bone mass of the spine and modestly reduces bone turnover in women with osteoporosis. No significant effect on nonvertebral fractures has been observed. Calcitonin may have analgesic benefit.

Osteoporosis therapies for rheumatoid arthritis patients: minimizing gastrointestinal side effects

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript identifies characteristics that put people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at high risk for osteoporosis or gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances. The manuscript then reviews therapies available for osteoporosis in the United States and makes recommendations about choosing therapies that minimize GI adverse effects in RA patients at high risk for such events.

DATA SOURCES

References identified through MEDLINE, abstracts, and prescribing information for individual drugs.

DATA EXTRACTION

Characteristics that predispose patients to osteoporosis and GI problems were identified. Data on individual osteoporosis therapies were assessed by risk-benefit analysis and appropriateness for use in patients at risk for GI disturbances.

DATA SYNTHESIS

High risk of osteoporosis in people with RA is caused by disease activity, medication effects, physical inactivity, and standard risk factors such as postmenopausal status and increased age. Patients with RA are frequently at high GI risk if they are receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids. Because of the high potential for erosive esophagitis and other upper GI disorders with alendronate, caution is warranted in prescribing alendronate to RA patients with high GI risk. In such patients, estrogen replacement therapy, selective estrogen receptor modulators, or calcitonin should be considered for treatment, and either estrogen replacement therapy or selective estrogen receptor modulators should be considered for osteoporosis prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of GI risk is important in patients with RA and osteoporosis. Risk factors should be considered when choosing osteoporosis therapies.

Preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A review of recent controlled trials of antiresorptive agents

The evidence from randomised, controlled trials of the ability of antiresorptive treatments to reduce the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis is reviewed and summarised. The aminobisphosphonates, alendronic acid and risedronic acid, and the selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene have all been shown to reduce the incidence of radiographic vertebral fractures. Only alendronic acid and risedronic acid have been shown to reduce the incidence of non-spine fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. There is evidence of antifracture efficacy for calcium plus vitamin D, primarily in a nursing home setting or in people with low intakes of these nutrients. Furthermore, since both the placebo and active treatment groups received calcium and vitamin D in most controlled trials of antiresorptive agents, it appears that the other agents provide benefits beyond those of calcium and vitamin D alone. There is insufficient published evidence from randomised controlled trials to convincingly support the antifracture efficacy of other agents, including calcitonin, estrogen and etidronic acid, at this time. Data from observational studies suggest, however, that estrogen and etidronic acid may have antifracture efficacy in this population.

A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. PROOF Study Group

PURPOSE

We conducted a 5-year, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to determine whether salmon calcitonin nasal spray reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 1,255 postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive salmon calcitonin nasal spray (100, 200, or 400 IU) or placebo daily. All participants received elemental calcium (1,000 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) daily. Vertebral fractures were assessed with lateral radiographs of the spine. The primary efficacy endpoint was the risk of new vertebral fractures in the salmon calcitonin nasal spray 200-IU group compared with the placebo group.

RESULTS

During 5 years, 1,108 participants had at least one follow-up radiograph. A total of 783 women completed 3 years of treatment, and 511 completed 5 years. The 200-IU dose of salmon calcitonin nasal spray significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures by 33% compared with placebo [200 IU: 51 of 287, placebo: 70 of 270, relative risk (RR) = 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47- to 0.97, P = 0.03]. In the 817 women with one to five prevalent vertebral fractures at enrollment, the risk was reduced by 36% (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43- to 0.96, P = 0.03). The reductions in vertebral fractures in the 100-IU (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.60- to 1.21) and the 400-IU (RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.59- to 1.18) groups were not significantly different from placebo. Lumbar spine bone mineral density increased significantly from baseline (1% to 1. 5%, P<0.01) in all active treatment groups. Bone turnover was inhibited, as shown by suppression of serum type-I collagen cross-linked telopeptide (C-telopeptide) by 12% in the 200-IU group (P <0.01) and by 14% in the 400-IU group (P<0.01) as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Salmon calcitonin nasal spray at a dose of 200 IU daily significantly reduces the risk of new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity?

BACKGROUND

Medical treatment of women with established osteoporosis may decrease the incidence of future fractures. Postmenopausal women who have sustained a distal radial fracture have decreased bone-mineral density and nearly twice the risk of a future hip fracture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women following an acute fracture of the distal part of the radius.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed with use of a claims database that includes more than three million patients, from thirty states, enrolled in multiple health plans. All women, fifty-five years of age or older, who sustained a distal radial fracture between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 1997, were identified in the database. Only patients with at least six months of continuous and complete medical and pharmaceutical health-care coverage from the date of the fracture were enrolled, to ensure that all health-care claims would be captured in the database. This cohort of patients was then evaluated to determine the proportion who had undergone either a diagnostic bone-density scan or treatment with any recommended medication for established osteoporosis (estrogen, a bisphosphonate, or calcitonin) within six months following the fracture.

RESULTS

A search of the database identified 1,162 women, fifty-five years of age or older, who had a distal radial fracture. Of these 1,162 patients, thirty-three (2.8 percent) underwent a bone-density scan and 266 (22.9 percent) were treated with at least one of the medications approved for treatment of established osteoporosis. Twenty women had both a bone-density scan and drug treatment. Therefore, only 279 (24.0 percent) of the 1,162 women who sustained a distal radial fracture underwent either diagnostic evaluation or treatment of osteoporosis. There was a significant decrease in the rate of treatment of osteoporosis with increasing patient age at the time of the fracture (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Current physician practice may be inadequate for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women who have sustained a distal radial fracture.

Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in the elderly

Due to age-associated bone losses, all elderly are prone to osteoporosis, which often leads to fractures. Fractures frequently result in dependency and institutionalization, as well as physical deformities that may lead to respiratory and cardiovascular problems. Currently, no drugs exist to promote new bone formation. Thus care of the elderly focuses primarily on lifestyle modification and increased dietary intake of calcium and vitamin D; decreased intake of caffeine, phosphates, and alcohol; smoking cessation; increased exercise; and drugs. Drugs for preventing osteoporosis include supplemental calcium and vitamin D, hormone replacement therapy, and alendronate. Drugs that enhance bone loss or increase the likelihood of falls should be eliminated, if possible, or the dosages adjusted. Making residences safer will also help to minimize the potential for falls. Drugs for treating osteoporosis include hormone replacement therapy, alendronate, and nasal calcitonin. The prevention and treatment plan is individualized for each patient, taking into account personal preferences, risk factors for osteoporosis and fracture, concomitant diseases and drug therapies, efficacy and tolerance of osteoporosis therapy, quality of life, life expectancy, finances, and health insurance coverage.

A review of clinical trials of therapies for osteoporosis using fracture as an end point

As the population ages, fragility fractures grow in importance as a public health problem. The principal goal of osteoporosis therapy is primary and secondary fracture prevention. A growing choice of therapies is now available for the treatment of osteoporosis. In this article, we review their efficacy using fracture prevention as an end point. The considerable heterogeneity among studies with regard to patient age, past fracture history, fracture site, and analytical methods precludes the possibility of performing a meaningful meta-analysis. Fracture outcomes have been reported in clinical trials with calcium supplementation, vitamin D supplementation, estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), calcitonin, etidronate, alendronate, sodium fluoride (NaF), parathyroid hormone (PTH), and raloxifene. Compelling evidence for fracture prevention has been provided for calcium and vitamin D supplementation and alendronate treatment. Evidence of fracture prevention exists for ERT, raloxifene, calcitonin, etidronate, and PTH. Data on NaF are inconsistent. Across agents, there is a trend toward greater efficacy for patients at greatest risk of fracture.

The role of calcitonin in the prevention of osteoporosis

This article discusses calcitonin as an alternative for patients with established osteoporosis who cannot, will not, or should not proceed with estrogen replacement therapy. Clinical trial data for calcitonin in both injectable and nasal spray formulations and for both lower-dose and higher-dose regimens are presented.

Health of older women

Older persons are the fastest growing segment of the American population, and older women significantly outnumber men. The health status of older women is influenced by disease and psychosocial factors. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is a tool which takes into account the many aspects of health and provides a framework for developing individualized goals of care. Cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, hormonal treatment, urinary incontinence, mental health, sexuality, substance abuse, cancer and exercise are discussed.

Nasal calcitonin

Nasal calcitonin is a newly approved treatment for established osteoporosis that increases lumbar spine bone mass, is safe, and well tolerated. Fracture efficacy data is not yet available, although preliminary results are promising. The dose for established osteoporosis is 200 IU. The dose for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis has not been established. Nasal calcitonin may be analgesic to bone and may be of benefit in glucocorticoid-induced vertebral osteoporosis. Nasal spray calcitonin may be of benefit to the symptomatic patient with acute vertebral fracture, the complex patient, or the patient with established osteoporosis who is intolerant of bisphosphonates or estrogen.

Calcitonin versus etidronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of published clinical trials

This review examines the evidence on the efficacy of calcitonin and etidronate in the prevention of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. MEDLINE was searched for clinical trials calcitonin or etidronate and reviews of the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The reference sections of the papers retrieved were again searched for trials on the treatments of interest. Two people independently collected data from the trials that met the inclusion criteria of the study. Weighted means in the change in bone mineral density (BMD) and differences in vertebral fracture rates were computed for calcitonin and etidronate separately. The existence of publication bias was investigated by funnel plots of effect size against sample size. Eighteen clinical trials and calcitonin and six with etidronate were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled change in vertebral BMD at the end of the studies was 1.97 (95% CI 1.77 to 2.17) with calcitonin and 3.20 (95% CI 2.92 to 3.48) with etidronate. Pooled change in proximal femur BMD was 0.32 (95% CI -0.27 to 0.91) with calcitonin and 2.42 (95% CI 2.16 to 2.68) with etidronate. The aggregated number of vertebral fractures prevented by the treatment was 59.2 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI 55.1 to 63.3) for calcitonin and 28.3 (95% CI 26.2 to 30.4) for etidronate. With the available evidence we cannot establish the superiority of either of the two drugs for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The clinical trials are particularly lacking in data on hip fracture, the most important consequence of osteoporosis. In this situation consideration of the relative costs of the drugs is prominent.

Calcitonin

Nasal calcitonin is a newly approved treatment for established osteoporosis. Nasal calcitonin is safe, preventative, and may increase bone mass in the lumbar spine. Fracture efficacy data are not yet available, although preliminary results are promising. The dose of nasal calcitonin for the treatment of established osteoporosis is 200 IU daily. The dose for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis has not yet been established. Nasal calcitonin may be analgesic to bone and of benefit in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis. Current pharmacologic options for prevention and treatment

For virtually all asymptomatic postmenopausal women, moderate exercise and supplementation with calcium and vitamin D are recommended. In addition, most postmenopausal women without contraindications would benefit from estrogen replacement therapy, primarily because of its cardiovascular benefits. In patients with contraindications or an aversion to hormone therapy, bone densitometry should be performed to determine risks before expensive nonhormonal treatment is initiated. Therapy with alendronate sodium (Fosamax) or calcitonin (Calcimar, Miacalcin) is clearly indicated in women with established osteoporosis and may be appropriate for early postmenopausal women with osteopenia. Calcitonin is a good option in patients with disabling spinal bone pain. Slow-release sodium fluoride, although still considered experimental, may eventually be given for vertebral fracture in patients with mild to moderate disease.

Salmon calcitonin nasal spray : An effective alternative to estrogen therapy in select postmenopausal women

The efficacy and safety of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis are reviewed with special consideration given to patients for whom ERT, the primary antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis, is not indicated, tolerable, or is refused. The various formulations of estrogen and salmon calcitonin, for which the nasal spray formulation was recently approved for use in the United States, are reviewed in depth with reference to dose ranges, side effects, and convenience. Data regarding increases in bone mineral density (BMD) produced by each agent are presented. Specifically, the range of increases in BMD induced by ERT and salmon calcitonin are comparable. Given the substantial public health consequences of postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures, the primary care physician is increasingly faced with the need to educated and recruit postmenopausal patients to appropriate therapy with the optimal agent for that particular patient. In the many patients who are unable or unwilling to accept, initiate, and comply with prescribed ERT, alternative therapeutic options are necessary Based on the established safety profile of salmon calcitonin, ease of administration, an uncomplicated dosing regimen, no reported drug interactions, and the lack of uterine bleeding associated with ERT or gastrointestinal adverse effects of other agents used to treat osteoporosis, salmon calcitonin nasal spray is an appropriate alternative approach for the treatment of postmenopausal bone loss.

Intranasal salcatonin (salmon calcitonin). A review of its pharmacological properties and role in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common problem among postmenopausal women and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and costs primarily resulting from osteoporotic fractures. Salcatonin (salmon calcitonin) inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption and is approximately 40 to 50 times more potent than human calcitonin. In most randomised trials in which intranasal salcatonin (usually 50 to 200 IU/day plus oral calcium supplements) was administered for 1 to 5 years to postmenopausal women for prevention of osteoporosis, bone mineral density or content of the lumbar spine increased by approximately 1 to 3% from baseline. In contrast, postmenopausal women receiving only oral calcium supplements typically had reductions in bone mineral density or content of about 3 to 6%. The difference between treatment groups was statistically significant in essentially all studies. Although changes in bone mineral density or content were broadly similar in studies of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis to those in postmenopausal women receiving therapy for prevention of the disease, studies in women with established osteoporosis did not usually demonstrate statistically significant differences between treatment groups. Also in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis, intranasal salcatonin reduced pain and/or analgesic consumption in some trials and, in a limited number of studies of relatively short duration (i.e. < or = 2 years), the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. A large multicentre 5-year study with adequate statistical power to confirm the effect of intranasal salcatonin on reducing osteoporotic fracture rates in postmenopausal women is currently under way. The intranasal formulation of salcatonin offers a more convenient and better tolerated alternative to the parenteral formulation of the drug which is administered by regular subcutaneous or intramuscular injections. Adverse events associated with the intranasal formulation are generally mild and transient, usually involving local reactions such as nasal discomfort, rhinorrhoea or rhinitis. Thus, for postmenopausal women unable or unwilling to tolerate long term hormone replacement therapy, intranasal salcatonin is an attractive alternative for the management of osteoporosis.

Ultrasound parameters in osteoporotic patients treated with salmon calcitonin: a longitudinal study

Speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of ultrasound (US) in bone have been proposed as alternatives to radiation-based methods for the quantitative assessment of osteoporosis. However, the usefulness of US in monitoring response to treatment in osteoporotic patients has yet to be defined. To compare US with bone mineral density (BMD), we studied 112 osteoporotic women (age range 50-64 years). Seventy-eight of them were treated with salmon calcitonin nasal spray (CT; 200 IU/day, 1 month on and 1 month off) and calcium (500 mg/day); 34 patients were given only calcium. One hundred and four women complied with treatment throughout the 2-year study period. At baseline and after 1 and 2 years we measured BMD at lumbar spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and SOS, BUA and Stiffness index, by an Achilles ultrasound unit. Moreover, biochemical markers of bone turnover (alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin and hydroxyproline) were also measured at baseline and after 6, 12 and 24 months. In the calcitonin-treated group at the end of the study period BMD had increased by 1.99%, SOS by 0.20%, BUA by 0.88% and Stiffness by 2.12%. By contrast in the calcium-treated group all parameters had decreased (BMD, -2.66%; SOS, -0.55%; BUA, -3.30%; Stiffness, -6.0%) by the end of the study period. The differences between groups were significant for BMD, SOS and Stiffness. At baseline a significant, but weak correlation was found between BMD and US parameters. The correlation coefficients between percentage changes at the end of the study period, in BMD and in SOS, BUA and Stiffness, were all significant (p < 0.001), being 0.41, 0.53 and 0.57 respectively. In conclusion, ultrasound measurements carried out in conjunction with BMD measurements will yield a more comprehensive assessment of skeletal status and may be helpful in monitoring the response to treatment in osteoporotic patients.