Current status and future possibilities of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in the management of portal hypertension

Technology improvements for image-guided and minimally invasive spine procedures

This paper reports on technology developments aimed at improving the state of the art for image-guided minimally invasive spine procedures. Back pain is a major health problem with serious economic consequences. Minimally invasive procedures to treat back pain are rapidly growing in popularity due to improvements in technique and the substantially reduced trauma to the patient versus open spinal surgery. Image guidance is an enabling technology for minimally invasive procedures, but technical problems remain that may limit the wider applicability of these techniques. The paper begins with a discussion of low back pain and the potential shortcomings of open back surgery. The advantages of minimally invasive procedures are enumerated, followed by a list of technical problems that must be overcome to enable the more widespread dissemination of these techniques. The technical problems include improved intraoperative imaging, fusion of images from multiple modalities, the visualization of oblique paths, percutaneous spine tracking, mechanical instrument guidance, and software architectures for technology integration. Technical developments to address some of these problems are discussed next. The discussion includes intraoperative computerized tomography (CT) imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/CT image registration, three-dimensional (3-D) visualization, optical localization, and robotics for percutaneous instrument placement. Finally, the paper concludes by presenting several representative clinical applications: biopsy, vertebroplasty, nerve and facet blocks, and shunt placement. The program presented here is a first step to developing the physician-assist systems of the future, which will incorporate visualization, tracking, and robotics to enable the precision placement and manipulation of instruments with minimal trauma to the patient.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for intractable colonic bleeding in a patient with cirrhosis

A patient with portal hypertension due to alcoholic liver disease developed colonic bleeding that responded to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) after the failure of other measures. This case illustrates that TIPS should be considered in the treatment of colonic, as well as upper gastrointestinal, bleeding associated with portal hypertension.

Differential effects on portal and effective hepatic blood flow. A comparison between transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt and small-diameter H-graft portacaval shunt

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to determine the effects of transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt (TIPS) and small-diameter prosthetic H-graft portacaval shunt (HGPCS) on portal and effective hepatic blood flow.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Mortality after TIPS is higher than after HGPCS for bleeding varices. This higher mortality is because of hepatic failure, possibly a result of excessive diminution of hepatic blood flow.

METHODS

Forty patients randomized prospectively to undergo TIPS or HGPCS had effective hepatic blood flow determined 1 day preshunt and 5 days postshunt using low-dose galactose clearance. Portal blood flow was determined using color-flow Doppler ultrasound.

RESULTS

Treatment groups were similar in age, gender, and Child's class. Each procedure significantly reduced portal pressures and portasystemic pressure gradients. Portal flow after TIPS increased (21 mL/second +/- 11.9 to 31 mL/second +/- 16.9, p < 0.05), whereas it remained unchanged after HGPCS (26 mL/second +/- 27.7 to 14 mL/second +/- 41.1, p = n.s.). Effective hepatic blood flow was diminished significantly after TIPS (1684 mL/minute +/- 2161 to 676 mL/minute +/- 451, p < 0.05) and was unaffected by HGPCS (1901 mL/ minute +/- 1818 to 1662 mL/minute +/- 1035, p = n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Both TIPS and HGPCS achieved significant reductions in portal vein pressure gradients. Portal flow increased after TIPS, although most portal flow was diverted through the shunt. Effective hepatic flow is reduced significantly after TIPS but well preserved after HGPCS. Hepatic decompensation and mortality after TIPS may be because, at least in part, of reductions in nutrient hepatic flow.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS) with balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents: technical and clinical aspects after 3 1/2 years' experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate prospectively our experience with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using four different metallic stents.

METHODS

Between November 1991 and April 1995, 57 patients (41 men and 16 women; age 35-72 years, mean 54 years) underwent the TIPS procedure. Techniques for portal vein localization before and during TIPS were fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT) studies, wedged hepatic venography, arterial portography, and ultrasound. After predilation we deployed balloon-expandable (n = 48) and self-expanding (n = 45) metallic stents. Fifteen patients underwent variceal embolization. Initial follow-up angiograms (mean 6.9 months, range 3-24 months) were obtained in 39 of these patients.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (93%) had successful TIPS placement. The mean decrease in portal pressure was 42.7%. Besides fluoroscopy, the most helpful techniques for portal vein localization were venography and CT. Residual stenosis (n = 1) and late shortening (n = 4) of Wallstents resulted in shunt dysfunction. The technical problems encountered with the Palmaz stent resulted from its lack of flexibility. We combined balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents in 12 patients. The 30-day and late follow-up (mean 11.9 months) percutaneous reintervention rates were 11.3% and 64.2%, respectively. There were no clinically significant complications related to the TIPS insertions.

CONCLUSION

An ideal stent does not exist for TIPS, and the authors recommend combining a Palmaz stent with a flexible self-expanding stent.