The Delta Valve: a physiologic shunt system

Global Rostral Midbrain Syndrome (GRMS) and Corpus callosum infarction in the context of shunt overdrainage

We report 3 cases of Global rostral midbrain syndrome (GRMS) and Corpus Callosum (CC) infarction, in the context of hydrocephalus followed by shunt dysfunction and slit ventricles. Prior shunt implantation had been indicated for adult-onset hydrocephalus secondary to aqueductal stenosis of varying causes. All three patients had been stable for months before developing repeated shunt dysfunctions, ultimately progressing to parkinsonism, Parinaud syndrome, akinetic mutism, pyramidal signs, cognitive impairment, CC infarction and slit ventricles, in the context of CSF overdrainage. Parkinsonism-related symptoms responded to dopa in all cases, but Parinaud syndrome and cognitive impairment persisted. Although GRMS has been described in the context of a transtentorial pressure gradient after shunt blockage, in these three cases with similar clinical presentation, reverse transtentorial pressure gradient and slit ventricles due to shunt overdrainage was the likely cause. The authors discuss the role of CC infarction and provide a detailed analysis after gathering previously described data, to unify information under a recognizable clinical entity and better understand the underlying pathophysiology, treatment options and outcome.

Gravitational shunt valves in hydrocephalus to challenge the sequelae of over-drainage

INTRODUCTION

In hydrocephalus treatment, ventriculo-peritoneal shunts (VPS) have become the most relevant therapy for seven decades among other treatment options. Due to the hydrostatic pressure in vertical position, CSF diversion is somehow non-physiological. The integration of gravitational valves in VPS was established to counteract the hydrostatic draining force and to approach a physiological condition of the cerebrospinal diverting system. Numerous clinical studies have shown that gravitational valves are able to reduce secondary complications of VPS treatment. It remains a challenge for the treating neurosurgeon to select the correct valve resistance based on individual anatomies and different etiologies of hydrocephalus as well as varying levels of activity of the patient.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the development of gravitational shunt valves from historical, theoretical and clinical aspects for pediatric and adult etiologies of hydrocephalus. We discuss the role of gravitational shunt valves in preventing over-drainage issues and present the state-of-the-art literature. Furthermore, ongoing prospective trials are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Counteracting the hydrostatic force by selecting the correct valve in a VPS system to achieve physiological balance in CSF diversion during vertical and horizontal body changes has become the current standard for hydrocephalus management. Gravitational shunt valves reliably address this need to minimize over-drainage events in the vertical position without affecting the CSF flow in the horizontal position. The results of ongoing prospective studies on the safety and efficacy of adjustable gravitational valves are still pending. Due to the complexity of the CSF flow, lifelong follow-up care for patients with VPS is critical.

Ventriculo-peritoneal shunting devices for hydrocephalus

BACKGROUND

Hydrocephalus is a common neurological disorder, caused by a progressive accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the intracranial space that can lead to increased intracranial pressure, enlargement of the ventricles (ventriculomegaly) and, consequently, to brain damage. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt systems are the mainstay therapy for this condition, however there are different types of shunt systems.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and adverse effects of conventional and complex shunt devices for CSF diversion in people with hydrocephalus.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2020 Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to February 2020); Embase (Elsevier) (1974 to February 2020); Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information Database (LILACS) (1980 to February 2020); ClinicalTrials.gov; and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised trials of different types of ventriculo-peritoneal shunting devices for people with hydrocephalus. Primary outcomes included: treatment failure, adverse events and mortality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors screened studies for selection, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Due to the scarcity of data, we performed a Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) incorporating GRADE for the quality of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six studies with 962 participants assessing the effects of standard valves compared to anti-syphon valves, other types of standard valves, self-adjusting CSF flow-regulating valves and external differential programmable pressure valves. All included studies started in a hospital setting and offered ambulatory follow-up. Most studies were conducted in infants or children with hydrocephalus from diverse causes. The certainty of the evidence for most comparisons was low to very low. 1. Standard valve versus anti-syphon valve Three studies with 296 randomised participants were included under this comparison. We are uncertain about the incidence of treatment failure in participants with standard valve and anti-syphon valves (very low certainty of the evidence). The incidence of adverse events may be similar in those with standard valves (range 0 to 1.9%) and anti-syphon valves (range 0 to 2.9%) (low certainty of the evidence). Mortality may be similar in those with standard valves (0%) and anti-syphon valves (0.9%) (RD 0.01%, 95% CI -0.02% to 0.03%, low certainty of the evidence). Ventricular size and head circumference may be similar in those with standard valves and anti-syphon valves (low certainty of the evidence). None of the included studies reported the quality of life of participants. 2. Comparison between different types of standard valves Two studies with 174 randomised participants were included under this comparison. We are uncertain about the incidence of treatment failure in participants with different types of standard valves (early postoperative period: RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.27; at 12 months follow-up: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.92, very low certainty of the evidence). None of the included studies reported adverse events beyond those included under "treatment failure". We are uncertain about the effects of different types of standard valves on mortality (range 2% to 17%, very low certainty of the evidence). The included studies did not report the effects of these interventions on quality of life, ventricular size reduction or head circumference. 3. Standard valve versus self-adjusting CSF flow-regulating valve One study with 229 randomised participants addressed this comparison. The incidence of treatment failure may be similar in those with standard valves (42.98%) and self-adjusting CSF flow-regulating valves (39.13%) (low certainty of the evidence). The incidence of adverse events may be similar in those with standard valves (range 0 to 1.9%) and those with self-adjusting CSF flow-regulating valves (range 0 to 7.2%) (low certainty of the evidence). The included study reported no deaths in either group in the postoperative period. Beyond the early postoperative period, the authors stated that nine patients died (no disaggregated data by each type of intervention was available, low certainty of the evidence). The included studies did not report the effects of these interventions on quality of life, ventricular size reduction or head circumference. 4. External differential programmable pressure valve versus non-programmable valve One study with 377 randomised participants addressed this comparison. The incidence of treatment failure may be similar in those with programmable valves (52%) and non-programmable valves (52%)  (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.24, low certainty of the evidence). The incidence of adverse events may be similar in those with programmable valves (6.19%) and non-programmable valves (6.01%) (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.15, low certainty of the evidence). The included study did not report the effect of these interventions on mortality, quality of life or head circumference. Ventricular size reduction may be similar in those with programmable valves and non-programmable valves (low certainty of the evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Standard shunt valves for hydrocephalus compared to anti-syphon or self-adjusting CSF flow-regulating valves may cause little to no difference on the main outcomes of this review, however we are very uncertain due to the low to very low certainty of evidence. Similarly, different types of standard valves and external differential programmable pressure valves versus non-programmable valves may be associated with similar outcomes. Nevertheless, this review did not include valves with the latest technology, for which we need high-quality randomised controlled trials focusing on patient-important outcomes including costs.

Comparison of anti-siphon devices-how do they affect CSF dynamics in supine and upright posture?

BACKGROUND

Three different types of anti-siphon devices (ASDs) have been developed to counteract siphoning-induced overdrainage in upright posture. However, it is not known how the different ASDs affect CSF dynamics under the complex pressure environment seen in clinic due to postural changes. We investigated which ASDs can avoid overdrainage in upright posture best without leading to CSF accumulation.

METHODS

Three shunts each of the types Codman Hakim with SiphonGuard (flow-regulated), Miethke miniNAV with proSA (gravitational), and Medtronic Delta (membrane controlled) were tested. The shunts were compared on a novel in vitro setup that actively emulates the physiology of a shunted patient. This testing method allows determining the CSF drainage rates, resulting CSF volume, and intracranial pressure in the supine, sitting, and standing posture.

RESULTS

The flow-regulated ASDs avoided increased drainage by closing their primary flow path when drainage exceeded 1.39 ± 0.42 mL/min. However, with intraperitoneal pressure increased in standing posture, we observed reopening of the ASD in 3 out of 18 experiment repetitions. The adjustable gravitational ASDs allow independent opening pressures in horizontal and vertical orientation, but they did not provide constant drainage in upright posture (0.37 ± 0.03 mL/min and 0.26 ± 0.03 mL/min in sitting and standing posture, respectively). Consequently, adaptation to the individual patient is critical. The membrane-controlled ASDs stopped drainage in upright posture. This eliminates the risk of overdrainage, but leads to CSF accumulation up to the volume observed without shunting when the patient is upright.

CONCLUSIONS

While all tested ASDs reduced overdrainage, their actual performance will depend on a patient's specific needs because of the large variation in the way the ASDs influence CSF dynamics: while the flow-regulated shunts provide continuous drainage in upright posture, the gravitational ASDs allow and require additional adaptation, and the membrane-controlled ASDs show robust siphon prevention by a total stop of drainage.

Ultrasound characterization of interface oscillation as a proxy for ventriculoperitoneal shunt function

Hydrocephalus, where cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) production rate is greater than reabsorption rate, leads to impaired neurological function if left untreated. Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS) are implanted in the brain ventricles to route CSF. VPS systems have a high failure rate, and failure symptoms resemble symptoms of common maladies. The current gold standard for shunt diagnosis, surgical intervention, poses high risk and requires an expensive procedure for patients. Current non-invasive methods lack proper insight to assist physicians. We propose a noninvasive method of characterizing the oscillation of the shunt's pressure-relief valve to assist physicians in shunt diagnosis. Brightness-mode and motion-mode ultrasound images can be used to determine fluid flow. Blockage in the system could be detected by observing the phase change of the ultrasound signal in different flow cases with or without perturbation. Future testing and implementation can allow for the use of this method in localizing and identifying the modality of failure.

Ventricular Shunts

Ventricular shunts are mechanical devices used in the treatment of hydrocephalus, by means of which cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is diverted from the ventricles to other low-pressure body cavities. Over the last 50 years, mechanical shunting has become the cornerstone for the treatment of hydrocephalus with shunt valves evolving from simple differential valves to complex programmable valves. The chief complications of ventricular shunting include obstruction, infections, and overdrainage causing subdural hematomas and slit-ventricle syndrome. As the number of commercially available valve designs continues to grow, each new generation aims at reducing the likelihood of complications, especially those resulting from overdrainage. Several studies aimed at establishing the superiority of any valve design have been conducted. All have highlighted the advantages and shortcomings of most models without conclusively providing evidence for choosing one over another. As a result, choices still rest on individual and institutional preferences.

Prevention of ventricular catheter obstruction and slit ventricle syndrome by the prophylactic use of the Integra antisiphon device in shunt therapy for pediatric hypertensive hydrocephalus: a 25-year follow-up study

OBJECT

This 25-year follow-up study was performed on 120 children with hypertensive hydrocephalus to evaluate the influence of the early prophylactic implantation of the Integra antisiphon device (ASD, Integra Neurosciences Ltd.) on the rate of proximal shunt obstructions and the frequency of symptomatic slit ventricle syndrome (SVS). The adaptability of the ASD to growth, proper positioning of the ASD as a necessity for its successful performance, and the 3 phases of SVS development are discussed.

METHOD

Since 1978, the ASD has consistently been implanted either at the time of primary shunt insertion (66 neonates, mean follow-up 11 years) or during revisions of preexisting shunts (54 children, mean follow-up 11.8 years). The complication rate among the 54 children before ASD implantation (mean follow-up 8.3 years) was compared with that among all 120 patients once an ASD had been inserted. Shunt complications were documented as ventricular catheter, distal catheter, and infectious complications.

RESULTS

The study revealed a significant long-term reduction in ventricular catheter obstructions and hospitalizations due to intermittent intracranial hypertension symptoms (symptomatic SVS) after both primary and secondary ASD implantation. Data in the study suggest that the high rate of ventricular catheter obstruction in pediatric shunt therapy is caused by hydrostatic suction induced by differential-pressure valve shunts during mobilization of the patient and that the development of a SVS can be traced back to this constant suction, which causes chronic CSF overdrainage and ventricular noncompliance. Recurrent ventricular catheter obstruction and SVS can be prevented by prophylactic supplementation of every shunt system with an ASD.

CONCLUSIONS

To inhibit chronic hydrostatic suction, to prevent overdrainage and proximal shunt obstruction, and to avoid SVS and thus improve the patient's quality of life, the prophylactic implantation of an ASD in every pediatric hydrocephalus shunt is recommended.

Surgical management of adult hydrocephalus

The management of adult hydrocephalus spans a broad range of disorders and ages. Modern management strategies include endoscopic and adjustable cerebrospinal fluid shunt diversionary techniques. The assessment and management of the following clinical conditions are discussed: 1) the adult patient with congenital or childhood-onset hydrocephalus, 2) adult slit ventricle syndrome, 3) multicompartmental hydrocephalus, 4) noncommunicating hydrocephalus, 5) communicating hydrocephalus, 6) normal pressure hydrocephalus, and 7) the shunted patient with headaches. The hydrodynamics of cerebrospinal fluid shunt diversion are discussed in relation to mechanisms of under- and overdrainage conditions. A rationale for the routine implementation of adjustable valves for adult patients with hydrocephalus is provided based on objective clinical and experimental data. For the condition of normal pressure hydrocephalus, recommendations are offered regarding the evaluation, surgical treatment, and postoperative management of this disorder.

Elastance correlates with outcome after endoscopic third ventriculostomy in adults with hydrocephalus caused by primary aqueductal stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To study prospectively the correlation between clinical outcome after endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and resistance to the outflow of cerebrospinal fluid (R(out)) and elastance in adults with hydrocephalus caused by primary aqueductal stenosis (AS).

METHODS

R(out) and elastance were measured in the subarachnoid space and intraventricularly before ETV in 15 consecutive patients. Three months after the ETV, the clinical effect was evaluated by standardized indices, and R(out) and elastance were measured. If symptoms persisted and the ETV was patent, shunt surgery was offered. The effect of the shunt operation and R(out) were measured after 3 months.

RESULTS

Four patients experienced excellent improvement, six improved slightly, and five had unchanged or deteriorated symptoms after ETV. R(out) before ETV did not correlate with outcome. R(out) decreased after ETV with correlation to the clinical effect; in the six patients who had shunt surgery, R(out) decreased further. High preoperative elastance correlated strongly with a good outcome and reduction of ventricle size. Elastance did not change after ETV.

CONCLUSION

R(out) intraventricularly and in the subarachnoid space could not predict the outcome of the ETV, but the reduction in R(out) correlated positively with clinical improvement. Preoperative elastance correlated positively with clinical improvement, and elastance was unchanged after ETV. Clinical improvement correlated positively with reduction in ventricle size.

Ventriculopleural shunt obstruction and positive-pressure ventilation. Case report

The authors report an unusual case of a patient with low-pressure hydrocephalus and a ventriculopleural shunt, in whom routine respiratory management performed using positive-pressure ventilation caused shunt obstruction and coma. While the patient received positive-pressure ventilation with external cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage at subatmospheric pressure, the ventricles returned to normal size and the coma rapidly reversed. After the authors' recognition of the effect of positive-pressure ventilation on intrapleural pressure and ventriculopleural shunt function, and the subsequent removal of positive-pressure ventilation, CSF flow through the shunt resumed and the patient's coma resolved.

Posture-related changes in the pressure environment of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt system

OBJECT

The purpose of this study is to clarify the whole pressure environment of the ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt system in patients with successfully treated hydrocephalus and to determine which factor of the pressure environment has a preventive effect on overdrainage.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with hydrocephalus who had been treated with VP shunt therapy by using a Codman-Hakim programmable valve without incidence of overdrainage were examined. The authors evaluated intracranial pressure (ICP), intraabdominal pressure (IAP), hydrostatic pressure (HP), and the perfusion pressure (PP) of the shunt system with the patients both supine and sitting. With patients supine, ICP, IAP, and HP were 4.6 +/- 3 mm Hg, 5.7 +/- 3.3 mm Hg, and 3.3 +/- 1 mm Hg, respectively. As a result, the PP was only 2.2 +/- 4.9 mm Hg. When the patients sat up, the IAP increased to 14.7 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, and ICP decreased to-- 14.2 +/- 4.5 mm Hg. The increased IAP and decreased ICP offset 67% of the HP (42.9 +/- 3.5 mm Hg), and consequently the PP (14 +/- 6.3 mm Hg) corresponded to only 33% of HP.

CONCLUSIONS

The results observed in patients indicated that IAP as well as ICP play an important role in VP shunt therapy and that the increased IAP and the decreased ICP in patients placed in the upright position allow them to adapt to the siphoning effect and for overdrainage thereby to be avoided.

In vivo intracranial pressure dynamics in patients with hydrocephalus treated by shunt placement

OBJECT

With the commercial availability of a variety of shunt systems, there is considerable controversy over the choice of the most appropriate shunt valve for each individual with hydrocephalus. Although the performance characteristics of all shunt systems are well documented in the laboratory setting, there is little description of the in vivo dynamics of intracranial pressure (ICP) after implantation of commonly used shunt systems in humans. The authors coupled telemonitoring devices to several different shunt systems to measure the performance characteristics of these valve systems with respect to intraventricular pressure (IVP) at increments of head elevation.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with different shunt systems and three control patients without shunts were studied for IVP at 0 degrees, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, 75 degrees, and 90 degrees of head elevation, and the resultant curves were analyzed for the best-fit regression coefficient. For purposes of analysis the authors grouped shunt valve systems by design characteristics into three groups: differential-pressure valves (r = -0.321 +/- 0.061; 11 patients), nonsiphoning systems (r = -0.158 +/- 0.027; 10 patients), and flow-regulated valves (r = -0.16 +/- 0.056; four patients); there were three control patients without shunts (r = -0.112 +/- 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that differential-pressure valves always caused ICP to drop to 0 by 30 degrees of head elevation, whereas all other valve systems caused a more gradual drop in ICP, more consistent with pressures observed in the control patients without shunts. Not surprisingly, the differential-pressure valve group was found to have a significant difference in mean regression coefficient when compared with those in whom nonsiphoning shunts (p < 0.023) or no shunts were placed (p < 0.049). These data provide a basis for evaluating shunt valve performance and for predicting valve appropriateness in patients in whom characteristics such as pressure and flow dynamics are weighed in the choice of a specific valve for implantation.

The importance of shunt valve position in flow characteristics of the Medtronic PS Medical Delta valve

This study was conducted to document the extent to which flow depends on valve position in relation to head-pressure reference.

Medtronic PS Medical Delta valves (contour model, performance levels 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0) were studied in a bench test designed to evaluate flow rates with respect to valve position in relation to the head-pressure reference postion. The valves were connected to an “infinite” reservoir by the standard inlet catheter. An initial head (proximal) pressure was selected for each valve based on package insert data. The position of the inlet catheter tip was fixed at this starting head pressure, thus making the inlet catheter tip position the reference for relative head pressures on the valve assembly. When the valve body is positioned above this level, the effective head pressure is lowered, and when the valve body is positioned below this level, the effective head pressure is raised. Flow was established with the siphon control portion of the valve body located on the same horizontal level as the inlet catheter tip (the reference head pressure or “0” position). A standard silastic catheter was attached to the outlet of the valve, and its length was fixed at 50 cm for all valves (-50 cm H20). The distal end of the outlet catheter was connected to a fraction collector, and 1-minute samples (five replicates) were collected for gravimetric determination of flow rate. The valve assembly was then moved in 1-cm increments through the range of 4 cm above to 8 cm below the head-pressure reference position. Samples were collected from each position (4 cm to -8 cm) relative to the inlet catheter tip. Flow rate, in milliliters/hour, was plotted against both relative position (4 cm to -8 cm) and absolute head pressure (in centimeters of water).

Each of the valves tested was shown to have a linear relationship between flow and position relative to the inlet catheter tip (or absolute head pressure). The average increase in flow per centimeter of displacement of valve from catheter tip was 16.5 ml/hr/cm (range 14.4-17.6 ml/hr/cm). Once the inlet catheter tip is fixed in position, it serves as a pressure reference. Movement of the valve above this level results in a net decrease in effective head pressure, and movement below this position results in a net increase in effective head pressure. Thus, the positioning of shunt valves in locations different from this pressure reference position should be performed only with the knowledge that significant increases in outflow rate may occur when the valve body is positioned lower than the inlet catheter tip. This increase in outflow rate is not the result of siphoning or a defect in the antisiphon device but instead the result of a net increase in effective head pressure.

Incidence and management of subdural hematoma/hygroma with variable- and fixed-pressure differential valves: a randomized, controlled study of programmable compared with conventional valves

Shunt systems with differential pressure valves are prone to the complications of overdrainage. A programmable valve permits adjustment of the opening pressure of the valve. In this paper the authors report the incidence of subdural fluid collections in a randomized trial of programmable compared with conventional valves, and they describe methodologies used in management of this complication.

A multiinstitutional, prospective, randomized trial of the Codman Hakim programmable valve and conventional fixed-pressure valves was undertaken. Two classes were defined: “new” and “replacement” valves. Randomization of the type of valve in each group was performed at each study site. Clinical and radiological studies were required at fixed intervals over a 104-week period. All complications were reported. The experimental valves were required to be reprogrammed after magnetic resonance imaging studies, but all other decisions regarding pressure setting were left to each investigator.

Three hundred seventy-seven patients were randomized; 194 were treated with a programmable valve and 183 with a fixed-pressure valve. The two groups were statistically similar in demographic composition, as were the “new” and “replacement” categories. The investigators made 540 valve pressure changes (five per patient; range one-41 changes). More than half of the reprogramming adjustments were made in the first 3 months postplacement; 70% were made within 6 months. More than half of all reprogramming adjustments were required in a group of 30 patients.

Four treatment modalities were observed: 1) 30% of the fluid collections resolved spontaneously (25% in the patients with programmable valves and 36.3% in those with conventional valves) and were largely found to be hygromas in infants and children; 2) four subdural fluid collections were unresolved and under observation; 3) the subdural hematoma was drained and the shunt removed (in 8.3% of patients with the programmable valve and 36.3% of those with the control valve); 4) the pressure of programmable valve was raised in 58% of patients (seven of 12), and this increase in opening pressure was a feature used by investigators to affect treatment.

There was no significant difference in the incidence of subdural fluid collections between the programmable and fixed-pressure valve treatment groups. The programmable feature provided a considerable advantage in treatment when subdural collections occurred.

Risks in using siphon-reducing devices in adult patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus: bench test investigations with Delta valves

To elucidate the reason for malfunction of Delta valves in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus, the authors applied a new concept of the bench test and simulated intracranial pressure (ICP) to measure the resultant flow with a complete shunt system. Subcutaneous pressure on the valve, valve implantation site, and postural hydrostatic differential-pressure changes were simulated in this bench test designed for adult patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Subcutaneous pressure ranged within 6.4 +/- 0.09 cm H2O (mean +/- standard deviation) on the 7th day after the implantation of the valve in rats. A linear correlation between valve closing pressures and the external pressure was observed: gradual increase of the latter resulted in an approximately equal rise in the closing pressure. Closing pressure ranged within the physiological variation of ICP (10 +/- 5 cm H2O) in the supine position. In the erect position it was higher than the physiological variation (+5 to -5 cm H2O) when the valve was placed at the level of the foramen of Monro and lower when placed at the level of the clavicle. This observation indicates that the subcutaneous pressure around the Delta valve significantly affects its closing pressure. An excessive reduction of flow or a functional obstruction occurs when the patient with a Delta valve implanted at the foramen of Monro assumes an erect posture. The authors conclude that Delta valves are not recommended for implantation at the level of the foramen of Monro in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus because of the risk of underdrainage. The mastoid process or clavicle may be the alternative levels for its implantation to prevent underdrainage; however, the possibility of shunt malfunction should be kept in mind because subcutaneous pressure is variable among patients and that might affect the performance characteristics of these valves.