Determination of trunk motion patterns associated with permanent or transient stenosis of the lumbar spine

Are there differences in lifting technique between those with and without low back pain? A systematic review

Background and aims

To systemically review the literature to compare freestyle lifting technique, by muscle activity and kinematics, between people with and without low back pain (LBP).

Methods

Five databases were searched along with manual searches of retrieved articles by a single reviewer. Studies were included if they compared a freestyle lifting activity between participants with and without LBP. Data were extracted by two reviewers, and studies were appraised using the CASP tool for case-control studies.

Results

Nine studies were eligible. Heterogeneity did not allow for meta-analysis. Most studies (n = 8 studies) reported that people with LBP lift differently to pain-free controls. Specifically, people with LBP lift more slowly (n = 6 studies), use their legs more than their back especially when initiating lifting (n = 3 studies), and jerk less during lifting (n = 1 studies). Furthermore, the four larger studies involving people with more severe LBP also showed that people with LBP lift with less spinal range of motion and greater trunk muscle activity for a longer period.

Conclusions

People with LBP move slower, stiffer, and with a deeper knee bend than pain-free people during freestyle lifting tasks. Interestingly, such a lifting style mirrors how people, with and without LBP, are often told how to lift during manual handling training. The cross-sectional nature of the comparisons does not allow for causation to be determined.

Implications

The changes described may show embodiment of cautious movement, and the drive to protect the back. There may be value in exploring whether adopting a lifting style closer to that of pain-free people could help reduce LBP.

Effects of pregnancy on lumbar motion patterns and muscle responses

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The kinematics of the lumbar region and the activation patterns of the erector spinae muscle have been associated with the genesis of low back pain, which is one of the most common complications associated with pregnancy. Despite the high prevalence of pregnancy-related low back pain, the biomechanical adaptations of the lumbar region during pregnancy remain unknown.

PURPOSE

This study analyzes lumbar spine motion and the activation pattern of the lumbar erector spinae muscle in healthy pregnant women.

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study involved 34 nulliparous women (control group) and 34 pregnant women in the third trimester (week 36 ± 1).

OUTCOME MEASURES

We recorded the parameters of angular displacement of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane during trunk flexion-extension, and the EMG activity of the erector spinae muscles during flexion, extension, eccentric and concentric contractions, and the myolectrical silence.

METHODS

The participants performed several series of trunk flexion-extension movements, which were repeated 2 months postpartum. The position of the lumbar spine was recorded using an electromagnetic motion capture system. EMG activity was recorded by a surface EMG system and expressed as a percentage of a submaximal reference contraction.

RESULTS

Antepartum measurements showed a decrease (relative to control and postpartum measurements) in lumbar maximum flexion (52.5 ± 10.5° vs 57.3 ± 7.7° and 58.7 ± 8.6°; p < .01), the percentage of lumbar flexion during forward bending (56.4 ± 5.6% vs 59.4 ± 6.8% and 59.7 ± 5.6%; p < .01), and the time keeping maximum levels of lumbar flexion (35.7 ± 6.7% vs 43.8 ± 5.3% and 50.1 ± 3.7%; p < .01). Higher levels of erector spinae activation were observed in pregnant women during forward bending (10.1 ± 4.8% vs 6.3 ± 2.4% and 6.6 ± 2.7%; p < .01) and eccentric contraction (12.1 ± 5.2% vs 9.4 ± 3.1% and 9.1 ± 2.9%; p < .01), as well as a shortened erector spinae myoelectric silence during flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women show adaptations in their patterns of lumbar motion and erector spinae activity during trunk flexion-extension. These changes could be associated with the genesis of pregnancy-related low back pain, by means of biomechanical protection mechanisms against the increase on abdominal mass and ligamentous laxity.

Restoring lumbar spine stiffness using an interspinous implant in an ovine model of instability

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of an interspinous implant on lumbar spine stability and stiffness during dorsoventral loading.

METHODS

Twelve Merino lambs were mechanically tested in vivo. Oscillatory (2 Hz) loads were applied to L2 under load control while displacements were monitored. Tri-axial accelerometers further quantified adjacent L3-L4 accelerations. Dorsoventral lumbar spine stiffness and L3 and L4 dorsoventral and axial displacements were determined over six trials of 20 cycles of loading. Four conditions were examined: 1) initial intact, 2) following destabilization at L3-L4, 3) following the insertion of an InSwing(®) interspinous device at L3-L4, and 4) with the implant secured with a tension band. Comparisons were performed using a one-way ANOVA with repeated measures and post-hoc Bonferroni correction.

FINDINGS

Compared to the intact condition, destabilization significantly decreased lumbar stiffness by 4.5% (P=.001) which was only recovered by the interspinous device with tension band. The interspinous device caused a significant 9.75% (P=.001) increase in dorsoventral stiffness from destabilization that increased 14% with the tension band added (P=.001). The tension band was responsible for decreased displacements from the intact (P=.038), instability (P=.001), and interspinous device (P=.005) conditions. Dorsoventral L3-L4 motion significantly improved with the interspinous device (P=.01) and the addition of the tension band (P=.001). No significant differences in L3-L4 intersegmental stability were noted for axial motion in the sagittal plane.

INTERPRETATION

This ovine model provided objective in vivo biomechanical evidence of lumbar instability and its restoration by means of an interspinous implant during dorsoventral spinal loading.

Reliability and validity of a new objective tool for low back pain functional assessment

STUDY DESIGN

Classification and functional assessment model for nonspecific low back pain (LBP) patients and controls on the basis of kinematic analysis parameters.

OBJECTIVE

Develop a logistic regression model using kinematic analysis variables to (1) discriminate between LBP patients and controls and (2) obtain objective parameters for LBP functional assessment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Functional assessment of spinal disorders has been carried out traditionally by means of subjective scales. Objective functional techniques have been developed, which usually involve the application of external loads or the analysis of highly standardized trunk flexion-extension maneuvers. Few studies have used everyday activities such as sit-to-stand or lifting an object from the ground. They have shown that the motion patterns of LBP patients differ from those of healthy subjects. Nevertheless, very few studies have tried to correlate objective findings to the results of subjective scales, and no previous study has developed a LBP classification and functional assessment model on the basis of kinematic analysis of everyday activities.

METHODS

Sixteen controls and 39 LBP patients performed a sit-to-stand task, and lifted three different weights from a standing position. The vertical forces exerted and the relative positions of the lower limb and the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacroiliac regions were recorded. Reliability was determined from repetitions of the tests performed by the control group. Binary logistic regression analyses were computed. The results of the selected regression equation were correlated to the Oswestry Disability Index scale results, to check the validity of the procedure for the measurement of functional disability.

RESULTS

Reliability of the parameters was good. The selected regression model used two variables, and correctly classified 97.3% of the patients. High correlations were found between the results of this regression equation and the Oswestry Disability Index scale.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to distinguish LBP patients from healthy subjects by means of the biomechanical analysis of everyday tasks. This kind of analysis can produce objective and reliable indexes about the patients' degree of functional impairment.

The association between isoinertial trunk muscle performance and low back pain in male adolescents

The literature reports inconsistent findings regarding the association between low back pain (LBP) and trunk muscle function, in both adults and children. The strength of the relationship appears to be influenced by how LBP is qualified and the means by which muscle function is measured. The aim of this study was to examine the association between isoinertial trunk muscle performance and consequential (non-trivial) low back pain (LBP) in male adolescents. Healthy male adolescents underwent anthropometric measurements, clinical evaluation, and tests of trunk range of motion (ROM), maximum isometric strength (STRENGTH) and peak movement velocity (VEL), using an isoinertial device. They provided information about their regular sporting activities, history and family history of LBP. Predictors of "relevant/consequential LBP" were examined using multivariable logistic regression. LBP status was reassessed after 2 years and the change from baseline was categorised. At baseline, 33/95 (35%) subjects reported having experienced consequential LBP. BMI, a family history of LBP, and regularly playing sport were each significantly associated with a history of consequential LBP (p < 0.05). 85/95 (89%) boys participated in the follow-up: 51 (60%) reported no LBP at either baseline or follow-up (never LBP); 5 (6%) no LBP at baseline, but LBP at follow-up (new LBP); 19 (22%) LBP at baseline, but none at follow-up; and 10 (12%) LBP at both time-points (recurrent/persistent LBP). The only distinguishing features of group membership in these small groups were: fewer sport-active in the "never LBP" group); worse trunk mobility, in the "persistent LBP" group, lower baseline sagittal ROM in the "never LBP" and "new LBP" (p < 0.05). Regular involvement in sport was a consistent predictor of LBP. Isoinertial trunk performance was not associated with LBP in adolescents.

Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion

Interspinous devices have been introduced to provide a minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. Little is known however, of the effect of interspinous devices on intersegmental range of motion (ROM). The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the effect of a novel minimally invasive interspinous implant, InSwing, on sagittal plane ROM of the lumbar spine using an ovine model. Ten adolescent Merino lambs underwent a destabilization procedure at the L1-L2 level simulating a stenotic degenerative spondylolisthesis (as described in our earlier work; Spine 15:571-576, 1990). All animals were placed in a side-lying posture and lateral radiographs were taken in full flexion and extension of the trunk in a standardized manner. Radiographs were repeated following the insertion of an 8-mm InSwing interspinous device at L1-L2, and again with the implant secured by means of a tension band tightened to 1 N/m around the L1 and L2 spinous processes. ROM was assessed in each of the three conditions and compared using Cobb's method. A paired t-test compared ROM for each of the experimental conditions (P < 0.05). After instrumentation with the InSwing interspinous implant, the mean total sagittal ROM (from full extension to full flexion) was reduced by 16% from 6.3 degrees to 5.3 +/- 2.7 degrees. The addition of the tension band resulted in a 43% reduction in total sagittal ROM to 3.6 +/- 1.9 degrees which approached significance. When looking at flexion only, the addition of the interspinous implant without the tension band did not significantly reduce lumbar flexion, however, a statistically significant 15% reduction in lumbar flexion was observed with the addition of the tension band (P = 0.01). To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study radiographically showing the advantage of using an interspinous device to stabilize the spine in flexion. These results are important findings particularly for patients with clinical symptoms related to instable degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Posture-dependent trunk extensor EMG activity during maximum isometrics exertions in normal male and female subjects

Posture-dependent trunk function data are important for appropriate normalization of submaximal trunk exertions, and is also necessary to define a more precise and specific use for strength testing in the prevention and diagnosis of spinal disorders. The aim of the current study was to quantify maximal effort trunk muscle extensor activity and trunk isometric extension torque over a functional range of sagittal standing postures. Twenty healthy, young adult male and female subjects performed isometric extension tasks over a sagittal posture range of -20 degrees extension to +50 degrees flexion, in 10 degrees increments. Erector spinae muscle activity was recorded bilaterally at the level of L3 using surface EMG electrodes. Isometric trunk extension torque was measured using a trunk dynamometer. EMG and trunk torque differed significantly between genders, but there were no differences between male and female subjects when the data were normalized with respect to the upright posture. For the combined male and female population, upright posture normalized L3 EMG activity (EMGn) and trunk extension torque (Tn) increased 1.7-fold and 3.5-fold, respectively, over the 70 degrees range of sagittal postures examined. The ratio (Tn/EMGn) increased two-fold (0.83 to 1.67) from -20 degrees extension to +50 degrees flexion, indicating that the neuromuscular efficiency increases with flexion. Trunk extension torque normalized with respect to the upright posture was linearly and positively correlated (r = 0.59, P < 0.001) to similarly normalized L3 EMG activity. This relatively weak correlation suggests that trunk muscle synergism and/or intrinsic muscle length-tension relationships are also modulated by posture. This study provides data that can be used to estimate trunk extensor muscle function over a broad range of sagittal postures. Our findings indicate that appropriate postural normalization of trunk extensor EMG activity is necessary for studies where submaximal trunk exertions are performed over a range of upright postures.

Lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: an overview

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common condition in elderly patients and also one of the most common reasons to perform spinal surgery at an advanced age. Disc degeneration, facet degeneration and hypertrophy, and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and calcification usually participate in the genesis of a stenotic condition in the elderly. These changes can lead to symptoms by themselves or decompensate a preexisting narrow canal. Although some lesions are more central or more lateral, this classic dichotomy is less present in the elderly patient, in whom the degenerative process usually encroaches both central and lateral pathways. Some less common causes of lumbar spinal stenosis are found in the aging subject, such as Paget's disease. However, it must be stressed that so-called stenotic images (sometimes severe) are present on imaging studies in a great number of symptom-free individuals, and that the relationship between degenerative lesions, importance of abnormal images, and complaints is still unclear. Lumbar stenosis is a very common reason for decompressive surgery and/or fusion. Various conditions can lead to a narrowing of the neural pathways and differential diagnosis with vascular troubles, also common in the elderly, can be challenging. The investigation of stenotic symptoms should be extremely careful and thorough and include a choice of technical examinations including vascular investigations. This is of utmost importance, especially if a surgical sanction is considered to avoid disappointing results.

Assessment of trunk function in single and multi-level spinal stenosis: a prospective clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the biomechanical indicators of single- and multi-level stenosis and to determine the biomechanical outcome of selective conservative decompression.

DESIGN

This study is a prospective clinical trial examining trunk function in spinal stenosis patients operated using a conservative procedure in an orthopaedic clinic.

BACKGROUND

Although several clinical studies have examined the instability and motion characteristics of operated lumbar spinal canal stenosis, few if any studies have prospectively examined the biomechanical outcome of lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery.

METHODS

Comprehensive pre- and post-operative trunk dynamometer strength and motion analysis tests were performed on 36 patients operated for lumbar canal stenosis. Surgical treatment efficacy was evaluated within a three variable crossed factorial design considering stenosis classification, number of operative levels, and changes in several trunk biomechanical outcomes from pre- to post-operative assessment. Patients were evaluated after a minimum one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Pre-operatively there were no differential effects associated with stenosis classification or number of operated levels. There was a significant post-operative increase in isometric trunk extension torque and flexion-extension power and a return to a more normal trunk extension-flexion torque ratio. Patients with mixed, single level stenosis demonstrated greater trunk extension power both pre- and post-operatively compared to other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis produced a marked improvement in the functional mechanical status of the low back.

RELEVANCE

This study assists clinicians and researchers to understand trunk function following conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Joint coordination during whole-body lifting in women with low back pain after pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To quantify differences in the kinematics of lifting between women with low back and/or pelvic pain after pregnancy and women without.

DESIGN

Comparison study.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Volunteer sample of 7 women with pain (positive pain drawing, no physical examination) and 9 female controls (not matched).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Duration of downward and upward phases, relative instant of box lift-off, joint angles, spatial angles of trunk and pelvis, pelvic angle relative to trunk, and phase angle relationships between joints.

RESULTS

The duration of the upward phase +/- standard deviation was longer in the pain group (1731+/-290 ms vs 1489+/-187 ms, P=.031). At box lift-off, this group had less hip joint flexion (101.9 degrees +/-20.8 degrees vs 78.7 degrees +/-12.4 degrees, P=.015) but more backward pelvis tilt relative to the trunk, that is, more lumbar spine flexion (126.3 degrees +/-16.8 degrees vs 109.0 degrees +/-12.3 degrees, P=.031). The pain group showed an immediate transition from lumbar spine flexion to extension, whereas the controls maintained peak flexion for about 600 ms. The peak phase lag between knee and hip joint extension in the upward phase was larger for the pain group (-29.7 degrees +/-8.3 degrees vs -17.2 degrees +/-5.5 degrees, P=.003).

CONCLUSION

Women with low back and/or pelvic pain after pregnancy showed different kinematics of lifting. Further research is needed to determine the exact relationship between the altered kinematics and the underlying disorder.

Posture-dependent isometric trunk extension and flexion strength in normal male and female subjects

The objective of this study was to quantify the relationship between trunk posture and trunk muscle function in a group of young, normal male and female subjects. Ten male and 10 female subjects performed isometric flexion and extension tasks using a trunk dynamometer. Peak isometric torque was recorded in flexion and extension at 10 degrees increments over a sagittal posture range of -20 degrees extension to +50 degrees of flexion. Significant differences in trunk strength (isometric torque) were found between males and females, at various sagittal plane trunk postures, and between flexion (F) and extension (E) tasks. Flexion torque was greatest at 20 degrees to 30 degrees flexion, whereas extension torque was greatest at 50 degrees flexion. Gender-specific differences in trunk strength were markedly reduced when the torque data were normalized by the subject's height multiplied by body weight. The E/F torque ratio showed a relatively linear, over twofold increase with increasing flexion angle, and was significantly greater for female subjects compared with male subjects at most sagittal postures. The baseline trunk isometric strength data provided by this study should help clinicians to use strength testing more precisely and specifically in prevention and diagnosis of patients at risk for back disorders.

Classification of low back pain from dynamic motion characteristics using an artificial neural network

STUDY DESIGN

Data were collected from 183 subjects who were randomly assigned to the training and test groups. During testing of the classification system, knowledge of the low back pain condition or motion characteristics of the patients in the test group was not made available to the system.

OBJECTIVES

To determine specific characteristics of trunk motion associated with different categories of spinal disorders and to determine whether a neural network analysis system can be effective in distinguishing patterns.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Numerous studies have established the difficulty of evaluating lower back pain. Imaging techniques are expensive and ineffective in many cases. A technique for evaluation of lower back pain was developed on the basis of analysis of such dynamic motion features as shape, velocity, and symmetry of movements, using a neural network classification system.

METHODS

Dynamic motion data were collected from 183 subjects using a triaxial goniometer. Features of the movement were extracted and provided as input to a two-stage neural network classifier governed by a radial basis function architecture. After training, the output of the classifier was compared with Québec Task Force pain classifications obtained for the patients. Linear and nonlinear classification techniques were compared.

RESULTS

The system could determine low back pain classification from motion characteristics. The neural network classifier produced the best results with up to 85% accuracy on novel "validation" data.

CONCLUSIONS

A neural network based on kinematic data is an excellent predictive model for classification of lower back pain. Such a system could markedly improve the management of lower back pain in the individual patient.