Renal function in the elimination of oral melphalan in patients with multiple myeloma

Melphalan-induced supraventricular tachycardia: incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Cardiotoxicity of aggressive chemotherapeutic regimens includes cardiomyopathy and arrhythmias. Although cardiomyopathy is a well-recognized entity, arrhythmias are poorly studied.

HYPOTHESIS

Certain chemotherapeutic regimes are associated with supraventricular arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data on patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplant (bone marrow transplant; BMT) from 1998 to 2005 and developed supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) during the same hospital admission. The Fisher χ2 test and the Student t test were used for comparison of categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

During the period of 1998-2005, there were 1221 BMTs, 62 (5.1%) of which were complicated by SVT. Melphalan-based regimens demonstrated a significantly higher rate of SVT than any other chemotherapy. Out of 438 patients who received melphalan, 48 (11%) developed atrial fibrillation (n = 35) or SVT (n = 13) during the same hospital admission, and 390 did not. Patients with SVT were older, had higher baseline creatinine, larger size of the left atrium, and more cardiac comorbidities. Incidence of SVT was associated with greater length of stay (24.9 ± 8.9 d vs 19.6 ± 5.8 days, P<0.0001), even after adjustment for comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Supraventricular tachycardia, mostly atrial fibrillation, complicates about 5% of chemotherapeutic treatments used with BMT. Melphalan is the most arrhythmogenic agent, and is associated with SVT in 11% of patients. Development of SVT results in about a 4-day increase in the length of hospital stay.

Genetic polymorphisms in the amino acid transporters LAT1 and LAT2 in relation to the pharmacokinetics and side effects of melphalan

OBJECTIVES

Melphalan is widely used in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Pharmacokinetics of this alkylating drug shows high inter-individual variability. As melphalan is a phenylalanine derivative, the pharmacokinetic variability may be determined by genetic polymorphisms in the L-type amino acid transporters LAT1 (SLC7A5) and LAT2 (SLC7A8).

METHODS

Pharmacokinetics were analysed in 64 patients after first administration of intravenous melphalan. Severity of side effects was documented according to WHO criteria. Genomic DNA was analysed for polymorphisms in LAT1 and LAT2 by sequencing of the entire coding region, intron-exon boundaries and 2 kb upstream promoter region. Selected polymorphisms in the common heavy chain of both transporters, the protein 4F2hc (SLC3A2), were analysed by single nucleotide primer extension.

RESULTS

Melphalan pharmacokinetics was highly variable with up to 6.2-fold differences in total clearance. A total of 44 polymorphisms were identified in LAT1 and 21 polymorphisms in LAT2. From all variants, only five were in the coding region and only one heterozygous non-synonymous polymorphism (Ala94Thr) was found in LAT2. Numerous polymorphisms were found in the LAT1 and LAT2 5'-flanking regions but did not correlate with expression of the respective genes. No significant correlations could be observed between the polymorphisms in 4F2hc, LAT1, and LAT2 with melphalan pharmacokinetics or with melphalan side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed that these transporter genes are highly conserved, particularly in the coding sequences. Genetic variation in 4F2hc, LAT1, and LAT2 does not appear to be a major cause of inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics and of adverse reactions to melphalan.

Oral mucositis in myeloma patients undergoing melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplantation: incidence, risk factors and a severity predictive model

Melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplant (Mel-ASCT) is a standard therapy for multiple myeloma, but is associated with severe oral mucositis (OM). To identify predictors for severe OM, we studied 381 consecutive newly diagnosed myeloma patients who received Mel-ASCT. Melphalan was given at 200 mg/m2 body surface area (BSA), reduced to 140 mg/m2 for serum creatinine >3 mg/dl. Potential covariates included demographics, pre-transplant serum albumin and renal and liver function tests, and mg/kg melphalan dose received. The BSA dosing resulted in a wide range of melphalan doses given (2.4-6.2 mg/kg). OM developed in 75% of patients and was severe in 21%. Predictors of severe OM in multiple logistic regression analyses were high serum creatinine (odds ratio (OR)=1.581; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.080-2.313; P=0.018) and high mg/kg melphalan (OR=1.595; 95% CI: 1.065-2.389; P=0.023). An OM prediction model was developed based on these variables. We concluded that BSA dosing of melphalan results in wide variations in the mg/kg dose, and that patients with renal dysfunction who are scheduled to receive a high mg/kg melphalan dose have the greatest risk for severe OM following Mel-ASCT. Pharmacogenomic and pharmacokinetic studies are needed to better understand interpatient variability of melphalan exposure and toxicity.

Individual dose adaptation of anticancer drugs

The dose of anticancer drugs is currently adjusted to the patient body surface area, although patients have different abilities to clear anticancer drugs. The dose adjustment to physiological functions permits major toxic accidents to be avoided. The adjustment to tumour drug content is considered, but for ethical or technical reasons, it cannot be used routinely The best criterion for the dose adjustment seems to be drug plasma concentration. The relationship between plasma concentration and efficacy may not be excellent, since it depends on the presence of resistant cells and on the blood flow through the tumour. A relationship between plasma concentration and/or the area under the curve (AUC) with toxicity has been reported with all major anticancer drugs. Different methods of dose adjustment to the drug plasma concentration are reported. In conclusion, dose adjustment to the drug plasma concentration or to the AUC can improve the chemotherapy efficacy, while reducing toxicity.

Drug dosage in patients during continuous renal replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic considerations

The advantages of continuous haemofiltration and haemodialysis over intermittent haemodialysis for the treatment of acute renal failure are well recognised. In intensive care patients, 4 different continuous procedures, arteriovenous and venovenous haemofiltration (CAVH and CVVH) or haemodialysis (CAVHD and CVVHD), are employed. These effective detoxification treatments require knowledge of their influence on drug disposition. Data on kinetics of drugs during continuous treatment are scarce and limited almost exclusively to the oldest and least effective procedure (CAVH). Selected dialysis membranes may adsorb drugs, as in the case of aminoglycosides. In addition, elimination of substances with large molecular weights may vary depending on the pore size of the membrane, as in the case of vancomycin. Thus, even if drug dosages can be based on pharmacokinetic studies, selection of a dialysis membrane not studied may cause unpredictable drug concentrations. With these limitations in mind and considering the available literature on pharmacokinetics in patients with renal failure, general guidelines for drug dosage during continuous renal replacement therapy can be given. In haemofiltration, drug protein binding is the major factor determining sieving, i.e. the appearance of the drug in the ultrafiltrate. In haemodialysis, diffusion is added to ultrafiltration, and therefore the saturation of the combined dialysate and ultrafiltrate will decrease further with increasing dialysate flow rate. In continuous haemofiltration or haemodialysis the extracorporeal clearance can be calculated by multiplying the saturation value (estimated or, better, measured) with the ultrafiltrate and dialysate flow rate. Dividing the extracorporeal clearance by the total clearance (including the nonrenal clearance) gives the fraction of the dose removed due to extracorporeal elimination. Whether dosage recommendations available for anuric patients have to be modified or not can be decided on the basis of this value. In case of high nonrenal clearance, the degree of saturation is without clinical significance. Based on these considerations guidelines have been constructed for the effect of extracorporeal elimination on more than 120 different drugs commonly used in intensive care patients.

Phase II trial and pharmacokinetic assessment of intravenous melphalan in patients with advanced prostate cancer

Alkylating agents have been reported to yield response rates of up to 20% in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Melphalan was studied in four small trials in which the drug was given orally. In this phase II trial, melphalan (30 mg/m2) was given intravenously every 28 days to 27 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed so as to describe the clearance of melphalan in this population and in an attempt to carry out pharmacodynamic modeling for toxicity and response. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was also assessed prospectively. No objective responses to this regimen were documented. The median survival for patients on this trial was 11.5 months. There was no correlation between drug clearance and measured creatinine clearance and no relationship between systemic exposure and toxicity. A decrease of > 50% in serum PSA that was sustained for > 6 weeks was documented in two patients, most notably in one patient who has survived for more than 29 months. Intravenous melphalan is not an active agent in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Pharmacokinetics of oral melphalan in relation to renal function in multiple myeloma patients

The impact of renal function on oral melphalan pharmacokinetics was studied in 15 patients with multiple myeloma. A two-fold interindividual variation in the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was found. An increase in AUC and melphalan mean residence time (MRT) was noted in patients with renal dysfunction. No correlation was found between GFR and the terminal plasma half-life time. We conclude from these results that renal dysfunction is associated with an increase in AUC and MRT of oral melphalan. A careful follow-up of hematological toxicity and possibly a dose reduction of melphalan are proposed for myeloma patients with renal impairment.

Intratumoral measurement and plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered melphalan. Report of a patient with plasmacytoma

In a human case of plasmacytoma we studied plasma and tumor concentrations of melphalan given intravenously. Intratumoral concentration of melphalan was similar to plasma concentration 60 min after the end of infusion.