The successful surgical management of perforation after endoscopic sphincterotomy: report of two cases

Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy: When is it needed? A dual non-trauma centre experience and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) has been very rarely reported in literature as a lifesaving procedure for complex pancreatic injury, uncontrollable hemorrhage from ulcers and tumors, descending duodenal perforations, and severe infection. The aim of this study was to analyze the experience of two non-trauma centers and to review the literature concerning emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2014, from a population of 169 PD (92 females and 77 males; mean age: 61.3, range 23-81) 5 patients (3%; 2 females and 3 males; mean age: 57.8, range: 42-74) underwent EPD for non-traumatic disease performed at two Academic Units of the University of Bari.

RESULTS

The emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy subgroup of patients showed an overall morbidity of 80%, and mortality of 40%. In 80% (4/5) of patients treated by emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy, the pancreatic remnant was not reconstructed, and in 20% (1/5) a pancreaticojejunostomy was performed.

CONCLUSION

Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy is an effective life-saving operation reservable to pancreatoduodenal trauma, perforations, and bleeding, unmanageable by a less invasive approach. It should be preferentially approached by surgeons with a high level of experience in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery and in trauma centers too, but it should also be in the armamentarium of general surgeons performing hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.

Management of duodeno-pancreato-biliary perforations after ERCP: outcomes from an Italian tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND

The management of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) perforation is often unknown by many physicians, and there is a paucity of literature regarding the best surgical management approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of ERCP-related perforations to the duodeno-pancreato-biliary tract observed at the Digestive Surgery Department of the Catholic University of Rome was conducted to identify their optimal management and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

From January 1999 to December 2011, 30 perforations after ERCP were observed. Seven patients underwent ERCP at another institution, and 23 patients underwent an endoscopic procedure at our hospital. Diagnosis of perforation was both clinical and instrumental. Fifteen patients (50 %) were successfully treated conservatively. Fifteen patients (50 %) underwent surgery after a mean time of 8.1 days (range 1-26 days) from ERCP: ten received a retroperitoneal laparostomy approach, three of them both an anterior and posterior laparostomy approach, and two an anterior laparostomy approach. Duodenal leak closure was observed after a mean (± standard deviation, SD) of 12.6 (± 4.6) and 24.6 (± 7.9) days after conservative and surgical treatment, respectively (p < 0.001). The overall and postoperative mortality rates were 13.3 % (4 of 30 patients) and 26.6 % (4 of 15 patients), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-ERCP perforation is burdened by a high risk of mortality. Early clinical and radiographic features have to be used to determine which type of surgical or conservative treatment is indicated. Half of patients can be treated conservatively, but in case of sepsis or unstable general conditions, early surgical procedure is indicated as the only possible chance of recovery.

Management of duodeno-pancreato-biliary perforations after ERCP: outcomes from an Italian tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND

The management of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) perforation is often unknown by many physicians, and there is a paucity of literature regarding the best surgical management approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of ERCP-related perforations to the duodeno-pancreato-biliary tract observed at the Digestive Surgery Department of the Catholic University of Rome was conducted to identify their optimal management and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

From January 1999 to December 2011, 30 perforations after ERCP were observed. Seven patients underwent ERCP at another institution, and 23 patients underwent an endoscopic procedure at our hospital. Diagnosis of perforation was both clinical and instrumental. Fifteen patients (50 %) were successfully treated conservatively. Fifteen patients (50 %) underwent surgery after a mean time of 8.1 days (range 1-26 days) from ERCP: ten received a retroperitoneal laparostomy approach, three of them both an anterior and posterior laparostomy approach, and two an anterior laparostomy approach. Duodenal leak closure was observed after a mean (± standard deviation, SD) of 12.6 (± 4.6) and 24.6 (± 7.9) days after conservative and surgical treatment, respectively (p < 0.001). The overall and postoperative mortality rates were 13.3 % (4 of 30 patients) and 26.6 % (4 of 15 patients), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-ERCP perforation is burdened by a high risk of mortality. Early clinical and radiographic features have to be used to determine which type of surgical or conservative treatment is indicated. Half of patients can be treated conservatively, but in case of sepsis or unstable general conditions, early surgical procedure is indicated as the only possible chance of recovery.

Operative treatment of periampullary retroperitoneal perforation complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based strategies are lacking regarding the appropriate management of periampullary retroperitoneal perforations complicating endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). We propose a transduodenal operative repair of periampullary retroperitoneal perforation.

METHODS

Six patients with duodenal periampullary perforation induced by endoscopic sphincterotomy underwent operation after failure of an attempt of conservative management. After mobilization of the second and the third part of the duodenum, a minimal transversal duodenotomy was carried out, the papilla was exposed, periampullary perforation was readily identified, and was sutured easily as a sphincteroplasty or by 2 or 3 Vicryl 3/0 sutures. Patient outcomes were measured.

RESULTS

Periampullary perforation was repaired as sphincteroplasty in 2 cases, and with Vicryl 3/0 sutures in 4 cases. The mean duration of operation was 176 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. None of the patients required reoperation after transduodenal repair of the perforation. The patients had a normal postoperative course. The median hospital stay was 10.5 days (range, 9 to 20 days) and the mortality rate was nil. There were no delayed complications during a median follow-up of 60 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The transduodenal operative approach to periampullary perforation after ERCP/ES at an early stage in the clinical evolution of the perforation is a safe and effective procedure. We consider this approach a useful option for the treatment of periampullary perforation after ERCP/ES when initial endoscopic and conservative management do not yield good results within 24 hours.

Emergency pancreatoduodenectomy in nontrauma patients

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the safety of pancreatoduodenectomy has improved, with a low mortality rate and reduced morbidity in institutions with extensive experience in the procedure. The indication for pancreatoduodenectomy has been expanded. Emergency pancreatoduodenectomy has mainly been performed for abdominal trauma.

AIMS

To discuss possible indications for emergency pancreatoduodenectomy in nontrauma patients.

METHODOLOGY

A series of 417 consecutive pancreatic head resections performed between November 1993 and August 2000 was reviewed for emergency interventions. Indications and outcome of emergency pancreatoduodenectomies were analyzed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of emergency pancreatoduodenectomy was 1%. Two patients had duodenopancreatic complications after endoscopic and surgical interventions, and two patients had otherwise uncontrollable bleeding from a penetrating duodenal ulcer and an ampullary tumor. In all four patients, emergency pancreatoduodenectomy was carried out without local complications but with a high morbidity. One patient died after surgery.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that emergency pancreatoduodenectomy may be considered, under exceptional circumstances, by surgeons experienced in pancreatic resections, but unfavorable perioperative conditions should be included in the preoperative planning and risk assessment of such patients.