Behavioural and pharmacological dissociation of chlordiazepoxide effects on discrimination and punished responding

Potentiation of the anticonflict effects of diazepam, but not pentobarbital and phenobarbital, by aminooxyacetic acid (AOAA)

The Conditioned Suppression of Drinking (CSD) paradigm is an "animal model" for anxiety which has been used to study the anticonflict effects of the benzodiazepines. It has been postulated that benzodiazepines produce their effects through interactions with GABA. The present study examined this potential GABA-BZ interaction on CSD behavior. In daily 10-minute sessions, water-deprived rats were trained to drink from a tube which was occasionally electrified (0.5 mA), electrification being signalled by a tone. Within 2-3 weeks control CSD responding had stabilized (16-24 shocks session and 10-14 ml water/session); drug tests were conducted at weekly intervals. As expected, diazepam (0.3-20.0 mg/kg), pentobarbital (0.6-10.0 mg/kg) and phenobarbital (10.0-40.0 mg/kg) alone markedly increased the number of shocks received at doses which did not depress background responding (i.e., water intake). Treatment with the GABA-transaminase inhibitor aminooxyacetic acid (AOAA: 2.5-10.0 mg/kg, 10- or 60-minute pretreatment) alone had no anticonflict effect on CSD behavior. However, pretreatment (60-minute) with 10.0 mg/kg AOAA significantly potentiated the effects of diazepam, as indicated by a significant shift to the left in the diazepam dose-response curve relative to diazepam alone. By contrast, the anticonflict effects of pentobarbital and phenobarbital were unaffected by this AOAA pretreatment. Thus, while increases in GABA transmission alone do not appear to affect CSD behavior, the anticonflict effect of benzodiazepines, but not barbiturates, appear to be potentiated by increases in GABA transmission.

Are the effects of benzodiazepines on discrimination and punishment dissociable?

Studies have shown that benzodiazepines (BZs) both disrupt discrimination and increase resistance to punishment. Using a delayed response task, we provide evidence that effects of BZs on discrimination cannot be fully explained by deficits in either short or long term memory, or by intolerance for delay of reward. A schedule with rewarded, nonrewarded (Time out: TO) and conflict components was used to investigate effects in rats of compounds active at the BZ receptor on successive discrimination and punished responding in parallel. The GABA transaminase inhibitor ethanolamine-O-sulphate exerted additive effects with chlordiazepoxide (CDP) on punished but not TO responding. Both GABA and CDP injected into the amygdala selectively increased conflict rates, but with peripheral treatment CDP also increased TO rates. Two inverse BZ agonists, CGS 8216 and FG 7142 antagonzied the anti-conflict effects of GABA and CDP, given within the amygdala or peripherally, but the increase in TO rates induced by systemic CDP was counteracted only by peripheral treatments. These compounds also reduced rates of conflict responding below baseline, consistent with anxiogenic activity. Effects of the BZ antagonist Ro 15-1788 were broadly similar to those of the inverse agonists, except that it did not antagonise the anti-conflict action of intra-amygdaloid GABA, nor significantly reduce punished responding at the single dose used. We conclude from these results that the anti-conflict effects of BZs are mediated by a GABAergic amygdaloid mechanism, but that the same mechanism is not involved in BZ effects on discrimination.