Carcinoma of the reconstructed stomach tube following esophageal resection for a benign stricture: report of a case and review of the literature

Gastric Conduit Cancer following Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

The incidence of gastric cancer associated with esophageal cancer is notably high. In recent years, there has been an increase in patients with gastric conduit cancers due to early detection and radical treatment of esophageal cancer, leading to prolonged survival of the patients. Metachronous gastric cancer following esophagectomy sometimes can pose a clinical challenge for surgeons, while gastric tube reconstruction is a well-established procedure accompanying esophagectomy, treating gastric cancer within the gastric tube can be difficult in contrast. Surgical treatment of gastric tube cancers is often complex and life-threatening. Early detection of gastric tube cancer is crucial for improving prognosis as it allows for less invasive surgical interventions. However, no specific guidelines for detecting gastric tube cancer have been established. In this report, we present a case of gastric tube cancer in a patient that had Ivor-Lewis surgery 20 years ago for preinvasive adenocarcinoma of the thoracic esophagus against the background of Barrett's esophagus. Recommendations for earlier and more accurate diagnosis and treatment of this pathology are discussed.

Gastric cancer in the reconstructed gastric tube after radical esophagectomy: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

Metachronous gastric carcinoma arising in a gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction has been occasionally encountered in long-term survivors of esophageal cancer. This study investigated 10 cases of gastric tube cancer in order to clarify the characteristics and the outcome of these patients.

METHODS

Four hundred and seventy-one patients underwent a radical esophagectomy at Kyushu University Hospital between 1989 and 2003. There were 10 cases of gastric tube cancer after an esophagectomy.

RESULTS

The interval between the esophagectomy and the development of the gastric tube cancer ranged from 1.1 to 7 years. There was no peak for the incidence of gastric tube cancer. In 6 of 10 cases of gastric tube cancer, endoscopic or surgical resection were performed for the treatment; however, chemotherapy was administered to the other 4 cases for several reasons. The prognosis of patients who underwent resection was better than that of the other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequent endoscopic examinations are therefore important even several years after performing an esophagectomy, since the risk of gastric tube cancer is higher than the risk of a recurrence of esophageal cancer several years after an esophagectomy. Only an early diagnosis permits a less invasive and appropriate approach for the treatment of gastric tube cancer.

Effect of esophagoplasty on the mucosa structure in the gastric transplant

Structural modifications of the gastric tube transplant were studied during the delayed period after esophagoplasty carried out for benign diseases of the esophagus. Adaptive and pathological reactions manifesting in atrophic and sclerotic changes in the mucosa formed the basis for transplant reorganization. The leading morphological markers were degeneration and hypersecretion of the foveolar epithelium, focal atrophy of the fundal glands with foci of pyloric metaplasia, hypertrophy and fibrosis of the muscle plate, and stromal sclerosis. Abundant polymorphonuclear infiltration of the mucosa with lymphoid follicular hyperplasia were observed in H. pylori contamination of the gastric transplant.

Gastric tube cancer: immunohistochemical study of 10 lesions in six patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastric tube cancer (GTC), defined as carcinoma arising in the reconstructed gastric tube after esophagectomy, has been increasingly reported, but its pathogenesis remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine clinically and pathologically 10 GTCs in six patients.

METHODS

In addition to examination of the clinicopathological features of GTCs, the adjacent gastric tube mucosa was also evaluated immunohistochemically using gastric foveolar markers (MUC5AC and human gastric mucin), pyloric gland markers (MUC6 and M-GGMC-1), and intestinal markers (MUC2 and CD10).

RESULTS

All patients were men and three patients had multiple GTCs. All GTCs were located on the middle to lower portion of the gastric tube. Nine GTCs had tubular and/or papillary adenocarcinoma components, and another was signet-ring cell carcinoma. Intestinal metaplasia was found in non-neoplastic mucosa adjacent to nine GTCs. Metaplastic goblet cells adjacent to five GTCs expressed both gastric and intestinal markers, which were similar to the corresponding GTC cells, indicating a close association between the GTCs and metaplastic goblet cells. The other three GTCs expressed only intestinal markers, which may support the suggestion that the intestinal phenotype is expressed later in cancerous development.

CONCLUSION

Pathogenesis of GTCs could be identical to that of ordinary gastric cancer. Cancerous multiplicity associated with esophageal cancer may also play a role in the development of GTCs.

Metachronous cancer of gastroplasty after esophagectomy

We reviewed two cases of adenocarcinoma of the gastric tube used for reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancer. The first case gastric cancer was detected during follow-up by endoscopic examination. Total resection of the gastric tube and reconstruction by Roux-en-Y was performed each time. The patient was alive and disease-free 1 year after surgery. In the second case the tumor was revealed via thoracic pain. Chemotherapy, using carboplatin-5-fluorouracil, was performed because of lung metastasis but the patient died 1 year later. The incidence of gastric tube cancer after esophagectomy has recently increased in conjunction with the lengthening of survival of esophageal cancer patients. The clinical symptoms related to tumors are associated with short-term survival, whereas the cancers detected by routine endoscopy screening have occasional long-term survival. Gastrectomy is proposed for surgical treatment but the operating procedure is complex with a high morbidity rate. Lesions detected at an early stage could be treated by minimally invasive surgery such as endoscopic mucosal resection.