Comparative study of availability of prednisolone after intestinal infusion of prednisolone metasulfobenzoate and prednisone

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease. Oral steroids are the standard treatment. We have updated this review, which was first published in 2002, because several new treatments have since been tried.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of treatments for bullous pemphigoid.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated searches of the following databases to November 2021: Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We searched five trial databases to January 2022, and checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs of treatments for immunofluorescence-confirmed bullous pemphigoid.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors, working independently, evaluated the studies against the review's inclusion criteria and extracted data from included studies. Using GRADE methodology, we assessed the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in each comparison. Our primary outcomes were healing of skin lesions and mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 RCTs (1442 participants). The main treatment modalities assessed were oral steroids, topical steroids, and the oral anti-inflammatory antibiotic doxycycline. Most studies reported mortality but adverse events and quality of life were not well reported. We decided to look at the primary outcomes 'disease control' and 'mortality'. Almost all studies investigated different comparisons; two studies were placebo-controlled. The results are therefore based on a single study for each comparison except azathioprine. Most studies involved only small numbers of participants. We assessed the risk of bias for all key outcomes as having 'some concerns' or high risk, due to missing data, inappropriate analysis, or insufficient information. Clobetasol propionate cream versus oral prednisone Compared to oral prednisone, clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body probably increases skin healing at day 21 (risk ratio (RR 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.13; 1 study, 341 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Skin healing at 21 days was seen in 99.8% of participants assigned to clobetasol and 92.4% of participants assigned to prednisone. Clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body compared to oral prednisone may reduce mortality at one year (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.01; 1 study, 341 participants; low-certainty evidence). Death occurred in 26.5% (45/170) of participants assigned to clobetasol and 36.3% (62/171) of participants assigned to oral prednisone. This study did not measure quality of life. Clobetasol propionate cream may reduce risk of severe complications by day 21 compared with oral prednisone (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.86; 1 study, 341 participants; low-certainty evidence). Mild clobetasol propionate cream regimen (10 to 30 g/day) versus standard clobetasol propionate cream regimen (40 g/day) A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen probably does not change skin healing at day 21 (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.03; 1 study, 312 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Both groups showed complete healing of lesions at day 21 in 98% participants. A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen may not change mortality at one year (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.32; 1 study, 312 participants; low-certainty evidence), which occurred in 118/312 (37.9%) participants. This study did not measure quality of life. A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen may not change adverse events at one year (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.14; 1 study, 309 participants; low-certainty evidence). Doxycycline versus prednisolone Compared to prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day), doxycycline (200 mg/day) induces less skin healing at six weeks (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92; 1 study, 213 participants; high-certainty evidence). Complete skin healing was reported in 73.8% of participants assigned to doxycycline and 91.1% assigned to prednisolone. Doxycycline compared to prednisolone probably decreases mortality at one year (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.89; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 14; 1 study, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Mortality occurred in 2.4% (3/132) of participants with doxycycline and 9.7% (11/121) with prednisolone. Compared to prednisolone, doxycycline improved quality of life at one year (mean difference 1.8 points lower, which is more favourable on the Dermatology Life Quality Index, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.58 lower; 1 study, 234 participants; high-certainty evidence). Doxycycline compared to prednisolone probably reduces severe or life-threatening treatment-related adverse events at one year (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.99; 1 study, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Prednisone plus azathioprine versus prednisone It is unclear whether azathioprine plus prednisone compared to prednisone alone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from two trials (98 participants). These studies did not measure quality of life. Adverse events were reported in a total of 20/48 (42%) participants assigned to azathioprine plus prednisone and 15/44 (34%) participants assigned to prednisone. Nicotinamide plus tetracycline versus prednisone It is unclear whether nicotinamide plus tetracycline compared to prednisone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from one trial (18 participants). This study did not measure quality of life. Fewer adverse events were reported in the nicotinamide group. Methylprednisolone plus azathioprine versus methylprednisolone plus dapsone It is unclear whether azathioprine plus methylprednisolone compared to dapsone plus methylprednisolone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from one trial (54 participants). This study did not measure quality of life. A total of 18 adverse events were reported in the azathioprine group and 13 in the dapsone group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body is probably similarly effective as, and may cause less mortality than, oral prednisone for treating bullous pemphigoid. Lower-dose clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body is probably similarly effective as standard-dose clobetasol propionate cream and has similar mortality. Doxycycline is less effective but causes less mortality than prednisolone for treating bullous pemphigoid. Other treatments need further investigation.

Free prednisolone pharmacokinetics predicted from total concentrations in patients with inflammatory - immunonologic conditions

Prednisone is an anti-inflammatory drug widely used in internal medicine and rheumatology, but dosing remains empirical. The active metabolite of prednisone is free prednisolone. The aim of this work was to build a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model that can predict free prednisolone concentrations in patients with inflammatory/immunologic conditions.A total of 107 patients from the department of internal medicine of Cochin hospital provided 343 observations. Blood samples drawn for biological analyses were used for drug determination. Total plasma prednisolone concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and the data were modelled using Monolix. The pharmacokinetics was ascribed a one-compartment open model with three transit compartments standing for the absorption and metabolism process. The model used predicts free concentrations that served to derive total concentrations given published binding constants. Only size parameters influenced the pharmacokinetics. Free prednisolone CL_U /F and V_U /F, scaled allometrically on lean body weight, were, respectively, 26.7 L/h and 94.3 L for 50 kg LBW. CL_U /F interindividual variability was 0.20. The additive and proportional residual variabilities were, respectively, 4.3 µg/L and 0.20. The results point out some dosing issues, that is the possibility of under- or over-dosage in thin or overweight patients respectively.

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease in the West. Oral steroids are the standard treatment.This is an update of the review published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To assess treatments for bullous pemphigoid.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In August 2010 we updated our searches of the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Clinical Trials), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Ongoing Trials registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of treatments for participants with immunofluorescence-confirmed bullous pemphigoid.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors evaluated the studies for the inclusion criteria, and extracted data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 randomised controlled trials (with a total of 1049 participants) of moderate to high risk of bias. All studies involved different comparisons, none had a placebo group. In 1 trial plasma exchange plus prednisone gave significantly better disease control at 1 month (0.3 mg/kg: RR 18.78, 95% CI 1.20 to 293.70) than prednisone alone (1.0 mg/kg: RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.90), while another trial showed no difference in disease control at 6 months.No differences in disease control were seen for different doses or formulations of prednisolone (one trial each), for azathioprine plus prednisone compared with prednisone alone (one trial), for prednisolone plus azathioprine compared with prednisolone plus plasma exchange (one trial), for prednisolone plus mycophenolate mofetil or plus azathioprine (one trial), for tetracycline plus nicotinamide compared with prednisolone (one trial). Chinese traditional medicine plus prednisone was not effective in one trial.There were no significant differences in healing in a comparison of a standard regimen of topical steroids (clobetasol) with a milder regimen (RR 1.00, 95% 0.97 to 1.03) in one trial. In another trial, clobetasol showed significantly more disease control than oral prednisolone in people with extensive and moderate disease (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.17), with significantly reduced mortality and adverse events (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Very potent topical steroids are effective and safe treatments for BP, but their use in extensive disease may be limited by side-effects and practical factors. Milder regimens (using lower doses of steroids) are safe and effective in moderate BP. Starting doses of prednisolone greater than 0.75 mg/kg/day do not give additional benefit, lower doses may be adequate to control disease and reduce the incidence and severity of adverse reactions. The effectiveness of adding plasma exchange, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil to corticosteroids, and combination treatment with tetracycline and nicotinamide needs further investigation.

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid is the most common autoimmune bullous disease in the West. Oral steroids are considered the standard treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of treatments for bullous pemphigoid.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE to March 2003 and bibliographies from identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of treatments for patients with immunofluorescence confirmed bullous pemphigoid.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers evaluated the studies in terms of the inclusion criteria, five extracted data independently; disagreements were resolved by discussion. Statistical pooling of the data was inappropriate because of heterogeneity of treatments.

MAIN RESULTS

We found seven randomised controlled trials with a total of 634 patients. All studies involved different comparisons, none included a placebo group. Different doses, different formulations of corticosteroids and the addition of azathioprine failed to show significant differences in measures of disease control. However, patients who took azathioprine were able to almost halve the amount of prednisone required for disease control. Plasma exchange plus prednisone achieved significantly better disease control than prednisone alone; this favourable effect was not apparent in another study. The latter study also compared plasma exchange or azathioprine plus prednisone, but failed to show significant differences for disease control or mortality, although total adverse events at six months almost reached statistical significance in favour of plasma exchange plus prednisone. Comparing tetracycline plus nicotinamide with prednisolone, no significant difference for disease response was shown. A very potent topical corticosteroid was compared to oral prednisone in patients with moderate and extensive disease. In patients with extensive disease, the topical steroid group showed significantly better survival and disease control, and less severe complications, while no significant differences for these outcomes were seen in patients with moderate disease. Most of the reported deaths were in patients taking high doses of oral corticosteroids.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Very potent topical steroids are effective and safe treatments for bullous pemphigoid; their use in extensive disease may be limited by side effects and practical factors. Starting doses of prednisolone greater than 0.75 mg/kg/day do not seem to give additional benefit, lower doses may be adequate for disease control; this could reduce the incidence and severity of adverse reactions. The effectiveness of the addition of plasma exchange or azathioprine to corticosteroids has not been established. Combination treatment with tetracycline and nicotinamide may be useful; this needs further validation.

Oral prednisolone metasulphobenzoate in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are one of the mainstays of treatment for active ulcerative colitis, but they are associated with numerous side effects. The sparingly absorbed corticosteroid prednisolone metasulphobenzoate is used topically in the treatment of distal disease. A targeted-release oral preparation (Predocol) has been developed to allow delivery of this drug to the whole colon. We have studied the effect of oral Predocol on inflammation as measured by 99Tc(m)-HMPAO leucocyte scintigraphy in patients with symptomatic and sigmoidoscopic relapse of known extensive ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Fourteen patients were recruited and received Predocol 47.1 mg twice daily, 8 for 7 days and 6 for 14 days. Scintigraphy was performed prior to and at the end of treatment. Each segment of colon was graded (0-4) and individual scores summed to give a total scintigraphic score.

RESULTS

Total scintigraphic score improved by a mean of 2.5 (P = 0.027). Mean individual scores improved in the rectum by 0.7 (P = 0.038) and in the descending colon by 0.8 (P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Predocol is an oral preparation of a poorly absorbed salt of prednisolone that is effective in reducing inflammation over short treatment periods in patients with active ulcerative colitis.

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid is the most common autoimmune bullous disease in the West. Oral steroids are considered the standard treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of treatments for bullous pemphigoid.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE to March 2003 and bibliographies from identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of treatments for patients with immunofluorescence confirmed bullous pemphigoid.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers evaluated the studies in terms of the inclusion criteria, five extracted data independently; disagreements were resolved by discussion. Statistical pooling of the data was inappropriate because of heterogeneity of treatments.

MAIN RESULTS

We found seven randomised controlled trials with a total of 634 patients. All studies involved different comparisons, none included a placebo group. Different doses, different formulations of corticosteroids and the addition of azathioprine failed to show significant differences in measures of disease control. However, patients who took azathioprine were able to almost halve the amount of prednisone required for disease control. Plasma exchange plus prednisone achieved significantly better disease control than prednisone alone; this favourable effect was not apparent in another study. The latter study also compared plasma exchange or azathioprine plus prednisone, but failed to show significant differences for disease control or mortality, although total adverse events at six months almost reached statistical significance in favour of plasma exchange plus prednisone. Comparing tetracycline plus nicotinamide with prednisolone, no significant difference for disease response was shown. A very potent topical corticosteroid was compared to oral prednisone in patients with moderate and extensive disease. In patients with extensive disease, the topical steroid group showed significantly better survival and disease control, and less severe complications, while no significant differences for these outcomes were seen in patients with moderate disease. Most of the reported deaths were in patients taking high doses of oral corticosteroids.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Very potent topical steroids are effective and safe treatments for bullous pemphigoid; their use in extensive disease may be limited by side effects and practical factors. Starting doses of prednisolone greater than 0.75 mg/kg/day do not seem to give additional benefit, lower doses may be adequate for disease control; this could reduce the incidence and severity of adverse reactions. The effectiveness of the addition of plasma exchange or azathioprine to corticosteroids has not been established. Combination treatment with tetracycline and nicotinamide may be useful; this needs further validation.