Advanced esophageal carcinoma

COX7B Is a New Prognostic Biomarker and Correlates with Tumor Immunity in Esophageal Carcinoma

Esophageal carcinoma (ESCA) refers to the most common type of malignant tumor, which reveals that it occurs often all over the world. ESCA is also correlated with an advanced stage and low survival rates. Thus, the development of new prognostic biomarkers is an absolute necessity. In this study, the aim was to investigate the potential of COX7B as a brand-new predictive biomarker for ESCA patients. COX7B expression in pancancer was examined using TIMER2. The statistical significance of the predictive value of COX7B expression was explored. The relationship between COX7B expression and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in ESCA was analyzed by using ssGSEA. In this study, the result indicated that several types of cancers had an abnormally high amount of COX7B. COX7B expression in samples from patients with ESCA was considerably higher than in nontumor tissues. A more advanced clinical stage may be anticipated from higher COX7B expression. According to the findings of Kaplan-Meier survival curves, patients with low COX7B levels had a more favorable prognosis than those with high COX7B levels. The result of multivariate analysis suggested that COX7B expression was a standalone prognostic factor for the overall survival of ESCA patients. A prognostic nomogram including gender, clinical stage, and COX7B expression was constructed, and TCGA-based calibration plots indicated its excellent predictive performance. An analysis of immune infiltration revealed that COX7B expression has a negative correlation with TFH, Tcm, NK cells, and mast cells. COX7B may serve as an immunotherapy target and as a biomarker for ESCA diagnosis and prognosis.

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth more frequent cancer worldwide, with a poor prognosis. Initial staging is critical to decide on the best individual treatment approach. Current modalities for the assessment of EC are irradiating techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography/CT, or invasive techniques, such as digestive endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive and non-irradiating imaging technique that provides high degrees of soft tissue contrast, with good depiction of the esophageal wall and the esophagogastric junction. Various sequences of MRI have shown good performance in initial tumor and lymph node staging in EC. Diffusion-weighted MRI has also demonstrated capabilities in the evaluation of tumor response to chemoradiotherapy. To date, there is not enough data to consider whole body MRI as a routine investigation for the detection of initial metastases or for prediction of distant recurrence. This narrative review summarizes the current knowledge on MRI for the management of EC.

Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis along the left gastric artery in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of lymph node (LN) metastasis (LNM) along the left gastric artery is high, its relationship with the prognosis in postoperative patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is rarely reported. This study clarified the prognostic impact of LNM along the left gastric artery in postoperative patients with ESCC.

METHODS

This study assessed data of 1521 patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between March 1992 and March 2012. A chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to explore the preliminary correlation between clinical factors and LNM along the left gastric artery. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess whether LNM along the left gastric artery was an independent predictor of overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to present a classifying effect based on LN status.

RESULTS

LNM was observed in 598 patients (39.3%) and was found along the branches of the left gastric artery in 256 patients (16.8%). The patients were classified into two groups based on the presence of LNM along the left gastric artery. Patients without LNM along the left gastric artery had better cancer-specific survival than those with positive LNs (P <  0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that LNM along the left gastric artery was an important independent prognostic factor for long-term survival among ESCC patients (P = 0.011).

Mongolian Mind-Body Interactive Psychotherapy enhances the quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer: A pilot study

Esophageal cancer is a major public health issue in China. Mongolian Mind-Body Interactive Psychotherapy (MMIP) is a new psychotherapy that combines modern psychology with traditional Mongolian medicine. Previous cases have shown better quality of life (QoL) after MMIP in patients with cancer and other diseases. This study aimed to shed light on the effect of MMIP on the quality of life of patients in Inner Mongolia. A total of 21 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer were studied. QoL assessment was performed using the two questionnaires of EORTC QLQ-OES 18 and QLICP-OES. The results showed that MMIP had statistical significant improvement on body function, psychological function, common symptoms, and side effects, such as reflux. As alternative and complementary medicine, MMIP could help esophageal cancer patients experience better QoL. Further large-scale studies are required to determine the impact of MMIP for QoL in patients undergoing surgery or chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Predictive significance of CYFRA21-1, squamous cell carcinoma antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen for lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cancer

From January 2018 to May 2018, 108 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy with two- to three-field lymph node dissection. Serum cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1), squamous cell carcinoma antigen, and carcinoembryonic antigen levels were detected before surgery. Preoperative serum levels of CYFRA21-1 and squamous cell carcinoma antigen were correlated closely with pN stage ( P = 0.000 and P = 0.045). CYFRA21-1 and pathological T status were independent predictors of lymph node metastasis ( P = 0.000). The area under the curve values of CYFRA21-1 and squamous cell carcinoma antigen for predicting lymph node metastasis were 0.731 ( P =0.000) and 0.650 ( P =0.007), respectively. Our study demonstrated that serum CYFRA21-1 and squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels were associated with lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, especially in patients at the early T stage. The preoperative serum CYFRA21-1 level was an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis.

Building CT Radiomics Based Nomogram for Preoperative Esophageal Cancer Patients Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction

PURPOSE: To build and validate a radiomics-based nomogram for the prediction of pre-operation lymph node (LN) metastasis in esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 197 esophageal cancer patients were enrolled in this study, and their LN metastases have been pathologically confirmed. The data were collected from January 2016 to May 2016; patients in the first three months were set in the training cohort, and patients in April 2016 were set in the validation cohort. About 788 radiomics features were extracted from computed tomography (CT) images of the patients. The elastic-net approach was exploited for dimension reduction and selection of the feature space. The multivariable logistic regression analysis was adopted to build the radiomics signature and another predictive nomogram model. The predictive nomogram model was composed of three factors with the radiomics signature, where CT reported the LN number and position risk level. The performance and usefulness of the built model were assessed by the calibration and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen radiomics features were selected to build the radiomics signature. The radiomics signature was significantly associated with the LN metastasis (P<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the radiomics signature performance in the training cohort was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.732-0.881), and in the validation cohort it was 0.771 (95% CI: 0.632-0.910). The model showed good discrimination, with a Harrell’s Concordance Index of 0.768 (0.672 to 0.864, 95% CI) in the training cohort and 0.754 (0.603 to 0.895, 95% CI) in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis showed our model will receive benefit when the threshold probability was larger than 0.15. CONCLUSION: The present study proposed a radiomics-based nomogram involving the radiomics signature, so the CT reported the status of the suspected LN and the dummy variable of the tumor position. It can be potentially applied in the individual preoperative prediction of the LN metastasis status in esophageal cancer patients.

Survival benefit of surgery to patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

To assess if surgery provided survival benefit to patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), we performed a retrospective review of 1230 patients who were newly diagnosed with stage T2-T4 esophageal SCC from 2007 to 2014 in our hospital. There were greater than 70% of patients with age under 65 years, and more than 85% were stage T3-T4 at the time of diagnosis. The median survival time was 1.06 year (95% CI 0.99–1.1 yrs). Survival analyses showed that survival time was significantly associated with age, T stage, clinical lymph node involvement and treatment modality (surgery versus definite chemoradiotherapy). Surgery still possessed a powerful impact on overall survival by multivariable analysis. Death risk of patients treated with curative surgery was significantly lower than those with definite chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, for patients of stage T3N(+) and T4, surgery combined with (neo-)adjuvant treatment were significantly associated with higher survival rate than surgery alone or definite chemoradiotherapy. In conclusion, the patients who undergo surgery were significantly associated longer survival, therefore, curative resection should be considered for esophageal cancer patients who are medically fit for surgery. Moreover, combined with (neo-)adjuvant treatment is recommended for surgically resectable stage T3-T4 esophageal SCC.

The Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Involvement in Large Scale Operable Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A 10-Year Experience

Background

Lymph node (LN)-related factors including the number of LN regions involved, the LN ratio (LNR), and the number of metastatic LNs are strong prognostic indicators for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. Accurately staging LN involvement may improve the stratification of patients and guide the management of patients.

Methods

A total of 688 potentially resectable patients who had regional LN metastases were enrolled in this retrospective study.

Results

ESCC involving a single region was associated with better outcomes than that involving multiple regions (P < 0.001 for both PFS and OS). An increased number of metastatic LNs was significantly associated with reduced PFS and OS based on univariate analysis (P < 0.001). PFS and OS were significantly higher in patients with a lower cancer-involved LNR, with 5-year OS rates of 9.7% and 31.4% for patients with a lower and higher cancer-involved LNR, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, patients with N1 LN involvement experienced longer survival than patients with N2 LN involvement (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.12-1.68) or N3 LN involvement (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.52-2.53). Higher LNR resulted in longer OS than lower LNR based on multivariate analysis (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.15-1.84; P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Our study has shown that not only the number of metastatic LNs but also the number of involved LN regions predicts outcomes after definitive surgery among Chinese patients with N-positive ESCC. LNR might serve as a powerful indicator that should be included in TNM staging for EC patients.

Extent of lymph node dissection: common hepatic artery lymph node dissection can be omitted for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Controversy persists regarding the adequate extent of lymph node (LN) dissection in thoracic esophageal cancer (EC) surgery. Oncologic efficacy should be balanced with the increased risk of postoperative complications after aggressive radical LN dissection. Here, we evaluate the effectiveness of common hepatic artery LN dissection in surgery for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among a total of 1,563 EC patients who underwent surgery from May 2005 to December 2012 at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 1,248 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were selected for this study, including 682 patients who underwent esophagectomy with common hepatic artery LN dissection and 566 patients who underwent esophagectomy without common hepatic artery LN dissection. The clinical data of patients were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, the locoregional LN metastasis, relationship between metastatic rates of common hepatic artery LN and clinicopathological factors were analyzed. A propensity score match analysis were performed to control for potential differences in the characteristics of patients with EC cell carcinoma, and postoperative complications were analyzed after propensity score-matching.

RESULTS

The metastatic rate of common hepatic LN was 3.5%. Logistic regression analysis revealed tumor diameter, N classification and pTNM stage were risk factors for common hepatic LN metastasis. Matching based on propensity scores produced 361 patients in each group. The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 32.70% and 35.45%, respectively, no significant difference was found (P=0.432).

CONCLUSIONS

The metastatic rate of common hepatic artery LN is low. For patients who undergo resection for Stage I thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the dissection of common hepatic artery LN may be safely omitted.

Imaging strategies in the management of oesophageal cancer: what's the role of MRI?

OBJECTIVES

To outline the current role and future potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of oesophageal cancer regarding T-staging, N-staging, tumour delineation for radiotherapy (RT) and treatment response assessment.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library were searched identifying all articles related to the use of MRI in oesophageal cancer. Data regarding the value of MRI in the areas of interest were extracted in order to calculate sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy for group-related outcome measures.

RESULTS

Although historically poor, recent improvements in MRI protocols and techniques have resulted in better imaging quality and the valuable addition of functional information. In recent studies, similar or even better results have been achieved using optimised MRI compared with other imaging strategies for T- and N-staging. No studies clearly report on the role of MRI in oesophageal tumour delineation and real-time guidance for RT so far. Recent pilot studies showed that functional MRI might be capable of predicting pathological response to treatment and patient prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In the near future MRI has the potential to bring improvement in staging, tumour delineation and real-time guidance for RT and assessment of treatment response, thereby complementing the limitations of currently used imaging strategies.

KEY POINTS

• MRI's role in oesophageal cancer has been somewhat limited to date. • However MRI's ability to depict oesophageal cancer is continuously improving. • Optimising TN-staging, radiotherapy planning and response assessment ultimately improves individualised cancer care. • MRI potentially complements the limitations of other imaging strategies regarding these points.

Analysis of new N-category on prognosis of oesophageal cancer with positive lymph nodes in a Chinese population

Background

The 7^th edition of the new TNM classification system for oesophageal cancer (EC) has been published. N-category is now divided into N0, N1, N2 and N3. In this study, we aimed to validate the prognostic ability of the new N classification system in EC with positive lymph nodes in a Chinese population, and evaluate whether the new N classification system can help the decision-making for postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Patients and methods

From 2002 to 2008, thoracic EC who underwent oesophagectomy were retrospectively analysed. Patients pathological stage 6^th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer / Union International Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) TNM classification were switched to pathological stage 7^th edition for this analysis. Patients with pathological stage T1-4N1-3M0 EC were selected. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were employed to compare overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 545 patients met the inclusion criteria: 346 (63.5%) received oesophagectomy alone, 199 (36.5%) received oesophagectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy, and 36.1% (197/545) received oesophagectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis revealed significant difference in OS among patients at different postoperative pN-category (p<0.001). This was also present in patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy (p<0.001) and those undergoing postoperative chemotherapy (p<0.001). There was no marked difference in OS between patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy and surgery alone at the same postoperative pN-category, except that postoperative radiotherapy marginally improved OS in patients with pN2 and pN3 disease.

Conclusions

Our results validated the prognostic ability of new N classification system. The N-category is an independent prognostic factor in patients with resectable thoracic EC who were positive for lymph nodes in a Chinese population. Further studies are required to clarify the role of new N classification system in the decision-making for postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Management of advanced-stage operable esophageal cancer

The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing in the developed world, with a relative increase in adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma. The distensible nature of the esophagus results in delayed development of symptoms associated with esophageal cancer; hence many patients have locally advanced or metastatic cancer at the time of initial presentation. Although resection remains the treatment of choice for early-stage esophageal cancer, the best treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is debatable and, consequently, varies at different centers. This article discusses the published literature on various available therapeutic options for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Treatment of T4 esophageal cancer. Definitive chemo-radiotherapy vs chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery

The outcome of patients with T4 esophageal cancer, defined as a tumor that invades neighboring structures (e.g., aorta, trachea, bronchus, and lung), is extremely poor. Despite recent advances in surgical techniques, these tumors are usually considered inoperable. Two distinct therapeutic options are currently available for T4 esophageal cancers: chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery (CRT-S), which comprises esophagectomy following down-staging of the tumor by CRT, and definitive chemo-radiotherapy (D-CRT), which is designed to avoid esophagectomy by using maximum doses of irradiation. CRT-S is superior to D-CRT with respect to local control and short-term survival although CRT-S is associated with relatively higher perioperative mortality and morbidity. On the other hand, it is sometimes difficult to achieve local control with D-CRT and the treatment often results in fistula formation, though a complete response to CRT is often associated with better prognosis. Admittedly, the difference in the survival rate between the two modalities is marginal at long-term follow-up due to operative morbidity and inadequate control of distant metastasis in CRT-S. Changes in perioperative management and intensive systemic chemotherapy may enhance the outcome. Randomized controlled trials involving large population samples are needed to define the standard treatment for T4 esophageal cancer.

Lymph node metastases and prognosis in oesophageal carcinoma--a systematic review

Oesophageal cancer is the 7th most common cause of cancer-related death in the developed world and the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma is now the fastest growing of any gastrointestinal cancer. Lymph node involvement is the single most important prognostic factor in oesophageal cancer. Imaging to determine the extent of lymph node involvement and plan treatment often requires a combination of modalities to avoid under-staging. The 7th edition of the staging system released by the International Union Against Cancer (IUCC) has stratified lymph node involvement according to the number of lymph nodes involved and redefined its groupings for location of metastatic lymph node involvement. This review discusses the prognostic and treatment implications of these modifications and explores micrometastatic lymph node involvement, capsular infiltration and lymph node ratio as possible additions to the staging system.

p53 Mutation analysis of low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the esophagus using laser capture microdissection

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and to analyze the characteristics of p53 point mutation in esophageal intraepithelial lesions.

METHODS

p53 Immunohistochemical and genetic analyses were performed on histopathologically and morphometrically diagnosed lesions. Laser capture microdissection samples were used for increased accuracy.

RESULTS

Of the 70 lesions studied, 21 were high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ (HGD/CIS), 21 low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 16 reactive atypical epithelia (RAE) and 12 normal epithelia (NE). Immunohistochemical staining showed p53 protein accumulation in 86% (18/21) of HGD/CIS, 81% (17/21) of LGD, and in none of RAE and NE. p53 point mutation was detected in 71% (15/21) of HGD/CIS, 67% (14/21) of LGD, but in none of RAE and NE. Of HGD/CIS and LGD with p53 protein accumulation, similar percentages had mutations: 83% (15/18) and 82% (14/17), respectively. Of lesions with mutations, 72% (21/29) had mutations at hot spots such as codons 238, 248, 273 and 282.

CONCLUSIONS

p53 Point mutation prevalent in HGD/CIS was also present in a large number of LGD. This is strong evidence that LGD is a neoplastic lesion and that p53 point mutation is deeply involved in esophageal carcinogenesis.

Surgical techniques

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) has shown a remarkable increase during recent decades. Most patients are present with advanced stage disease, reflecting transmural growth and metastasis to lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis. Moreover, the pattern of lymph node dissemination is chaotic and difficult to predict, and despite the use of modern technology (e.g., spiral CT, EUS, FDG-PET), clinical staging remains suboptimal. These shortcomings in staging, as well as in different attitudes toward extent of resection and lymphadenectomy, are reflected by a great variation in surgical techniques, which are discussed in this review. As to the results, primary surgery can currently be performed with low mortality, below 5% in high volume centers. Hospital mortality and morbidity are mainly related to pulmonary complications and anastomotic leaks, the latter mostly resolving under conservative treatment. Overall 5-year survival varies between 10% and 59%. As expected the most important prognostic determinants are completeness of resection (R0 vs. R1-R2) and lymph node status (N0, N1). R0 resection currently offers 5-year survival rates of over 40%. Five-year survival figures for node-negative (N0) patients exceed 70%, and even for node-positive (N1), patients reach 25%. It is not known whether performing a three-field lymph node dissection is beneficial for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. With overall 5-year survival currently exceeding 30%-40%, these figures should be the gold standard against which all other therapeutic modalities are compared.

[Preoperative evaluation of prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell cancer]

Despite substantial improvements in the surgical therapy of esophageal squamous cell cancer, the prognosis still remains poor. This is mainly due to locally advanced tumors (T3-4, N+) or systemic metastases (M1) in the majority of patients at initial presentation. It is of the utmost importance to reliably detect relevant pretherapeutic prognostic indicators for optimal individual therapeutic strategies. Pretherapeutic prognostic indicators should therefore discriminate precisely between incurable and potentially curative disease. Preoperative or definitive multimodal treatment is increasingly being offered to patients with locally advanced tumors and opens a broad field for innovative techniques such as pretherapeutic molecular response prediction or early response detection by PET scan to further individualize and optimize treatment strategies.

Quality in the surgical treatment of cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

Surgical treatment of cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remains a complex and challenging task. Quality of care may be improved by concentrating these patients in high volume centres in order to decrease post-operative mortality. However, it appears that hospital mortality is a poor tool to measure the quality. More likely specialisation as well as appropriate hospital environment supporting a dedicated multidisciplinary team are key elements in improving both the short term and long term results. The dedicated specialist surgeon has a key role in improving these results through surgical quality. The most important goal in the surgical treatment of these cancers is to perform a complete resection (R0). Data from literature seem to indicate that R0 resection combined with extensive lymphadenectomy are resulting in improved disease free survival and possibly in improved 5 year survival, often reported to exceed 35% after such interventions. These results suggest that there is a great need for standardisation of surgery. Such a standardisation and the resulting improved quality most likely will result in a significant improvement of outcome of esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and GEJ. These improvements in outcome should become the gold standard to which all other therapeutic regimens should be compared. Poor surgical quality and related poor results should not be a justification for multimodality regimen.

Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy on staging, disease-free survival, and 5-year survival in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy is mainly performed in Japan. Data from Western experience with 3-field lymphadenectomy are scarce and dealing with relatively small numbers. As a result, its role in the surgical practice of cancer of the esophagus and GEJ remains controversial.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 1999, primary surgery with 3-field lymphadenectomy was performed in 192 patients, of whom a cohort of 174 R0 resections was used for further analysis.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality of the whole series was 1.2%. Overall morbidity was 58%. Pulmonary complications occurred in 32.8%, cardiac dysrhythmias in 10.9%, and persistent recurrent nerve problems in 2.6%. pTNM staging was as follows: stage 0, 0.6%; stage I, 9.2%; stage II, 27.6%; stage III, 28.7%; and stage IV, 33.9%. Overall 3- and 5-year survival was 51% and 41.9%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was 51.4% and 46.3%, respectively. Locoregional lymph node recurrence was 5.2%; no patient developed an isolated cervical lymph node recurrence. Five-year survival for node-negative patients was 80.2% versus 24.5% for node-positive patients. Five-year survival by stage was 100% in stages 0 and I, 59.1% in stage II, 36.8% in stage III, and 13.3% in stage IV. Twenty-three percent of the patients with adenocarcinoma (25.8% distal third and 17.6% GEJ) and 25% of the patients with squamous cell carcinoma (26.2% middle third) had positive cervical nodes resulting in a change of pTNM staging specifically related to the unforeseen cervical lymph node involvement in 12%. Cervical lymph node involvement was unforeseen in 75.6% of patients with cervical nodes at pathologic examinations. Five-year survival for patients with positive cervical nodes was 27.7% for middle third squamous cell carcinoma. For distal third adenocarcinomas, 4-year survival was 35.7% and 5-year survival 11.9%. No GEJ adenocarcinoma with positive cervical nodes survived for 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. The prevalence of involved cervical nodes is high, regardless of the type and location of tumor resulting in a change of final staging specifically related to the cervical field in 12% of this series. Overall 5-year and disease-free survival after R0 resection of 41.9% and 46.3%, respectively, may indicate a real survival benefit. A 5-year survival of 27.2% in patients with positive cervical nodes in middle third carcinomas indicates that these nodes should be considered as regional (N1) rather than distant metastasis (M1b) in middle third carcinomas. These patients seem to benefit from a 3-field lymphadenectomy. The role of 3-field lymphadenectomy in distal third adenocarcinoma remains investigational.

Extended surgery for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

The overall prognosis of patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remains poor mainly because of the advanced stage of the disease at the time of presentation. As a result, controversy persists over the appropriate extent of surgery. This article reviews the impact of aggressive surgery on staging, disease-free survival, and cure rate. Despite recent advances in staging including positron emission tomography (PET), the findings after aggressive surgery indicate that the overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of clinical staging are still too low. These shortcomings in clinical staging therefore question the value of the indications, results, and interpretation of outcomes in multimodality treatment regimens. Extended surgery increases the R(0) resection rate, which seems to have an undeniable beneficial effect on the incidence of locoregional recurrence and which should be considered as a parameter of surgical quality, especially within the context of multimodality trials. As to the effect on cure rate, the only randomized trial with published results did not indicate a significant difference between extended and more limited resections for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ, albeit that a subsequent subanalysis did show a significant survival benefit favoring more extended surgery in distal third adenocarcinomas. However, the bulk of current literature suggests that better survival is achieved by more aggressive surgery. For three-field lymphadenectomy the available data suggest a potential survival benefit. It appears that positive cervical lymph nodes in patients with middle or proximal third carcinoma should no longer be considered as M(1a/b) distant lymph node metastasis but rather as N(1) regional disease.

Beneficial effect of a prone position for patients with hypoxemia after transthoracic esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

Although the prone position has been reported to improve arterial oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, there have been no reports on its efficacy in patients with hypoxemia after transthoracic esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of the prone position on hypoxemia after three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical study.

SETTING

General intensive care unit at a university hospital.

INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS

Sixteen patients who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy and showed hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 ratios of <200 under positive end-expiratory pressure of >5 cm H2O) on the fifth postoperative day were randomly assigned to prone (eight patients) and nonprone (eight patients) groups. Prone position for 6 hrs was carried out for four consecutive days. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio, the duration of ventilatory support, and length of stay, were measured.

RESULTS

Oxygenation: The PaO2/FiO2 ratio markedly increased by 32% +/- 22% in seven of eight patients (p <.05) when the patients were moved from the supine to the prone position. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio after the fourth prone position (238 +/- 55, p <.05) was significantly higher than that before the first trial of prone position (166 +/- 25) in these seven patients. Duration of ventilatory support and intensive care unit length of stay: Both the ventilation period (11.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 14.0 +/- 1.6 days, p =.0029) and the length of stay in the intensive care unit (12.8 +/- 4.4 vs. 17.2 +/- 3.4 days, p =.0032) were significantly shorter in the prone group compared with the nonprone group. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio at the time of cessation of prone positioning was significantly higher than the corresponding value in the nonprone group.

CONCLUSION

In hypoxemic patients after three-field lymphadenectomy, the prone position improved arterial oxygenation without any deleterious effects. The beneficial effect of the prone position is possibly attributable to opening of the bronchi obstructed by secretions.

Methods of palliation of esophageal and gastric cancer

Esophageal and gastric malignancies are common worldwide. Less than half are amenable to curative treatment at the time of diagnosis because of advanced or metastatic disease. Palliation is often required for symptoms, such as dysphagia, gastrointestinal bleeding, aspiration caused by tracheoesophageal fistula, nausea and emesis secondary to gastric outlet obstruction, and malnutrition. This article reviews the gastric outlet obstruction, and malnutrition. This article reviews the medical, endoscopic, and surgical options for palliative treatment.

Multimodality therapy for resectable cancer of the thoracic esophagus

The frequency of esophageal carcinoma continues to increase in North America primarily because of the increased incidence of Barrett's epithelium in the distal esophagus and its malignant potential. Aggressive treatments involving multimodality therapies have been offered to improve overall poor survival rates. A review of this experience follows, to explain the rationale and to compare results of therapies. Although preoperative chemoradiation therapy is commonly used for locally advanced disease, few data support its superiority over surgical resection alone, followed by adjuvant therapy when appropriate. Hence this regimen should be limited to patients enrolled in controlled, randomized studies until the data support its widespread use.

Two-field dissection is enough for esophageal cancer

Three-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer remains controversial. The high prevalence of cervical lymph node involvement is the basis of cervical lymphadenectomy. Studies of recurrence patterns after esophagectomy, however, indicate that clinically relevant cervical nodal recurrence is uncommon, and that the incidence of such recurrence is similar to that of two-field lymphadenectomy. Moreover, a convincing survival benefit cannot be proven for the more extended lymphadenectomy. The emphasis of three-field lymphadenectomy has shifted to lymphadenectomy of the superior mediastinum and along the recurrent laryngeal nerve chains. Radical dissection of these areas may improve local disease control; the price to pay is increased postoperative morbidity and impaired long-term quality of life. Furthermore, the selection of appropriate patients for extended lymphadenectomy is difficult. Formal three-field lymphadenectomy seems unnecessary, but the controversy of the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy and its impact on survival remains unanswered.

Cancer of the esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction: potentially curative therapies

The definition of potential curative tumors of the esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction remains problematic. This is due to a lack of accuracy in clinical staging despite recent advances in CT, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography scan and minimally invasive staging modalities. As a result much controversy persists regarding indications for surgery and extent of resection and lymphadenectomy. Today surgery with curative option results in five-year survival of over 30%. Multimodality regimens, especially neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, seem to be beneficial in patients with a complete response on pathologic staging. Other indications are investigational and should be studied within carefully monitored study protocols. In early carcinoma T(is)-T(1a) endoluminal ablation technique seem to open promising perspectives provided of discrimination between T(is)-T(1a) and T(1b) can be made by the use of 20mhz EUS probes.

Treatment of esophageal carcinoma

Cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction remains a virulent malignancy with an overall poor prognosis. Especially in the Western hemisphere, the incidence of adenocarcinoma is sharply rising. Over the last two decades, surgery has become the mainstay of treatment. Decreased surgical mortality and standardization of oncologic principles focusing on the completeness of resection are believed to be responsible for the improved 5-year survival rates, which are reaching > or = 30%. Until now, there has been no proven benefit from combined neoadjuvant treatment modalities using chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy except for the subset of patients showing a complete response at pathologic examination. Further research should focus on new chemotherapeutic agents and the development of molecular markers that allow better identification of candidates for multimodality regimens.

Is there a role for radical esophagectomy

The aim of primary surgery in the treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) is definite cure. To obtain this goal R0 resection, i.e. complete macroscopic and microscopic removal is of paramount importance. However, one of the most controversial questions remains the extent of lymph node dissection, in particular the value of cervical lymph node dissection (the so called third field). Three arguments are believed to favour more extended lymphadenectomy: optimal staging, prolonged tumour control, improved cure rate. (a) Optimal staging: available data indicate that unforeseen lymph node involvement in the neck is encountered in approximately 30% of the patients after 3-field lymphadenectomy. Even in tumours of the GEJ up to 20% of the patients in the T3N+ setting have unforeseen positive nodes in the neck. (b) Prolonged tumour control: radical esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy is decreasing locoregional recurrence substantially, below 10%, in several published reports. More over extended lymphadenectomy seems to defer onset of locoregional recurrence and generalised metastasis for up to 3 years or more. (c) Improved cure rate: despite a lack of prospective randomised study many studies indicate a distinct survival benefit after radical esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy. From the available data it becomes clear that radical surgery and extensive lymphadenectomy offers the best chances for prolonged survival or cure. This can be done without increasing hospital mortality and morbidity. Survival figures obtained by this technique are a gold standard to which survival obtained by other techniques (e.g. multimodality treatment forms, VATS resections) have to be compared.

Problems in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy preceding surgery for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus

The adverse effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the postoperative course in esophageal cancer was studied in 9 patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy preceding surgery for thoracic esophageal carcinoma possibly involving adjacent organs (neoadjuvant group), and 13 patients undergoing surgery without neoadjuvant therapy for same disease (control group). The two groups were compared for volume of intraoperative hemorrhage, surgical duration, frequency of postoperative morbidity, and for postoperative changes in blood platelet counts, and serum thrombopoietin and interleukin-6 levels. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 1121 g (580-1,662 g) in the neoadjuvant group and 546.5 g (274.7-778.3 g) in controls group (Student's T test: p < 0.01). No significant difference was seen found between the two groups in the degree of postoperative deterioration in cardiopulmonary function or in interleukin-6 levels. Blood platelet counts decreased in both groups until postoperative day 7, but recovery on postoperative day 14 was significantly depressed in the neoadjuvant group compared to controls. Serum thrombopoietin levels were higher in the neoadjuvant group than in controls (Mann-Whitney U-test: p < 0.05). We found that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy induces latent postoperative myelosuppression and may lead to intractable infection.

Prognostic value of immunohistochemically identifiable tumor cells in lymph nodes of patients with completely resected esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Current methods of disease staging often fail to detect small numbers of tumor cells in lymph nodes. Metastatic relapse may arise from these few cells.

METHODS

We studied 1308 lymph nodes from 68 patients with esophageal cancer without overt metastases who had undergone radical en bloc esophagectomy. A total of 399 lymph nodes obtained from 68 patients were found to be free of tumor by routine histopathological analysis and were studied further for isolated tumor cells by immunohistochemical analysis with the monoclonal anti-epithelial-cell antibody Ber-EP4. This antibody did not stain lymph nodes from 24 control patients without carcinoma.

RESULTS

Of the 399 "tumor free" lymph nodes, 67 (17 percent), obtained from 42 of the 68 patients, contained Ber-EP4-positive tumor cells. Fifteen of 30 patients who were considered free of lymph-node metastases by histopathological analysis had such cells in their lymph nodes, and 5 of the 15 had small primary tumors. Ber-EP4-positive cells found in "tumor free" nodes were independently predictive of significantly reduced relapse-free survival (P=0.008) and overall survival (P=0.03). They predicted relapse both in patients without nodal metastases (P=0.01) and in those with regional lymph-node involvement (P=0.007). All 12 patients whose lymph nodes were negative on both histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis and who were available for follow-up survived without recurrence. The presence of micrometastatic tumor cells in bone marrow had no additional prognostic value.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemical examination of lymph nodes may improve the pathological staging of esophageal cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil/low-dose leucovorin for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Forty-four patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were treated with biochemical modulated combination chemotherapy and surgery. Treatment consisted of cisplatinum (70 mg/m2/day 1, day 22), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 700 mg/m2/day, days 1-5, 22-26), and leucovorin (20 mg/m2/day, days 1-5, 22-26) with nutritional support, and surgery (days 42-70, mean day 56). Surgery consisted of subtotal esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or additional irradiation to the mediastinum was restricted to patient with residual tumors. Clinical response rate was 63.6% in primary tumor, 52.6% in intramural metastasis, 100% in intraepithelial spread, and 30.9% for metastatic lymph nodes. There was a slight disagreement between the result of evaluation of histological and clinical effect. The incidence of postoperative complications was 25%, and the mortality rate was 2.3%. Overall 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year survival rates of the patients were 57%, 37.9%, 28.5%, and 28.5%, respectively. The median survival time was 14.7 months. Responders survived longer than nonresponders. The histological responders survived longer than clinical responders. The 4-year survival rate of patients without residual tumor after treatment was 75% in the superficial cases, 51% in the locoregional cases, and 50% in the widespread cases.

Selective approach to the treatment of oesophageal cancer

Between September 1985 and December 1994, 322 patients with oesophageal cancer were treated. Of the 190 patients who underwent operation, 173 had an oesophageal resection; in 124 this was performed as an abdominothoracic resection and in 49 by the transhiatal approach. The assessment of radicality after histological examination revealed a curative (R0) resection in 121 patients (70 per cent) and a palliative (R1-R2) resection in 52 (30 per cent). Prognosis was correlated with the extent of mediastinal lymph node dissection. In 77 patients with stage pT1-3 pN0-1 pM0 the 5-year survival rate was 40 per cent after abdominothoracic resection with two-field lymph node dissection and zero after transhiatal resection (P = 0.01). The authors propose a differentiated surgical approach involving abdominothoracic resection with two-field lymph node dissection for patients with limited tumours (pT1-3 pN0-1 M0) if the operative risk is tolerable. Transhiatal resection appears to be effective only in patients with early tumours (Union Internacional Contra la Cancrum stage 0).

Oesophageal carcinoma--past and present studies

Surgery is a crucial part of therapy of oesophageal cancer. The many trials which are described focus on variations in surgical technique. A trend is found that results are better with more extensive procedures. Local control evidently is improved, but an effect on survival is not yet sufficiently shown. Combinations of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy with surgery are effective by downstaging offering seemingly better survival in responding patients. Interpretation of trial data, however, is difficult because of the relatively small numbers in individual studies; the differences of the used treatment modalities make an overview approach less reasonable. Great attention should be given in the future trial work to better standardization (interpretation of definitions). Directives for optimal staging should be described in all study protocols.