Correlation between low CSA plasma concentration and severity of acute GvHD in bone marrow transplantation

Tremor Induced by Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, or Everolimus: A Review of the Literature

Calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus are immunosuppressant drugs that are known to induce tremors. Non-calcineurin inhibitors such as sirolimus and everolimus have also reportedly been accompanied by tremors, albeit less likely. However, the prevalence rates reported in the literature are notably wide, and the risk profiles for these drug-induced tremors are less understood. We searched PubMed to extract data on the risk of tremors with these drugs when prescribed for various transplant and non-transplant indications. We ascertained whether the risk of drug-induced tremor is influenced by the underlying diagnosis, dosing formulations, drug concentrations, and blood monitoring. We extracted data on treatment strategies and outcomes for tremors. Articles were primarily screened based on English language publications, abstracts, and studies with n ≥ 5, which included case series, retrospective studies, case-controlled studies, and prospective studies. We found 81 eligible studies comprising 33 cyclosporine, 43 tacrolimus, 6 sirolimus, and 1 everolimus that discussed tremor as an adverse event. In the pooled analysis of studies with n > 100, the incidence of tremor was 17% with cyclosporine, 21.5% with tacrolimus, and 7.8% with sirolimus and everolimus together. Regarding the underlying diagnosis, tremor was more frequently reported in kidney transplant (cyclosporine 28%, tacrolimus 30.1%) and bone marrow transplant (cyclosporine 40%, tacrolimus 41.9%) patients compared with liver transplant (cyclosporine 9%, tacrolimus 11.5%) and nontransplant indications (cyclosporine 21.5%, tacrolimus 11.3%). Most studies did not report whether the risk of tremors correlated with drug concentrations in the blood. The prevalence of tremors when using the twice-daily formulation of tacrolimus was nearly the same as the once-daily formulation (17% vs 18%). Data on individual-level risk factors for tremors were lacking. Except for three studies that found some benefit to maintaining magnesium levels, there were minimal data on treatments and outcomes. A large body of data supports a substantive and wide prevalence of tremor resulting from tacrolimus use followed by cyclosporine, especially in patients receiving a kidney transplant. However, there is little reporting on the patient-related risk factors for tremor, risk relationship with drug concentrations, treatment strategies, and outcomes.

Relationship between cyclosporine area-under-the curve and acute graft versus host disease in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant: A prospective, multicenter study

Traditionally in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), cyclosporine doses are individualized using cyclosporine trough concentrations (C₀) while area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC) is used in solid organ transplant. AUC potentially has an important relationship with the development of acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD). We conducted a prospective study to describe the relationship between severe (grade III-IV) aGVHD and cyclosporine AUC in pediatric HSCT recipients. Pediatric patients who underwent allogeneic myeloablative HSCT and scheduled to receive cyclosporine for aGVHD prophylaxis participated in this multicenter study. Cyclosporine doses were adjusted based on C₀ according to each center's standard of care. Cyclosporine AUC was determined weekly until neutrophil engraftment or Day +42, whichever was later. Associations between severe aGVHD and cyclosporine AUC and other patient and treatment-related factors were evaluated. Of the 110 children enrolled, 97 were evaluable. Thirty-seven (38%) children developed aGVHD; 13 (13.4%) had severe aGVHD. On univariate analysis, there was no association between severe aGVHD and cyclosporine AUC at any time point before engraftment. Future research should focus on refinement of C₀ targets for cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring in HSCT.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part I

Although immunosuppressive treatments and target concentration intervention (TCI) have significantly contributed to the success of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), there is currently no consensus on the best immunosuppressive strategies. Compared with solid organ transplantation, alloHCT is unique because of the potential for bidirectional reactions (i.e. host-versus-graft and graft-versus-host). Postgraft immunosuppression typically includes a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and a short course of methotrexate after high-dose myeloablative conditioning, or a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil after reduced-intensity conditioning. There are evolving roles for the antithymyocyte globulins (ATGs) and sirolimus as postgraft immunosuppression. A review of the pharmacokinetics and TCI of the main postgraft immunosuppressants is presented in this two-part review. All immunosuppressants are characterized by large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and by narrow therapeutic indices. It is essential to understand immunosuppressants' pharmacokinetic properties and how to use them for individualized treatment incorporating TCI to improve outcomes. TCI, which is mandatory for the calcineurin inhibitors and sirolimus, has become an integral part of postgraft immunosuppression. TCI is usually based on trough concentration monitoring, but other approaches include measurement of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the dosing interval or limited sampling schedules with maximum a posteriori Bayesian personalization approaches. Interpretation of pharmacodynamic results is hindered by the prevalence of studies enrolling only a small number of patients, variability in the allogeneic graft source and variability in postgraft immunosuppression. Given the curative potential of alloHCT, the pharmacodynamics of these immunosuppressants deserves to be explored in depth. Development of sophisticated systems pharmacology models and improved TCI tools are needed to accurately evaluate patients' exposure to drugs in general and to immunosuppressants in particular. Sequential studies, first without and then with TCI, should be conducted to validate the clinical benefit of TCI in homogenous populations; randomized trials are not feasible, because there are higher-priority research questions in alloHCT. In Part I of this article, we review the alloHCT process to facilitate optimal design of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies. We also review the pharmacokinetics and TCI of calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate.

Optimizing the use of cyclosporin in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Cyclosporin remains the most widely used immunosuppressive agent in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). The increased awareness of the impact of the intensity of post-transplant immunosuppression on determining outcome after allogeneic SCT has resulted in a re-examination of whether cyclosporin is currently being optimally used in this population of patients. Recent studies in solid organ transplantation have questioned whether the use of trough levels provides the most accurate reflection of the immunosuppressive actions of cyclosporin and alternative strategies to monitor cyclosporin dosage after liver and kidney transplantation are increasingly being used. As a result there is now interest in examining whether there is scope for translating these advances into the arena of haematopoietic transplantation. In this paper, we will review the rationale underlying the current schedules for dosing and monitoring cyclosporin after allogeneic SCT and identify specific areas in which the use of cyclosporin requires re-evaluation. These include evaluation of whether patient outcome would be improved by using peak cyclosporin levels to determine dosing schedules, analysis of optimal cyclosporin dosing schedules in patients undergoing reduced intensity allografts and investigation of surrogate markers of cyclosporin's immunosuppressive activity.

Relationship between CsA trough blood concentration and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease after paediatric stem cell transplantation from matched-sibling or unrelated donors

In order to determine optimal CsA trough blood concentrations (TBC) in the early post transplantation period, we analysed relationships between TBC and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in paediatric SCT. A total of 94 children consecutively underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) from: matched-sibling (MSD) (n=36), mismatched-related (MMRD) (n=3) and unrelated donors (UD) (n=55). GVHD prophylaxis usually included CsA alone or with methotrexate. Antithymocyte globulin was added in UD-SCT. TBC during the first weeks of post transplantation were estimated retrospectively by a Bayesian pharmacokinetic method and statistically associated with aGVHD. In MSD-SCT, the mean TBC during the first 2 weeks post transplantation were 42+/-10 and 90+/-7 ng/ml, respectively, in patients with grade II-IV and 0-I aGVHD (P=0.001). In SCT from UD and MMRD, TBC were 73+/-4 vs 95+/-8 ng/ml (P=0.284). For TBC >85 ng/ml, no patient developed grade II-IV aGVHD, 10 developed mild aGVHD and 30 had no aGVHD. For TBC <65 ng/ml, 7/11 patients receiving an MSD-SCT and 4/18 receiving an UD- or MMRD-SCT developed grade II-IV aGVHD. The mean TBC corresponding to each grade were: no GVHD: 101+/-10 ng/ml, mild: 77+/-11 ng/ml, moderate: 61+/-13 ng/ml, severe: 56+/-15 ng/ml (P <0.001). These results reveal a strong relationship between TBC during the early post transplantation period and the severity of aGVHD in paediatric SCT.

Posttransplant day significantly influences pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cyclosporine-based immunosuppression is common after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Elevated cyclosporine concentrations are associated with significant toxicity and often result in the temporary cessation or discontinuation of cyclosporine. Low blood concentrations also result in significant immunologic risks, primarily graft-versus-host disease and loss of stem cell graft. The pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine are highly complex, and maintaining therapeutic and safe cyclosporine concentrations are challenging. Several clinical factors are known to independently influence in vivo cyclosporine pharmacokinetic behavior. However, in the critically ill patient, several of these clinical factors are generally present simultaneously. Unfortunately, there are no studies that have evaluated the combined effects of these clinical factors on cyclosporine disposition in HSCT. The objective of our study is to determine the population pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenous and oral cyclosporine, evaluate the effects of clinical covariates on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics, and develop a model that estimates clearance (Cl) and dose requirements for an individual HSCT patient with these clinical covariates. The authors analyzed 740 cyclosporine steady-state whole blood concentrations in 129 adult patients obtained between day 0 and discharge or 60 days posttransplant, whichever came first. Patients received intravenous cyclosporine at 2.5 mg/kg every 12 hours if body weight was greater than 50 kg, 2.5 mg/kg every 8 hours if less than 50 kg, or 5 to 7.5 mg/kg/d given as a continuous infusion, beginning on day-3. Patients were converted to oral therapy as tolerated. The influence of clinical covariates on the Cl of cyclosporine was tested with a nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM). The tested clinical covariates were age, height, body weight on admission, body surface area, sex, type of hematologic malignancy, transplant type, preparative regimen, baseline serum creatinine, T-cell depletion of graft, number of methotrexate doses, day of onset, and maximum grade of acute graft-versus-host disease. The route and frequency of cyclosporine administration, day posttransplant, total bilirubin level, serum creatinine level, actual body weight, presence of concurrent CYP450 enzyme inhibitors and inducers, or nephrotoxins on the day of the cyclosporine blood measurement were also evaluated. Cyclosporine Cl significantly decreased each week posttransplant. The authors found no significant effect of any of the other tested covariates including total bilirubin on Cl. The final regression model for the estimation of Cl is: Cl (L/hr) = ([body weight in kg - 70] * 0.183 + 22.3) * (day posttransplant factor). The corresponding day posttransplant factor estimates are 1.46, 1.32, 1.20, and 1.0 during days 0 to 7, 8 to 14, 15 to 21 and greater than 21 posttransplant, respectively. The interindividual variability in Cl was 27.7%. The dose of intravenous or oral cyclosporine can be calculated using the estimated Cl. Understanding cyclosporine pharmacokinetics and the clinical events that lead to alterations in Cl and exposure is critical in optimizing immunosuppressive therapy. The authors found that cyclosporine Cl significantly decreased posttransplant until day 21. A pharmacokinetics model was developed that incorporates the day posttransplant to predict cyclosporine Cl. Cyclosporine dose requirements in an individual HSCT patient to achieve the desired therapeutic blood target can be estimated using this model.

Statement of current majority practices in graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis and treatment in children

Great variations exist in the prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD in children undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). The EBMT Working Party Paediatric Diseases (EBMT-WP PD) and the International BFM Study Group--Subcommittee Bone Marrow Transplantation (IBFM-SG), aimed at evaluating current local standards in the prevention and treatment of GVHD and steps which can be taken to achieve a uniform policy for the individual methods. Several conferences with their members assessed practices which are mainly applied or under investigation in children and identified where additional information is needed. For prevention of GVHD, the majority of the paediatric centres prefer CsA +/- MTX. Addition of folinic acid to MTX was considered for reduction of side-effects. During treatment of acute GVHD most centres administer prednisolone and whole blood level-adjusted CsA as medications of first choice. In cases of poor or no response to this therapy, additional immunosuppressive agents such as ATG, mycophenolate-mofetile and tacrolimus are being increasingly used. The treatment of chronic GVHD usually consists of various combinations of prednisolone and CsA. In severe cases, extracorporeal photopheresis, psoralene-UVA (PUVA) and thalidomide are administered.

Cyclosporine monitoring improves graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after bone marrow transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The principal objective of this study was to determine whether a relationship exists between trough cyclosporine concentrations measured by HPLC and the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of 59 consecutive human leukocyte antigen-matched bone marrow transplants. Patients received uniform GVHD prophylaxis with cyclosporine and methotrexate. Whole blood trough cyclosporine concentrations were measured at least twice weekly during hospitalization and weekly after discharge.

SETTING

A dedicated bone marrow transplant unit in an academic center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The means of cyclosporine concentrations were assessed for each patient on a weekly basis during the first 50 days after transplant. These means were compared between patients developing grade 2-4 acute GVHD and patients without significant GVHD.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients developed acute GVHD at a median of 25 days after bone marrow transplant (range 10-50). There was no correlation between the development of GVHD and patient age, diagnosis, donor age, donor gender, donor-recipient gender mismatch, and time to neutrophil engraftment (> 1000 x 10(6) cells/L). Although mean weekly cyclosporine concentrations were consistently lower in patients developing acute GVHD, the difference in values compared with those of patients with GVHD was not statistically significant. Mean weekly cyclosporine concentrations at the time of neutrophil engraftment were statistically associated with the development of GVHD. Patients with GVHD had mean +/- SD concentrations of 174 +/- 69 ng/mL, significantly lower than 254 +/- 114 ng/mL in patients without GVHD. Furthermore, the rate of GVHD was 82 percent in patients with mean concentrations < 200 ng/mL at the time of neutrophil engraftment as compared with a rate of 34 percent in patients with concentrations > or = 200 ng/mL (relative risk = 2.4). Also, mean cyclosporine concentrations measured during the week of onset of GVHD were significantly lower compared with mean cyclosporine concentrations of all other patients at risk of GVHD during that week.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine concentrations are associated with the development of acute GVHD. Patients with HPLC whole blood concentrations < 200 ng/mL are at significantly higher risk of developing GVHD, particularly if these concentrations are observed during the week of neutrophil engraftment. More effective GVHD prophylaxis could be achieved by careful monitoring of cyclosporine concentrations after transplant.