Position-effect variegation and chromosome structure of a heat shock puff in Drosophila

Biology and Physics of Heterochromatin-Like Domains/Complexes

The hallmarks of constitutive heterochromatin, HP1 and H3K9me2/3, assemble heterochromatin-like domains/complexes outside canonical constitutively heterochromatic territories where they regulate chromatin template-dependent processes. Domains are more than 100 kb in size; complexes less than 100 kb. They are present in the genomes of organisms ranging from fission yeast to human, with an expansion in size and number in mammals. Some of the likely functions of domains/complexes include silencing of the donor mating type region in fission yeast, preservation of DNA methylation at imprinted germline differentially methylated regions (gDMRs) and regulation of the phylotypic progression during vertebrate development. Far cis- and trans-contacts between micro-phase separated domains/complexes in mammalian nuclei contribute to the emergence of epigenetic compartmental domains (ECDs) detected in Hi-C maps. A thermodynamic description of micro-phase separation of heterochromatin-like domains/complexes may require a gestalt shift away from the monomer as the "unit of incompatibility" that determines the sign and magnitude of the Flory-Huggins parameter, χ. Instead, a more dynamic structure, the oligo-nucleosomal "clutch", consisting of between 2 and 10 nucleosomes is both the long sought-after secondary structure of chromatin and its unit of incompatibility. Based on this assumption we present a simple theoretical framework that enables an estimation of χ for domains/complexes flanked by euchromatin and thereby an indication of their tendency to phase separate. The degree of phase separation is specified by χN, where N is the number of "clutches" in a domain/complex. Our approach could provide an additional tool for understanding the biophysics of the 3D genome.

Epigenetic control of variation and stochasticity in metabolic disease

BACKGROUND

The alarming rise of obesity and its associated comorbidities represents a medical burden and a major global health and economic issue. Understanding etiological mechanisms underpinning susceptibility and therapeutic response is of primary importance. Obesity, diabetes, and metabolic diseases are complex trait disorders with only partial genetic heritability, indicating important roles for environmental programing and epigenetic effects.

SCOPE OF THE REVIEW

We will highlight some of the reasons for the scarce predictability of metabolic diseases. We will outline how genetic variants generate phenotypic variation in disease susceptibility across populations. We will then focus on recent conclusions about epigenetic mechanisms playing a fundamental role in increasing variability and subsequently disease triggering.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Currently, we are unable to predict or mechanistically define how "missing heritability" drives disease. Unravelling this black box of regulatory processes will allow us to move towards a truly personalized and precision medicine.

A correlation between development time and variegated position effect in Drosophila melanogaster

Position-effect variegation is a phenomenon in which cell-autonomous genes, normally expressed in all cells of a tissue, are expressed in some cells but not in others, leading to a mosaic tissue. Variegation occurs when a normally euchromatic gene is re-positioned close to heterochromatin by chromosome rearrangement. The extent of variegation is known to be influenced by a number of environmental and genetic factors. In the courss of investigations of the influence of the pH of larval medium on the extent of eye-colour variegation in In(1)ωm4 Drosophila melanogaster, we have found that the extent of variegation depends on development time. Flies reared at pH 2·6 develop slowly and show more extreme variegation than those reared at higher pH. This effect, as well as variations within the pH treatments, can be accounted for by differences in development time. The observed regression relationship between variegation and development time also appears to accommodate the influences of temperature on both variables. We suggest that development time may account causally for the reported influences of a number of environmental agents (temperature, crowding, chemicals) on variegation. Ways in which this might occur are discussed in the context of models of the molecular basis of differential gene activity.

Cellular mechanism for targeting heterochromatin formation in Drosophila

Near the end of their 1990 historical perspective article "60 Years of Mystery," Spradling and Karpen (1990) observe: "Recent progress in understanding variegation at the molecular level has encouraged some workers to conclude that the heterochromatization model is essentially correct and that position-effect variegation can now join the mainstream of molecular biology." In the 18 years since those words were written, heterochromatin and its associated position effects have indeed joined the mainstream of molecular biology. Here, we review the findings that led to our current understanding of heterochromatin formation in Drosophila and the mechanistic insights into heterochromatin structural and functional properties gained through molecular genetics and cytology.

Chromosome organization and chromatin modification: influence on genome function and evolution

Histone modifications of nucleosomes distinguish euchromatic from heterochromatic chromatin states, distinguish gene regulation in eukaryotes from that of prokaryotes, and appear to allow eukaryotes to focus recombination events on regions of highest gene concentrations. Four additional epigenetic mechanisms that regulate commitment of cell lineages to their differentiated states are involved in the inheritance of differentiated states, e.g., DNA methylation, RNA interference, gene repositioning between interphase compartments, and gene replication time. The number of additional mechanisms used increases with the taxon's somatic complexity. The ability of siRNA transcribed from one locus to target, in trans, RNAi-associated nucleation of heterochromatin in distal, but complementary, loci seems central to orchestration of chromatin states along chromosomes. Most genes are inactive when heterochromatic. However, genes within beta-heterochromatin actually require the heterochromatic state for their activity, a property that uniquely positions such genes as sources of siRNA to target heterochromatinization of both the source locus and distal loci. Vertebrate chromosomes are organized into permanent structures that, during S-phase, regulate simultaneous firing of replicon clusters. The late replicating clusters, seen as G-bands during metaphase and as meiotic chromomeres during meiosis, epitomize an ontological utilization of all five self-reinforcing epigenetic mechanisms to regulate the reversible chromatin state called facultative (conditional) heterochromatin. Alternating euchromatin/heterochromatin domains separated by band boundaries, and interphase repositioning of G-band genes during ontological commitment can impose constraints on both meiotic interactions and mammalian karyotype evolution.

Differential gene silencing by trans-heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster

The brown(Dominant) (bw(D)) allele contains a large insertion of heterochromatin leading to the trans-inactivation of the wild-type allele in bw(D)/bw(+) heterozygous flies. This silencing is correlated with the localization of bw(+) to a region of the interphase nucleus containing centric heterochromatin. We have used a series of transgene constructs inserted in the vicinity of the bw locus to demarcate both the extent of bw(D) influence along the chromosome and the relative sensitivities of various genes. Examples of regulatory regions that are highly sensitive, moderately sensitive, and insensitive were found. Additionally, by using the same transgene at increasing distances from the bw(D) insertion site in trans we were able to determine the range of influence of the heterochromatic neighborhood in terms of chromosomal distance. When the transgene was farther away from bw, there was, indeed, a tendency for it to be less trans-inactivated. However, insertion site also influenced silencing: a gene 86 kb away was trans-inactivated, while the same transgene 45 kb away was not. Thus location, distance, and gene-specific differences all influence susceptibility to trans-silencing near a heterochromatic neighborhood. These results have important implications for the ability of nuclear positioning to influence the expression of large blocks of a chromosome.

Complex patterns of inheritance of an imprinted murine transgene suggest incomplete germline erasure

Here we report a transgenic mouse line that exhibits significant deviations from a classic pattern of parental imprinting. When the transgene is passed through the female germline, it is completely silenced in some offspring while in others expression is reduced. This variable expressivity does not appear to be the result of differences in the presence of unlinked modifiers. Female transmission of the transgene is associated with hypermethylation. The transgene is generally reactivated on passage through the male germline. Extended pedigrees reveal complex patterns of inheritance of the phenotype. The most likely explanation for this result is that the imprint is not completely erased and reset when passed through the germline of either sex. FISH analysis reveals that the transgene has integrated into chromosome 3 band E3, a region not known to carry imprinted genes, and the integration site shows no sign of allele-specific differential methylation. These findings, in conjunction with other recent work, raise the possibility that the introduction of foreign DNA into the mammalian genome, either through retrotransposition or transgenesis, may be associated with parental imprinting that is not always erased and reset during meiosis.

Suppressors of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster affect expression of the heterochromatic gene light in the absence of a chromosome rearrangement

Suppressors of position-effect variegation (Su(var)s) in Drosophila melanogaster are usually studied in the presence of chromosomal rearrangements, which exhibit variegated expression of euchromatic genes moved near to, or heterochromatic genes moved away from, centromeric heterochromatin. However, the effects of Su(var) mutations on heterochromatic gene expression in the absence of a variegating re-arrangement have not yet been defined. Here we present a number of results which suggest that Su(var) gene products can interact to affect the expression of the light gene in its normal heterochromatic location. We initially observed that eye pigment was reduced in several Su(var) double mutants; the phenotype resembled that of light mutations and was more severe when only one copy of the light gene was present. This reduced pigmentation could be alleviated by a duplication for the light gene or by a reduction in the amount of cellular heterochromatin. In addition, the viability of most Su(var) double mutant combinations tested was greatly reduced in a genetic background of reduced light gene dosage, when extra heterochromatin is present. We conclude that Su(var) gene products can affect expression of the heterochromatic light gene in the absence of any chromosomal rearrangements. However, it is noteworthy that mutations in any single Su(var) gene have little effect on light expression; we observe instead that different pairings of Su(var) mutations are required to show an effect on light expression. Interestingly, we have obtained evidence that at least two of the second chromosome Su(var) mutations are gain-of-function lesions, which also suggests that there may be different modes of interaction among these genes. It may therefore be possible to use this more sensitive assay of Su(var) effects on heterochromatic genes to infer functional relationships among the products of the 50 or more known Su(var) loci.Key words: heterochromatin, chromatin, gene interactions.

Developmental regulation of heterochromatin-mediated gene silencing in Drosophila

The roles of differentiation, mitotic activity and intrinsic promoter strength in the maintenance of heterochromatic silencing were investigated during development using an inducible lacZ gene as an in vivo probe. Heterochromatic silencing is initiated at the onset of gastrulation, approximately 1 hour after heterochromatin is first visible cytologically. A high degree of silencing is maintained in the mitotically active imaginal cells from mid-embryogenesis until early third instar larval stage, and extensive relaxation of silencing is tightly associated with the onset of differentiation. Relaxation of silencing can be triggered in vitro by ecdysone. In contrast, timing and extent of silencing at both the initiation and relaxation stages are insensitive to changes in cell cycle activity, and intrinsic promoter strength also does not influence the extent of silencing by heterochromatin. These data suggest that the silencing activity of heterochromatin is developmentally programmed.

The M31 gene has a complex developmentally regulated expression profile and may encode alternative protein products that possess diverse subcellular localisation patterns

HP1-like chromobox genes comprise an evolutionarily conserved family of genes that encode components of centromeric heterochromatin. In order to investigate the role of the murine HP1-like gene, M31, in heterochromatin formation we have isolated its gene and characterised its transcripts and protein products. PCR products that represent M31 transcripts were detected at the one-cell stage and were maternal in origin. Maternal provision of M31 transcripts may reflect a need for M31 in the formation of a functional centromere in order that there is proper segregation of chromosomes during the early cleavage divisions; studies in fission yeast and Drosophila have suggested a crucial role for HP1-like genes in centromere function. There are three protein products encoded by the M31 gene. Surprisingly, the two smaller products are found almost exclusively in the cytoplasm.

The structure of heterochromatic DNA is altered in polyploid cells of Drosophila melanogaster

DNA sequences within heterochromatin are often selectively underrepresented during development of polyploid chromosomes, and DNA molecules of altered structure are predicted to form as a consequence of the underrepresentation process. We have identified heterochromatic DNAs of altered structure within sequences that are underrepresented in polyploid cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Specifically, restriction fragments that extend into centric heterochromatin of the minichromosome Dp(1;f)1187 are shortened in polyploid cells of both the ovary and salivary gland but not in the predominantly diploid cells of the embryo or larval imaginal discs and brains. Shortened DNA molecules were also identified within heterochromatic sequences of chromosome III. These results suggest that the structure of heterochromatic DNA is altered as a general consequence of polyploid chromosome formation and that the shortened molecules identified form as a consequence of heterochromatic underrepresentation. Finally, alteration of heterochromatic DNA structure on Dp(1;f)1187 was not correlated with changes in the variegated expression of the yellow gene located on the minichromosome.

DNA representation of variegating heterochromatic P-element inserts in diploid and polytene tissues of Drosophila melanogaster

Position-effect variegation (PEV) is the mosaic expression of a euchromatic gene brought into juxtaposition with heterochromatin. Fourteen different transformed Drosophila melanogaster lines with variegating P-element inserts were used to examine the DNA levels of these transgenes. Insert sites include pericentric, telomeric and fourth chromosome regions. Southern blot analyses showed that the heterochromatic hsp26 transgenes are underrepresented 1.3- to 33-fold in polytene tissue relative to the endogenous euchromatic hsp26 gene. In contrast, the heterochromatic hsp26 transgenes are present in approximately the same copy number as the endogenous euchromatic hsp26 gene in diploid tissue. It appears unlikely that DNA loss could account for the lack of gene expression in diploid tissues seen with these examples of PEV.

Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure

A euchromatic gene placed in the vicinity of heterochromatin by a chromosomal rearrangement generally exhibits position effect variegation (PEV), a clonally inherited pattern showing gene expression in some somatic cells but not in others. The mechanism responsible for this loss of gene expression is investigated here using fly lines carrying a P element containing the Drosophila melanogaster white and hsp26 genes. Following mobilization of the P element, a screen for variegation of white expression recovered inserts at pericentric, telomeric, and fourth chromosome regions. Previously identified suppressors of PEV suppressed white variegation of pericentric and fourth chromosome inserts but not telomeric inserts on the second and third chromosomes. This implies a difference in the mechanism for gene repression at telomeres. Heat shock-induced hsp26 expression was reduced from pericentric and fourth chromosome inserts but not from telomeric inserts. Chromatin structure analysis revealed that the variegating inserts showed a reduction in accessibility to restriction enzyme digestion in the hsp26 regulatory region in isolated nuclei. Micrococcal nuclease digests showed that pericentric inserts were packaged in a more regular nucleosome array than that observed for euchromatic inserts. These data suggest that altered chromatin packaging plays a role in PEV.

Examination of DNA sequences undergoing chromatin conformation changes at a variegating breakpoint in Drosophila melanogaster

Position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster is associated with the inability of certain genes to be correctly expressed in a proportion of cells, giving a mosaic phenotype. The lack of expression is thought to be due to alterations in the gene's chromatin structure due to its proximity to a region of heterochromatin. Because of the difficulties involved, there is little biochemical data to support the intuitively appealing model of 'heterochromatin spreading' used to explain this phenomenon. Differences in restriction fragment length were used to distinguish DNA regions from either normal (non-position affected) or rearranged (position affected) chromosomes so as to examine possible changes in gene copy number and the effects of endogenous nucleases. DNA sequences at the breakpoint of In(1)wm4, which variegates for the white gene, were assayed under conditions where the chromatin conformation was altered using second site modifier mutations (Su(var) or En(var)). No change in the DNA sequence copy number was observed at either chromosome breakpoint, relative to wild type, when either suppressor or enhancer mutations were present. Therefore copy number change, through differential polyploidization or somatic gene loss, is not affected by Su(var) or En(var) induced changes in the chromatin conformation. Initial experiments showed a gross difference in the sensitivity of DNA to endogenous nucleases that appeared associated with Su(var) and En(var) mutations. En(var) mutation bearing samples appeared delayed in the digestion, relative to Su(var).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Heterochromatin protein 1, a known suppressor of position-effect variegation, is highly conserved in Drosophila

The Su(var)205 gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), a protein located preferentially within beta-heterochromatin. Mutation of this gene has been associated with dominant suppression of position-effect variegation. We have cloned and sequenced the gene encoding HP1 from Drosophila virilis, a distantly related species. Comparison of the predicted amino acid sequence with Drosophila melanogaster HP1 shows two regions of strong homology, one near the N-terminus (57/61 amino acids identical) and the other near the C-terminus (62/68 amino acids identical) of the protein. Little homology is seen in the 5' and 3' untranslated portions of the gene, as well as in the intronic sequences, although intron/exon boundaries are generally conserved. A comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of HP1-like proteins from other species shows that the cores of the N-terminal and C-terminal domains have been conserved from insects to mammals. The high degree of conservation suggests that these N- and C-terminal domains could interact with other macromolecules in the formation of the condensed structure of heterochromatin.

Position effect variegation and chromatin proteins

Variegated phenotypes often result from chromosomal rearrangements that place euchromatic genes next to heterochromatin. In such rearrangements, the condensed structure of heterochromatin can spread into euchromatic regions, which then assume the morphology of heterochromatin and become transcriptionally inactive. In position-effect variegation (PEV) therefore, gene inactivation results from a change in chromatin structure. PEV has been intensively investigated in the fruitfly Drosophila, where the phenomenon allows a genetic dissection of chromatin components. Consequently, many genes have been identified which, when mutated, act as dominant modifiers (suppressors or enhancers) of PEV. Data available already demonstrate that genetic, molecular and developmental analysis of these genes provides an avenue to the identification of regulatory and structural chromatin components, and hence to fundamental aspects of chromosome structure and function.

Identification of a subdomain of CENP-B that is necessary and sufficient for localization to the human centromere

We have combined in vivo and in vitro approaches to investigate the function of CENP-B, a major protein of human centromeric heterochromatin. Expression of epitope-tagged deletion derivatives of CENP-B in HeLa cells revealed that a single domain less than 158 residues from the amino terminus of the protein is sufficient to localize CENP-B to centromeres. Centromere localization was abolished if as few as 28 amino acids were removed from the amino terminus of CENP-B. The centromere localization signal of CENP-B can function in an autonomous fashion, relocating a fused bacterial enzyme to centromeres. The centromere localization domain of CENP-B specifically binds in vitro to a subset of alpha-satellite DNA monomers. These results suggest that the primary mechanism for localization of CENP-B to centromeres involves the recognition of a DNA sequence found at centromeres. Analysis of the distribution of this sequence in alpha-satellite DNA suggests that CENP-B binding may have profound effects on chromatin structure at centromeres.

Cytogenetic and molecular aspects of position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Underreplication of chromosomal material as a result of gene inactivation

A chromosomal region subjected to position effect variegation was analysed for possible DNA under-replication. DNA clones from the vicinity of the euheterochromatin junction and from a distance of hundreds of kilobase pairs were used as probes. Formation of compact blocks of chromatin is regarded as a characteristic feature of position effect variegation. It was shown that in T (1;2) dorvar7 males undergoing position effect variegation clones representing the DNA nearest to the breakpoint in 2B7 hybridized normally in situ to the compact blocks, providing evidence against DNA underreplication. In females the same clones did not hybridize to the compact blocks. These variations in hybridization may be related to different degrees of compaction of chromosome regions in males and females. A correlation between the degree of underreplication and the level of cell polyteny was shown by Southern-blot hybridization of a DNA probe from the 2B region to DNA from an X/O strain carrying Dp (1;1)pn2b displaying position effect variegation and compaction in 94% of salivary gland cells. Almost complete underreplication of the DNA of this region was found in salivary gland cells (with a maximal degree of polyteny), intermediate underreplication was found in fat body cells (with an intermediate degree of polyteny), and replication was not disturbed in diploid cells of the larval cephalic complex.

A pairing-sensitive element that mediates trans-inactivation is associated with the Drosophila brown gene

Position-effect variegation in Drosophila is the mosaic expression of a gene juxtaposed to heterochromatin by chromosome rearrangement. The brown (bw+) gene is unusual in that variegating mutations are dominant, causing "trans-inactivation" of the homologous allele. We show that copies of bw+ transposed to ectopic sites are not trans-inactivated by rearrangements affecting the endogenous gene. However, when position-effect variegation is induced on an ectopic copy by chromosome rearrangement, the allele on its paired homolog is trans-inactivated, whereas other copies of bw+ are not. This confirms that trans-inactivation is "chromosome local" and maps the responsive element to the immediate vicinity of brown. Subsequent P-transposase-induced deletions within the ectopic copy in cis to the rearrangement breakpoint caused partial suppression of trans-inactivation. Surprisingly, the amount of suppression was correlated with deletion size, with some degree of trans-inactivation persisting even when the P[bw+] transposon was completely excised. The chromosome-local nature of the phenomenon and its extreme sensitivity to small disruptions of somatic pairing leads to a model in which a regulator of the brown gene is inactivated by direct contact with heterochromatic proteins.

A sequence motif found in a Drosophila heterochromatin protein is conserved in animals and plants

Modifiers of position-effect-variegation in Drosophila encode proteins that are thought to modify chromatin, rendering it heritably changed in its expressibility. In an attempt to identify similar modifier genes in other species we have utilized a known sequence homology, termed chromo box, between a suppressor of position-effect-variegation, Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), and a repressor of homeotic genes, Polycomb (Pc). A PCR generated probe encompassing the HP1 chromo box was used to clone full-length murine cDNAs that contain conserved chromo box motifs. Sequence comparisons, in situ hybridization experiments, and RNA Northern blot analysis suggest that the murine and human sequences presented in this report are homologues of the Drosophila HP1 gene. Chromo box sequences can also be detected in other animal species, and in plants, predicting a strongly conserved structural role for the peptide encoded by this sequence. We propose that epigenetic (yet heritable) changes in gene expressibility, characteristic of chromosomal imprinting phenomena, can largely be explained by the action of such modifier genes. The evolutionary conservation of the chromo box motif now enables the isolation and study of putative modifier genes in those animal and plant species where chromosomal imprinting has been described.

Position-effect variegation after 60 years

Position-effect variegation in Drosophila--the mosaic expression of a gene placed adjacent to a junction between euchromatin and heterochromatin--remains an enigma. However, new insights are being gained from recent studies of genetic modifiers, new model systems, and variegating genes showing exceptional behavior.

Reduced DNA polytenization of a minichromosome region undergoing position-effect variegation in Drosophila

Molecular analysis of a Drosophila minichromosome, Dp(1;f)1187, revealed a relationship between position-effect variegation and the copy number reductions of heterochromatic sequences that occur in polytene cells. Heterochromatin adjacent to a defined junction with euchromatin underpolytenized at least 60-fold. Lesser reductions were observed in euchromatic sequences up to 103 kb from the breakpoint. The copy number changes behaved in all respects like the expression of yellow, a gene located within the affected region. Both copy number and yellow expression displayed a cell-by-cell mosaic pattern of reduction, and adding a Y chromosome, a known suppressor of variegation, increased both substantially. We discuss the possibility that changes in replication alter copy number locally and also propose an alternative model of position-effect variegation based on the somatic elimination of heterochromatic sequences.

Proposed genetic basis of Huntington's disease

I propose that Huntington's disease (HD) is caused by dominant position-effect variegation, a phenomenon for which new information is available in Drosophila melanogaster. The essential features of this proposal are that (1) the HD mutation is the result of a chromosome alteration that inactivates transcription of a nearby structural gene or genes (cis-inactivation); the combination of this proposed chromosome alteration and the structural gene(s) is termed the HD allele; (2) there is pairing in some somatic cells between the HD and HD+ alleles on homologous chromosomes; (3) as a result of this somatic pairing, the HD mutation also inactivates transcription of the HD+ structural gene on the normal homologue (trans-inactivation), resulting in complete dominance of the mutation; (4) polymorphism for an X-linked recessive modifier of position-effect variegation means that the age of onset of symptoms of HD will depend on which parent the HD mutation was inherited from. The fully dominant nature of HD and the parental-source effect on the age of onset are thus both understandable within the genetic and epigenetic paradigm of position-effect variegation.

Trans-inactivation of the Drosophila brown gene: evidence for transcriptional repression and somatic pairing dependence

Position-effect variegation in Drosophila is the variable inactivation of a gene that occurs when it is juxtaposed to heterochromatic regions of chromosomes. The brown gene, required for pteridine pigment in the eye, is unusual in that expression of the unrearranged homolog also is affected. This dominant effect can be very strong, as inactivation is detectable when as many as three trans copies of the gene are present. We show that pteridine reductions coincide with similar reductions in the accumulation of brown mRNA. The dominant effect is suppressed by certain altered structural configurations of the brown region, suggesting that somatic pairing is involved in the phenomenon. We propose that direct transmission of the altered chromatin structure characteristic of position-effect variegation (heterochromatinization) occurs between paired homologs in the region of the brown locus.

Position effect variegation in Drosophila: towards a genetics of chromatin assembly

The formation of a highly condensed chromosome structure (heterochromatin) in a region of a eukaryotic chromosome can inactivate the genes within that region. Genetic studies using the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster have identified several essential genes which influence the formation of heterochromatin. My purpose in this review is to summarize some recent work on the genetics of heterochromatin assembly in Drosophila and a recent model for how chromosomal proteins may interact to form a heterochromatic structure.

Patterns of puffing activity and chromosomal polymorphism in Drosophila subobscura. IV. Position effect at the boundaries of the E12 inversion

The puffing patterns in polytene E chromosomes of Drosophila subobscura were followed in third-instar larvae and throughout the prepupa period. Two gene arrangements, Est and E1+2+9+12 were studied. A majority of puffs exhibit a similar pattern, but the puffs 61AC and 67AB behave differently in the two chromosomal arrangements, both in homozygotes and in heterozygotes. These two puffs are located at the end of the E12 inversion. This position effect is an interesting phenomenon that probably is not due to a heterochromatinization effect.

Modulation of tk expression in mouse pericentromeric heterochromatin

We have obtained a mouse transformant cell line containing two herpes viral thymidine kinase (tk) genes integrated in pericentromeric heterochromatin. Restriction analysis of tk- revertant and tk+ rerevertant derivatives suggest that one of the two tk genes is repressed in tk- cells, but is reactivated in tk+ rerevertants. The results of Northern analysis indicated that repression-activation is probably controlled at the transcriptional level. To examine the molecular basis for this repression, we cloned the tk gene from a tk- revertant cell line. Then, using the cloned tk gene as donor DNA to select for tk+ transformants, we found that it has a transfection efficiency indistinguishable from the viral tk gene. This indicates that repression is probably not mediated via any DNA sequence changes within the tk gene. The results of further studies by restriction analysis, azacytidine treatments, and secondary DNA transfection assays demonstrated that tk repression is associated with changes in DNA methylation. Surprisingly, derepression of the tk gene was accompanied by rearrangements in the flanking DNA. The latter result suggests that the flanking DNA may exert cis effects on tk gene expression. Additional studies with this system may provide insights into the molecular basis underlying position effects in heterochromatin.

Modulation of tk expression in mouse pericentromeric heterochromatin

We have obtained a mouse transformant cell line containing two herpes viral thymidine kinase (tk) genes integrated in pericentromeric heterochromatin. Restriction analysis of tk- revertant and tk+ rerevertant derivatives suggest that one of the two tk genes is repressed in tk- cells, but is reactivated in tk+ rerevertants. The results of Northern analysis indicated that repression-activation is probably controlled at the transcriptional level. To examine the molecular basis for this repression, we cloned the tk gene from a tk- revertant cell line. Then, using the cloned tk gene as donor DNA to select for tk+ transformants, we found that it has a transfection efficiency indistinguishable from the viral tk gene. This indicates that repression is probably not mediated via any DNA sequence changes within the tk gene. The results of further studies by restriction analysis, azacytidine treatments, and secondary DNA transfection assays demonstrated that tk repression is associated with changes in DNA methylation. Surprisingly, derepression of the tk gene was accompanied by rearrangements in the flanking DNA. The latter result suggests that the flanking DNA may exert cis effects on tk gene expression. Additional studies with this system may provide insights into the molecular basis underlying position effects in heterochromatin.

Variegated expression of the Sgs-4 locus in Drosophila melanogaster

Experiments on T(1;4)wm258-21 larvae of Drosophila melanogaster are described which establish the existence of a salivary gland specific marker for position-effect variegation. The marker is a glue protein gene called Sgs-4 which is expressed during the third larval instar. Using temperature as a variegation modifier, we showed that cytological compaction for the Sgs-4 chromosomal locus is enhanced at 17 degrees C and reduced at 29 degrees C. We also found that the Sgs-4 protein and transcript from salivary glands at 17 degrees C accumulate to roughly half the levels found in salivary glands at 29 degrees C. Southern analysis suggested that the Sgs-4 locus at 17 degrees C is polytenized to roughly one-third the level at 29 degrees C. The results are discussed with respect to alternative models of variegation.

Two discrete modes of histone gene expression during oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

We have used in situ hybridization to ovarian tissue sections to study the pattern of histone gene expression during oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Our studies suggest that there are two distinct phases of histone gene expression during oogenesis. In the first phase, which occurs during early to middle oogenesis (stages 5-10A), we observe a mosaic pattern of histone mRNA in the 15 nurse cells of the egg chamber: some cells have very high levels of mRNA, while others have little or no mRNA. Our analysis suggests that there is a cyclic accumulation and subsequent degradation of histone mRNA in the egg chamber and that very little histone mRNA is transported into the growing oocyte. Moreover, since the endomitotic replication cycles of the nurse cells are asynchronous during this period, the mosaic distribution of histone message would suggest that the expression of the histone genes in each nurse cell nucleus is probably coupled to DNA replication as in most somatic cells. The second phase begins at stage 10B. During this period, histone gene expression appears to be "induced" in all 15 nurse cells of the egg chamber, and instead of a mosaic pattern, high levels of histone mRNA are found in all cells. Unlike the earlier phase, this expression is apparently uncoupled from the endomitotic replication of the nurse cells (which are completed by the end of stage 10A). Moreover, much of the newly synthesized histone mRNA is transported from the nurse cells into the oocyte where it accumulates and is stored for use during early embryogenesis. Finally, we have also observed tightly clustered grains within nurse cell nuclei in non-denatured tissue sections. As was the case with cytoplasmic histone mRNA, there is a mosaic distribution of nuclear grains from stages 5 to 10A, while at stage 10B, virtually all nurse cell nuclei have grain clusters. These grain clusters appear to be due to the hybridization of nurse cell histone gene DNA to our probe, and are localized in specific regions of the nucleus.

Novobiocin blocks the Drosophila heat shock response

In the studies reported here we show that the antibiotic novobiocin, an in vitro inhibitor of topoisomerase II, blocks the Drosophila heat shock response. If novobiocin is added prior to induction, there is no detectable expression of the Drosophila heat shock genes. Moreover, analysis of the chromatin organization of the 87A7 heat shock locus indicates that the antibiotic prevents the structural alterations which normally accompany heat induction. When novobiocin is added after induction, transcription appears to be rapidly turned off, and the chromatin organization of the 87A7 locus is "fixed" in an "active" configuration. Novobiocin also prevents the re-establishment of the pre-induced 87A7 chromatin organization which occurs during recovery from heat shock. We have also presented data suggesting that this antibiotic blocks transcription at 25 degrees C. These findings raise the possibility that topoisomerase II may be required in eukaryotes for both gene activation and deactivation.

Determinants of heat shock-induced chromosome puffing

Modified Drosophila heat shock genes were introduced into the germ line by P element transformation. The genes were altered such that several factors could be tested for their influence upon chromosome puffing. Deletion of promoter sequences upstream of position -73 of an hsp70-IacZ hybrid gene was sufficient to abolish puffing. Analysis of progressive 5' deletions defines a 16 bp interval that contains sequences required for both heat-induced puffing and gene expression. An internal deletion of the hsp70-IacZ gene that reduces the transcript size from 9 kb to 0.8 kb results in a dramatic reduction in puff size. The chromosomal insertion sites of 26 variant hsp70 or hsp26 genes fail to influence puffing greatly with one marked exception. This transformant possesses an insert that fails to puff and exhibits a tissue-restricted pattern of expression. These results indicate that variation in either promoter strength or transcript length have profound effects on puffing.

Control of DNA replication and spatial distribution of defined DNA sequences in salivary gland cells of Drosophila melanogaster

In dividing cells, each sequence replicates exactly once in each S-phase, but in cells with polytene chromosomes, some sequences may replicate more than once or fail to replicate during S-phase. Because of this differential replication, the control of replication in polytene cells must have some unusual features. Dennhöfer (1982a) has recently concluded that the total DNA content of the polytene cells of Drosophila salivary glands exactly doubles in each S-phase. This observation, along with previous studies demonstrating satellite underreplication in salivary gland cells, led us to consider the hypothesis that there is a "doubling of DNA" mechanism for the control of DNA replication in polytene cells. With this mechanism, a doubling of DNA content, rather than the replication of each sequence, would signal the end of a cycle of DNA replication. To test this hypothesis, we have reinvestigated the replication of several sequences (satellite, ribosomal, histone and telomere) in salivary gland cells using quantitative in situ hybridization. We find that underreplication of some sequences does occur. In addition we have repeated Dennhöfer's cytophotometric and labeling studies. In contrast to Dennhöfer, we find that the total DNA contents of nonreplicating nuclei do reflect this partial replication, in accord with Rudkin's (1969) result. We conclude that DNA replication in polytene cells is controlled by modifications of the mechanism operating in dividing cells, where control is sequence autonomous, and not by a "doubling of DNA" mechanism. In situ hybridization to unbroken salivary gland nuclei reveals the distribution of specific sequences. As expected, satellite, histone and 5S sequences are usually in a single cluster.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Transcriptionally active chromatin is sensitive to Neurospora crassa and S1 nucleases

We have examined the distribution of Neurospora crassa and S1 nuclease cleavage products in the chromatin of the 87A7 heat shock locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Both of these nucleases generate single and double-strand breaks in chromatin at specific sites in the 87A7 locus. Before heat induction, we find that the 5' ends of the two 87A7 hsp 70 genes contain N. crassa and S1 nuclease hypersensitive sites, while there are only a few cleavage products from elsewhere in the locus. With N. crassa nuclease, we observe one major 5' fragment, and this is derived from cleavage in a DNA segment mapping about 90 to 115 base-pairs from the beginning of the transcription unit. With S1 nuclease, we find two 5' cleavage products. The first maps about 120 to 130 base-pairs from the beginning of the gene. Interestingly, this site is also sensitive to S1 nuclease in supercoiled but not linear naked DNA. The other fragment maps very close to the transcription start site (approximately 0 to -15 base-pairs). After heat induction, there is a transition in the chromatin architecture of 87A7. First, there is a marked reduction in the yield of the prominent 5' N. crassa and S1 nuclease fragments. Second, the entire hsp 70 gene, as well as the spacer DNA just downstream from the 3' end of the gene, becomes highly sensitive to both of these nucleases.

Integration of Drosophila heat-shock genes transfected into cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells

We have used DNA-mediated gene transfer to introduce into Drosophila melanogaster cells DNA sequences for which no selective criteria exist. We have introduced a Drosophila heat-shock locus into cultured Drosophila cells by calcium phosphate cotransfection with the copia vector pCV31gpt and selection for xanthine utilization. We recovered cell lines containing between three and about 50 copies of both pCV31gpt and pMH10A, a cloned 87 A7 hsp70 heat-shock locus that encodes a mutant 40,000-dalton heat-shock protein (hsp40). The stable inheritance of the transformed DNAs argues that the input DNAs have integrated into the genome. We show that this is indeed the case for one cell line by cloning back the transfected DNA and detecting the flanking chromocentral sequences by in situ hybridization. Surprisingly, the integrated hsp70 genes are not expressed. This report represents the first example of the cointroduction of DNA sequences into Drosophila cells by cotransfection with a dominant selectable marker.

Position effect variegation of an acid phosphatase gene in Drosophila melanogaster

X-ray mutagenesis has produced a series of deficiencies in a duplication of part of the third chromosome containing the acid phosphatase gene (Acph-1) in Drosophila melanogaster. In one of these deficiencies, Acph-1 is shown to be undergoing position effect variegation. Naturally occurring electrophoretic variants of the enzyme were used to visualize and determine quantitatively the extent of variegation of the allele which is cis to the heterochromatic breakpoint. Alteration of genotypic background and temperature provided further evidence for position effect. Rocket immunoelectrophoresis was used to correlate the levels of acid phosphatase activity and protein in flies containing the deficiency. A novel result indicates that the variegation is not the consequence of an averaging of active and inactive cells, but rather due to a quantitative alteration of gene activity within at least some individual cells.

A structural basis for variegating position effects

Variegating position effects in Drosophila result from chromosome rearrangements where normal genes, having been placed next to heterochromatin, are inactivated in some cells but not in others, thereby producing a variegated tissue. We have determined that the euchromatic breakpoints for three variegating white mutants are clustered and lie approximately 25 kb downstream of the white structural gene. In each case the white locus is adjoined in the heterochromatin to a mobile genetic element. Satellite sequences are not involved. We also demonstrate that revertants of the variegating mutant, wm4, are reinversions that leave the initial wm4-heterochromatic junction intact so that some heterochromatin-derived sequences remain joined to white at its new location. These results suggest a simple model for understanding the structure of heterochromatic domains and how variegating position effects may arise.

Chromatin organization of the 87A7 heat shock locus of Drosophila melanogaster

We have examined the chromatin structure of the hsp 70 gene complex at the 87A7 heat shock locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Our results indicate that this locus has a complex chromatin organization. Heat induction causes highly specific alterations in the chromatin throughout the locus. There are major changes within the heat shock gene transcription units, and in both the upstream and downstream flanking spacers.