Proteins in chromosome banding. II. Effect of R- and C-banding treatments on the proteins of isolated nuclei

The structure of C-banded human metaphase chromosomes as observed by atomic force microscopy

The ultrastructure of C-banded human metaphase chromosomes was studied by the combined use of light microscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Light microscopy of the C-banded chromosomes showed that the centromeric regions of all chromosomes except the Y chromosome were positively stained. AFM further revealed that the C-positive region was higher than the C-negative region. The area of the C-positive region was specific depending on each chromosome; it ranged from the centromere to the proximal end of the long arm in chromosome 1, while it was restricted to the centromere in chromosomes 2 and 3. At higher magnification, chromatin fibers about 50 nm thick were clearly shown in the entire length of the chromosomes. In the C-positive region, these chromatin fibers were densely packed, while chromatin fibers were loosely packed with gentle twisting in the C-negative region. These AFM findings suggest that certain factors related to the chromatin fiber compaction remain in the C-positive region even after successive C-banging treatment.

C-banding visualized by atomic force microscopy

C-banding is a method used for studying chromosome rearrangements near centromeres and for investigating polymorphisms. In human chromosomes, the C-bands are located at the centromere of all the chromosomes and the distal long arm of the Y chromosome. In this study, we aimed to detect the structural changes in chromosomes during the stages of C-banding by atomic force microscopy. We observed crater-like structures in the chromosomes after 2xSSC (saline sodium citrate) treatment and measured the relative difference between the heights of chromatid and centromere of the chromosomes. Results showed that the relative difference was 3 nm in chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y, whereas in the other chromosomes this value was 11.6 nm. After Giemsa staining, the relative difference increased by a factor of 16 in chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y. The other chromosomes showed no such increase, which is in accordance with our suggestion that nonhiston proteins associated with DNA in constitutive heterochromatin can make the constitutive heterochromatin resistant to C-banding.

The mechanism of G-banding detected by atomic force microscopy

The morphologic changes occurring in human chromosomes during G-banding by trypsin treatment on the same metaphase were followed with the aid of an atomic force microscope (AFM). It was found that trypsin treatment alone caused a pattern of collapse in the chromosomes that was clearly dependent on the duration of trypsinization. The progressive pattern of collapse first indicated the loss of internal differentiation between chromatids, then bands, and finally all internal structures, except for edges running around the chromosomes' perimeter. When stained with Giemsa, the collapsed chromosomes partly regained their original form, and transverse ridges appeared that correspond to G-positive band regions. However, the treatment of fixed chromosomes with trypsin for 42 s diminished the chromosomal edges, and the z-dimensions could not be measured even with the subsequent application of Giemsa.

Differential decondensation of mitotic chromosomes during hypotonic treatment of living cells as a possible cause of G-banding: an ultrastructural study

The chromosomal ultrastructure of Chinese hamster cells treated with 0.075 M KCl - a solution ordinarily used for making preparations of spread chromosomes - was studied. The hypotonic treatment was shown to result in differential decondensation of chromosomes which consists in the uneven distribution of deoxyribonucleoprotein (DNP) fibrils along chromatids. Fixation of cells with methanol acetic acid causes an abrupt restructuring of chromosomes. However, the DNP preserves its uneven distribution along chromatids. As seen on ultra-thin sections of marker nucleolus organizer chromosomes, the densely packed regions may correspond to G-bands detected in the selfsame chromosomes by standard methods of differential staining. The results suggest that the capacity of chromosomes for differential staining is based on the different resistance of G- and R-bands to the decondensing action of hypotonic solutions on living cells.

The structural basis for C-banding. A scanning electron microscopy study

The same C-banded human polymorphic chromosomes were observed in the light microscope (LM) and then in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) to investigate the structural changes produced by the C-banding technique. C-banded regions, which stained positively in LM, were highly condensed with tightly packed chromatin fibres, resembling non-banded chromosomes. In striking contrast, adjacent non-C-banded regions were represented by loosely arranged fibres, resembling G-banded chromosomes. The significance of these observations in relation to current theories on the effects of C-banding on chromosome structure is discussed.

The effect of chromosome banding techniques on the proteins of isolated chromosomes

Experiments were undertaken to determine the effect of various chromosome banding treatments on the histone and nonhistone proteins of isolated, fixed, air-dried metaphase chromosomes. Chromosome preparations were exposed to G-banding (SSC, urea, NaCl-urea, or trypsin), R-banding (Earle's balanced salt solution), and C-banding (NaOH or Ba(OH)2) treatments, and the extracted and residual proteins were examined by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The results indicate that each of the banding treatments induce characteristic alterations in the chromosomal proteins. The residual proteins left in chromosomes after the diverse G-banding treatments were generally similar to one another, indicating that treatments inducing the same type of banding have similar effects on the chromosomal proteins. This was also true for the two different C-banding treatments. On the other hand, the residual protein patterns seen after the G-banding treatments were strikingly different from those seen after R-banding, which in turn differed from those seen after C-banding. The treatments inducing different types of banding therefore produce markedly different effects on the chromosomal proteins. These protein alterations may have an important influence on the induction of chromosome bands.

The ultrastructure of R-banded chromosomes

Electron microscopy has been used to study the fine structural organization of R-banded chromosomes prepared by treatment of the chromosomes with a hot NaH2PO4 solution. The results indicate that there is a structural basis for R-banding with this technique. In comparison to untreated control chromosomes, the R-banded chromosomes had a greatly reduced electron density, suggesting that the heat treatment has a general adverse effect on chromosome structure. Chromatin fibers formed a coarse, irregular network throughout the chromosome and were often enlarged, probably as a result of the fusion of two or more native fibers. The chromatin fibers were more aggregated and had an increased electron density in the R-band regions of the chromosome than in the interbands. This indicates that the treatment has a differential effect on the structure of bands and interbands. A comparison of the ultrastructure of R- and G-banded chromosomes demonstrated that the distribution of aggregated chromatin was reversed by these two types of banding techniques; however, the treatments producing the R-banding appeared to induce less extreme differences in the degree of chromatin condensation in band and interband regions than those giving rise to G-banding. It is suggested that alterations of DNA-protein interactions may arise from the differential denaturation of proteins and/or DNA in R-band and interband regions during the heat pretreatment. Such differential alterations in DNA-protein interactions may induce localized changes in the organization of chromatin and may account for the subtle morphological differences observed between the band and interband regions.

Microfluorometric investigations of chromatin structure. I. Evaluation of nine DNA-specific fluorochromes as probes of chromatin organization

The ability of the highly condensed chromatin of small thymocyte nuclei and the more loosely organized chromatin of hepatocyte nuclei to interact with nine DNA-specific fluorochromes was assessed by microfluorometry. Although the results obtained with five of the fluorochromes - mithramycin, 7-aminoactinomycin D, Hoechst 33258, DAPI, and propidium iodide - were found to be virtually unaffected by differences in the degree of condensation of the chromatin, the values obtained with the remaining fluorochromes - proflavine, quinacrine mustard, berberine sulfate, and pyronin Y - appeared to be affected significantly by organizational differences of the chromatin. All of the latter "structural probes," except quinacrine mustard, produced fluorescence values which were higher in the 2c nuclei of hepatocytes than in the nuclei of small thymocytes. Quinacrine mustard yielded higher values in thymocyte nuclei; and in the hepatocyte polyploid series (2, 4, and 8c), it did not produce the expected multiples of the 2c value. Pretreatment of the two types of nuclei with RNase affected their total fluorescence in unpredictable ways. While RNase extraction lessened the differences between thymocyte and 2c hepatocyte nuclei stained with propidium iodide, Hoechst 33258, proflavine, and berberine sulfate, it increased the differences between nuclei stained with mithramycin, quinacrine mustard, pyronin Y, and 7-aminoactinomycin D. The ability of RNA-depleted chromatin to interact with various types of fluorochromes might be a useful parameter in subsequent studies of chromatin organization.

Proteins in chromosome banding. I. Effect of G-banding treatments on the proteins of isolated nuclei

Nuclei were isolated from Chinese hamster cells, treated with hypotonic KCl, fixed in acetic methanol, and either air-dried in glass tubes (in situ) or left in suspension (in vitro). These preparations were then exposed to a variety of G-banding treatments, including the 2 xSSC, urea, NaCl-urea, and trypsin methods. The proteins extracted into the treatment solution and those remaining in the nuclei were analyzed by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The three former treatments extracted specific subsets of the total nuclear nonhistone proteins into the treatment solution. Some of the extracted nonhistones were common to all treatments while others were unique to a particular treatment. Variable amounts and types of the histones were also extracted by these treatments, but significant quantities of all of these proteins still remained in the nuclei afterwards. The trypsin treatment appeared to degrade some of the nonhistones, while other nonhistones, as well as the histones, were relatively resistant to trypsin digestion. Although there were a few differences in the residual proteins found in the nuclei after the various G-band treatments, the overall electrophoretic patterns of these proteins were generally similar. The results indicate that the G-banding techniques induce specific and reproducible changes in the proteins of isolated nuclei. If these banding treatments induce similar changes in the proteins of mitotic chromosomes, such alterations might be involved in mechanisms of chromosome banding.