1
|
Doshi A, Shaw M, Tonea R, Moon S, Minyety R, Doshi A, Laine A, Guo J, Danino T. Engineered bacterial swarm patterns as spatial records of environmental inputs. Nat Chem Biol 2023; 19:878-886. [PMID: 37142806 DOI: 10.1038/s41589-023-01325-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
A diverse array of bacteria species naturally self-organize into durable macroscale patterns on solid surfaces via swarming motility-a highly coordinated and rapid movement of bacteria powered by flagella. Engineering swarming is an untapped opportunity to increase the scale and robustness of coordinated synthetic microbial systems. Here we engineer Proteus mirabilis, which natively forms centimeter-scale bullseye swarm patterns, to 'write' external inputs into visible spatial records. Specifically, we engineer tunable expression of swarming-related genes that modify pattern features, and we develop quantitative approaches to decoding. Next, we develop a dual-input system that modulates two swarming-related genes simultaneously, and we separately show that growing colonies can record dynamic environmental changes. We decode the resulting multicondition patterns with deep classification and segmentation models. Finally, we engineer a strain that records the presence of aqueous copper. This work creates an approach for building macroscale bacterial recorders, expanding the framework for engineering emergent microbial behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Doshi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Marian Shaw
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Ruxandra Tonea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Soonhee Moon
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Rosalía Minyety
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Anish Doshi
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Laine
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jia Guo
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Tal Danino
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
- Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
The transcription of many genes, particularly in prokaryotes, is controlled by transcription factors whose activity can be modulated by controlling their DNA binding affinity. Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which DNA binding affinity is regulated is important, but because forming definitive conclusions usually requires detailed structural information in combination with data from extensive biophysical, biochemical, and sometimes genetic experiments, little is truly understood about this topic. This review describes the biological requirements placed upon DNA binding transcription factors and their consequent properties, particularly the ways that DNA binding affinity can be modulated and methods for its study. What is known and not known about the mechanisms modulating the DNA binding affinity of a number of prokaryotic transcription factors, including CAP and lac repressor, is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert F Schleif
- Biology Department, Johns Hopkins University , 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vijesurier RM, Carlock L, Blumenthal RM, Dunbar JC. Role and mechanism of action of C. PvuII, a regulatory protein conserved among restriction-modification systems. J Bacteriol 2000; 182:477-87. [PMID: 10629196 PMCID: PMC94299 DOI: 10.1128/jb.182.2.477-487.2000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/1999] [Accepted: 10/27/1999] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The PvuII restriction-modification system is a type II system, which means that its restriction endonuclease and modification methyltransferase are independently active proteins. The PvuII system is carried on a plasmid, and its movement into a new host cell is expected to be followed initially by expression of the methyltransferase gene alone so that the new host's DNA is protected before endonuclease activity appears. Previous studies have identified a regulatory gene (pvuIIC) between the divergently oriented genes for the restriction endonuclease (pvuIIR) and modification methyltransferase (pvuIIM), with pvuIIC in the same orientation as and partially overlapping pvuIIR. The product of pvuIIC, C. PvuII, was found to act in trans and to be required for expression of pvuIIR. In this study we demonstrate that premature expression of pvuIIC prevents establishment of the PvuII genes, consistent with the model that requiring C. PvuII for pvuIIR expression provides a timing delay essential for protection of the new host's DNA. We find that the opposing pvuIIC and pvuIIM transcripts overlap by over 60 nucleotides at their 5' ends, raising the possibility that their hybridization might play a regulatory role. We furthermore characterize the action of C. PvuII, demonstrating that it is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that binds to the pvuIIC promoter and stimulates transcription of both pvuIIC and pvuIIR into a polycistronic mRNA. The apparent location of C. PvuII binding, overlapping the -10 promoter hexamer and the pvuIICR transcriptional starting points, is highly unusual for transcriptional activators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M Vijesurier
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pagratis NC, Revel HR. Broad host range, regulated expression system utilizing bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase and promoter. Biotechnol Bioeng 1993; 41:837-45. [DOI: 10.1002/bit.260410902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
5
|
Roberts M, Baumberg S. Anomalous expression of the E. coli lac operon in Proteus mirabilis. I. Effects of L8 and L8 UV5. MOLECULAR & GENERAL GENETICS : MGG 1984; 198:159-65. [PMID: 6441102 DOI: 10.1007/bf00328716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
The lac operon shows anomalous expression in Proteus mirabilis: the maximal induced level is 10% or less of that in E. coli, while repression reduces this by a factor of only 2-5. We have sought to determine whether this effect relates in any way to CRP-mediated activation of expression, by comparing expression in P. mirabilis of lac operons (introduced for technical reasons on IncP1 plasmids) either regulatorily wild-type or bearing L8 or L8UV5. Derivatives of RP1 bearing L8UV5 were obtained by homogenotisation of pGC9114 (RP1::Tn951) in a L8UV5 background; while derivatives of RP4 bearing lac+, L8 or L8UV5 were obtained by Mu-mediated translocation of chromosomal regions bearing these alleles, following partial heat-induction of Mucts62 on pGM14 (RP4::Mucts62) in the appropriate hosts. These plasmids could be readily transferred to, and stably maintained in, the P. mirabilis strains employed. It was found that L8 reduced the maximal level of beta-galactosidase activity, and L8UV5 restored this activity to around wild-type, in P. mirabilis quantitatively very much as in E. coli. Nevertheless, the low maximal level of expression and high basal level characteristic of the former host were unchanged. The simplest explanation of these results is that P. mirabilis contains a protein that mimics the E. coli CRP protein in interacting with the appropriate DNA binding site and thereby stimulating transcription; and that the anomalous regulation of lac in this host is unconnected with the CRP system.
Collapse
|