Case report 432: Granulocytic sarcoma (GS), with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES)

Presentation of Chloromas in B-Mode Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Chloromas, also referred to as myeloid sarcomas, describe rare extramedullary tumor aggregates of malignant myeloid progenitor cells. The aim of this study was investigate the diagnostic features and characteristics of chloromas using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Between July 2007 and April 2021, 15 patients with 20 myeloid neoplasms and suspected chloroma manifestations were examined using B-mode US (B-US) and CEUS. Clinical data and B-US (echogenicity, border, size) and CEUS (hyper-, iso-, hypo- or complex enhancement) characteristics were retrospectively analyzed. Absolute and relative frequencies were determined. In B-US, the chloromas were most frequently hypo-echoic (n = 15, 75%). In addition, a hyperechoic (n = 2, 10%) or echocomplex (n = 3, 15%) presentation was observed. On CEUS, 7 chloromas (35%) had an arterial hyperenhancement, 8 (40%) an iso-enhancement and 3 (15%) a complex enhancement. Two chloromas (10%) did not exhibit any enhancement. We describe for the first time CEUS and B-US patterns of chloromas. They are typically hypo-echoic on B-US and have a strong iso- or hyperenhancement on CEUS, which may help in the differential diagnosis of some unclear masses (e.g., hematoma, abscess) in patients with myeloid neoplasias. Nevertheless, histology is necessary for a reliable diagnosis.

Extramedullary leukemia in children with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group

OBJECTIVES

To describe features of patients with acute myeloid leukemia presenting with extramedullary leukemic tumors (EML).

METHODS

Among 1,832 patients entered on Children's Cancer Group's chemotherapy trials with acute myeloid leukemia, 199 patients had EML, defined as any leukemic collection outside the bone marrow cavity. Three patient groups were denoted: group 1 (n=109) with EML involving skin (with or without other sites of EML), group 2 (n=90) with EML in sites other than skin, and group 3 (n=1,633) without EML.

RESULTS

The incidence of EML was 10.9%. Group 1 patients tended to be younger, had higher white blood cell counts, were more often CNS positive, had FAB M4 or M5 subtypes, and possessed more abnormalities of chromosome 11 than group 3 patients. Group 2 patients were younger, more often had the FAB M2 subtype, and had a higher incidence of t(8;21)(q22;q22) abnormality than group 3, but had similar white blood cell counts and incidence of CNS positivity at diagnosis. For group 1 the 5-year event-free survival was 26%, significantly worse than for group 3 at 29%. Event-free survival was better for group 2 patients (5-year estimate 46%), which remained a favorable prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. The authors retrospectively determined whether 118 (59%) of the EML patients received localized radiotherapy to the site of EML: 42 did and 76 did not. There were no differences in estimated event-free survival between patients who did and did not receive radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-skin (group 2) EML appeared to be an independent favorable prognostic factor. Localized radiotherapy to the site of EML at the end of induction chemotherapy did not improve outcome.

The role of trisomy 8 in the pathogenesis of chronic eosinophilic leukemia

A case of chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) manifesting as spinal cord compression by an extradural eosinophilic chloroma in a 32-year-old Chinese man was presented, who subsequently developed extramedullary transformation at the skin and then peritoneal cavity. Cytogenetic study of bone marrow cells at diagnosis showed a clonal karyotypic abnormality of trisomy 8 (+8), which on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was shown to be present in a clone of abnormal eosinophils, hence showing the neoplastic nature of the eosinophilic proliferation. There was another population of abnormal eosinophils that did not show +8. At blastic transformation, all blast cells in ascitic fluid were shown by FISH to harbor +8. These findings suggest that +8 in this case may have arisen from clonal evolution and is not the primary genetic event in leukemogenesis, but +8 most probably imparts a further survival advantage to the clone responsible for subsequent blastic transformation.