Cytochrome P450 enzymes and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases as hepatocellular autoantigens

Transitioning from Idiopathic to Explainable Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis lacks an identifiable cause, and its diagnosis requires the exclusion of etiologically defined diseases that resemble it. Insights into its pathogenesis are moving autoimmune hepatitis from an idiopathic to explainable disease, and the goal of this review is to describe the insights that are hastening this transition. Two types of autoimmune hepatitis are justified by serological markers, but they also have distinctive genetic associations (DRB1 and DQB1 genes) and autoantigens. DRB1 alleles are the principal susceptibility factors in white adults, and a six amino acid sequence encoded in the antigen-binding groove of class II molecules of the major histocompatibility complex can influence the selection of autoantigens. Polymorphisms, including variants of SH2B3 and CARD10 genes, may affect immune reactivity and disease severity. The cytochrome mono-oxygenase, CYP2D6, is the autoantigen associated with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis, and it shares homologies with multiple viruses that might promote self-intolerance by molecular mimicry. Chemokines, especially CXCL9 and CXCL10, orchestrate the migration of effector cells to sites of injury and are associated with disease severity. Cells of the innate and adaptive immune responses promote tissue damage, and possible deficiencies in the number and function of regulatory T cells may facilitate the injurious process. Receptor-mediated apoptosis is the principal mechanism of hepatocyte loss, and cell-mediated and antibody-dependent mechanisms of cytotoxicity also contribute. Insights that explain autoimmune hepatitis will allow triggering exogenous antigens to be characterized, risk management to be improved, prognostic indices to be refined, and site-specific therapeutic interventions to emerge.

Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a variable clinical phenotype, and the absence of conventional autoantibodies does not preclude its diagnosis or need for treatment. The goals of this review are to describe the frequency and nature of autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis, indicate its outcome after corticosteroid treatment, and increase awareness of the diagnosis in patients with unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis. The frequency of presumed autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis in patients with acute and acute severe presentations is ≤7%, and its frequency in patients with chronic presentations is 1-34%. Patients with acute presentations can have normal serum γ-globulin levels, centrilobular zone 3 necrosis, and low pre-treatment international diagnostic scores. Liver tissue examination is essential for the diagnosis, and hepatic steatosis can be a co-morbid feature. The comprehensive international scoring system can support but never override the clinical diagnosis pre-treatment, and non-standard serological markers should be sought if the clinical diagnosis is uncertain or the diagnostic score is low. A 3-month treatment trial with corticosteroids should be considered in all patients, regardless of the serological findings, and improvements have occurred in 67-87% of cases. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis may be associated with an autoantibody outside the conventional battery; it may have a signature autoantibody that is still undiscovered, or its characteristic autoantibodies may have been suppressed or have a delayed expression. The pathogenic mechanisms are presumed to be identical to those of classical disease. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis is an infrequent but treatable disease that must be considered in unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis.

Emerging opportunities for site-specific molecular and cellular interventions in autoimmune hepatitis

Current corticosteroid-based treatments of autoimmune hepatitis frequently have incomplete or unsatisfactory outcomes, side effects, and excessive immune suppression. The goal of this review is to describe the advances in developing animal models of autoimmune hepatitis and in treating diverse immune-mediated diseases that make pursuit of site-specific molecular and cellular inventions in autoimmune hepatitis feasible. Prime source and review articles in English were selected by a Medline search through October 2009. A murine model infected with an adenovirus expressing human CYP2D6 is a resource for evaluating new therapies because of its histological and serological features, persistence, and progressive hepatic fibrosis. Synthetic analog peptides that block autoantigen expression, a dimeric recombinant human fusion protein of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4, monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-alpha, recombinant interleukin 10, tolerization techniques for disease-triggering autoantigens, T regulatory cell transfer, vaccination against antigen-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, and gene silencing methods using small inhibitory RNAs are feasible interventions to explore. Treatments directed at dampening immunocyte activation with soluble cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4, inhibiting immunocyte differentiation with recombinant interleukin 10, and improving immunosuppressive activity with regulatory T cell modulation have the most immediate promise. Progress in the development of an animal model of autoimmune hepatitis and experiences in other immune-mediated diseases justify the evaluation of site-specific molecular and cellular interventions in this disease.

Autoantibodies as prognostic markers in autoimmune liver disease

Certain autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease have prognostic implications that are under-utilized and under-developed. The goals of this review are to indicate progress in characterizing the autoantibodies with prognostic connotations and to indicate the feasibility and importance of discovering other markers. Prime source and review articles in English were selected by a Medline search through 2010. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen, actin, liver cytosol type 1, asialoglycoprotein receptor, chromatin, cyclic citrullinated peptide, and uridine glucuronosyltransferases have been associated with the occurrence, severity, and progression of autoimmune hepatitis, and antibodies to Sp100, gp210, and centromere have had similar implications in primary biliary cirrhosis. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen have shown the most promise in autoimmune hepatitis as they have been associated with severe histological changes, long durations of treatment, relapse after drug withdrawal, and high frequency of liver failure. Antibodies to the nuclear rim pore protein, gp210, have shown the most promise in primary biliary cirrhosis as they have been associated with severe interface hepatitis, lobular inflammation, and progression to liver failure. The major limitations of the autoantibodies have been their lack of standardized assays, low negative predictabilities, and fluctuating levels. Performance parameters will improve as critical pathogenic pathways, comprehensive testing batteries, and standardized assays through international exchange workshops are developed. Progress has been made in identifying the serological markers of prognosis in autoimmune liver disease, and they promise to reflect critical disease mechanisms and enhance patient management.

Advances in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the liver, interface hepatitis (based on histologic examination), hypergammaglobulinemia, and production of autoantibodies. Many clinical and basic science studies have provided important insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of AIH. Transgenic mice that express human antigens and develop autoantibodies, liver-infiltrating CD4(+) T cells, liver inflammation, and fibrosis have been developed as models of AIH. AIH has been associated with autoantibodies against members of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes, transfer RNA selenocysteine synthase, formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase, and the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases, whereas alleles such as DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0401 are genetic risk factors in white North American and northern European populations. Deficiencies in the number and function of CD4(+)CD25(+) (regulatory) T cells disrupt immune homeostasis and might be corrected as a therapeutic strategy. Treatment can be improved by continuing corticosteroid therapy until normal liver test results and normal liver tissue are within normal limits, instituting ancillary therapies to prevent drug-related side effects, identifying problematic patients early, and providing long-term maintenance therapy after patients experience a first relapse. Calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil are potential salvage therapies, and reagents such as recombinant interleukin-10, abatacept, and CD3-specific antibodies are feasible as therapeutics. Liver transplantation is an effective salvage therapy, even in the elderly, and AIH must be considered in all patients with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. Identification of the key defects in immune homeostasis and antigen targets will direct new therapies.

LKM-1 sera from autoimmune hepatitis patients that recognize ERp57, carboxylesterase 1 and CYP2D6

Liver kidney microsomal antibody type 1 (LKM-1) is a diagnostic marker for autoimmune hepatitis type 2 (AIH-2). Characterization of LKM autoantibodies of patients with AIH-2 demonstrated that a proportion of LKM sera contains autoantibodies which recognize one or more small linear epitopes on cytochrome P450, CYP2D6, an enzyme of drug metabolism pathways. The identification and epitope mapping of antigens involved in autoimmune diseases are important in understanding the mechanisms triggering autoimmunity and providing guidance for designing immunomodulatory therapy. In this study, several proteins recognized by LKM-1-positive sera in rat and human hepatic microsomes were analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS after separation with ion-exchange chromatography or two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. We identified these proteins as ERp57 and carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) as well as CYP2D6. Epitopes in ERp57 and CES1 recognized by LKM-1-positive serum were investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with protease-digested peptides of ERp57 and CES1. The peptides comprising amino acids 105-129 of ERp57 and 558-566 of CES1 were specifically recognized by the serum. The epitopes in EPp57 and CES1 recognized by LKM-1-positive sera were homologous with those in hepatitis C virus (HCV). Viral infection of such as HCV may thus possibly trigger autoimmune hepatitis.

Interaction magnitude, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticlopidine in relation to CYP2C19 genotypic status

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the extent of the interaction and on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticlopidine.

METHODS

Homozygous (hmEMs) and heterozygous extensive metabolizers (htEMs), and poor metabolizers (PMs, n = 6 each) took an oral dose (20 mg) of omeprazole. After a 1-week washout period, each subject received ticlopidine (200 mg) for 8 days, and ticlopidine pharmacokinetics were studied on days 1 and 7. On day 8, omeprazole was given again and its kinetic disposition was compared with that in the first dose. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was measured as a pharmacodynamic index.

RESULTS

In contrast to the PMs, whose mean kinetic parameters were not altered by the repeated dosings of ticlopidine, an eight- to 10-fold increase in the mean AUC ratio of omeprazole to 5-hydroxyomeprazole was observed in both the EM groups. No significant intergenotypic differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of ticlopidine were observed, although the accumulation ratio tended to be greater in hmEMs than in PMs (2.4 +/- 0.2 versus 1.7 +/- 0.2). A significantly positive correlation (P = 0.031) was observed between the individual percent inhibition of platelet aggregation and AUC0-24 of ticlopidine regardless of the CYP2C19 polymorphism.

CONCLUSIONS

Ticlopidine is a potent inhibitor for CYP2C19 and may be associated with the phenocopy when CYPC19 substrates are co-administered to EMs. Whether and to what extent CYP2C19 would be involved in the metabolism of ticlopidine remain unanswered from the present in-vivo study.

Drug bioactivation, covalent binding to target proteins and toxicity relevance

A number of therapeutic drugs with different structures and mechanisms of action have been reported to undergo metabolic activation by Phase I or Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes. The bioactivation gives rise to reactive metabolites/intermediates, which readily confer covalent binding to various target proteins by nucleophilic substitution and/or Schiff's base mechanism. These drugs include analgesics (e.g., acetaminophen), antibacterial agents (e.g., sulfonamides and macrolide antibiotics), anticancer drugs (e.g., irinotecan), antiepileptic drugs (e.g., carbamazepine), anti-HIV agents (e.g., ritonavir), antipsychotics (e.g., clozapine), cardiovascular drugs (e.g., procainamide and hydralazine), immunosupressants (e.g., cyclosporine A), inhalational anesthetics (e.g., halothane), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDSs) (e.g., diclofenac), and steroids and their receptor modulators (e.g., estrogens and tamoxifen). Some herbal and dietary constituents are also bioactivated to reactive metabolites capable of binding covalently and inactivating cytochrome P450s (CYPs). A number of important target proteins of drugs have been identified by mass spectrometric techniques and proteomic approaches. The covalent binding and formation of drug-protein adducts are generally considered to be related to drug toxicity, and selective protein covalent binding by drug metabolites may lead to selective organ toxicity. However, the mechanisms involved in the protein adduct-induced toxicity are largely undefined, although it has been suggested that drug-protein adducts may cause toxicity either through impairing physiological functions of the modified proteins or through immune-mediated mechanisms. In addition, mechanism-based inhibition of CYPs may result in toxic drug-drug interactions. The clinical consequences of drug bioactivation and covalent binding to proteins are unpredictable, depending on many factors that are associated with the administered drugs and patients. Further studies using proteomic and genomic approaches with high throughput capacity are needed to identify the protein targets of reactive drug metabolites, and to elucidate the structure-activity relationships of drug's covalent binding to proteins and their clinical outcomes.