Synchronised activity in the vomero-nasal nerves with a note on the function of the organ of Jacobsen

One nose, one brain: contribution of the main and accessory olfactory system to chemosensation

The accessory olfactory system is present in most tetrapods. It is involved in the perception of chemical stimuli, being implicated also in the detection of pheromones. However, it is sensitive also to some common odorant molecules, which have no clear implication in intraspecific chemical communication. The accessory olfactory system may complement the main olfactory system and may contribute different perceptual features to the construction of a unitary representation, which merges the different chemosensory qualities. Crosstalk between the main and accessory olfactory systems occurs at different levels of central processing, in brain areas where the inputs from the two systems converge. Interestingly, centrifugal projections from more caudal brain areas are deeply involved in modulating both main and accessory sensory processing. A high degree of interaction between the two systems may be conceived and partial overlapping appears to occur in many functions. Therefore, the central chemosensory projections merge inputs from different organs to obtain a complex chemosensory picture.

The rodent accessory olfactory system

The accessory olfactory system contributes to the perception of chemical stimuli in the environment. This review summarizes the structure of the accessory olfactory system, the stimuli that activate it, and the responses elicited in the receptor cells and in the brain. The accessory olfactory system consists of a sensory organ, the vomeronasal organ, and its central projection areas: the accessory olfactory bulb, which is connected to the amygdala and hypothalamus, and also to the cortex. In the vomeronasal organ, several receptors-in contrast to the main olfactory receptors-are sensitive to volatile or nonvolatile molecules. In a similar manner to the main olfactory epithelium, the vomeronasal organ is sensitive to common odorants and pheromones. Each accessory olfactory bulb receives input from the ipsilateral vomeronasal organ, but its activity is modulated by centrifugal projections arising from other brain areas. The processing of vomeronasal stimuli in the amygdala involves contributions from the main olfactory system, and results in long-lasting responses that may be related to the activation of the hypothalamic-hypophyseal axis over a prolonged timeframe. Different brain areas receive inputs from both the main and the accessory olfactory systems, possibly merging the stimulation of the two sensory organs to originate a more complex and integrated chemosensory perception.

Sensory processing in the main and accessory olfactory systems: comparisons and contrasts

The vomeronasal organ (VNO) and accessory olfactory system (AOS) are present in most terrestrial vertebrates except birds and higher primates. The receptor neurons of the AOS are sequestered inside the VNO, away from the main airflow to the main olfactory receptor neurons. Mechanisms of stimulus access to the sensory neurons vary across species but in most cases there is a system for delivering stimuli faster than would be possible by diffusion. Vomeronasal (VN) receptor neurons typically lack cilia, the site of most of the transduction apparatus in the main olfactory receptors. The VN receptor neurons have a restricted but privileged pathway to the areas of the brain concerned with reproduction and social behavior. In contrast, the main olfactory neurons have a broad pathway to wide areas of the brain, including the neocortex. Experiments where the VNOs or other parts of the accessory olfactory pathway were ablated indicate that the system is important in many behavioral and physiological responses to pheromones (chemical signals carrying information about gender or reproductive or dominance status), some of which may be proteins. VN sensory neurons respond to both volatile and non-volatile stimuli. There is no evidence in the vertebrate AOS for the extreme sensitivity or selectivity characteristic of insect pheromone detectors, but this has not been adequately tested. There is some evidence for learning, possibly by synaptic modification at the second-order neuron level. Social and reproductive cues stimulating the AOS often elicit an intracerebral release of LHRH--which may act at receptors different from those of the pituitary to facilitate behavior. Whether the LHRH release is necessary for AOS-mediated behavioral response is not yet clear.

Electrophysiological mapping of the accessory olfactory bulb of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus)

Field potentials elicited by electrical stimulation of the vomeronasal nerve were measured in the accessory olfactory bulb of the rabbit. Maps were made of the distribution of surface field potentials and of the corresponding depth profiles. The surface maps followed closely the contours of the accessory olfactory bulb: at the frontal border the field potential tended to zero and at the center of the structure the field potential attained a maximum. Depth profiles of the field potentials through the accessory olfactory bulb presented a surface-negative wave and, in depth, a positive wave. The polarity reversal occurred at the deep part of the granule cell layer. The zero equipotential line followed closely the curvature of the granule cell layer. Current source density analysis of the depth profiles revealed a main sink at the external plexiform and granule cell layers. This indicates that the main activity in the accessory olfactory bulb is generated by the synapses between the mitral cells and the granule cells as is found in the main olfactory bulb.

Fine structure of the epithelia of the vomeronasal organ of horse and cattle. A comparative study

The vomeronasal organ of both horses and cattle is a tubular structure situated bilaterally at the base of the nasal septum. In frontal plane the shape of its lumen is semilunar to crescent. The sensory epithelium lining the medial wall of the lumen contains receptor, supporting and basal cells with some surface modifications in both species. In the horse, a structure similar to a microprocess was observed among the microvilli of receptor cells. In cattle, a large mass of the cytoplasm of the receptor cell occasionally protrudes to form a bleb-like structure. The supranuclear cytoplasm of the receptor cells contain mitochondria, free ribosomes, rough endoplasmic reticula, Golgi apparatus, lysosomes and multivesicular bodies. Some receptor cells were pyknotic. In both species the respiratory epithelia of the lateral wall of the lumen contain ciliated, non-ciliated and basal cells. In the horse, this epithelium differs from that of other species in evidence of prominent secretory function.

Slow potentials of the turtle olfactory bulb in response to odor stimulation of the nose

Odor stimulation of the nose in the box turtle and the gopher tortoise produced a characteristic series of slow potentials in the olfactory bulb which were referred to as the odor evoked response. When recorded with direct coupling, the odor evoked response had 3 components: wave I, a short duration monophasic event; wave II, a long duration variation in the DC potential; and wave III, an oscillatory potential superimposed on wave II. Waves I and II were negative at bulbar surfaces receiving olfactory input and positive deep within the bulb. This series of potentials could be evoked by 3 methods of odor stimulation: (1) large puffs delivered from odorant test bottles, (2) small puffs delivered from a syringe and (3) continuous flow with concentration and nasal flow rate parameters controlled by an olfactometer. When the odor evoked response was recorded at a bulbar locus, these potentials were seen in response to each stimulation and the amplitudes of each wave were reproducible with the same stimulus. The amplitudes of the 3 waves were compared in the gopher tortoise and differed with the 3 odorants tested--high purity geraniol, technical grade geraniol and amyl acetate. Odorant concentration also directly affected the response amplitudes of all 3 wave components. The amplitudes of waves I and III markedly decreased with closely spaced stimulations recovering to near the initial values when the interstimulus interval was increased severalfold. This series of sensory evoked potentials is considered to reflect the processing of odor information from the olfactory receptors by the olfactory bulb.