A study of cell interactions involved in Pleurodeles waltlii epidermal differentiation

Periderm fate and independence of tooth formation are conserved across osteichthyans

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that periderm (the outer ectodermal layer) in zebrafish partially expands into the mouth and pharyngeal pouches, but does not reach the medial endoderm, where the pharyngeal teeth develop. Instead, periderm-like cells, arising independently from the outer periderm, cover prospective tooth-forming epithelia and are crucial for tooth germ initiation. Here we test the hypothesis that restricted expansion of periderm is a teleost-specific character possibly related to the derived way of early embryonic development. To this end, we performed lineage tracing of the periderm in a non-teleost actinopterygian species possessing pharyngeal teeth, the sterlet sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus), and a sarcopterygian species lacking pharyngeal teeth, the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum).

RESULTS

In sturgeon, a stratified ectoderm is firmly established at the end of gastrulation, with minimally a basal ectodermal layer and a surface layer that can be homologized to a periderm. Periderm expands to a limited extent into the mouth and remains restricted to the distal parts of the pouches. It does not reach the medial pharyngeal endoderm, where pharyngeal teeth are located. Thus, periderm in sturgeon covers prospective odontogenic epithelium in the jaw region (oral teeth) but not in the pharyngeal region. In axolotl, like in sturgeon, periderm expansion in the oropharynx is restricted to the distal parts of the opening pouches. Oral teeth in axolotl develop long before mouth opening and possible expansion of the periderm into the mouth cavity.

CONCLUSIONS

Restricted periderm expansion into the oropharynx appears to be an ancestral feature for osteichthyans, as it is found in sturgeon, zebrafish and axolotl. Periderm behavior does not correlate with presence or absence of oral or pharyngeal teeth, whose induction may depend on 'ectodermalized' endoderm. It is proposed that periderm assists in lumenization of the pouches to create an open gill slit. Comparison of basal and advanced actinopterygians with sarcopterygians (axolotl) shows that different trajectories of embryonic development converge on similar dynamics of the periderm: a restricted expansion into the mouth and prospective gill slits.

Cellular polarity in cultured animal pole cells of Xenopus embryos

The expression of intracellular and surface polarity in cultured animal pole cells of Xenopus embryos (stages 6, 8, and 10) was examined morphologically and immunocytochemically. When control embryos reached stage 23, daughter cells derived from a single or a few animal pole cells formed aggregates. Outer cells of the aggregates displayed intracellular and surface polarity and expressed an epidermis-specific antigen (XEP-1) on the apical surface circumference, while these characteristics had not yet been established in the animal pole cells at the time of isolation. However, inner cells of the aggregates did not display the cellular polarity along an outer-inner axis of the aggregates and displayed the antigen randomly within the aggregates. These results indicate that the expression of cellular polarity in epidermal differentiation of Xenopus embryos in vitro depends on the position within the aggregates formed by daughter cells derived from isolated animal pole cells.