Capacity for RNA synthesis in 70S ribosome-deficient plastids of heat-bleached rye leaves

Plastid Gene Transcription: An Update on Promoters and RNA Polymerases

Chloroplasts, the sites of photosynthesis and sources of reducing power, are at the core of the success story that sets apart autotrophic plants from most other living organisms. Along with their fellow organelles (e.g., amylo-, chromo-, etio-, and leucoplasts), they form a group of intracellular biosynthetic machines collectively known as plastids. These plant cell constituents have their own genome (plastome), their own (70S) ribosomes, and complete enzymatic equipment covering the full range from DNA replication via transcription and RNA processive modification to translation. Plastid RNA synthesis (gene transcription) involves the collaborative activity of two distinct types of RNA polymerases that differ in their phylogenetic origin as well as their architecture and mode of function. The existence of multiple plastid RNA polymerases is reflected by distinctive sets of regulatory DNA elements and protein factors. This complexity of the plastid transcription apparatus thus provides ample room for regulatory effects at many levels within and beyond transcription. Research in this field offers insight into the various ways in which plastid genes, both singly and groupwise, can be regulated according to the needs of the entire cell. Furthermore, it opens up strategies that allow to alter these processes in order to optimize the expression of desired gene products.

The discovery of plastid-to-nucleus retrograde signaling-a personal perspective

DNA and machinery for gene expression have been discovered in chloroplasts during the 1960s. It was soon evident that the chloroplast genome is relatively small, that most genes for chloroplast-localized proteins reside in the nucleus and that chloroplast membranes, ribosomes, and protein complexes are composed of proteins encoded in both the chloroplast and the nuclear genome. This situation has made the existence of mechanisms highly probable that coordinate the gene expression in plastids and nucleus. In the 1970s, the first evidence for plastid signals controlling nuclear gene expression was provided by studies on plastid ribosome deficient mutants with reduced amounts and/or activities of nuclear-encoded chloroplast proteins including the small subunit of Rubisco, ferredoxin NADP+ reductase, and enzymes of the Calvin cycle. This review describes first models of plastid-to-nucleus signaling and their discovery. Today, many plastid signals are known. They do not only balance gene expression in chloroplasts and nucleus during developmental processes but are also generated in response to environmental changes sensed by the organelles.

The translational apparatus of plastids and its role in plant development

Chloroplasts (plastids) possess a genome and their own machinery to express it. Translation in plastids occurs on bacterial-type 70S ribosomes utilizing a set of tRNAs that is entirely encoded in the plastid genome. In recent years, the components of the chloroplast translational apparatus have been intensely studied by proteomic approaches and by reverse genetics in the model systems tobacco (plastid-encoded components) and Arabidopsis (nucleus-encoded components). This work has provided important new insights into the structure, function, and biogenesis of chloroplast ribosomes, and also has shed fresh light on the molecular mechanisms of the translation process in plastids. In addition, mutants affected in plastid translation have yielded strong genetic evidence for chloroplast genes and gene products influencing plant development at various levels, presumably via retrograde signaling pathway(s). In this review, we describe recent progress with the functional analysis of components of the chloroplast translational machinery and discuss the currently available evidence that supports a significant impact of plastid translational activity on plant anatomy and morphology.

Plastid gene transcription: promoters and RNA polymerases

Chloroplasts, the sites of photosynthesis and sources of reducing power, are at the core of the success story that sets apart autotrophic plants from most other living organisms. Along with their fellow organelles (e.g., amylo-, chromo-, etio-, and leucoplasts), they form a group of intracellular biosynthetic machines collectively known as plastids. These plant cell constituents have their own genome (plastome), their own (70S) ribosomes, and complete enzymatic equipment covering the full range from DNA replication via transcription and RNA processive modification to translation. Plastid RNA synthesis (gene transcription) involves the collaborative activity of two distinct types of RNA polymerases that differ in their phylogenetic origin as well as their architecture and mode of function. The existence of multiple plastid RNA polymerases is reflected by distinctive sets of regulatory DNA elements and protein factors. This complexity of the plastid transcription apparatus thus provides ample room for regulatory effects at many levels within and beyond transcription. Research in this field offers insight into the various ways in which plastid genes, both singly and groupwise, can be regulated according to the needs of the entire cell. Furthermore, it opens up strategies that allow to alter these processes in order to optimize the expression of desired gene products.

The transcription machineries of plant mitochondria and chloroplasts: Composition, function, and regulation

Although genomes of mitochondria and plastids are very small compared to those of their bacterial ancestors, the transcription machineries of these organelles are of surprising complexity. With respect to the number of different RNA polymerases per organelle, the extremes are represented on one hand by chloroplasts of eudicots which use one bacterial-type RNA polymerase and two phage-type RNA polymerases to transcribe their genes, and on the other hand by Physcomitrella possessing three mitochondrial RNA polymerases of the phage type. Transcription of genes/operons is often driven by multiple promoters in both organelles. This review describes the principle components of the transcription machineries (RNA polymerases, transcription factors, promoters) and the division of labor between the different RNA polymerases. While regulation of transcription in mitochondria seems to be only of limited importance, the plastid genes of higher plants respond to exogenous and endogenous cues rather individually by altering their transcriptional activities.

Overexpression of phage-type RNA polymerase RpoTp in tobacco demonstrates its role in chloroplast transcription by recognizing a distinct promoter type

Plant cells possess three DNA-containing compartments, the nucleus, the mitochondria and the plastids. Accordingly, plastid gene regulation is fairly complex. Albeit plastids retained their own genome and prokaryotic-type gene expression system by a plastid-encoded RNA polymerase (PEP), they need a second nuclear-encoded plastid transcription activity, NEP. Candidate genes for putative NEP catalytic subunits have been cloned in Arabidopsis thaliana (AtRpoTp) and Nicotiana sylvestris (NsRpoTp). To provide evidence for RpoTp as a gene encoding a NEP catalytic subunit, we introduced the AtRpoTp and NsRpoTp cDNAs into the tobacco nucleus under the control of the strong constitutive CaMV 35S promoter. Analysis of transcription from NEP and PEP promoters in these transgenic plants using primer extension assays revealed enhanced transcription from typical type I NEP promoters as PatpB-289 in comparison with the wild type. These data provide direct evidence that RpoTp is a catalytic subunit of NEP and involved in recognition of a distinct subset of type I NEP promoters.

Organellar RNA polymerases of higher plants

The nuclear genome of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana contains a small gene family consisting of three genes encoding RNA polymerases of the single-subunit bacteriophage type. There is evidence that similar gene families also exist in other plants. Two of these RNA polymerases are putative mitochondrial enzymes, whereas the third one may represent the nuclear-encoded RNA polymerase (NEP) active in plastids. In addition, plastid genes are transcribed from another, entirely different multisubunit eubacterial-type RNA polymerase, the core subunits of which are encoded by plastid genes [plastid-encoded RNA polymerase (PEP)]. This core enzyme is complemented by one of several nuclear-encoded sigma-like factors. The development of photosynthetically active chloroplasts requires both PEP and NEP. Most NEP promoters show certain similarities to mitochondrial promoters in that they include the sequence motif 5'-YRTA-3' near the transcription initiation site. PEP promoters are similar to bacterial promoters of the -10/-35 sigma 70 type.

Separation of two classes of plastid DNA-dependent RNA polymerases that are differentially expressed in mustard (Sinapis alba L.) seedlings

Chloroplast and etioplast in vitro transcription systems from mustard have different functional properties, which is reflected in differences in phosphorylation status. Here we report another transcription control mechanism, which involves two plastid DNA-dependent RNA polymerases designated as peak A and peak B enzymes. Both are large multi-subunit complexes, but differ in their native molecular mass (> 700 kDa for peak A and ca. 420 kDa for peak B) and in their polypeptide composition. The A enzyme is composed of at least 13 polypeptides, while the B enzyme contains only four putative subunits. Peak B activity is inhibited by rifampicin, whereas that of peak A is resistant. RNA polymerase activity was compared for plastids from cotyledons of 4-day-old seedlings that were grown either under continuous light (chloroplasts) or in darkness (etioplasts), or were first dark-grown and then transferred to light for 16 h ('intermediate-type' plastids). While the total activity was approximately the same in all three cases, enzyme B was the predominant activity obtained from etioplasts and enzyme A that obtained from chloroplasts. Both had equal activity in preparations from the 'intermediate-type' plastid form. Both activation/inactivation and differential gene expression seem to play a role in the regulation of the plastid transcription machinery.

Chloroplast RNA polymerase genes of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii exhibit an unusual structure and arrangement

Nucleotide sequence analysis of a 17043 base-pair (bp) region of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii plastome indicates the presence of three open reading frames (ORFs) similar to RNA polymerase subunit genes. Two, termed rpoB1 and rpoB2, are homologous to the 5'- and 3'-halves of the Escherichia coli beta subunit gene, respectively. A third, termed rpoC2, is similar to the 3'-half of the bacterial beta' subunit gene. These genes exhibit several unusual features: (1) all three represent chimeric structures in which RNA polymerase gene sequences are juxtaposed in-frame with long sequences of unknown identity; (2) unlike their counterparts in plants and eubacteria, rpoB1 and rpoB2 are separated from rpoC2 by a long (7 kilobase-pair, kbp) region containing genes unrelated to RNA polymerase; (3) DNA homologous to the 5' half of rpoC (termed rpoC1 in other species) is not present at the 5' end of rpoC2 and could not be detected in C. reinhardtii chloroplast DNA. RNA expression could not be detected for any of the RNA polymerase genes, suggesting that they are pseudogenes or genes expressed at stages of the C. reinhardtii life-cycle not investigated. The three genes are flanked by GC-rich repeat elements. We suggest that repeat DNA-mediated chloroplast recombination events may have contributed to their unusual arrangement.

Multiple coordinate controls contribute to a balanced expression of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase subunits in rye leaves

In the leaves of rye (Secale cereale L.), control mechanisms acting at multiple molecular levels contribute to a coordinate expression of the subunit polypeptides of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase. The relevance and hierarchy of the different control steps were evaluated by comparing the time courses of changes in levels of translatable mRNA, rates of in vivo amino acid incorporation, and the turnover of subunit polypeptides after selective interference with translation at either cytoplasmic 80S ribosomes, or at the 70S ribosomes of the chloroplast, by compartment-specific inhibitors, or by the use of 70S-ribosome-deficient leaves. The latter were generated by growing the plants at a non-permissive elevated temperature of 32 degrees C. The rates of synthesis of the two ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase subunits were most rapidly adapted to each other by translational controls. Within 0.5-2.5 h after selective inhibition of the synthesis of either subunit, that of the other subunit made in the unaffected compartment also declined by more than 90% without any marked change in its mRNA. After prolonged inhibition (24 h) of either cytoplasmic or chloroplast protein synthesis, the levels of mRNAs for both subunits were greatly diminished. In rye, the mRNA levels for both subunits changed under all experimental conditions tested in a closely parallel manner and appeared to be always maintained in a balanced, fairly constant ratio by strong coordinate controls. Even 70S-ribosome-deficient leaves contained mRNAs for both the small and the large subunits, although only in small amounts. The mRNAs for both subunits were also markedly further decreased in 70S-ribosome-deficient leaves after application of an inhibitor of cytoplasmic translation. MDMP [2-(4-methyl-2,6-dinitroanilino)-N-methylpropionamide], suggesting that the suppression of the large subunit mRNA in the plastids was not mediated through feedback effects of accumulating unassembled large subunits. Coordinate controls at both the mRNA and the translational level require a bidirectional exchange of regulatory signals between chloroplast and cytoplasm. However, these controls were not absolutely restrictive and allowed low rates of uncoupled synthesis of either large or small subunits. Large subunits made in the presence of MDMP were stable over 24 h. However, unassembled small subunits synthesized in 70S-ribosome-deficient leaves were degraded with a half-time of 10.5 h, in contrast to their behavior after integration into the holoprotein in normal leaves, where no turnover was detected. The proteolytic removal of surplus free small subunits is regarded as a final post-translational fine-tuning step to establish a balanced subunit stoichiometry in leaves.

The plastid rpoA gene encoding a protein homologous to the bacterial RNA polymerase alpha subunit is expressed in pea chloroplasts

The gene rpoA, encoding a protein homologous to the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase from Escherichia coli has been located in pea chloroplast DNA downstream of the petD gene for subunit IV of the cytochrome b-f complex. Nucleotide sequence analysis has revealed that rpoA encodes a polypeptide of 334 amino acid residues with a molecular weight of 38916. Northern blot analysis has shown that rpoA is co-transcribed with the gene for ribosomal protein S11. A lacZ-rpoA gene-fusion has been constructed and expressed in E. coli. Antibodies raised against the fusion protein have been employed to demonstrate the synthesis of the rpoA gene product in isolated pea chloroplasts. Western blot analysis using these antibodies and antibodies against the RNA polymerase core enzyme from the cyanobacterium, Anabaena 7120, has revealed the presence of the gene product in a crude RNA polymerase preparation from pea chloroplasts.

Unassembled polypeptides of the plastidic ribosomes in heat-treated 70S-ribosome-deficient rye leaves

The polypeptides of the subunits of 70S ribosomes isolated from rye (Secale cereale L.) leaf chloroplasts were analyzed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The 50S subunit contained approx. 33 polypeptides in the range of relative molecular mass (Mr) 13000-36000, the 30S subunit contained approx. 25 polypeptides in the range of Mr 13000-40500. Antisera raised against the individual isolated ribosomal subunits detected approx. 17 polypeptides of the 50S and 10 polypeptides of the 30S subunit in the immunoblotting assay. By immunoblotting with these antisera the major antigenic ribosomal polypeptides (r-proteins) of the chloroplasts were clearly and specifically visualized also in separations of leaf extracts or soluble chloroplast supernatants. In extracts from rye leaves grown at 32° C, a temperature which is non-permissive for 70S-ribosome formation, or in supernatants from ribosome-deficient isolated plastids, six plastidic r-proteins were visualized by immunoblotting with the anti-50S-serum and two to four plastidic r-proteins were detected by immunoblotting with the anti-30S-serum, while other r-proteins that reacted with our antisera were missing. Those plastidic r-proteins that were present in 70S-ribosome-deficient leaves must represent individual unassembled ribosomal polypeptides that were synthesized on cytoplasmic 80S ribosomes. For the biogenesis of chloroplast ribosomes the mechanism of coordinate regulation appear to be less strict than those known for the biogenesis of bacterial ribosomes, thus allowing a marked accumulation of several unassembled ribosomal polypeptides of cytoplasmic origin.

A tobacco chloroplast DNA sequence possibly coding for a polypeptide similar to E. coli RNA polymerase beta-subunit

DNA sequencing has revealed a long open reading frame (ORF) in the large single-copy region of tobacco chloroplast DNA. This ORF consists of 1070 codons and its deduced amino acid sequence shows about 39% homology to that of the beta-subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase. This finding raises a possibility that some of the chloroplast RNA polymerase subunits are coded for by the chloroplast genome.

Synthesis of ribosomal RNA in ribosome-deficient plastids of the mutant "albostrians" of Hordeum vulgare L

The nuclear gene-induced plastome mutant "albostrians" of Hordeum vulgare L. is characterized by a plastid ribosome-deficiency. This ribosome deficiency could be caused by the lack of or a defect in chloroplast RNA polymerase. However in our investigations we found an activity of chloroplast RNA polymerase in wild-type and mutant leaves of "albostrians" barley by (1) electron microscopic autoradio-graphy after in vivo labelling of RNA, (2) determination of RNA polymerase activity in isolated plastids, and (3) characterization of the newly synthesized RNA by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels. The genes of 23S and 16S rRNA are transcribed in mutant plastids and the RNAs are processed. From these results we conclude that the enzymes involved in transcription and processing of chloroplast rRNA are synthesized on cytoplasmic ribosomes and that the plastid ribosome deficiency in albostrians barley is probably not caused by a defective chloroplast DNA dependent RNA polymerase or by a mutation in the genes of 23S and 16S chloroplast rRNA.