Plastid fusion as an agent to arrest sorting out

Defining coalescent genes: Theory meets practice in organelle phylogenomics

The species tree paradigm that dominates current molecular systematic practice infers species trees from collections of sequences under assumptions of the multispecies coalescent (MSC), i.e., that there is free recombination between the sequences and no (or very low) recombination within them. These coalescent genes (c-genes) are thus defined in an historical rather than molecular sense, and can in theory be as large as an entire genome or as small as a single nucleotide. A debate about how to define c-genes centers on the contention that nuclear gene sequences used in many coalescent analyses undergo too much recombination, such that their introns comprise multiple c-genes, violating a key assumption of the MSC. Recently a similar argument has been made for the genes of plastid (e.g., chloroplast) and mitochondrial genomes, which for the last 30 or more years have been considered to represent a single c-gene for the purposes of phylogeny reconstruction because they are non-recombining in a historical sense. Consequently, it has been suggested that these genomes should be analyzed using coalescent methods that treat their genes-over 70 protein-coding genes in the case of most plastid genomes (plastomes)-as independent estimates of species phylogeny, in contrast to the usual practice of concatenation, which is appropriate for generating gene trees. However, although recombination certainly occurs in the plastome, as has been recognized since the 1970's, it is unlikely to be phylogenetically relevant. This is because such historically effective recombination can only occur when plastomes with incongruent histories are brought together in the same plastid. However, plastids sort rapidly into different cell lineages and rarely fuse. Thus, because of plastid biology, the plastome is a more canonical c-gene than is the average multi-intron mammalian nuclear gene. The plastome should thus continue to be treated as a single estimate of the underlying species phylogeny, as should the mitochondrial genome. The implications of this long-held insight of molecular systematics for studies in the phylogenomic era are explored.

Plastid Genomes of Flowering Plants: Essential Principles

The plastid genome (plastome ) has proved a valuable source of data for evaluating evolutionary relationships among angiosperms. Through basic and applied approaches, plastid transformation technology offers the potential to understand and improve plant productivity, providing food, fiber, energy, and medicines to meet the needs of a burgeoning global population. The growing genomic resources available to both phylogenetic and biotechnological investigations is allowing novel insights and expanding the scope of plastome research to encompass new species. In this chapter, we present an overview of some of the seminal and contemporary research that has contributed to our current understanding of plastome evolution and attempt to highlight the relationship between evolutionary mechanisms and the tools of plastid genetic engineering.

The plastid genomes of flowering plants

The plastid genome (plastome) has proved a valuable source of data for evaluating evolutionary relationships among angiosperms. Through basic and applied approaches, plastid transformation technology offers the potential to understand and improve plant productivity, providing food, fiber, energy and medicines to meet the needs of a burgeoning global population. The growing genomic resources available to both phylogenetic and biotechnological investigations are allowing novel insights and expanding the scope of plastome research to encompass new species. In this chapter we present an overview of some of the seminal and contemporary research that has contributed to our current understanding of plastome evolution and attempt to highlight the relationship between evolutionary mechanisms and tools of plastid genetic engineering.

Recombination between chloroplast DNAs does not occur in sexual crosses of Oenothera

Crosses of Oenothera result in the transmission of chloroplasts from both parents to their offspring. In spite of this biparental inheritance, no wild-type recombinants were recovered from crosses between different chloroplast mutants. Since more than 7500 progeny were examined, the results indicate that recombination between the chloroplast DNAs of higher plants must be a very rare event.

Generation of heteroplastidic Nicotiana cybrids by protoplast fusion: analysis for plastid recombinant types

Protoplasts of a mutant line of Nicotiana tabacum having a maternally-transmitted chlorophyll deficiency were fused with protoplasts of two alloplasmic-male-sterile Nicotiana lines by the "donor-recipient" technique. In both fusion experiments variegated plantlets were regenerated which were shown to contain cytoplasms of mixed chloroplast nature. This confirms that with the "donor-recipient" method one can obtain mixed cytoplasms of genetically different chloroplasts. We present a convenient system to assay for genetic recombination between chloroplasts by combining use of several cytoplasmic markers: vis. chlorophyll pigmentation, chloroplast DNA restriction patterns, tentoxin resistance and male sterility. Within the limits of the experiment no recombinant types were recovered.

The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division

When an organism has only one or two mitochondria or chloroplasts per cell, it is probable that their partitioning is always stringently controlled so that each daughter cell always receives half the organelles in the parent cell. When there are more copies of an organelle, the available data suggest that partitioning is stochastic but far from random, with a strong tendency toward equality. The molecular mechanisms that promote equal partitioning are not known in any case, but the great variety of organelle behavior suggests that many different mechanisms are involved in different organisms. As Wilson (1925) pointed out, the precision of partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles rarely if ever equals that of mitosis, but it is still an expression of selection for mechanisms that will ensure the hereditary continuity of the organelles. How cells compensate for unequal partitioning by controlling organelle replication is known for only one case. But when one considers that Tetrahymena and Paramecium use different methods to compensate for unequal partitioning of macronuclear DNA, it would not be surprising if organisms use a variety of different compensating replication modes for organelles as well. What is surprising is that so little attention has been paid to these problems. Nothing could be simpler than counting organelles in dividing cells, but this has been done on a large scale in only two systems. Quantitative techniques in cell biology have been developed to the point where such studies could be done even on cells that have too many organelles for direct counting. Molecular mechanisms of partitioning have scarcely been touched on. Much more has been done on the role of the cytoskeleton in determining cell shape, and some observations have been made on its role in positioning organelles in interphase cells, but these kinds of studies have not been extended to dividing cells. Some experiments and observations have been made on the role of microtubules and microfilaments in moving cytoplasmic organelles around the cell during interphase, but again nothing has been done on their possible role in partitioning organelles at cytokinesis. The major lesson of this article is how little has been done, and how much can be done. The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division is a wide-open field for future research, and one of great importance for both genetics and cell biology.