Effective treatment of chronically progressive multiple sclerosis with low-dose cyclophosphamide with minor side-effects

Potential Effect of Cyclophosphamide on Bleb Survival in Five Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Who Underwent Glaucoma Surgery

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this case series was to report the potential role of cyclophosphamide (CY) on bleb survival and to evaluate the safety of the trabeculectomy procedure under immunosuppressant systemic therapy.

CASE SERIES

Five eyes of five patients with unresponsive to intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering medication, progressive glaucoma, underwent mytomicin C (MMC) augmented phaco-trabeculectomy, performed by the same surgeon, A.G., during the period from May 2015 to January 2016. All patients were treated with low doses of systemic CY at the time of surgery, to control their relapsing progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) form.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up period of 20.6 ± 8.1 months, for cases of "complete success" (when the IOP was < 15 mmHg without glaucoma therapy) were observed, while one case was classified as a "qualified success" since the IOP was ≤ 15 mmHg with β-blocker drops. There were no bleb infections, nor bleb-related complications.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the safety of performing the filtration surgical procedure under immunosuppressant systemic therapy and provides a possible explication of CY anti-fibrotic mechanism and its possible role on bleb survival. Our findings may suggest new perspectives of study in this field.

Cyclophosphamide for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis is a presumed cell-mediated autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Cyclophosphamide (CFX) is a cytotoxic and immunosuppressive agent, used in systemic autoimmune diseases. Controversial results have been reported on its efficacy in MS. We conducted a systematic review of all relevant trials, evaluating the efficacy of CFX in patients with progressive MS.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to determine whether CFX slows the progression of MS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane MS Group Trials Register (searched June 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3 2006), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (January 1988 to June 2006) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effect of CFX treatment in patients affected by clinically definite progressive MS.CFX had to be administered alone or in combination with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) or steroids. The comparison group had to be placebo or no treatment or the same co-intervention (ACTH or steroids)

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently decided the eligibility of the study, assessed the trial quality and extracted data. We also contacted study authors for original data.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 461 identified references, we initially selected 70: only four RCTs were included for the final analysis. Intensive immunosuppression with CFX (alone or associated with ACTH or prednisone) in patients with progressive MS compared to placebo or no treatment (152 participants) did not prevent the long-term (12, 18, 24 months) clinical disability progression as defined as evolution to a next step of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. However, the mean change in disability (final disability subtracted from the baseline) significantly favoured the treated group at 12 (effect size - 0.21, 95% confidence interval - 0.25 to -0.17) and 18 months (- 0.19, 95% confidence interval - 0.24 to - 0.14) but favoured the control group at 24 months (0.14, CI 0.07 to 0.21). We were unable to verify the efficacy of other schedules. Five patients died; sepsis and amenorrhea frequently occurred in treated patients (descriptive analysis).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to achieve all of the objectives specified for the review. This review shows that the overall effect of CFX (administered as intensive schedule) in the treatment of progressive MS does not support its use in clinical practice.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis with cyclophosphamide: critical review of clinical and immunologic effects

Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent used to treat malignancies and immune-mediated inflammatory non-malignant processes such as lupus nephritis and immune-mediated neuropathies. It has been studied as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) for the past 30 years and is used by physicians in selected cases of progressive or worsening MS. Review of published reports suggests that it is efficacious in cases of worsening MS that have an inflammatory component as evidenced by relapses and/or gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or in patients in earlier stages of disease where inflammation predominates over degenerative processes in the central nervous system (CNS). There is no evidence of efficacy in primary progressive MS or later stages of secondary progressive MS. Although a general immunosuppressant that affects both T- and B-cell function, cyclophosphamide has selective immune effects in MS by suppressing IL-12 and Th1-type responses and enhancing Th2/Th3 responses (IL-4, IL-10, TGF-beta; eosinophils in peripheral blood). Side effects include nausea, alopecia, infertility, bladder toxicity and risk of malignancy. The most commonly used regimens involve every 4- to 8-week outpatient i.v. pulse therapy given with or without corticosteroids and are usually well-tolerated by patients. Cyclophosphamide is currently used in patients whose disease is not controlled by beta-interferon or glatiramer acetate and those with rapidly worsening MS.

Cyclophosphamide for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis is a presumed cell-mediated autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Cyclophosphamide (CFX) is a cytotoxic and immunosuppressive agent, used in systemic autoimmune diseases. Controversial results have been reported on its efficacy in MS. We conducted a systematic review of all relevant trials, evaluating the CFX efficacy in patients with progressive MS.

OBJECTIVES

The main objectives were to determine whether CFX slows the disease progression.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) were systematically searched. References list of retrieved studies and conference abstracts on the main meetings on Multiple Sclerosis were handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effect of CFX treatment in patients affected by clinically definite progressive MS. CFX had to be administered alone or in combination with ACTH or steroids. The comparison group had to be placebo or no treatment or the same co intervention (ACTH or steroids) The main outcome criteria were : progression of disability (defined as an increase of 0.5 point in Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS) for patients with baseline EDSS > or = 6 and 1 for EDSS < or = 5.5), differences of disability between treatment-control groups and the number of patients with side effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The identified references were reviewed by two reviewers who independently decided the eligibility of the study, extracted and summarized data and assessed the trial's quality. The statistical analysis was performed using the Cochrane RevMan software and analyzed using Cochrane MetaView.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 326 identified references, 80 were selected for full review, only four RCTs were selected for the final analysis. Intensive immunosuppression with CFX (alone or associated with ACTH or prednisone) in patients with progressive MS compared to placebo or no-treatment (152 participants) did not prevent the long -term (12-18-24 months) risk to evolution to a next step of EDSS. However, the mean change in disability (final disability subtracted from the baseline) significantly favoured the treated group at 12 (effect size - 0.21; C. I. - 0.24, - 0.17) and 18 months (- 0.19; C. I. - 0.24, - 0.14). We were not able to verify the efficacy of other schedules. Five patients died; sepsis and amenorrhea frequently occurred in treated patients (descriptive analysis).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Only limited objectives were reached. This review shows a role of CFX in the treatment of progressive MS, but less toxic schedules must be considered, before its use in the clinical practice.

Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis with pulse cyclophosphamide/methylprednisolone: response to therapy is linked to the duration of progressive disease

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there are variables linked to responsiveness to pulse cyclophosphamide/methylprednisolone therapy in progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

BACKGROUND

MS is a presumed autoimmune disease of the CNS in which immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory treatments are being used. We have treated patients with the progressive form of MS using a regimen consisting of pulse cyclophosphamide/methylprednisolone that is given as an outpatient at 4 - 8 week intervals similar to lupus nephritis protocols.

DESIGN/METHODS

We investigated a series of 95 consecutive progressive MS patients treated in an open label fashion in an effort to identify factors linked to response to treatment. Clinical outcome measures included status at 12 months and time to failure determined by EDSS change and global physician impression. For each endpoint, associations were examined between outcome and patient characteristics including gender, age at onset of disease and treatment, EDSS 1 year previously and at start of treatment, duration of MS, previous treatment, age at onset and duration of progression, and primary vs secondary progressive MS.

RESULTS

Of the variables studied, age, gender, age at onset, and age at treatment did not correlate with response to therapy. The most significant variable that correlated with response was length of time the patient was in the progressive phase (P=0.048, 12 month change in EDSS; P=0.017, risk for time to failure). Patients that improved on therapy at 12 months had progressive disease for an average of 2.1 years prior to treatment, whereas those stable or worse had progressive disease for 5.0 and 4.1 years respectively. There was a trend (P=0.08) favoring positive clinical responses in secondary progressive as opposed to primary progressive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that progressive MS may become refractory to immunosuppressive therapy with time and early intervention when patients enter the progressive stage should be considered. Furthermore, in trials of immunosuppressive agents for progressive MS, duration of progression should be considered as a randomization and analysis variable.

The current therapy of multiple sclerosis

The mainstay of treatment for multiple sclerosis in the U.K., and worldwide, remains corticosteroid therapy. High-dose pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone is currently the most favoured agent for acute exacerbations or a sudden acceleration in clinical course. Many patients who follow a more insidious decline rely on symptomatic treatments designed to ameliorate the chronic symptoms associated with their condition. Attempts to influence disease progression using a wide range of immune-modulating agents have not to date been of sufficient clinical benefit to justify their routine usage. With increasing understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms future treatments are being more specifically directed toward disease prevention.