Suppression of transcription of the ribosomal RNA cistrons of Drosophila melanogaster in a structurally rearranged chromosome

Position effect variegation and chromatin proteins

Variegated phenotypes often result from chromosomal rearrangements that place euchromatic genes next to heterochromatin. In such rearrangements, the condensed structure of heterochromatin can spread into euchromatic regions, which then assume the morphology of heterochromatin and become transcriptionally inactive. In position-effect variegation (PEV) therefore, gene inactivation results from a change in chromatin structure. PEV has been intensively investigated in the fruitfly Drosophila, where the phenomenon allows a genetic dissection of chromatin components. Consequently, many genes have been identified which, when mutated, act as dominant modifiers (suppressors or enhancers) of PEV. Data available already demonstrate that genetic, molecular and developmental analysis of these genes provides an avenue to the identification of regulatory and structural chromatin components, and hence to fundamental aspects of chromosome structure and function.

A sequence motif found in a Drosophila heterochromatin protein is conserved in animals and plants

Modifiers of position-effect-variegation in Drosophila encode proteins that are thought to modify chromatin, rendering it heritably changed in its expressibility. In an attempt to identify similar modifier genes in other species we have utilized a known sequence homology, termed chromo box, between a suppressor of position-effect-variegation, Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), and a repressor of homeotic genes, Polycomb (Pc). A PCR generated probe encompassing the HP1 chromo box was used to clone full-length murine cDNAs that contain conserved chromo box motifs. Sequence comparisons, in situ hybridization experiments, and RNA Northern blot analysis suggest that the murine and human sequences presented in this report are homologues of the Drosophila HP1 gene. Chromo box sequences can also be detected in other animal species, and in plants, predicting a strongly conserved structural role for the peptide encoded by this sequence. We propose that epigenetic (yet heritable) changes in gene expressibility, characteristic of chromosomal imprinting phenomena, can largely be explained by the action of such modifier genes. The evolutionary conservation of the chromo box motif now enables the isolation and study of putative modifier genes in those animal and plant species where chromosomal imprinting has been described.

Position effect variegation in Drosophila: towards a genetics of chromatin assembly

The formation of a highly condensed chromosome structure (heterochromatin) in a region of a eukaryotic chromosome can inactivate the genes within that region. Genetic studies using the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster have identified several essential genes which influence the formation of heterochromatin. My purpose in this review is to summarize some recent work on the genetics of heterochromatin assembly in Drosophila and a recent model for how chromosomal proteins may interact to form a heterochromatic structure.

Molecular hypotheses for position-effect variegation: anti-sense transcription and promoter occlusion

There is currently no comprehensive molecular hypothesis to account for position-effect variegation, the mosaic expression of a gene lying near a breakpoint of a chromosomal rearrangement. Here it is proposed that position-effect variegation arises from either anti-sense transcription or from promoter occlusion (transcription readthrough), the former mechanism operating for breakpoints on the 3' side of the affected gene and the latter for breakpoints on the 5' side. Anti-sense transcription will occur in rearrangements that place the anti-sense strand of genes next to a promoter. This anti-sense RNA hybridizes to, and thereby inactivates, sense mRNA transcripts (as anti-sense RNA is known to do). Promoter occlusion may occur in rearrangements that place the affected gene near an open upstream promoter. This promoter drives readthrough transcription that inhibits most normal transcripts. Occasional normal transcripts lead to phenotypic variegation. These hypotheses have three strengths: (i) they predict the major observed features of position-effect variegation including variegated phenotype, stable inheritance, the involvement of rearrangements, only some rearrangements causing variegation, the occurrence of both dominant and recessive variegation, the spreading effect of variegation to several loci, and the conditions required for expression of variegation; (ii) they can plausibly account for features of position-effect variegation that they do not specifically predict; (iii) they lead to a series of novel and testable predictions, including the presence of altered transcripts in rearrangements including position-effect variegation, the location of breakpoints required to cause variegation, and a correlation between the extent of the spreading effect and the length of the novel transcript. These mechanisms can account for several other cases of variegation in addition to classic position-effect variegation. Actual or putative examples of phenotypic variegation due to these mechanisms are known.

Suppression of ribosomal RNA genes in Drosophila melanogaster

The rDNA of fiveYchromosome mutants was examined with respect to their insert free (In−) repeat type multiplicity. The In− repeat number of each mutant was correlated with its hemizygousbobbedphenotype and additivity with anXNObobbed(bb) mutant. Four of these mutants showed a direct relationship between their In− frequency, hemizygousbbphenotype and additivity tests. A fifth mutant,bb1–4, had a sufficient number of In− repeats to ensure viability to the late pupal stage and show additivity; however, the In− repeats genetically behaved as a complete rDNA deletion. Possible mechanisms resulting in the suppression of thebb1–4In− repeats are discussed.

Mutants affecting position-effect heterochromatinization in Drosophila melanogaster

The dominant suppressor Su(var)b101 and the dominant enhancer En(var)c101 were found to affect significantly white variegation in a strongly variegating line of the Wm4 chromosome (Wm4h) which has been used as standard rearrangement for a genetic dissection of position-effect variegation (Reuter and Wolff, 1981). Both mutations were also shown to affect position-effect heterochromatisation in T (1 ; 4)Wm258-21 and variegation in all the rearrangements tested (white, brown, scute and bobbed variegation). These results suggest that the genes identified encode functions essential for the manifestation of gene inactivation in position-effect rearrangements. It seems also reasonable to assume that in all the rearrangements tested identical heterochromatisation processes lead to inactivation of the genes whose phenotype is variegated.

Isolation of dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation have been isolated by using a strongly variegated line carrying the wm4 chromosome (wm4h) and the dominant enhancer mutant En(var)c101. The use of an effective genetic test system made it possible to isolate more than 100 strongly dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation. This suggests that the phenomenon of position-effect variegation is characterised by a complex genetic basis. The significance of the isolated mutants to genetic dissection of structural and regulatory functions of the eukaryotic chromosome is discussed.

Developmental changes of sepiapterin synthase activity associated with a variegated purple gene in Drosophila melanogaster

A variegated position effect on the autonomous gene, purple, has been studid enzymologically in Drosophila melanogaster. Sepiapterin synthase, the enzyme system associated with pr+, was examined for activity in different developmental stages of the fly. The results indicate that T(y:22)prc5, cn/prc4 cn flies (flies in which pr+ has been translocated and which exhibit variegation) have a reduced amount of enzyme activity as compared with both Oregon-R and pr1 flies. This reduction in activity was not found in larval stages, which suggests that the inactivation process probably occurs in late larval or early pupal stages. The phenotype of the variegated adult has white eyes with red-colored spots and patches where drosopterins occur. The phenotype of the fly carrying the translocation is modified by the presence of additional Y chromosomes. This extends the observation from other systems that extra heterochromatin acts to suppress the variegated position effect. The advantages of studying the variegation by measuring enzyme activity, as well as the phenotypic expression, are several; for example, the developmental time at which variegation occurs may be estimated even though drosopterin synthesis is not occurring.

Comparative studies on the human glutamate-pyruvate transaminase phenotypes--GPT 1, GPT 2-1, GPT 2

The quantitative differences between the activity of the 3 common phenotypes of human red cell GPT has been confirmed. In addition, the activity of red cell GPT 1 was found to be greater in young children than in adults. No such difference was found for the GPT 2 phenotype. The activity of the red cell GPT 1 was found to decrease with age, reaching the adult level at the age of 10 to 12 years. Red cell GPT of all the 3 common phenotypes in both adults and children was found to show a similar response to the addition of excess pyridoxal phosphate. A method has been devised for the partial purification of human GPT (cytoplasmic) from liver. GPT 1 and GPT 2 have been purified, and very few significant differences were found amongst the physical and kinetic parameters tested.

Morphogenic effects of halogenated thymidine analogues on Drosophila. VI. Causal analysis of bromodeoxyuridine induced growth lesions

Variations in the treatment conditions which affect the frequency of BUdR-induced morphogenic lesions in Drosophila melanogaster have been studied. By varying the concentrations of BUdR and FU, or by changing the duration of treatment, it has been demonstrated that increased incorporation of BUdR into DNA results in a concomitant increase in morphogenic lesions. A quantitative analysis of the data on BUdR-induced lesions as a function of the age of the larvae at the time of treatment indicates that an analog pulse during early larval life induces fewer, but larger lesions than a similar treatment given during later stages of development. These observations support the hypothesis that the developmental modifications are the result of genetic changes which in subsequent replication cycles of DNA are transmitted to descendant cells, and are not necessarily due to the presence of BUdR in DNA per se of cells in the developing organism.