Photopigment and receptor properties in Drosophila compound eye and ocellar receptors

Autofluorescent Biomolecules in Diptera: From Structure to Metabolism and Behavior

Light-based phenomena in insects have long attracted researchers’ attention. Surface color distribution patterns are commonly used for taxonomical purposes, while optically-active structures from Coleoptera cuticle or Lepidoptera wings have inspired technological applications, such as biosensors and energy accumulation devices. In Diptera, besides optically-based phenomena, biomolecules able to fluoresce can act as markers of bio-metabolic, structural and behavioral features. Resilin or chitinous compounds, with their respective blue or green-to-red autofluorescence (AF), are commonly related to biomechanical and structural properties, helpful to clarify the mechanisms underlying substrate adhesion of ectoparasites’ leg appendages, or the antennal abilities in tuning sound detection. Metarhodopsin, a red fluorescing photoproduct of rhodopsin, allows to investigate visual mechanisms, whereas NAD(P)H and flavins, commonly relatable to energy metabolism, favor the investigation of sperm vitality. Lipofuscins are AF biomarkers of aging, as well as pteridines, which, similarly to kynurenines, are also exploited in metabolic investigations. Beside the knowledge available in Drosophila melanogaster, a widely used model to study also human disorder and disease mechanisms, here we review optically-based studies in other dipteran species, including mosquitoes and fruit flies, discussing future perspectives for targeted studies with various practical applications, including pest and vector control.

The yellow specialist: dronefly Eristalis tenax prefers different yellow colours for landing and proboscis extension

Droneflies, imagoes of the hoverfly Eristalis tenax, are known to possess a preference for yellow flowers, i.e. they prefer to visit yellow flowers and prefer to extend the proboscis to yellow colours. In this study we disentangle these colour preferences by investigating the landing reaction and proboscis reflex with particular reference to intensity, spectral purity and dominant wavelength of colour stimuli and their UV reflection properties. In multiple-choice tests, naïve and non-trained flies prefer to land on yellow colours independent of their UV reflection characteristics, but also accept blue, white and pink colours if they absorb UV and are of sufficient brightness. Flies trained to land on colours other than yellow still prefer yellow colours to some extent. Moreover, the flies prefer bright over dark yellow colours even if trained to dark yellow ones. The flies refuse to land on dark colours of all hues. Naïve flies exhibit the proboscis reflex only to pure yellow pollen. These experiments show for the first time that landing in droneflies is triggered by a yellow colour independent of its UV reflection properties, but proboscis extension is triggered by yellow colours strongly absorbing blue and UV. The ability to discriminate colours is better than predicted by the categorical colour vision model. The colour preferences in E. tenax represent a fine-tuned ability to visit yellow flowers displaying a UV bull's-eye pattern.

Visual ecology of flies with particular reference to colour vision and colour preferences

The visual ecology of flies is outstanding among insects due to a combination of specific attributes. Flies' compound eyes possess an open rhabdom and thus separate rhabdomeres in each ommatidium assigned to two visual pathways. The highly sensitive, monovariant neural superposition system is based on the excitation of the peripheral rhabdomeres of the retinula cells R1-6 and controls optomotor reactions. The two forms of central rhabdomeres of R7/8 retinula cells in each ommatidium build up a system with four photoreceptors sensitive in different wavelength ranges and thought to account for colour vision. Evidence from wavelength discrimination tests suggests that all colour stimuli are assigned to one of just four colour categories, but cooperation of the two pathways is also evident. Flies use colour cues for various behavioural reactions such as flower visitation, proboscis extension, host finding, and egg deposition. Direct evidence for colour vision, the ability to discriminate colours according to spectral shape but independent of intensity, has been demonstrated for few fly species only. Indirect evidence for colour vision provided from electrophysiological recordings of the spectral sensitivity of photoreceptors and opsin genes indicates similar requisites in various flies; the flies' responses to coloured targets, however, are much more diverse.

Electrophysiological sensitivity of carotenoid deficient and replaced Drosophila

R1-6 dominated electroretinographic (ERG) spectral sensitivities were determined as a function of days posteclosion from carotenoid deprived and replaced white-eyed Drosophila. The sensitivity of flies deprived from egg to adult waxed (about 1.5 log units by day 3), and then waned gradually from 3-11 days (over 2 log units by day 11). Carotenoid replacement (feeding nothing but carrot juice) effected recovery to near the replete controls' level in about 1 day throughout (tested at 0, 4, and 11 days). The normal yellow cornmeal-agar-molasses-brewers yeast fly food (in our laboratory, supplemented with beta-carotene) renders a slower recovery (requiring 7-9 days) since it is a medium designed largely for larval growth. Placing replete adults on deprivational medium did not create a deprivational syndrome in over 11 days. At 3-7 days, deprived flies reared and maintained in constant darkness had substantially enhanced sensitivity, beyond the 1.5 log unit increment already described for cyclic light rearing conditions. All spectral analyses are consistent with the ultraviolet (UV) sensitization of the blue (480 nm) rhodopsin by a replacement-dependent retinoid including two unexpected findings: (1) sensitivity recovery with carrot juice was so fast that the UV peak was already high at 6 h; and (2) the waxing of the deprived fly's sensitivity in dark rearing was so great that the UV peak was present at 4-7 days.

Microphotometric, ultrastructural, and electrophysiological analyses of light-dependent processes on visual receptors in white-eyed wild-type and norpA (no receptor potential) mutant Drosophila

We examined a white-eyed strain of the norpA mutant (norpA;cn bw) and white (w)norpA+ controls using microspectrophotometry (MSP), electron microscopy (EM), and electroretinography (ERG). These studies revealed that light mediates receptor demise in norpA even though norpA lacks phototransduction. Rhodopsin and the rhabdomere which houses it decrease with increasing age in norpA but not in w with rearing on a 12 h light/12-h dark cycle or in constant light. At higher temperature in norpA;cn bw and w reared in constant light, visual pigment decreases, rhabdomeres diminish, and cells die. Importantly, dark rearing blocked visual pigment loss in norpA;cn bw; the M-potential, an ERG reflection of visual pigment level, corroborated this finding. MSP showed that norpA's visual pigment loss was not due to acute loss of metarhodopsin, rhodopsin's photoproduct. NorpA blocks certain processes expected to be light elicited. The alteration of visual pigment as a function of time of day, present in w controls, is absent in white-eyed norpA, suggesting that light-induced depolarization may be necessary to entrain the rhythm. Microspectrofluorometry using the fluorescent dye, Lucifer yellow, suggested that norpA lacks a light-induced uptake mechanism; using control flies, we determined the stimulus parameters required for uptake in vivo. An attempt to "cure" norpA;cn bw by replacement "therapy" using phospholipase C, missing in norpA's phototransduction cascade, was largely unsuccessful.

Ultraviolet and blue light induced damage to the Drosophila retina: microspectrophotometry and electrophysiology

Intense ultraviolet (UV) and blue stimulation decreases visual pigment concentration and increases long wavelength fluorescent emission in R1-6 photoreceptors in the white eyed fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. We used microspectrophotometry to show that the threshold for visual pigment decrease is about 1 log unit lower for UV than for blue light (18.7 vs approximately 19.9 log quanta/cm2 respectively). UV and blue stimuli about 0.2 log units brighter had been shown to cause structural degeneration. Above the threshold for structural damage, visual pigment is decreased permanently while below this level, a recovery of visual pigment was achieved within several hours. Microspectrofluorometric data are partially consistent with the hypothesis that the visual pigment is converted into a fluorescent product which had been named M'. M' had been proposed to be a new form of metarhodopsin which absorbs chiefly in the yellow and which has a fluorescent emission in the red; long wavelength stimulation had been reported to regenerate the native visual pigment from M'. Our data suggest that the situation is significantly more complex than this simple model. For instance, we report that long wavelength stimulation regenerates only a small fraction of the visual pigment which had been decreased by UV or blue stimulation. Furthermore, several lines of evidence suggest that other fluorescent products are also created by intense UV and blue stimulation. We were particularly interested in the lower damage threshold for UV light because of the hypothesis that UV visual sensitivity is mediated by a sensitizing pigment which absorbs UV light and transfers its energy to the blue absorbing rhodopsin. Our data suggest that the UV light decreases the rhodopsin without preferentially decreasing the sensitizing pigment.

Genetics of the nervous system in Drosophila

The genetic analysis ofDrosophilaneurobiology has expanded into a considerable field. A host of genetic variants is now available for analyzing the development, structure, physiology, and chemistry of the fly's excitable cells and tissues and how they control the animal's behavior.