Inhibitory effects of harvested proximal tubular fluid on Jv and delta cNa during acute saline volume expansion in the rat

Acute mannitol and saline volume expansion in the rat: effect on transepithelial potential difference in proximal tubules

1. Transepithelial potential difference (PDte) of proximal tubules was measured in rats under control conditions (C), and mannitol-saline and saline extracellular fluid volume expansion (MVE, SVE, respectively) under conditions of normal net lumen to basal sodium transport. 2. PDte was measured in kidneys bathed with Hartmann's solution or covered with mineral oil under both volume-expanded conditions together with their controls. 3. PDte was significantly lower in kidneys bathed with Hartmann's solution than those covered with oil. 4. In MVE rats, with mineral oil covering the kidneys, PDte (expressed as mean and s.e.m.) was for the control 2.20 +/- 0.05 (n = 45) mV and MVE 1.97 +/- 0.04 (n = 36) mV, lumen positive, a significant reduction of 10% (P less than 0.001). In SVE rats, with mineral oil covering the kidneys, PDte was for C = 2.42 +/- 0.05 (n = 74) mV and SVE = 1.93 +/- 0.03 (n = 67) mV, a significant reduction (P less than 0.001) of 20%. 5. According to thermodynamic considerations, neither of these changes is sufficient to explain the 50% inhibition of Na transport measured previously during MVE and SVE with autologous tubular fluid. The present results offer further evidence supporting the idea that the inhibition of Na transport during MVE and SVE is largely due to inhibition of the active Na transporting step.

The effects of high Na and Cl concentrations on rat proximal volume and Na fluxes at zero tubular flow

1. In vivo micropuncture techniques, with and without peritubular capillary perfusion, were used to study the effects of high extracellular Na and Cl concentrations on transepithelial volume (Jv) and sodium (JNa) fluxes in rat proximal tubules. 2. In a double blind manner, the shrinking drop technique of Gertz was used to measure Jv; JNa was calculated from this and the tubular fluid Na concentration. 3. At both 184 and 279 mmol/l pericellular Na concentrations (both inside and outside the tubular epithelium), net Jv decreased significantly by 15 and 64%, respectively. Net JNa remained constant at 184 but decreased by 29% at 279 mmol/l Na concentration. 4. Thus, at both Na concentrations, when translated to free flow conditions, fractional Na reabsorption must have decreased. These findings, also supported by previous results at these Na concentrations, indicate that active Na transport was inhibited by high pericellular Na concentrations. 5. When intratubular Cl concentration was varied between 108 and 138 mmol/l while peritubular Cl was maintained constant (blood perfusing the capillaries), neither Jv nor JNa changed. Thus, at zero tubular flow, differential Cl/HCO3 concentrations do not provide significant driving forces for net Jv or JNa. 6. When only intratubular but not peritubular Na was elevated to 279 mmol/l, Jv and JNa increased markedly by 50 and 187%, providing evidence that a true solvent drag (solute drag) effect does exist in rat proximal tubules. 7. These findings offer a mechanism to explain why Na reabsorption is not increased when the filtered load of Na is increased with an elevation of plasma Na.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)