Mechanisms of inhibitory noradrenergic transmission in the rabbit facial vein

Sympathetic control of arterial membrane potential by ATP-sensitive K(+)-channels

Stimulation of perivascular nerve terminals leads to a release of various neurotransmitters such as norepinephrine, epinephrine, acetylcholine, nitric oxide, and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Because some of these substances have been shown to cause smooth muscle hyperpolarization by direct or endothelium-dependent mechanisms, we hypothesized that the liberation of 1 or more of these transmitters may lead to neurogenic hyperpolarization in arterial muscle cells. The present study was designed to determine the presence or absence of neurogenic hyperpolarization and, if present, its underlying mechanisms in isolated rat mesenteric resistance arteries, through the use of conventional microelectrode techniques. The experiments were performed under the combined blockade of alpha-adrenoceptors and purinoceptors with phentolamine and suramin to eliminate depolarizing responses to nerve stimulation. Under these conditions, perivascular nerve stimulation (5 Hz, 30 seconds) evoked smooth muscle hyperpolarization (-3.3+/-0.3 mV, n=15), which was abolished by tetrodotoxin, indicating the neurogenic origin of the response. This neurogenic hyperpolarization was resistant to atropine, nitro-L-arginine, or CGRP8-37, a CGRP antagonist, but was abolished by guanethidine and beta-blocker propranolol. This hyperpolarization was also abolished by glibenclamide, an ATP-sensitive K(+) channel (K(ATP)) blocker, but was unaffected by apamin, a Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channel blocker. In separate experiments, exogenous norepinephrine caused glibenclamide-sensitive hyperpolarization in the presence of phentolamine. On the other hand, norepinephrine-induced depolarization in the absence of phentolamine was enhanced by propranolol. These findings suggest that neurally released catecholamines cause membrane hyperpolarization through the activation of K(ATP) by beta-adrenoceptors. Such hyperpolarization may play an important role in the control of arterial membrane potential by opposing alpha-adrenergic depolarization.

Neuroeffector transmission in arterioles of the guinea-pig choroid

1. Using conventional microelectrode techniques, membrane potentials were recorded from smooth muscle cells of guinea-pig choroidal arterioles. 2. Transmural stimulation initiated excitatory junction potentials (EJPs) which were abolished by either guanethidine or alpha,beta-methylene-ATP but not by phentolamine, indicating that they resulted from activation of purinoceptors. 3. Trains of stimuli evoked EJPs which were followed by a slow depolarization, an inhibitory junction potential (IJP) or a biphasic membrane potential change which consisted of an IJP and a subsequent slow depolarization. 4. Slow depolarizations were abolished by either phentolamine or guanethidine, indicating that they resulted from activation of alpha-adrenoceptors. 5. IJPs were abolished by atropine but not by guanethidine, and were reduced by 50 % by apamin with the residual response being abolished by charybdotoxin, indicating that they resulted from the activation of muscarinic receptors which open two sets of Ca2+-activated K+ channels. 6. Most responses were followed by slow hyperpolarizations. These were almost abolished by L-nitroarginine, an effect which was partly overcome by L-arginine, and were abolished by glibenclamide, indicating that they resulted from the release of NO and activation of ATP-sensitive K+ channels. 7. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that arterioles were densely innervated by adrenergic nerve fibres. A population of fibres, likely to be cholinergic, was also identified. Furthermore, populations of nerve fibres immunoreactive to antibodies against either nitric oxide synthase (NOS) or substance P (SP) were also identified. 8. These findings indicate that choroidal arterioles of the guinea-pig are innervated by at least three different populations of nerves, adrenergic nerves which evoke excitatory responses, cholinergic nerves which evoke inhibitory responses and a population of nerves which cause the release of NO.

Properties of sympathetic neuromuscular transmission and smooth muscle cell membranes in vascular beds

In vascular smooth muscle tissues, the cycle of contraction-relaxation is mainly regulated by the cytosolic Ca, and many other factors, such as substances released from endothelial cells and perivascular nerve terminals (mainly sympathetic nerves). In this article, we introduce regional differences in specific features of ionic channels in vascular smooth muscle membranes (mainly on features of Ca, Na and K channels) in relation to mobilization of the cytosolic Ca. In many vascular tissues, neurotransmitters released from sympathetic nerve terminals activate post-junctional receptors, and subsequently modify ion channels (receptor-activated cation channel and voltage-dependent Ca channel), whereas in some tissues, ionic channels are not modified by receptor activations (pharmaco-mechanical coupling). However, activation of receptors, with or without modulation of ionic channels, regulates the cytosolic Ca through synthesis of second messengers. In addition, receptors distributed on prejunctional nerve terminals positively or negatively regulate the release of transmitters. Roles of neurotransmitters (mainly ATP and noradrenaline) are also discussed in relation to the generation of excitatory junction potentials.

Comparison of the prejunctional beta-adrenoceptor stimulating actions of adrenaline and isoprenaline in the dog mesenteric vein

1. The prejunctional beta-adrenoceptor stimulating actions of adrenaline and isoprenaline were compared by recording junction potentials from smooth muscle cells of the dog mesenteric vein. 2. The potency of adrenaline and isoprenaline on beta-adrenoceptors in the postjunctional membrane was estimated from hyperpolarization of the membrane in smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig facial vein. In the presence of yohimbine, both agents hyperpolarized the membrane to a similar extent. 3. In the dog mesenteric vein, amplitude of the excitatory junction potential (e.j.p.) and slow depolarization was inhibited by adrenaline and potentiated by isoprenaline; the former but not the latter was accompanied by depolarization of the smooth muscle membrane. 4. In the presence of yohimbine, adrenaline inhibited the e.j.p. without depolarization of the smooth muscle membrane; the action was weaker than in the absence of yohimbine. The isoprenaline-induced potentiation of the e.j.p. was further enhanced by yohimbine. 5. It is concluded that adrenaline and isoprenaline have similar stimulating actions on postjunctional beta-adrenoceptors in the guinea-pig facial vein, but have different actions on prejunctional beta-adrenoceptors in the dog mesenteric vein; isoprenaline but not adrenaline stimulates this beta-adrenoceptor to facilitate the release of transmitter substances from perivascular noradrenergic nerves.