Effect of pancreas transplantation on life expectancy, kidney function and quality of life in uraemic type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients

C4d-positive interacinar capillaries correlates with donor-specific antibody-mediated rejection in pancreas allografts

BACKGROUND

The deposition of the complement split fragment C4d and its association with acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in pancreas transplant (PTx) is not well defined. To characterize the deposition of C4d in PTx, we analyzed 27 PTx biopsies from 18 patients transplanted between 2004 and 2007 at the University of Wisconsin.

METHODS

The presence of C4d was graded in interacinar capillaries (IAC), islets, interstitium, and small- and medium-size vessels. Sera obtained at the time or within 5 days of the biopsy were tested for antidonor-specific antibodies (DSA).

RESULTS

16 biopsies (59.26%) showed at least 5% C4d+ IAC (range 5%-90%). Of those, five biopsies (18.5%) revealed diffuse labeling (>50% C4d+ IAC) and 11 (40.74%) showed focal staining (5%-50% C4d+ IAC). C4d+ IAC (>5%) was significantly associated with the presence of strong DSA for class I or class II (P<0.018). C4d staining of the media or endothelium of small and medium-size vessels was a common finding in all biopsies without any association with DSA. Similarly, staining of islets and parenchymal interstitium was not statistically associated with AMR. The majority of patients received intravenous corticosteroid bolus and taper, with specific cases requiring thymoglobulin, IVIg, rituximab, or plasmapheresis. Forty-six percent of patients who demonstrated AMR returned to insulin therapy because of chronic graft damage and loss of C-peptide.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the potential role of C4d labeling of PTx biopsies in the diagnosis of AMR and emphasize the staining of IAC as a valuable histologic tool for the diagnosis.

Banff schema for grading pancreas allograft rejection: working proposal by a multi-disciplinary international consensus panel

Accurate diagnosis and grading of rejection and other pathological processes are of paramount importance to guide therapeutic interventions in patients with pancreas allograft dysfunction. A multi-disciplinary panel of pathologists, surgeons and nephrologists was convened for the purpose of developing a consensus document delineating the histopathological features for diagnosis and grading of rejection in pancreas transplant biopsies. Based on the available published data and the collective experience, criteria for the diagnosis of acute cell-mediated allograft rejection (ACMR) were established. Three severity grades (I/mild, II/moderate and III/severe) were defined based on lesions known to be more or less responsive to treatment and associated with better- or worse-graft outcomes, respectively. The features of chronic rejection/graft sclerosis were reassessed, and three histological stages were established. Tentative criteria for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection were also characterized, in anticipation of future studies that ought to provide more information on this process. Criteria for needle core biopsy adequacy and guidelines for pathology reporting were also defined. The availability of a simple, reproducible, clinically relevant and internationally accepted schema for grading rejection should improve the level of diagnostic accuracy and facilitate communication between all parties involved in the care of pancreas transplant recipients.

Advances in pancreatic islet transplantation in humans

With recent advances in methods of islet isolation and the introduction of more potent and less diabetogenic immunosuppressive therapies, islet transplantation has progressed from research to clinical reality. Presently, several international centres have demonstrated successful clinical outcomes with high rates of insulin independence after islet transplantation. Ongoing refinements in donor pancreas procurement and processing, developments in islet isolation and purification technology, and advances in novel immunological conditioning and induction therapies have led to the acceptance of islet transplantation as a safe and effective therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. This review provides a historical perspective of islet transplantation, outlines the recent advances and current clinical outcomes, and addresses the present challenges and future directions in clinical islet transplantation.

Clinical islet transplant: current and future directions towards tolerance

The ultimate goal of islet transplantation is to completely correct the diabetic state from an unlimited donor source, without the need for chronic immunosuppressive drug therapy. Although islet transplantation provides an opportunity to develop innovative strategies for tolerance in the clinic, both alloimmune and autoimmune barriers must be controlled, if stable graft function is to be maintained long-term. After islet extraction from the pancreas, the cellular graft may be stored in tissue culture or cryopreserved for banking, providing an opportunity not only to optimally condition the recipient but also to allow in vitro immunologic manipulation of the graft before transplantation, unlike solid organ grafts. As such, islets may be considered a "special case." Remarkable progress has occurred in the last three years, with dramatic improvements in outcomes after clinical islet transplantation. The introduction of a steroid-free, sirolimus-based, anti-rejection protocol and islets prepared from two (or rarely three) donors led to high rates of insulin independence. The "Edmonton Protocol" has been successfully replicated by other centers in an international multicenter trial. A number of key refinements in pancreas transportation, processing, purification on non-ficoll-based media, storage of islets in culture for two days and newer immunological conditioning and induction therapies have led to continued advancement through extensive collaboration between key centers. This review outlines the historical development of islet transplantation over the past 30 years, provides an update on current clinical outcomes, and summarizes a series of unique opportunities for development and early testing of tolerance protocols in patients.

Pancreas and kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation is preferred over dialysis for management of end-stage renal disease complicating type I or type 2 diabetes, for those who are eligible. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) or pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK) is an important alternative to kidney transplantation alone for type I diabetes patients if the patient is able to withstand the additional risks of these procedures, because of the benefits of glucose control on other diabetic complications. Pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) is most useful for the treatment of debilitating, frequent hypoglycemia complicating type I diabetes, if renal function is adequate. One-year pancreas graft survival is best after SPK (82%) but has significantly improved after both PAK (74%) and PTA (76%). The I-year kidney graft and patient survival rates after SPK are similar to kidney transplantation alone. Pancreas transplantation normalizes glucose beyond what can be achieved with insulin therapy and has been shown to decrease progression of or improve most, if not all, diabetic end-organ complications using current immunosuppression regimens. However, the diabetologist and endocrinologist should remain involved in the care of the pancreas or kidney transplant recipient for treatment of vascular disease risk factors such as dyslipidemia, surveillance of other diabetic complications including foot ulcers, surveillance and treatment of bone loss, and management of hyperglycemia if it recurs.

Comparison before and after transplantation of pancreas-kidney and pancreas-kidney with loss of pancreas--a prospective controlled quality of life study

The aim of combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) in type I diabetic patients with end-stage nephropathy is to restore both functions. Quality of life (QoL) is supposed to improve as a result of this combined transplantation. The objectives of this study are to evaluate QoL before and after PKT and to compare the results with patients in whom the pancreas graft failed soon after the transplantation (PKT-P). The trial is a prospective controlled multicenter study. The control group consists of patients before transplantation and patients who received a PKT in whom the pancreas rejected or thrombosed soon after the transplantation. (PKT-P). A standardized home-based interview is done during dialysis, and repeated 5, 12, and 18 months after transplantation in both groups by the same interviewer. The interview consisted of disease-specific questions (RSCL), general questionnaires (NHP I and II, ABS), the Visual Analogue Scale, a specific questionnaire (Anxiety), and evaluative questions about social support and transplantation. Patients in whom the PKT is successful (n=17) improve significantly or show a strong tendency toward improvement on many aspects of quality of life. Patients in whom the pancreas failed (n=5) still demonstrate improvement, although this is not statistically significant in most cases. Intergroup comparison shows that PKT patients are less anxious, suffer of less itching, have better average daily living conditions, have no diet restrictions, and have a better [correction of have and] global quality of life.

Frequency of kidney rejection in diabetic patients undergoing simultaneous kidney and pancreatic islet cell transplantation

An increased frequency of kidney rejection has been reported in diabetic patients who have simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation compared with patients who have a kidney transplant alone. Kidney graft outcome is similar in the two groups. The mechanism for increased kidney graft rejection with a simultaneous pancreas graft is not clear. It is ascribed to the immunogenicity of the exocrine pancreas that initiates migration of activated cells from the peripheral blood that are entrapped in the kidney. Since the volume of the transplanted tissue is less in islet transplantation (usually < 2 ml) than in pancreas transplantation, one might not expect an increased frequency of kidney rejection in islet cell recipients. We looked at biopsy-proven kidney rejection episodes in patients who had combined kidney and islet transplants and compared this with the frequency of rejection in diabetic and nondiabetic patients who underwent a kidney transplant alone under the same immunosuppression. Diabetic patients who had kidney islet transplants (n = 9) had a higher frequency of rejection (100%) compared with diabetic patients (n = 107, 55.1%) and nondiabetic patients (n = 327, 65%) who had a kidney transplant alone. The 1-year graft and patient survival rates were not different among the groups. Although the number of patients is small, it would appear that transplantation of a low volume of islet cells with high purity can lead to an increased frequency of kidney rejection. This is unlikely to be explained solely on the basis of fewer antigen matches in these recipients but may reflect the inherent immunogenicity of the purified islet preparations. Alternatively, there may be an effect of their direct infusion into the portal vein.