Meningioangiomatosis: advanced imaging and pathological study of two cases

Pure and non-pure meningioangiomatosis of 36 Chinese patients: an analysis of clinical presentation, diagnosis, histopathology and prognosis

Meningioangiomatosis (MA) is a disease that is extremely rarely reported. Sporadic MA is occasionally combined with meningioma or other lesions (identified as non-pure MA). This retrospective study investigated the difference between pure MA and non-pure MA by exploring clinical manifestations, histopathology characteristics, and outcomes of MA after surgery. We reviewed the medical records of 36 histopathologically confirmed MA patients (18 pure MA and 18 non-pure MA) who received surgery at our institution between 2012 and 2021. We compared differences in demographic, clinical, imaging, pathological features, and surgical outcomes between pure MA and non-pure MA through descriptive statistics. Compared to non-pure MA, pure MA presented with a more prominent male predilection (5:1 vs. 1.57:1, P = 0.264), a higher seizure incidence (83.3% vs 50.0%, P = 0.038), a more seizure type of GTCS (14/15 vs 5/9, P = 0.047), a less prominent enhancement on MRI (27.8% vs 88.9%, P < 0.001) and a preference of temporal and frontal lobe (100% vs 44.4%, P < 0.001). The differences in clinical characteristics between pure MA and non-pure MA demonstrate their disparate biological natures. Pure MA seems to be a non-neoplastic lesion, while non-pure MA is commonly combined with meningioma, which is a neoplastic lesion. A correct differential diagnosis can be achieved via a triad of the type of seizure, the location of lesion and the radiological presentation. MA is curable and the prognosis is excellent as most patients are free of seizure and recurrence after surgical treatment.

Meningioangiomatosis: Multimodal Analysis and Insights From a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Meningioangiomatosis is a poorly studied, rare, benign, and epileptogenic brain lesion.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate that surgical resection and a short-time interval to surgery improves epileptic seizure control, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of meningioangiomatosis cases.

METHODS

Using PRISMA-IPD guidelines, the authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathologically-proven meningioangiomatosis cases. Literature search in French and English languages (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Science Citation Index) including all studies (January 1981 to June 2020) dealing with histopathologically-proven meningioangiomatosis, without age restriction. We assessed clinical, imaging, histomolecular, management, and outcome findings of patients with meningioangiomatosis.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and seven cases of meningioangiomatosis from 78 studies were included. Most meningioangiomatosis was sporadic, preferentially concerned male patients, younger than 20 years old, and allowed a functionally independent status. Epileptic seizure was the main symptom, with 81.4% of patients having uncontrolled seizures at the time of surgery. Meningioangiomatosis mainly had frontal (32.3%) or temporal (30.7%) locations. Imaging presentation was heterogeneous, and the diagnosis was often missed preoperatively. The histopathologic pattern was similar whatever the clinical presentation, and immunohistochemistry had limited diagnostic value. On molecular analysis, allelic loss at 22q12 was more frequent in samples of meningioangiomatosis-associated meningioma (37.5%) than in isolated meningioangiomatosis (23.1%). Time interval from diagnosis to surgery (p = 0.011) and lack of surgical resection of the meningioangiomatosis (p = 0.009) were independent predictors of postoperative seizure control.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to low scientific evidence, a multicentric prospective study should help refining the management of meningioangiomatosis.

Sporadic Meningioangiomatosis Presenting as a Middle Cranial Fossa Arachnoid Cyst

BACKGROUND

Meningioangiomatosis is an extremely rare meningovascular disease of the central nervous system that is characterized by the proliferation of leptomeninges, cortical vessels, and perivascular spindled cells. Although it is a benign, neoplastic disorder that carries a good prognosis after surgical excision, initial diagnosis may be challenging as radiologic findings are often variable and nonspecific.

CASE DESCRIPTION

In this report, we describe an unusual presentation of meningioangiomatosis presenting as a symptomatic middle cranial fossa arachnoid cyst.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the unexpected diagnosis and infrequency of this condition, the case is discussed in collaboration with current literature and management strategies.

Meningioangiomatosis: A review of the variable manifestations and complex pathophysiology

Meningioangiomatosis (MA) is a rare, complex and heterogeneous disease of meningovascular proliferation that is found primarily in the leptomeninges and cerebral cortex but can involve subcortical white matter and other brain regions such as the cerebellum and deep gray matter. MA may be found in pediatric or adult populations and may be sporadic or neurofibromatosis-associated. The presentation of MA is highly variable: it may be associated with other neurological diseases; clinically presents on a spectrum from asymptomatic to seizures or focal deficits; radiologically presents with multifocal, tumor-like, or cystic lesions, or may appear normal; and pathologically may have cellular or vascular predominance. In this article, we review the various manifestations of MA including neurofibromatosis-associated MA, multifocal MA, cystic MA, and MA associated with meningioma, other brain tumors, focal cortical dysplasia, neurodegenerative changes, and post-radiation changes. The treatment of MA is also reviewed. While the pathogenesis of MA remains elusive, we discuss the proposed theories such as developmental, dysplastic, hamartomatous or reactive ethology in given variants. It is important for physicians to be aware of MA as more research on this complex entity is needed and timely diagnosis may benefit outcomes in patients with MA.

Sporadic meningioangiomatosis with and without meningioma: analysis of clinical differences and risk factors for poor seizure outcomes

BACKGROUND

Meningioangiomatosis (MA) is a rare cerebral lesion. Sporadic MA occasionally combines with meningioma (MA-M). The aim of the present study was to clarify whether MA-M and pure MA have clinical differences and to determine risk factors for unsatisfactory seizure outcomes in sporadic MA.

METHODS

We reported 14 sporadic MA cases in our center and conducted a literature review. We compared the demographic, clinical, imaging, electrophysiological and pathological features and surgical outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the risk factors for poor seizure outcomes.

RESULTS

MA-M cases showed a more prominent male predilection (4.2 times vs. 1.6 times, p = 0.04), a shorter duration of symptoms (2.8 ± 0.8 years vs. 5.2 ± 0.6 years, p = 0.02), and a lower seizure incidence (53.6 % vs. 89.3 %, p < 0.001) as compared to pure MA. A gyriform alteration on imaging was exclusively associated with pure MA. The Ki-67 was higher in the meningioma component than in the MA component in MA-M (1.2 ± 0.3 % vs. 6.1 ± 1.1 %, p < 0.001). Lesions located in the temporal lobe predicted poor seizure outcomes (p = 0.02, OR = 4.4, 95 % confidence interval, 1.24-15.89).

CONCLUSION

Clinical differences may be caused by the different biological natures. MA-M seems to be a neoplastic lesion, while pure MA seems to be a non-neoplastic lesion. Long-term follow-up is required for MA-M. Because the coexistence of hippocampal sclerosis may explain the poor seizure outcomes of MA located in the temporal lobe, it is important to identify underlying hippocampal sclerosis and to perform complete resection.

Meningioangiomatosis: a case report and literature review emphasizing diverse appearance on different imaging modalities

Purpose. Meningioangiomatosis (MA) is a rare, benign lesion that commonly mimics other intracranial malformations in clinical presentation and appearance on imaging. The case presented and the literature review performed highlight the importance of combining MRI and CT results to better characterize intracranial lesions and including MA on the list of differential diagnoses of patients presenting with seizures. Methods. The case described is of a 19-year-old male with a 10-year history of worsening seizures refractory to multiple drug regimens. MRI revealed an atypical vascular malformation. The patient underwent surgical resection of the epileptogenic cortex. Results. Although the radiologic impression of the lesion was a vascular malformation, pathological examination revealed MA. A literature search performed highlights the variability of the appearance of MA on CT and MRI and suggests the utility of the T2 GRE sequence in illustrating the presence of calcification and, in a lesion with other characteristic features, the diagnosis of MA. Conclusion. MA can be a difficult diagnosis to make based on imaging findings alone. However, in a patient with a characteristic history and presentation, the presence of a calcified mass on CT and MRI brain susceptibility artifact on a T2 GRE sequence may suggest MA.

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance appearance of sporadic meningioangiomatosis correlated with pathological findings

PURPOSE

Meningioangiomatosis (MA) is a rare benign localized lesion of leptomeninges and underlying cerebral cortex. Preoperative diagnosis is difficult and challenging because of its diverse clinical, pathological, and imaging features. We retrospectively analyzed 7 cases of MA to explore their imaging features and correlate with pathological findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Imaging studies including computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were retrospectively reviewed in 7 patients with surgically and pathologically verified intracranial MA (not associated with neurofibromatosis). Computed tomography studies were performed in axial plane without iodinated contrast-material administration; magnetic resonance studies consisted of axial T1-weighted, T2-weighted, Fluid attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), and postcontrast T1-weighted sequences and coronal or sagittal precontrast and postcontrast T1-weighted sequences.

RESULTS

Computed tomography showed focal extensively calcified lesions in 3 cases, lesions with patchy calcification in 2 cases, and no apparent calcification in 2 cases. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated predominantly hypointensity on T1-weighted images and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images. Six of 7 cases exhibited gyriform hyperintensity on FLAIR sequences, which correlated with proliferating microvessels with perivascular cuffs of spindle-cell proliferation within the cortex on histopathological analysis. After contrast-material administration, all but 1 showed heterogeneous enhancement. The nonenhancing lesion on MRI was completely calcified on CT.

CONCLUSION

Gyriform hyperintensity on FLAIR sequence is the main MRI feature of MA, which correlates with proliferating microvessels with perivascular cuffs of spindle-cell proliferation within the cortex on pathological analysis. Plain CT scan is essential to demonstrate the extent of calcification of these lesions.

The contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to distinguishing typical from atypical meningiomas

INTRODUCTION

Atypical/malignant meningiomas recur more frequently then typical meningiomas. In this study, the contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to the differentiation of atypical/malignant and typical meningiomas and to the determination of histological subtypes of typical meningiomas was investigated.

METHODS

The study was performed prospectively on 39 patients. The signal intensity of the lesions was evaluated on trace and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images. ADC values were measured in the lesions and peritumoral edema. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Mean ADC values in atypical/malignant and typical meningiomas were 0.75+/-0.21 and 1.17+/-0.21, respectively. Mean ADC values for subtypes of typical meningiomas were as follows: meningothelial, 1.09+/-0.20; transitional, 1.19+/-0.07; fibroblastic, 1.29+/-0.28; and angiomatous, 1.48+/-0.10. Normal white matter was 0.91+/-0.10. ADC values of typical meningiomas and atypical/malignant meningiomas significantly differed (P<0.001). However, the difference between peritumoral edema ADC values was not significant (P>0.05). Furthermore, the difference between the subtypes of typical meningiomas and atypical/malignant meningiomas was significant (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging findings of atypical/malignant meningiomas and typical meningiomas differ. Atypical/malignant meningiomas have lower intratumoral ADC values than typical meningiomas. Mean ADC values for peritumoral edema do not differ between typical and atypical meningiomas.

Meningioangiomatosis associated with neurofibromatosis: report of 2 cases in a single family and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Meningioangiomatosis (MA) is a rare benign disorder. It may occur sporadically or in association with neurofibromatosis (NF). The sporadic type typically presents with seizures, whereas that associated with NF is often asymptomatic. Of the 100 cases reported, only 14 are associated with NF. We now report 2 additional cases of MA associated with neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) in a single family, with one occurring in the cerebellum. The etiology, pathology, and imaging features of MA are presented.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 38-year-old woman (patient 1) presented with a 4-month history of ataxia. She had been diagnosed previously with NF2. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain revealed bilateral acoustic neuromas and multiple calcified intracranial lesions. Her 13-year-old daughter (patient 2) presented with complex partial seizures. MRI scans of the brain revealed bilateral acoustic neuromas and a right parietal mass. Patient 1 underwent a suboccipital craniotomy to resect the right-sided acoustic neuroma. A small portion of normal-appearing cerebellar cortex was resected to avoid undue retraction. Histopathologic examination showed the presence of a lesion consistent with MA. Patient 2 underwent a right temporal-parietal craniotomy to remove the enhancing epileptogenic right posterior temporoparietal lesion. Histopathologic analysis showed a lesion consistent with meningioma and MA.

CONCLUSIONS

MA has been reported infrequently in association with NF2. We now report 2 cases of MA associated with NF2 in one family, and we add the cerebellum to possible locations of occurrence. MA should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cortical lesions, particularly in patients with NF2.

Insights into meningioangiomatosis with and without meningioma: a clinicopathologic and genetic series of 24 cases with review of the literature

Meningioangiomatosis (MA) is a rare seizure-associated lesion of presumed hamartomatous or developmental origin. It is occasionally combined with a neoplasm, most commonly meningioma (MA-M). In the current study, we examined 24 cases (14 pure MA, 10 MA-M) using immunohistochemistry for merlin, protein 4.1 B, progesterone receptor (PR), and MIB-1, as well as FISH for NF2 and 4.1B gene dosages. Nine cases of MA-M (90%) had gene deletions (NF2/4.7B), protein losses (merlin/protein 4.1B), and/or PR positivity, with a similar or identical phenotype in both components. No PR positivity or gene deletions were seen in pure MAs, though merlin and/or protein 4.1B were immunonegative in six cases. Our data suggest that in most MA-Ms, the MA component is neoplastic, likely representing an exuberant perivascular pattern of spread from the meningioma, rather than an underlying hamartoma. This pattern of spread may be facilitated by meningiomas that are predominantly leptomeningeal or intracerebral in origin. It remains important to distinguish this pattern from true brain invasion, given the more ominous prognostic significance of the latter. In contrast, most perivascular spindled cells of pure MA are genetically and immunohistochemically similar to non-neoplastic meningothelial cells, consistent with current histogenetic theories.

Cerebral angiofibroma: case report

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

Intracranial fibromatous tumors are very rare lesions, with few reported cases.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 34-year-old male patient who experienced seizures resulting from a cystic lesion in the left occipital region, which remained unchanged for 11 years. After the seizures increased in number, magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large cyst with a tumor nodule.

INTERVENTION

A left occipital craniotomy was performed, and the tumor was removed. Pathological studies, including immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analyses, indicated that this neoplasm was composed of fibrous and angiomatous components, and a diagnosis of cerebral angiofibroma was established.

CONCLUSION

Cerebral and meningeal fibromas are rare neoplasms that differ from solitary fibrous tumors and fibrous meningiomas. When a number of prominent blood vessels are present in a cerebral or meningeal fibroma, a diagnosis of angiofibroma can be considered. It is possible that some nodular brain tumors that were previously described as meningioangiomatosis could be reclassified as cerebral or meningeal angiofibromas.

Meningioangiomatosis. A comprehensive analysis of clinical and laboratory features

Meningioangiomatosis (MA) is a rare, benign, focal lesion of the leptomeninges and underlying cerebral cortex characterized by leptomeningeal and meningovascular proliferation. It may occur sporadically or in association with neurofibromatosis type 2. Previous reports have emphasized histological and imaging features. Data on the management of these patients are sparse, and electrophysiological features of MA lesions have not been published. We assessed the clinical, electrophysiological, histopathological and imaging features as well as the surgical outcome in MA, and compared MA with and without neurofibromatosis. Seven patients with MA at our centre were investigated and their outcome was assessed. A review of the literature is included. MA exhibits a wide range of clinical, imaging, histopathological and electrophysiological features, making the diagnosis difficult. Sporadic MA cases are not associated with neurofibromatosis and the two disorders are genetically distinct. Medically refractory, localization-related epilepsy is the commonest presentation in sporadic cases, but atypical presentations also occur. Unlike sporadic cases, MA with neurofibromatosis is often found incidentally, does not produce seizures, occurs less frequently (ratio of 1:4), and is multifocal. MRI findings in MA correspond to the histological picture. However, the appearance on imaging is non-specific and may suggest cystic atrophy, angioma and tumours. Several abnormalities have been found in close proximity to MA lesions, i.e. meningioma, oligodendroglioma, arteriovenous malformation, encephalocoel and orbital erosion. In spite of histopathological diversity, MA lesions are either predominantly cellular or vascular. Immunohistochemical results are inconsistent among cases, add little to the diagnosis, and do not support a meningeal origin. Electrocorticographic recordings from the surface and within MA lesions revealed a spectrum of electrophysiological expressions. Intrinsic epileptogenicity of MA lesions was documented in some cases. Epileptogenicity was confined to the perilesional cortex in some patients and it was complex (extralesional, multifocal, generalized) in others. Only 43% of our patients became seizure-free postoperatively compared with 68% previously reported, and >70% of our patients and those in the literature continued to require antiepileptic drugs. This is in keeping with the diverse electrophysiology of MA and suggests a less optimistic postoperative outcome than previously recognized.

The endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations

Advances in superselective microcatheterization techniques, which took place in the past decade, established superselective endovascular exploration as an integral and indispensable tool in the pretherapeutic evaluation of brain AVMs. The strict and routine application of superselective angiography furthered our knowledge on the angioarchitecture of brain AVMs, including vascular composition of the nidus, types of feeding arteries and types and patterns of venous drainage. In addition, various types of weak angioarchitectural elements, such as flow-related aneurysms, intranidal vascular cavities and varix formation proximal to high-grade stenosis of draining veins, could be identified as factors predisposing for AVM rupture. A wide spectrum of secondary angiomorphological changes induced by the arteriovenous shunt of the nidus and occurring up- and downstream of the nidus have been identified as manifestations of high-flow angiopathy. These data help to better predict the natural history, understand the widely variable clinical presentation and to define therapeutic targets of brain AVMs. Correlation of the topography of the AVM as demonstrated by MR with the angioarchitecture as demonstrated by superselective angiography provided a system for topographic-vascular classification of brain AVMs, which proved very useful for patient selection and definition of therapeutic goals. This study showed, that 40% of patients with brain AVMs can be cured by embolization alone with a severe morbidity of 1.3% and a mortality of 1.3%. Part of theses patients can, however, be cured equally effective by microsurgery or radiosurgery. Which modality will be chosen for a particular patient will mainly depend on the locally available expertise and experience, but also on the preference of the patient following its comprehensive information about the chances for cure and the risks associated with each of these therapeutic modalities. Embolization has a significant role in the multimodality treatment of brain AVMs, by either enabling or facilitating subsequent microsurgical or radiosurgical treatment. Appropriately targeted embolization in otherwise untreatable AVMs represents a reasonable form of palliative treatment of either ameliorating the clinical condition of the patient or reducing the potential risk of hemorrhage. Regarding the practical aspects of the endovascular treatment the following conclusions could be drawn from the experience obtained with this series of 387 patients with a brain AVM: (1) The goal of endovascular treatment should be defined prior to the procedure. This does not preclude a change in the goal, if additional information obtained during the procedure make this necessary. (2) The result of endovascular treatment of a brain AVM in terms of the degree of obliteration achieved and complication rate depends mainly on the endovascular strategy developed and the technique applied. These depend on the specific angioarchitecture and topography of the individual AVM, on the past history and clinical presentation of the patient and on the predefined goal of embolization. The strategy should include the definition of embolization targets, the selection of the most appropriate approach for endovascular navigation, the determination of the sequence of catheterization of individual feeding arteries, the selection of the type of catheters and microcatheters, the selection of the appropriate embolic materials as well as the site and mode of their delivery. Thereafter, every endovascular move should be, as in a chess game, the result of a logical plan. (3) Atraumatic superselective microcatheterization is a key point in the endovascular treatment of brain AVMs. It requires manual skills, knowledge of anatomy and respect for the vascular wall. (4) All locations of brain AVMs should be regarded as eloquent, and no distinction should be made between eloquent and non-eloquent areas of the brain when deciding on the execution of embolizatio

Meningioangiomatosis in a dog: magnetic resonance imaging and neuropathological studies

A case of a dog with a long-standing history of seizures is reported. Neurological examination suggested an intracranial focal lesion, while magnetic resonance imaging disclosed a right cerebral mass with ventricular involvement. Pathological analysis of the resected specimen revealed characteristics of meningioangiomatosis.

Cerebral meningioangiomatosis: case report

We discuss the clinical, neuroradiologic and histopathologic features of a case not apparently associated with neurofibromatosis (type 2), reviewing the relevant literature.

Meningioangiomatosis in the brain stem of a dog

Meningioangiomatosis (MA) is a malformation of the vasculature of the central nervous system, characterized by the proliferation of meningothelial cells around blood vessels. MA has been reported, albeit rarely, in main, cattle and dogs. This paper records a case of MA affecting the brain stem in a 9-year-old male dog, and provides histochemical and immunohistochemical evidence for a perivascular fibroblast-like cell origin of the proliferating cells.