Ultrasonography--the stethoscope of the surgeon in the era of endoscopic surgery

Intraoperative abdominal ultrasonography

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography during abdominal surgery has been reported since the 1960s, but its use did not become widespread until the recent availability of high-frequency, high-resolution transducers. This review discusses the application of intraoperative ultrasonography to open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A literature search (Medline) was undertaken. All papers pertaining to the subject matter that were located were included in the review.

RESULTS

Intraoperative ultrasonography influences surgical strategy in up to 50 per cent of liver resections for malignancy. It is the single most sensitive technique for the detection of occult hepatic metastases at the time of primary colorectal resection. In pancreatic surgery, intraoperative ultrasonography is of value in the localization of islet cell tumours and in the assessment of resectability of adenocarcinoma. The technique may also have a role in staging laparoscopy, and in the operative management of kidney and gastrointestinal diseases.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography is an ideal operative tool as it is safe, reproducible and requires no special patient preparation or positioning. It should be regarded as an essential component of major hepatobiliary and pancreatic procedures. The recent availability of flexible laparoscopic probes is likely to lead to a similar impact on minimal access surgery.

The evolution and maturation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an academic practice

BACKGROUND

The technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has evolved since its adoption in the late 1980s. We sought to document these changes and assess whether patient outcomes were influenced during this maturational process.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective data base was used to record the outcomes of all LCs performed in an academic surgeon's practice. Trends over time among 1,165 consecutive patients were assessed by comparing the first 100 LCs (group I), the middle 100 LCs (group II), and the most recent 100 LCs (group III).

RESULTS

During a 93-month period with 1,165 patients undergoing LC, 25 procedures (2.1%) were converted to open cholecystectomy. Perioperative complications occurred in 31 patients (3%): grade I in 9 (0.8%), grade II in 16 (1.4%), grade III in 5 (0.4%), and grade IV (death) in 1 (0.1%). Length of hospital stay and convalescence were 1.1 +/- 0.1 and 9.5 +/- 0.5 days, respectively. Nineteen patients (2%) were readmitted early after operation and 10 (1%) developed long-term complications (port-site hernia or retained stone). In group III, cholangiography was largely replaced by intraoperative ultrasonography for ductal evaluation. Operating room time decreased, while the rates of conversion, morbidity, and readmission remained the same. Patients had higher ASA classifications in the latter two groups, whereas operative charges were greater in Group III than in Groups I and II. These trends occurred even though most procedures are currently performed by residents, and fewer LCs are being done.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has matured into a more efficient operation, yet remains safe with low morbidity when performed by residents at an academic institution.

The utility of ultrasonography for screening the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the means by which the common bile duct is evaluated, if performed at all, has been debated. When the common bile duct is to be screened, two primary modalities have emerged. These techniques are fluoroscopic cholangiography and intracorporeal ultrasonography. Fluoroscopic cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been shown to be effective and accurate for demonstrating ductal stones and anomalies. More recently, laparoscopic ultrasonography has been utilized for screening the common bile duct. Ultrasonography is probably more sensitive than cholangiography for demonstrating intraluminal common bile duct stones or sludge and can be performed more rapidly and at less cost than cholangiography. However, ductal anomalies may not be as readily visualized. The two techniques, therefore, appear to be complementary for evaluating the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and both techniques should be taught to today's surgical trainees.