A modified pharmacokinetic model for platinum disposition in ovarian cancer patients receiving cisplatin

Pharmacokinetics of platinum after oral or intravenous cisplatin: a phase 1 study in 32 adult patients

AIMS

To develop a population pharmacokinetic model for simultaneous analysis of oral/intravenous cisplatin data in order to estimate the mean population pharmacokinetic parameters, mainly the bioavailability, of cisplatin and to evaluate the influence of covariates on the pharmacokinetic variability.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic and demographic data were collected from 32 adult patients (20 males/12 females, age range 47-76 years) receiving 30-min infusions or an oral formulation of cisplatin, 10-30 mg/m2, for various malignancies. Both total plasma and ultrafilterable or unbound platinum concentrations were determined.

RESULTS

Unbound and total platinum concentrations were ascribed to a two-compartment model, with first-order absorption and elimination. The oral bioavailability (F) population estimates were, respectively, 0.39 and 0.30 with associated intersubject variabilities (ISV) of 24% and 26%. Peak concentrations following oral dosing occurred at 1.0 h and 1.6 h for unbound and total platinum, respectively. Clearance (CL) and central distribution volume (V1) of unbound platinum were significantly related to body surface area (BSA). The CL and V1 mean estimates were, respectively, 37 l/h and 23 l with an associated ISV of 15%. The final pharmacokinetic models were validated using 1000 bootstrap samples of the original datasets.

CONCLUSIONS

Both unbound and total platinum data allowed a fair evaluation of oral cisplatin disposition, with close estimations for both absorption rates and oral bioavailability. These results also support the conventional dose adjustment of cisplatin based on BSA.

Cisplatin pharmacokinetics in children with cancer

Cisplatin is an important drug in the treatment of a number of paediatric cancers yet, despite widespread use, there are only very limited data on the pharmacokinetics of the drug in children. Cisplatin pharmacokinetics were studied in 21 patients following a 24 h infusion of 50-120 mg/m2 cisplatin. Total and free platinum (Pt) levels in plasma and Pt in urine, were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental and compartmental analyses. There was 3-fold interpatient variability in free drug exposure (area under the plasma concentration versus time curve--AUC) for a given surface area-based dose of cisplatin. The mean (+/- SD) pharmacokinetic parameters for free Pt were: AUC 0.47 +/- 0.13 mg/ml.min/100 mg/m2, Vdss 12.5 +/- 2.7 l/m2, t1/2 39 +/- 9 min, Ke 0.019 +/- 0.006 min-1, Clrenal 62 ml/min/m2, Cltotal 233 +/- 455 ml/min/m2, Cpss 0.31 +/- 0.09 microgram/ml. The total free Pt clearance was 1.5-5.8-fold higher (3.4 +/- 1.0) than the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The renal clearance of cisplatin was not related to GFR and cisplatin was subject to only limited urinary excretion (27% administered dose 0-48 h), indicating that there are other important pathways of clearance beside renal elimination. Patient and treatment heterogeneity precluded the investigation of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships; however, the degree of interpatient pharmacokinetic variability observed suggests that body surface area-based dosing of cisplatin in children is not satisfactory.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of ultrafilterable cisplatin species detectable by derivatization with diethyldithiocarbamate or atomic absorption spectroscopy

The pharmacokinetics of the cisplatin (DDP) species detected by measurement of diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC)-reactive species (DDTC-DDP) were compared to the pharmacokinetics of the species detected by measurement of total ultrafilterable platinum in patients receiving DDP alone or in combination with the nephroprotective agent sodium thiosulfate. The doses of DDP studied were 100 mg/m2 (11 courses given to eight patients) and 202.5 mg/m2 (five courses given to four patients) given as 2 h i.v. infusions, the latter with concurrent thiosulfate. When DDP was given alone (100 mg/m2) the two assays yielded the same area under the curve (AUC) values for DDTC-DDP and total ultrafilterable platinum during the first 4 h after the start of infusion; however, beyond 4 h post-infusion, the AUC for total ultrafilterable platinum was consistently greater than that for DDTC-DDP. When DDP was given with thiosulfate (202.5 mg/m2), the AUC for total ultrafilterable platinum was significantly greater than that of DDTC-DDP during the whole sampling period. The ratio of the AUC for total ultrafilterable platinum to DDTC-DDP, when DDP was given with thiosulfate, was barely significantly greater than that when DDP was given alone. These data indicate that during and immediately following a short infusion of DDP the major platinum-containing species present in plasma ultrafiltrate are still capable of reacting with nucleophilic sites on molecules such as DDTC; however, as the reactive species are eliminated, longer half-lived non-reactive ultrafilterable platinum species begin to predominate. They also indicate that although thiosulfate does neutralize a measurable amount of DDP in the plasma on the schedule employed, this degree of neutralization is not sufficient to explain the protection against DDP-induced nephrotoxicity produced by thiosulfate.