Generation of a fixed motor pattern: I. Details of synaptic interconnections of pyloric neurons in the stomatogastric ganglion of the crab,Cancer pagurus

Long-term expression of two interacting motor pattern-generating networks in the stomatogastric system of freely behaving lobster

Rhythmic movements of the gastric mill and pyloric regions of the crustacean foregut are controlled by two stomatogastric neuronal networks that have been intensively studied in vitro. By using electromyographic recordings from the European lobster, Homarus gammarus, we have monitored simultaneously the motor activity of pyloric and gastric mill muscles for </=3 mo in intact and freely behaving animals. Both pyloric and gastric mill networks are almost continuously active in vivo regardless of the presence of food. In unfed resting animals kept under "natural-like" conditions, the pyloric network expresses the typical triphasic pattern seen in vitro but at considerably slower cycle periods (2. 5-3.5 s instead of 1-1.5 s). Gastric mill activity occurs at mean cycle periods of 20-50 s compared with 5-10 s in vitro but may suddenly stop for up to tens of minutes, then restart without any apparent behavioral reason. When conjointly active, the two networks express a strict coupling that involves certain but not all motor neurons of the pyloric network. The posterior pyloric constrictor muscles, innervated by a total of 8 pyloric (PY) motor neurons, are influenced by the onset of each gastric mill medial gastric/lateral gastric(MG/LG) neuron powerstroke burst, and for one cycle, PY neuron bursts may attain >300% of their mean duration. However, the duration of activity in the lateral pyloric constrictor muscle, innervated by the unique lateral pyloric (LP) motor neuron, remains unaffected by this perturbation. During this period after gastric perturbation, LP neuron and PY neurons thus express opposite burst-to-period relationships in that LP neuron burst duration is independent of the ongoing cycle period, whereas PY neuron burst duration changes with period length. In vitro the same type of gastro-pyloric interaction is observed, indicating that it is not dependent on sensory inputs. Moreover, this interaction is intrinsic to the stomatogastric ganglion itself because the relationship between the two networks persists after suppression of descending inputs to the ganglion. Intracellular recordings reveal that this gastro-pyloric interaction originates from the gastric MG and LG neurons of the gastric network, which inhibit the pyloric pacemaker ensemble. As a consequence, the pyloric PY neurons, which are inhibited by the pyloric dilator (PD) neurons of the pyloric pacemaker group, extend their activity during the time that PD neuron is held silent. Moreover, there is evidence for a pyloro-gastric interaction, apparently rectifying, from the pyloric pacemakers back to the gastric MG/LG neuron group.

Differential modulation of chemical and electrical components of mixed synapses in the lobster stomatogastric ganglion

1. Two pairs of neurons in the pyloric network of the spiny lobster, Panulirus interruptus, communicate through mixed graded chemical and rectifying electrical synapses. The anterior burster (AB) chemically inhibits and is electrically coupled to the ventricular dilator (VD); the lateral pyloric (LP) and pyloric (PY) neurons show reciprocal chemical inhibition and electrical coupling. We examined the effects of dopamine (DA), serotonin (5HT) and octopamine (Oct) on these mixed synapses to determine the plasticity possible with opposing modes of synaptic interaction. 2. Dopamine increased net inhibition at all three pyloric mixed synapses by both reducing electrical coupling and increasing chemical inhibition. This reversed the sign of the net synaptic interaction when electrotonic coupling dominated some mixed synapses, and activated silent chemical components of other mixed synapses. 3. Serotonin weakly enhanced LP-->PY net inhibition, by reducing electrical coupling without altering chemical inhibition. Serotonin reduced AB-->VD electrical coupling, but variability in its effect on the chemical component made the net effect non-significant. 4. Octopamine enhanced LP-->PY and PY-->LP net inhibition by enhancing the chemical inhibitory component without altering electrical coupling. 5. Differential modulation of chemical and electrical components of mixed synapses markedly changes the net synaptic interactions. This contributes to the flexible outputs that modulators evoke from anatomically defined neural networks.

The innervation of the pyloric region of the crab, Cancer borealis: homologous muscles in decapod species are differently innervated

The muscles of the pyloric region of the stomach of the crab, Cancer borealis, are innervated by motorneurons found in the stomatogastric ganglion (STG). Electrophysiological recording and stimulating techniques were used to study the detailed pattern of innervation of the pyloric region muscles. Although there are two Pyloric Dilator (PD) motorneurons in lobsters, previous work reported four PD motorneurons in the crab STG (Dando et al. 1974; Hermann 1979a, b). We now find that only two of the crab PD neurons innervate muscles homologous to those innervated by the PD neurons in the lobster, Panulirus interruptus. The remaining two PD neurons innervate muscles that are innervated by pyloric (PY) neurons in P. interruptus. The innervation patterns of the Lateral Pyloric (LP), Ventricular Dilator (VD), Inferior Cardiac (IC), and PY neurons were also determined and compared with those previously reported in lobsters. Responses of the muscles of the pyloric region to the neurotransmitters, acetylcholine (ACh) and glutamate, were determined by application of exogenous cholinergic agonists and glutamate. The effect of the cholinergic antagonist, curare, on the amplitude of the excitatory junctional potentials (EJPs) evoked by stimulation of the pyloric motor nerves was measured. These experiments suggest that the differences in innervation pattern of the pyloric muscles seen in crab and lobsters are also associated with a change in the neurotransmitter active on these muscles. Possible implications of these findings for phylogenetic relations of decapod crustaceans and for the evolution of neural circuits are discussed.

Axonal branching pattern and coupling mechanisms of the cerebral giant neurones in the snail, Lymnaea stagnalis

The axonal branching pattern of the two cerebral giant neurones (CGCs) of Lymnaea stagnalis was studied with intrasomatically applied horseradish peroxidase. The cells are symmetrical. Each CGC projects to the ipsilateral n. labialis medius and n. arteriae labialis, the subcerebral commissure, and to all ipsi- and contralateral buccal nerves. The contralateral buccal nerves are reached via the ipsilateral cerebro-buccal connective and the buccal commissure. The CGC fire action potentials 1:1 in a driver-follower relationship. Each cell is capable of both driving and following. The relationship depends on the membrane potentials of the somata. In driving CGC spikes are initiated in a cerebral spike trigger zone located near the soma. In following cells spikes are initiated in a distal zone located in the buccal ganglia. The buccal zone is only affected by the partner CGC. CGC are synchronized by three coupling mechanisms: mutual excitatory chemical synapses, electrotonic coupling, and common input. The chemical and electrotonic connections are located in the buccal ganglia. All spikes are relayed to the partner cell via the chemical synapses. The electrotonic coupling improves the efficiency of the chemical synapses. The dual connection selectively synchronizes the CGC-axonal spikes from each side of the buccal mass. Common excitatory input affects the cerebral spike trigger zones and can initiate simultaneously spikes in both cells. This results in bilateral synchrony of spikes in the CGC-axons in both the buccal and the lip nerves.

Neural basis of rhythmic behavior in animals

Timing of the repetitive movements that constitute any rhythmic behavior is regulated by intrinsic properties of the central nervous system rather than by sensory feedback from moving parts of the body. Evidence of this permits resolution of the long-standing controversy over the neural basis of rhythmic behavior and aids in the identification of this mechanism as a general principle of neural organization applicable to all animals with central nervous systems.