Effects of parenteral diclofenac sodium on upper gastrointestinal motility after food in man

Diclofenac and dexamethasone modulate the effect of cannabidiol on the rat colon motility ex vivo

Introduction

Due to the growing interest in the use of cannabinoids in supportive therapies, they are increasingly used together with anti-inflammatory drugs. Cannabinoids inhibit gastrointestinal motility, while steroidal and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs influence motility in other ways. The aim of the research was to study the interactions between cannabidiol (CBD) and these two classes of anti-inflammatory drugs in the context of gastrointestinal motility. Dexamethasone (DEX) was selected as a steroidal drug and diclofenac (DCF) as a nonsteroidal counterpart.

Material and Methods

The experiments were performed on isolated rat colon strips in isometric conditions. The contractile response to acetylcholine (ACh) (1 μM) was measured with no substance applied as a control value and was measured after application of CBD (80 μM), DEX (100 μM), DCF (100 μM), or a combination of these substances.

Results

Cannabidiol strongly inhibited intestinal motility mediated by ACh application, DCF inhibited it non-significantly, while DEX intensified it. When CBD was co-administered with DEX, the combination inhibited intestinal motility non-significantly relative to the ACh-only control. Co-administration of CBD with DCF inhibited motility more than when these substances were administered separately.

Conclusion

Inhibition of the intestinal response to ACh is likely due to the synergistic effect of CBD and endogenous cannabinoids. Dexamethasone lessened the inhibitory effect of CBD, likely because of diminished availability of the arachidonic acid necessary for endogenous cannabinoid synthesis. However, diclofenac may increase endogenous cannabinoid synthesis, because of the greater availability of arachidonic acid caused by DCF blocking the cyclooxygenation pathway.

Antroduodenojejunal motor activity in untreated and treated celiac disease patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Patients with celiac disease may present with abnormal upper gut motor activity. However, it is not known if these abnormalities persist after the introduction of a gluten-free diet. The present study aimed to compare antroduodenojejunal motor variables recorded in untreated celiac patients with those of celiac patients given a gluten-free diet and healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Eleven untreated celiac disease patients, 12 age- and sex-matched celiac patients on a gluten-free diet (at least 12 months), and 33 controls entered the study. Antroduodenojejunal motility was recorded for 6 h during fasting and for 3 h after a standard meal by means of a perfused, multiple lumen catheter.

RESULTS

More than 80% of untreated celiac patients had discrete motor abnormalities of the upper gut, in both fasting and fed recordings, compared to the other subjects. Patients on a gluten-free diet also showed motor abnormalities, albeit to a lesser extent. In these patients histological evaluation showed the persistence of mild mucosal abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper gut motor abnormalities are frequent in patients with celiac disease, even in those on a gluten-free diet. In the latter group, these abnormalities may suggest an incomplete adherence to the dietary regimen.

Serotonergic and non-serotonergic targets in the pharmacotherapy of visceral hypersensitivity

Visceral hypersensitivity is considered a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Targeting visceral hypersensitivity seems an attractive approach to the development of drugs for functional GI disorders. This review summarizes current knowledge on targets for the treatment of visceral hypersensitivity, and the status of current and future drug and probiotic treatment development, and the role of pharmacogenomic factors.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study on effects of diclofenac sodium and indomethacin on postprandial gastric motility in man

Data from animal studies suggest that NSAIDs-induced gastric damage may be due to increased gastric motility. Such a mechanism, however, has never been tested or demonstrated in man. We evaluated the effects of two frequently prescribed NSAIDs, indomethacin and diclofenac sodium, on postprandial gastric motor activity (a physiologically reproducible stimulus) in healthy volunteers to see whether these compounds increase gastric motility. Twenty-four healthy volunteers of both sexes, 21-35 years of age, underwent a basal gastric motility recording. Thereafter, they were randomized in three groups to receive either placebo, indomethacin (50 mg three times a day) or diclofenac sodium (50 mg three times a day) for a week. At the end of the week, they underwent an identical manometric study. Analysis of the motility tracings showed no difference in gastric antral motility index and in amplitude of gastric antral contractions after NSAIDs with respect to the basal study and to the placebo group. About 50% of subjects (two in the placebo group) complained of side effects. These were transient and mild, except in two subjects taking indomethacin, in whom endoscopy was necessary; one of these had a small prepyloric ulcer. It is concluded that in man NSAID-related gastric damage is unlikely to be due to increased gastric motility.

Esophageal dysfunction in scleroderma: relationship with disease subsets

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between esophageal function and the extent of disease in a nonselected group of scleroderma patients, and to study gastric and small bowel motility in a group of scleroderma patients with more severe clinical manifestations.

METHODS

Esophageal function in 125 scleroderma patients was investigated by radiologic, endoscopic, manometric, and pH-metric techniques. Ten patients also underwent gastrointestinal (GI) manometric recording, both during fasting and after a standard meal.

RESULTS

Radiologic abnormalities of the esophagus were found in 55 of 81 patients (68%) and esophagitis in 45 of 125 (36%). No significant relationship was disclosed between GI symptoms, radiologic abnormalities, esophagitis grade, and the various disease subsets. However, the overall incidence of endoscopic esophagitis (irrespective of the degree) was significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with the patient subgroups, with 100% incidence of esophagitis in those having the more severe cutaneous involvement (type III). Manometric abnormalities were documented in 80% of patients, and pathologic reflux in 78%. The severity of esophageal abnormalities on manometry significantly correlated with the severity of the disease, whereas no correlations were found with pH-metric data. Ninety percent of the 10 female patients undergoing antroduodenal manometry displayed abnormal findings; of these, 60% showed neuropathic, and 30% myopathic, patterns. The latter were recorded in patients with a more severe stage of the disease (type III).

CONCLUSION

A direct relationship was observed between scleroderma subsets and the severity of esophageal (and, probably, more distal gut) motor involvement. Since no correlation was found between esophageal symptoms and the severity of manometric abnormalities, manometry should be considered the single most important GI test to document the severity of the "esophageal" disease. Gastric and small bowel manometry may also offer evidence of widespread gut involvement, and provide a rationale for a more targeted therapeutic approach.

Abnormal gastrointestinal motility in patients with celiac sprue

No study to date has objectively investigated whether the motor behavior of the small bowel is abnormal in celiac sprue. The purpose of this study was to systematically address this topic by means of intraluminal pressure recordings in a series of such patients. Sixteen subjects (nine adults, seven children, age range 2-69 years) with celiac sprue were recruited and studied while untreated. Manometric examination was carried out for 6 hr during fasting and 3 hr after a meal. Adult celiac patients displayed a significantly (mean +/- SEM) greater frequency of migrating motor complexes in comparison to controls during fasting (4.44 +/- 1.6 vs 2.45 +/- 0.20, P < 0.01), whereas no differences were found in the pediatric group with respect to this variable. Fasting motor abnormalities, chiefly represented by discrete clustered contractions, giant jejunal contractions, and bursts of nonpropagated contractions, were discovered in a high percentage in both groups of celiac subjects (89% in adults and 44% in children, respectively). Similar abnormalities were observed in the postprandial period, especially in adults. In conclusion, patients with celiac sprue frequently display discrete gastrointestinal motor abnormalities, which though perhaps nonspecific may account for several symptoms complained of by such patients.