1
|
Taherdangkoo R, Liu Q, Xing Y, Yang H, Cao V, Sauter M, Butscher C. Predicting methane solubility in water and seawater by machine learning algorithms: Application to methane transport modeling. JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY 2021; 242:103844. [PMID: 34111717 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2021.103844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The upward migration of methane from natural gas wells associated with fracking operations may lead to contamination of groundwater resources and surface leakage. Numerical simulations of methane transport in the subsurface environment require knowledge of methane solubility in the aqueous phase. This study employs machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict methane solubility in aquatic systems for temperatures ranging from 273.15 to 518.3 K and pressures ranging from 1 to 1570 bar. Four regression algorithms including regression tree (RT), boosted regression tree (BRT), least square support vector machine (LSSVM) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) were utilized for predicting methane solubility in pure water and mixed aquatic systems containing Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl- and SO4-2. The experimental data collected from the literature were used to implement the models. We used Grid search (GS), Random search (RS) and Bayesian optimization (BO) for tuning hyper-parameters of the ML models. Moreover, the predicted values of methane solubility were compared against Spivey et al. (2004) and Duan and Mao (2006) equations of state. The results show that the BRT-BO model is the most rigorous model for the prediction task. The coefficient of determination (R2) between experimental and predicted values is 0.99 and the mean squared error (MSE) is 1.19 × 10-7. The performance of the BRT-BO model is satisfactory, showing an acceptable agreement with experimental data. The comparison results demonstrated the superior performance of the BRT-BO model for predicting methane solubility in aquatic systems over a span of temperature, pressure and ionic strength that occurs in deep marine environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Taherdangkoo
- TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Institute of Geotechnics, Gustav-Zeuner-Str. 1, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.
| | - Quan Liu
- Department of Applied Geology, Geosciences Center, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Yixuan Xing
- Department of Applied Geology, Geosciences Center, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Huichen Yang
- Department of Applied Geology, Geosciences Center, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Viet Cao
- Faculty of Natural Sciences, Hung Vuong University, Nguyen Tat Thanh Str., Viet Tri, 35120 Phu Tho, Viet Nam
| | - Martin Sauter
- Department of Applied Geology, Geosciences Center, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Christoph Butscher
- TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Institute of Geotechnics, Gustav-Zeuner-Str. 1, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li W, He D, Hu G, Li X, Banerjee G, Li J, Lee SH, Dong Q, Gao T, Brudvig GW, Waegele MM, Jiang DE, Wang D. Selective CO Production by Photoelectrochemical Methane Oxidation on TiO 2. ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE 2018; 4:631-637. [PMID: 29806010 PMCID: PMC5968511 DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The inertness of the C-H bond in CH4 poses significant challenges to selective CH4 oxidation, which often proceeds all the way to CO2 once activated. Selective oxidation of CH4 to high-value industrial chemicals such as CO or CH3OH remains a challenge. Presently, the main methods to activate CH4 oxidation include thermochemical, electrochemical, and photocatalytic reactions. Of them, photocatalytic reactions hold great promise for practical applications but have been poorly studied. Existing demonstrations of photocatalytic CH4 oxidation exhibit limited control over the product selectivity, with CO2 as the most common product. The yield of CO or other hydrocarbons is too low to be of any practical value. In this work, we show that highly selective production of CO by CH4 oxidation can be achieved by a photoelectrochemical (PEC) approach. Under our experimental conditions, the highest yield for CO production was 81.9%. The substrate we used was TiO2 grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD), which features high concentrations of Ti3+ species. The selectivity toward CO was found to be highly sensitive to the substrate types, with significantly lower yield on P25 or commercial anatase TiO2 substrates. Moreover, our results revealed that the selectivity toward CO also depends on the applied potentials. Based on the experimental results, we proposed a reaction mechanism that involves synergistic effects by adjacent Ti sites on TiO2. Spectroscopic characterization and computational studies provide critical evidence to support the mechanism. Furthermore, the synergistic effect was found to parallel heterogeneous CO2 reduction mechanisms. Our results not only present a new route to selective CH4 oxidation, but also highlight the importance of mechanistic understandings in advancing heterogeneous catalysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Li
- Department
of Chemistry, Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut
Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
| | - Da He
- Department
of Chemistry, Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut
Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
| | - Guoxiang Hu
- Department
of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States
| | - Xiang Li
- Department
of Chemistry, Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut
Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
| | - Gourab Banerjee
- Department
of Chemistry and Yale Energy Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107, United States
| | - Jingyi Li
- Department
of Chemistry, Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut
Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
| | - Shin Hee Lee
- Department
of Chemistry and Yale Energy Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107, United States
| | - Qi Dong
- Department
of Chemistry, Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut
Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
| | - Tianyue Gao
- Department
of Chemistry, Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut
Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
| | - Gary W. Brudvig
- Department
of Chemistry and Yale Energy Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107, United States
| | - Matthias M. Waegele
- Department
of Chemistry, Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut
Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
| | - De-en Jiang
- Department
of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States
| | - Dunwei Wang
- Department
of Chemistry, Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut
Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
| |
Collapse
|