Familial effects of prostate and other cancers on lifetime breast cancer risk

BRCA Mutations in Prostate Cancer: Assessment, Implications and Treatment Considerations

Prostate cancer ranks fifth in cancer-related mortality in men worldwide. DNA damage is implicated in cancer and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are in place against this to maintain genomic stability. Impaired DDR pathways play a role in prostate carcinogenesis and germline or somatic mutations in DDR genes have been found in both primary and metastatic prostate cancer. Among these, BRCA mutations have been found to be especially clinically relevant with a role for germline or somatic testing. Prostate cancer with DDR defects may be sensitive to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors which target proteins in a process called PARylation. Initially they were used to target BRCA-mutated tumor cells in a process of synthetic lethality. However, recent studies have found potential for PARP inhibitors in a variety of other genetic settings. In this review, we explore the mechanisms of DNA repair, potential for genomic analysis of prostate cancer and therapeutics of PARP inhibitors along with their safety profile.

Metachronous or synchronous male breast and prostate cancers a duality to lookout for

Introduction: Breast cancer is well known as the stereotypical women's cancer, and prostate cancer represents the well-known stereotypical male counterpart. While prostate cancer carries the potential to metastasize to the breast, the synchronous or metachronous co-occurrence of primary breast and primary prostate cancers is quite unusual. Prostate cancer in men of African descent may have its own behaviour with regards to its relationship with male breast cancer.

Case presentation:

Case 1: A 64 year old male presented to Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (CHBAH) with a 2 years history of a painless left breast lump. A core biopsy was done and confirmed breast carcinoma. Tamoxifen was started but, due to disease progression, he underwent left modified radical mastectomy followed by chemotherapy. Prostate biopsy was done for raised Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) and suspicious prostate on digital rectal examination. A prostatic adenocarcinoma was subsequently diagnosed with bone metastases on bone scan. He was started on Androgen deprivation therapy and followed up every 3 months.

Case 2: A 68 year old male presented to CHBAH with a 1 year history of a painless right breast lump. A core biopsy confirmed breast cancer. Tamoxifen was started, followed by right modified radical mastectomy and chemotherapy for disease progression. A raised PSA and suspicious prostate on digital rectal examination prompted a prostate biopsy revealing a prostatic adenocarcinoma. Bone scan was negative for metastasis. He is currently on 3 monthly Androgen deprivation therapy and awaiting radiation.

Conclusion: This clinical practice article not only presents this exceptionally rare duality but highlights that both cancers can coexist either as sporadic conditions, or as a result of genetic mutations. Thus, we suggest that men with prostate cancer be screened clinically, biochemically and genetically for breast cancer and vice versa.

Family History of Breast or Prostate Cancer and Prostate Cancer Risk

PURPOSE

Breast and prostate cancer co-occur in families, and women with a family history of prostate cancer are at increased breast cancer risk. Prostate cancer is among the most heritable cancers, but few studies have investigated its association with familial breast cancer. The objective of this study is to investigate the extent to which familial breast or prostate cancer in first-degree relatives increases prostate cancer risk.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A prospective study of 37,002 U.S. men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. During the 16-year follow-up to 2012, 4,208 total and 344 lethal cases were diagnosed. Using cause-specific hazards regression, we estimated the multivariable HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between familial breast or prostate cancer and total and lethal prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Those with familial breast cancer had a 21% greater risk of prostate cancer overall (95% CI, 1.10-1.34), and a 34% greater risk of lethal disease (HR 1.34; 95% CI, 0.96-1.89). Family history of prostate cancer alone was associated with a 68% increased risk of total disease (95% CI, 1.53-1.83) and a 72% increased risk of lethal disease (95% CI, 1.25-2.38). Men with a family history of both cancers were also at elevated risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that men with a family history of breast or prostate cancer had elevated prostate cancer risks, including risk of lethal disease. These findings have translational relevance for cancer risk prediction in men.

Metachronous or synchronous male breast and prostate cancers a duality to lookout for

Introduction: Breast cancer is well known as the stereotypical women's cancer, and prostate cancer represents the well-known stereotypical male counterpart. While prostate cancer carries the potential to metastasize to the breast, the synchronous or metachronous co-occurrence of primary breast and primary prostate cancers is quite unusual. Prostate cancer in men of African descent may have its own behaviour with regards to its relationship with male breast cancer. Case presentation: Case 1: A 64 year old male presented to Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (CHBAH) with a 2 years history of a painless left breast lump. A core biopsy was done and confirmed breast carcinoma. Tamoxifen was started but, due to disease progression, he underwent left modified radical mastectomy followed by chemotherapy. Prostate biopsy was done for raised Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) and suspicious prostate on digital rectal examination. A prostatic adenocarcinoma was subsequently diagnosed with bone metastases on bone scan. He was started on Androgen deprivation therapy and followed up every 3 months. Case 2: A 68 year old male presented to CHBAH with a 1 year history of a painless right breast lump. A core biopsy confirmed breast cancer. Tamoxifen was started, followed by right modified radical mastectomy and chemotherapy for disease progression. A raised PSA and suspicious prostate on digital rectal examination prompted a prostate biopsy revealing a prostatic adenocarcinoma. Bone scan was negative for metastasis. He is currently on 3 monthly Androgen deprivation therapy and awaiting radiation. Conclusion: This clinical practice article not only presents this exceptionally rare duality but highlights that both cancers can coexist either as sporadic conditions, or as a result of genetic mutations. Thus, we suggest that men with prostate cancer be screened clinically, biochemically and genetically for breast cancer and vice versa.

The impact of interleukin-10 (IL-10) gene 4 polymorphisms on peripheral blood IL-10 variation and prostate cancer risk based on published studies

This study purported to investigate the impact of interleukin-10 (IL-10) gene 4 polymorphisms (−1082G>A, -819T>C, -592A>C and 210T>C) on peripheral blood IL-10 variation and prostate cancer (PCa) risk, with a special consideration given to various origins of between-study heterogeneity. 2 researchers independently fulfilled literature retrieval, quality assessment and information collection. Sub-grouped analyses per ethnicity, continent, design type, control source, genotyping procedure, genotype validation, age-matched status, study sample size, quality score and controls’ mean age were conducted, respectively. Total 17 unduplicated studies (patients/controls: 7561/8101) were assessable for PCa risk, and 4 unduplicated studies (1189 subjects) for peripheral blood IL-10 variation. Pooling all assessable studies identified a marginally significant association between the -1082A allele and increased PCa risk (odds ratio (OR)=1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.21) (Heterogeneity I²=64.3%), and no significance was detected in sub-grouped analyses of this polymorphism. Contrastingly, the -592C allele was significantly associated with reduced PCa risk in both prospective (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95) and population-based (OR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.00) studies (Heterogeneity I²=0.0% and 18.1%). Moreover, carriers of combined -592CA/CC genotypes had a significant higher level of peripheral blood IL-10 than the -592AA genotype carriers (weighted mean difference=0.45 and 0.54 mg/dL, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.67 and 0.30 to 0.39). The above comparisons possessed a low probability of publication bias. In sum, our findings suggested that IL-10 gene -592A>C polymorphism may represent a promising candidate locus for the occurrence of PCa, and further signified a contributing role of this polymorphism in prostate carcinogenesis.

Cancer Incidence in Physicians: A Taiwan National Population-based Cohort Study

Cancer has been the leading cause of death in Taiwan since 1982. Physicians have many health-related risk factors which may contribute to cancer, such as rotating night shift, radiation, poor lifestyle, and higher exposure risk to infection and potential carcinogenic drugs. However, the cancer risk in physicians is not clear. In Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified 14,889 physicians as the study cohort and randomly selected 29,778 nonmedical staff patients as the comparison cohort for this national population-based cohort study. Cox proportional-hazard regression was used to compare the cancer risk between physicians and comparisons. Physician subgroups were also analyzed. Physicians had a lower all-cancer risk than did the comparisons (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.97). In the sex-based analysis, male physicians had a lower all-cancer risk than did male comparisons (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.94); and female physicians did not (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.88-1.91). In the cancer-type analysis, male physicians had a higher risk of prostate cancer (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.12-2.65) and female physicians had twice the risk of breast cancer (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.11-3.62) than did comparisons. Cancer risk was not significantly associated with physician specialties. Physicians in Taiwan had a lower all-cancer risk but higher risks for prostate and breast cancer than did the general population. These new epidemiological findings require additional study to clarify possible mechanisms.

Tumour spectrum in non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer families in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30 % of all breast cancer is at least partly attributed to hereditary factors. Familial breast cancer is often inherited in the context of cancer syndromes. The most commonly mutated genes are BRCA1 and BRCA2 in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. The genetic background in families with hereditary breast cancer without predisposing germ line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (non-BRCA families) is still to a large extent unclear even though progress has been made. The aim of this study was to compare cancer proportions in familial non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer compared to the general population in search of putative new breast cancer syndromes.

METHODS

Pedigrees from 334 non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer families in the county of Stockholm, Sweden, were investigated and the distribution of cancer diagnoses other than breast cancer was compared with the distribution of cancer diagnoses in the general Swedish population in two reference years, 1970 and 2010. A cancer diagnosis was regarded as overrepresented in the non-BRCA families if the confidence interval was above both population reference values.

RESULTS

We found that endometrial cancer was overrepresented in the non-BRCA families with a 6.36 % proportion (CI 4.67-8.2) compared to the proportion in the general population in the reference years 1970 (3.07 %) and 2010 (2.64 %). Moreover tumours of the ovary, liver, pancreas and prostate were overrepresented.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we found an overrepresentation of endometrial cancer in our cohort of hereditary non-BRCA families. Our result supports previous inconsistent reports of a putative breast and endometrial cancer syndrome. An association has been suggested in studies of families with several cases of breast cancer in close relatives or bilateral breast cancer. To clarify this issue we suggest further studies on a breast and endometrial cancer syndrome in cohorts with a strong pattern of hereditary breast cancer. Identifying new breast cancer syndromes is of importance to improve genetic counselling for women at risk and a first step towards detection of new susceptibility genes.

Brca2 and Trp53 deficiency cooperate in the progression of mouse prostate tumourigenesis

Epidemiological studies have shown that one of the strongest risk factors for prostate cancer is a family history of the disease, suggesting that inherited factors play a major role in prostate cancer susceptibility. Germline mutations in BRCA2 predispose to breast and ovarian cancer with its predominant tumour suppressor function thought to be the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. BRCA2 has also been implicated in prostate cancer etiology, but it is unclear the impact that mutations in this gene have on prostate tumourigenesis. Here we have undertaken a genetic analysis in the mouse to determine the role of Brca2 in the adult prostate. We show that deletion of Brca2 specifically in prostate epithelia results in focal hyperplasia and low-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in animals over 12 months of age. Simultaneous deletion of Brca2 and the tumour suppressor Trp53 in prostate epithelia gave rise to focal hyperplasia and atypical cells at 6 months, leading to high-grade PIN in animals from 12 months. Epithelial cells in these lesions show an increase in DNA damage and have higher levels of proliferation, but also elevated apoptosis. Castration of Brca2;Trp53 mutant animals led to regression of PIN lesions, but atypical cells persisted that continued to proliferate and express nuclear androgen receptor. This study provides evidence that Brca2 can act as a tumour suppressor in the prostate, and the model we describe should prove useful in the development of new therapeutic approaches.

In Western countries, prostate cancer is the most common male cancer and the second biggest cause of cancer-related deaths in men. Men with a familial history of either breast or ovarian cancer have an elevated predisposition to prostate cancer, suggesting there is a genetic element to this disease. Indeed, the inheritance of a mutated form of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 has been linked to the development of prostate cancer, although the precise role that BRCA2 dysfunction plays in the development of prostate cancer is unclear. To address this, we have generated an animal model in which the mouse Brca2 gene is specifically deleted in the adult prostate. These mice develop precancerous prostate lesions, which progress in severity and incidence with the loss-of-function of an additional tumour suppressor, Trp53. Importantly, blocking male steroidal hormone production by castration leads to partial regression of the prostate lesions, however cells continue to proliferate after androgen withdrawal. This suggests human BRCA2 mutant prostate tumours, like the majority of prostate cancers, will respond to hormone therapy, but will relapse, as frequently occurs in this disease. In summary, our model suggests that BRCA2 acts as a tumour suppressor in the prostate and provides a pre-invasive model to test novel therapeutics.

Finding prostate cancer susceptibility genes

Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease with multiple loci contributing to susceptibility. Traditionally, genome-wide scans using high-risk families have utilized stratification by number of affected individuals, family history of other cancers, or family age at diagnosis to improve genetic homogeneity. In addition to locus heterogeneity, for later onset diseases such as prostate cancer, a major limitation to mapping efforts is that key parental DNA samples are rarely available. The lack of available samples from upper generations reduces inheritance information, and as a result, the standard 10-cM genome scan does not provide full power to detect linkage. To increase the ability to find disease-associated loci, much denser genome-wide scans must be undertaken in multiple ethnic groups. In addition, new ways of defining homogenous subsets of families need to be developed.

Genomic scan of 254 hereditary prostate cancer families

Hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease, complicating efforts to map and clone susceptibility loci. We have used stratification of a large dataset of 254 HPC families in an effort to improve power to detect HPC loci and to understand what types of family features may improve locus identification. The strongest result is that of a dominant locus at 6p22.3 (heterogeneity LOD (HLOD) = 2.51), the evidence for which is increased by consideration of the age of PC onset (HLOD = 3.43 in 214 families with median age-of-onset 56-72 years) and co-occurrence of primary brain cancer (HLOD = 2.34 in 21 families) in the families. Additional regions for which we observe modest evidence for linkage include chromosome 7q and 17p. Only weak evidence of several previously implicated HPC regions is detected. These analyses support the existence of multiple HPC loci, whose presence may be best identified by analyses of large, including pooled, datasets which consider locus heterogeneity.

Novel perspective: focusing on the X chromosome in reproductive cancers

In an XX female, one of the two X chromosomes has been inactivated during early embryonic life to achieve a compensation of X-linked gene products between males and females, leaving only one allele of X-linked genes functional. There are some X-linked genes escaping the X-inactivation, i.e., being expressed from both alleles. Escape from X-inactivation varies at different levels; some genes have both alleles active in some women but only one allele active in others, whereas some other genes have both alleles active in neoplastic tissue but only one allele active normally. The X-inactivation may be considered functionally equivalent to a loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for some genes, whereas escape from X-inactivation may be equivalent to functional gene amplification for others. The physiological LOH may make X-linked tumor suppressor genes lose their function more easily, compared with autosomal tumor suppressor genes, thus predisposing women to cancer formation more easily. Moreover, the human X chromosome contains many genes related to cancer or to sex and reproduction. All these properties of the X chromosome suggest that it may play more important roles than any autosomal chromosome in the development and progression of reproductive and urologic cancers.

Cancer risk in families with hereditary prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the clinical features of hereditary prostate carcinoma (HPC) and whether other malignancies are associated with this disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether tumors other than prostate carcinoma aggregate in families with HPC or whether this disease can be considered site specific.

METHODS

From 62 Swedish families with HPC, a cohort was constructed of 1364 first-degree relatives of the men with prostate carcinoma in these families. Through linkage to the Swedish Cancer Register, all reported cancer between 1958 and 1996 was identified. The expected number of cases was calculated by using the population rates in Sweden.

RESULTS

A standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1. 16 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.97-1.38) for the overall cancer risk was observed among the 1364 first-degree relatives. However, significant increased risks were noticed for gastric carcinoma (SIR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.59-4.52), for breast carcinoma in women (SIR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01-2.35), and for kidney carcinoma (SIR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.15-4.77).The excess risk for breast carcinoma was even more pronounced among women before the age of 65 years in families with earlier onset prostate carcinoma (SIR, 3.64; 95% CI, 1. 66-6.91). Seven families with at least two or more relatives with breast, gastric, or kidney carcinoma were identified, and, in one family, four relatives with early onset gastric carcinoma were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In most of the families with HPC, the disease appears to be "site specific," with no excess of other malignancies. However, in a subset of families, a significant aggregation of prostate carcinoma together with breast carcinoma and/or gastric carcinoma was observed that may have been caused by a common germline mutation in a cancer susceptibility gene.

The rate of the founder Jewish mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in prostate cancer patients in Israel

Inherited predisposition occurs in 5-10% of all prostate cancer (CaP) patients, but the genes involved in conferring genetic susceptibility remain largely unknown. Several lines of evidence indicate that germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 might be associated with an increased risk for CaP. Three mutations in these two genes (185delAG and 5382InsC (BRCA1) and 6174delT (BRCA2) occur in about 2.5% of the general Ashkenazi population, and the 185delAG BRCA1 mutation, in up to 1% of non-Ashkenazi Jews. In order to assess the contribution of these germline mutations to prostate cancer in Jewish Israeli patients, we tested 174 unselected prostate cancer patients (95 of Ashkenazi origin) for these mutations by PCR amplification and modified restriction enzyme digests. Patient's age range was 45-81 years (median 66), and in 24 (14.4%) the disease was diagnosed prior to 55 years of age. Nineteen (11%) and 12 (6.9%) patients had a first or second degree relative with CaP or breast cancer, respectively. Overall, five mutation carriers were detected: 2/152 (1.3%) 185delAG, 2/104 (2%) 5382InsC, and 1/158 (0.6%) 6174delT. In all carriers, the disease was diagnosed after the age of 55, and only one of them had a family history of breast and CaP. In addition, no allelic losses at the BRCA1 locus were demonstrated in 17 patients with a family history of CaP, using seven microsatellite markers. We conclude that the rate of the predominant Jewish BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in CaP patients does not significantly differ from that of the general population, and that mutational inactivation of the BRCA1 is rare in familial CaP. Thus, germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations probably contribute little to CaP occurrence, to inherited predisposition, and to early onset disease in Jewish individuals.

A somatic BRCA2 mutation in RER+ endometrial carcinomas that specifically deletes the amino-terminal transactivation domain

Mismatch repair deficiency and replication errors (RERs) occur in approximately 20% of sporadic endometrial carcinomas. Frameshift mutations in several cancer predisposing genes, especially in their mononucleotide repeats, are seen in RER+ tumors. In a survey of hereditary breast cancer genes in gynecological cancer, we analyzed the entire coding sequence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in 51 endometrial tumors, of which 12 were RER+. Seven somatic mutations were identified in six (50%) of the RER+ tumors, but none in RER- tumors. A novel base pair deletion at a (T)10 tract in BRCA2 intron 2, causing an in-frame splice deletion of exon 3, was observed in four tumors, one of which contained a second, truncating BRCA2 mutation. Two tumors exhibited frameshift mutations at polyA tracts in BRCA1 and BRCA2 exon 11, both predicted to result in premature translation termination. Whereas most mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are known to affect the more carboxy-terminal regions interacting with RAD51, and the transactivating BRCT domains of BRCA1, this is the first demonstration of a recurrent BRCA2 mutation that specifically deletes the amino-terminal transactivation domain. Moreover, our results suggest that somatic mutations in BRCA2(and to some extent BRCA1) may confer a growth advantage in RER+ endometrial carcinomas.

Familial prostate cancer and possible associated malignancies: nation-wide register cohort study in Sweden

There is a familial aggregation of prostate cancer, and 5 to 10% of all prostate cancers are estimated to be inherited in an autosomal-dominant mode. A population-based cohort study was performed in order to study familial prostate cancer and associated malignancies. A nation-wide register cohort study was conducted using an unselected study population. The cohort of 5,595 sons and 5,089 daughters of Swedish men found to have prostate cancer between 1959 and 1963 was identified. All types of cancer reported between 1958 and 1992 in this cohort were identified through linkage to the Swedish Cancer Registry. The expected number of different cancers was calculated using incidence rates obtained from the Registry. A highly significant increased overall standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.65 (95% CI, 1.49-1.83) was obtained for prostate cancer, with 370 observed cases compared with 224 expected prostate cancers. The SIR was 3.18 among cases 45 to 49 years old at diagnosis, with the risk gradually decreasing to a SIR of 1.45 among cases over 80 years of age. Among sons and daughters with a father whose prostate cancer was diagnosed at an early age (<70 years), an increased risk for colorectal cancer SIR 1.48 (1.10-1.95) was observed. No significant difference in cancer risk for other sites was observed among the daughters and sons of men with prostate cancer. This cohort study confirms earlier studies that a positive family history of prostate cancer is an important risk factor for developing this disease. Though increased risk was found for all ages, it was more pronounced in younger men. Since no other malignancy was significantly associated with prostate cancer, it is most likely that familial prostate cancer is "site-specific".

Mutational analysis of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene in endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether alteration of BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene occurs in sporadic endometrial carcinomas.

METHODS

Genomic DNAs were prepared from 33 consecutively collected endometrial carcinoma tissues for BRCA1 mutational analysis. To screen for BRCA1 mutation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technique were used with 41 overlapping PCR primer pairs for the 23 coding exons of BRCA1. Tumors that demonstrated SSCP variants were further subjected to direct DNA sequencing in the appropriate exons to identify the DNA alteration.

RESULTS

In addition to detecting a previously described polymorphism in exon 11, single strand conformation polymorphism analysis of the 33 endometrial cancers identified 3 tumors with mobility shifts. Two tumors shifted in exon 3 and showed the same pattern of band shift. The other tumor shifted in exon 9. DNA sequencing revealed sequence alterations in the 3 tumors; all appeared heterozygous. In the 2 tumors shifted in exon 3, the sequence alteration caused no amino acid change and was consistent with an infrequent silent polymorphism. In the third tumor, a missense alteration at codon 191 was detected and was recognized as germline in origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Because a normal allele of BRCA1 was retained in the tumor where a germline missense alteration was detected, the heterozygous DNA alteration should not be cancer predisposing in terms of the two-hit model for inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene. We conclude that mutation of BRCA1 may not be involved in the development of sporadic endometrial cancer.

Bilateral Breast Cancer in a Patient with a Strong Family History of Cancer: Analysis of p53 Germ Line Mutations

We report a case of bilateral breast carcinoma in a patient with a strong family history, including 4 cases of breast carcinoma, 1 case of prostate carcinoma (father), 1 case of hepatocellular carcinoma (mother), 2 cases of gastric carcinoma, 1 case of lung carcinoma, and 1 case of lingual carcinoma, in second degree relatives, together with analysis of germ line p53 mutations. The patient was a 51-year-old female who had undergone mastectomy 9 years previously for an invasive ductal carcinoma of the right breast. Lymph nodes were free of metastases and the tumor had negative estrogen receptor (ER) status. Bone and lung metastases developed 18 months after surgery, and had been well controlled with chemoendocrine therapy. She subsequently underwent a modified radical mastectomy for carcinoma in the contralateral breast. This was an invasive lobular carcinoma with negative lymph node metastasis, negative p53 immunoreaction, negative c-erbB-2 protein and positive ER status. In this breast-prostate carcinoma-type cancer family there was a high incidence of breast carcinoma; the father, who had prostate carcinoma, was possibly a carrier of a breast carcinoma susceptible gene. We have however detected to p53 germ line mutations in the lymphocytes DNA of the patient and her niece. The accumulation of cancers in this family line remains to be elucidated further using other genetic markers.