Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Current Strategies to Identify Patients That Will Benefit from TACE Treatment and Future Directions a Practical Step-by-Step Guide

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) depends on the stage of disease. In the Western Hemisphere, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification (BCLC) is the preferred staging system. Approximately one-third of patients initially present with intermediate-stage disease. For these patients, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the treatment of choice. However, the intermediate-stage comprises a heterogeneous subgroup of patients with considerable differences in tumor burden and liver function. In addition, differences in individual factors that are not captured by the BCLC framework, such as the tumor growth pattern, degree of hypervascularity, and vascular supply, complicate further evaluation of these patients. Due to these differences, not all patients benefit equally from TACE. Several tools and scoring systems have been devised to provide decision-making support. All of these have shown promising initial results but failed external evaluation and have not been translated to the clinic. Nevertheless, criteria for objectifying treatment decisions in daily clinical practice are needed in all stages of disease. Therefore, this review provides a concise practical step-by-step guide on current strategies for patient selection and decision-making, with a focus on TACE, to critically evaluate the existing decision-support tools and provide a summary of the latest updates in the field.

Lobaplatin-TACE combined with radioactive 125I seed implantation for treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety of lobaplatin-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radioactive 125I seed implantation in treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

75 patients with primary HCC were enrolled in the study, among them 43 receiving lobaplatin- TACE (TACE group) and 32 lobaplatin-TACE combined with 125I seed implantation (TACE+125I group). After treatment, the local remission rates and postoperative complications of two groups were compared using the Pearson Chi-square test. Overall survival in the two groups was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the differences were tested using Log-rank test.

RESULTS

There were 7 cases of complete response (CR), 13 of partial response (PR), 6 of stable disease (SD) and 17 of progressive disease (PD) in the TACE group, with 13 cases of CR, 9 of PR, 5 of SD and 5 of PD in the TACE+125I group. The disease control rates of TACE and TACE+125I group were 60.5% (26/43) and 84.4% (27/32), respectively, with a significant difference between them (P < 0.05). The survival rates at 6, 12 and 18 months in the TACE group were 100.0%, 81.8% and 50.0%, respectively, and those in TACE+125I group were 100.0%, 93.8% and 65.6%. The mean survival times in the TACE and TACE+125I groups were 19.5 and 22.9 months, respectively. There was a significant difference in the overall survival rate between two groups (P < 0.05). No serious complications were encountered in either group.

CONCLUSION

Lobaplatin-TACE combined with 125I seed implantation is favorable and safe for treatment of primary HCC.

Transarterial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: which technique is more effective? A systematic review of cohort and randomized studies

BACKGROUND

Chemoembolization (TACE) improves survival in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The optimal schedule, or whether embolization (TAE) alone gives the same survival advantage, is not known.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether specific patient characteristics and/or radiological transarterial techniques result in better outcomes.

METHOD

A PubMed search was carried out for cohort and randomized trials (n = 175) testing transarterial therapies; meta-analysis was performed where appropriate.

RESULTS

Anticancer drugs were used as sole agent in 75% of cases (double 15% and triple 6%): doxorubicin (36%), cisplatin (31%), epirubicin (12%), mitoxantrone (8%), mitomycin (8%), and SMANCS (5%). Embolizing agents used were: gelatin sponge particles (71%), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles (8%), degradable starch microspheres (DSM) (4%), and embospheres (4%). Sessions per patient were 2.5 +/- 1.5 (interval: 2 months). Objective response was 40 +/- 20%; survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were: 62 +/- 20%, 42 +/- 17%, 30 +/- 15%, and 19 +/- 16%, respectively, and survival time was 18 +/- 9.5 months. The post-TACE complications were: acute liver failure, 7.5% (range 0-49%); acute renal failure, 1.8% (0-13%); encephalopathy, 1.8% (0-16%); ascites, 8.3% (0-52%); upper gastrointestinal bleeding; 3% (0-22%); and hepatic or splenic abscess, 1.3% (0-2.5%). Treatment-related mortality was 2.4% (0-9.5%), mainly due to acute liver failure. Our meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) confirmed that TACE improves survival; but a meta-analysis of TACE versus TAE alone (3 RCTs, 412 patients) demonstrated no survival difference.

CONCLUSIONS

No chemotherapeutic agent appears better than any other. There is no evidence for benefit with lipiodol. Gelatin sponge is the most used embolic agent, but PVA particles may be better. TAE appears as effective as TACE. New strategies to reduce the risk of post-TACE complications are required.

Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical review from the surgeon's perspective

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the current results of various locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with special reference to the implications for surgeons.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Resection or transplantation is the treatment of choice for HCC, but most patients are not suitable candidates. The past decade has witnessed the development of a variety of locoregional therapies for HCC. Surgeons are faced with the challenge of adopting these therapies in the management of patients with resectable or unresectable HCC.

METHODS

A review of relevant English-language articles was undertaken based on a Medline search from January 1990 to August 2001.

RESULTS

Retrospective studies suggested that transarterial chemoembolization is an effective treatment for inoperable HCC, but its perceived benefit for survival has not been substantiated in randomized trials, presumably because its antitumor effect is offset by its adverse effect on liver function. Nonetheless, it remains a widely used palliative treatment for HCC not amenable to resection or ablative therapies, and it also plays an important role as a treatment of postresection recurrence and as a pretransplant therapy for transplantable HCC. Better patient selection, selective segmental chemoembolization, and treatment repetition tailored to tumor response and patient tolerance may improve its benefit-risk ratio. Transarterial radiotherapy is a less available alternative that produces results similar to those of chemoembolization. Percutaneous ethanol injection has gained wide acceptance as a safe and effective treatment for HCCs 3 cm or smaller. Uncertainty in tumor necrosis limits its potential as a curative treatment, but its repeatability allows treatment of recurrence after ablation or resection of HCC that is crucial to prolongation of survival. Cryotherapy affords a better chance of cure because of predictable necrosis even for HCCs larger than 3 cm, but its use is limited by a high complication rate. There has been recent enthusiasm for heat ablation by microwave, radiofrequency, or laser, which provides predictable necrosis with a low complication rate. Preliminary data indicated that radiofrequency ablation is superior to ethanol injection in the radicality of tumor ablation. The advent of more versatile radiofrequency probes has allowed ablation of HCCs larger than 5 cm. Recent studies have suggested that combined transarterial embolization and heat ablation is a promising strategy for large HCCs. Thus far, no randomized trials comparing various thermoablative therapies have been reported. It is also uncertain whether a percutaneous route, laparoscopy, or open surgery affords the best approach for these therapies. Thermoablative therapies have been combined with resection or used to treat postresection recurrence, and they have also been used as a pretransplant therapy. However, the value of such strategies requires further evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in locoregional therapies have led to a major breakthrough in the management of unresectable HCC, but the exact role of the various modalities needs to be defined by randomized studies. Novel thermoablative techniques provide the surgeon with an exciting opportunity to participate actively in the management of unresectable HCC. Locoregional therapies are also useful adjuncts in the management of patients with resectable or transplantable disease. Hence, surgeons must be equipped with the latest knowledge and techniques of ablative therapy to provide the most appropriate treatment for the wide spectrum of patients with HCC.

Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiotherapy and/or chemoembolization

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcome, patterns of failure, and toxicity for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with radiotherapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), or combined TACE and radiotherapy. Forty-two patients with unresectable HCC were treated with combined radiotherapy and TACE (TACE+RT group, 17 patients), radiotherapy alone (RT group, 9 patients), or with TACE alone (TACE group, 16 patients). Mean dose of radiation was 46.9 +/- 5.8 Gy in a daily fraction of 1.8 to 2 Gy, directed only to the cancer-involved areas of the liver. TACE was performed with a combination of Lipiodol, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and mitomycin C, followed by Gelfoam or Ivalon embolization. Tumor size was smaller in the TACE group (mean: 5.4 cm) compared with the TACE+RT group (8.6 cm) and the RT group (13.1 cm) (P = 0.0003). The median follow-up was 24 months in the TACE+RT group, 28 months in the RT group, and 23 months in the TACE group. Survival was significantly worse for patients treated with radiotherapy alone due to the selection bias of patients with more advanced disease and compromised condition in this group. In contrast, the TACE+RT and TACE groups had comparable survival (two-year rates: TACE+RT 58%, TACE 56%, P = 0.69). The local control rate for the treated tumors was similar in the TACE+RT and TACE groups (P = 0.11). The intrahepatic recurrence outside the treated tumors was common and similar between these two groups (P = 0.48). The extrahepatic progression-free survival was significantly shorter for patients in the TACE+RT group than in the TACE group (two-year rates: TACE+RT 36%, TACE 100%, P = 0.002). Seven patients died from complications of treatment. Local radiotherapy may be added to treat patients with unresectable HCC, and the control of progression of the treated tumors was promising even in patients with large hepatic tumors. Survival of patients with combined TACE and radiotherapy was similar to that with TACE as the only treatment, while a significant portion of the patients treated with radiotherapy developed extrahepatic metastasis.

Local radiotherapy with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment outcome, patterns of failure, and prognostic factors for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with local radiotherapy alone or as an adjunct to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From March 1994 to December 1997, 25 patients with unresectable HCC underwent local radiotherapy to a portion of the liver. Twenty-three patients were classified as having cirrhosis in Child-Pugh class A and 2 in class B. Mean diameter of the treated hepatic tumor was 10.3 cm. Mean dose of radiation was 46.9 +/- 5.9 Gy in a daily fraction of 1.8-2 Gy. Sixteen patients were also treated with Lipiodol and chemotherapeutic agents mixed with Ivalon or Gelfoam particles for chemoembolization, either before and/or after radiotherapy. Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) was given to one patient. All patients were monitored for treatment-related toxicity and for survival and patterns of failure.

RESULTS

In a median follow-up period of 23 months, 11 patients were alive and 14 dead. The median survival duration from treatment was 19.2 months with a 2-year survival of 41%. Only 3 of 25 patients had local progression of the treated hepatic tumor. The recurrences were seen within the liver or extrahepatic. The 2-year local, regional, and extrahepatic progression-free survival rates were 78%, 46%, and 39%, respectively. The local control ranked the highest. Patients with Okuda Stage I disease had significantly longer survival than those with Stage II and III (p = 0.02). Patients with T4 disease (p = 0.02) or treated with radiotherapy alone (p = 0.003) had significantly shorter survival. T4 disease (p = 0.03) and pretreatment alpha-fetoprotein level of more than 200 ng/ml (p = 0. 03) were associated with significantly worse regional progression-free survival. A significant difference was observed in both regional progression-free survival (p = 0.0001) and extrahepatic progression-free survival (p = 0.005) between patients with and without portal vein thrombosis before treatment. The presence of satellite nodules had a significantly worse impact on regional progression-free survival (p = 0.04) and extrahepatic progression-free survival (p = 0.03). Patients with hepatic tumor more than 6 cm in diameter or portal vein thrombosis tended to have shorter survival. Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) and gastrointestinal bleeding were the most common treatment-related toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy is effective in the treatment of patients with unresectable HCC. Its effect appeared to be more prominent within the site to which radiation was given. The combination of TACE and radiation was associated with better control of HCC than radiation given alone, probably due to the selection of patients with favorable prognosis for the combined treatment. A dose-volume model should be established in the next phase of research in the treatment of unresectable HCC.

Hepatic malignancies

The battle against malignancies of the liver is far from over, although tremendous strides have been made in the past decade, such as improved diagnostic capabilities, safe surgical resection, availability of safe nonsurgical ablative modalities, multimodality therapy, and aggressive approach to recurrent disease. Even after the best attempts at curative treatment, recurrence of primary and secondary malignancies of the liver continues to be the cause of demise for more than 70% of treated patients. The battle continues in the laboratories, where investigations are focused on delineating the pathophysiology of cancer on the molecular and genetic levels and mapping the patterns of cancer emergence and spread. The new millennium holds promise for formulating therapies that may improve disease-free survival for patients with malignancies of the liver.

Localized hepatocellular carcinoma: therapeutic options

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most common malignancies worldwide. Recent surveillance programs have allowed early detection and diagnosis, but overall survival of patients with HCC remains poor. This article provides a definition for localized HCC and summarizes the array of treatments that have emerged and the salient literature and findings for each. Among the treatments reviewed here are surgical resection, orthotopic liver transplantation, and local ablative therapies such as cryosurgery, percutaneous ethanol injection therapy, and transarterial chemoembolization.

Ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma as a complication of transarterial oily chemoembolization

BACKGROUND

Transarterial oily chemoembolization (TOCE) is frequently employed as a non-operative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Serious complications of TOCE are well known but ruptured HCC as a fatal complication of TOCE has not been reported previously.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on all patients who received TOCE for treatment of HCC from January 1989 to October 1996; the complication of ruptured HCC within 2 weeks from the procedure was recorded.

RESULTS

During the study period, 391 patients received a total of 1443 sessions of TOCE (mean 3.7 sessions per patient) for the treatment of HCC, with an overall median survival of 10.4 months. Six patients developed ruptured tumour within 2 weeks after TOCE, resulting in an overall incidence of 1.5 per cent per patient or 0.4 per cent per procedure. All except one patient died 1-25 days after tumour rupture. Factors common to these six patients included: (1) male sex; (2) large tumour size (range 8-17 cm in diameter); (3) tumour located in the right lobe of the liver; (4) tumour ruptured after the first session of TOCE; and (5) TOCE performed as primary treatment without previous hepatic resection.

CONCLUSION

Ruptured HCC is a serious complication of TOCE although the incidence is low. It occurred predominantly in men after the first session of TOCE for a large irresectable tumour of the right lobe.

Nonresectional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is generally accepted as the first choice of treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, due to its multifocal nature, association with chronic liver disease, and frequent postresectional recurrence, nonresectional therapies are important in the management of a significant proportion of patients with HCC.

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was performed on the current status of different nonresectional treatment modalities commonly employed for HCC. They include direct ablation methods, systemic chemotherapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, external and targeting radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, and immunotherapy. Multidisciplinary therapy resulting in preoperative cytoreduction has also been reported with improvement of therapeutic results.

CONCLUSION

Nonresectional therapies play an essential role in the treatment of inoperable HCC as they lead to satisfactory survival. Percutaneous ethanol injection and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization are the most frequently employed modalities, and they result in a 3-year survival rate of 55% to 70% and about 20%, respectively. Multidisciplinary therapy appears to be the current trend of management and improved survival is achieved especially when unresectable tumors are converted to resectable ones.

Superselective intra-arterial radiometabolic therapy with I-131 lipiodol in hepatocellular carcinoma

Superselective transcatheter arterial radioembolization with radioiodinated lipiodol and gelatin sponges was evaluated in 11 patients with nodular hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirteen tumor nodules were treated using 3-5 ml of lipiodol labeled with 259 to 2220 MBq of I-131 followed by gelatin sponge with the following results: 1) there was elevated uptake in 12 tumor nodules with high tumor-to-background ratios: 2) there was excellent clinical tolerance to the treatment (stable cirrhosis in 5 patients and cirrhosis progression in 2 cases); 3) there was good disease control with size reduction in five tumor lesions (41%) and no increase in seven lesions (59%) followed for 2 years; 4) there was a 2-year survival rate of 70%; and 5) three deaths due to hepatic failure at 2, 3, and 20 months after therapy. Superselective arterial radioembolization with I-131 lipiodol is a useful palliative approach to inoperable hepatocarcinoma, providing long-term local control without severe complications in the progression of cirrhosis.

Preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for resectable large hepatocellular carcinoma: a reappraisal

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) improves the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by causing tumour necrosis and shrinkage. Fifty-two patients with resectable large HCC (defined as a maximal tumour diameter of 10 cm or more) were prospectively randomized into two groups: group 1 comprised 24 patients who had 1-5 sessions of TACE before operation; group 2 consisted of the other 28 patients, on whom surgery was performed without delay. Tumour volume was reduced to a mean (s.d.) of 42.8 (15.3) per cent in 16 patients in group 1, but remained unchanged in four and increased in size in a further four. Patients in group 1 had a slightly longer operating time (5.5 versus 4.6 h, P = 0.09), a higher rate of concomitant resection of adjacent organs (58 versus 25 per cent, P = 0.03) and a higher rate of histological invasion to these organs (33 versus 4 per cent, P = 0.01). No difference was found between the two groups in operative blood loss, operative morbidity and mortality rates, and pathological staging. The disease-free survival rate in the two groups was similar, but the incidence of extrahepatic cancer recurrence was higher in group 1 (57 versus 23 per cent, P = 0.03). The actuarial survival rate was also significantly worse in group 1 when determined from the time of detection of the tumour (P = 0.03) or from operation (P = 0.01). It is concluded that preoperative TACE for resectable large HCC should be avoided because it does not provide complete necrosis in large tumours and results in delayed surgery and difficulty in the treatment of recurrent lesions, without any benefit.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with transcatheter arterial embolization. Analysis of prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is a useful treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To study the prognostic factors, survival time of patients with HCC after TAE was analyzed retrospectively using clinical manifestations of coexisting liver cirrhosis and clinical features of HCC.

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with HCC were treated with TAE between 1984 and 1991 and observed at Nagasaki University Hospital. All the patients also had liver cirrhosis.

RESULTS

The survival time of the 87 patients after TAE ranged from 2 months to 8.1 years (mean +/- standard deviation, 2.7 +/- 0.3 years). Survival curves after TAE did not differ between men and women (P > 0.5) or between hepatitis B and C viral infection (P > 0.8), but they depended on clinical stages of coexisting liver cirrhosis (P < 0.01). The cumulative survival after TAE was significantly longer in patients with uninodular tumors than in patients with multinodular tumors (P < 0.0001) (3-year survival, 53.3% vs. 13.3%; 5-year survival, 32.2% vs. 3.3%, respectively). In contrast, patients' survival time was not associated with the size of the tumor detected at the time of treatment with TAE (P > 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of HCC with TAE is well indicated regardless of tumor size for patients with nonadvanced liver cirrhosis and uninodular tumors. Alternatively, treatment of HCC with TAE alone is still insufficient in patients with multinodular tumors. Other treatment modalities in combination with TAE should be considered to achieve a more favorable prognosis of these patients.