Biological and clinical evaluation of lanreotide (BIM 23014), a somatostatin analogue, in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. A pilot study by the I.T.M.O. Group. Italian Trials in Medical Oncology

A review of the use of somatostatin analogs in oncology

Somatostatin is a neuropeptide produced by paracrine cells that are located throughout the gastrointestinal tract, lung, and pancreas, and is also found in various locations of the nervous system. It exerts neural control over many physiological functions including inhibition of gastrointestinal endocrine secretion through its receptors. Potent and biologically stable analogs of somatostatin have been developed. These somatostatin analogs show different efficacy on different receptors, and receptors are varyingly concentrated in specific tissues. Antitumor and antisecretory effects of somatostatin analogs in cancer have been shown in several in vivo and in vitro studies. However, these activities have not always yielded into clinically relevant patient outcome benefit. Somatostatin analogs are of clinical benefit in treating symptoms of ectopic hormone secretion (adrenocorticotropic hormone, growth hormone-releasing hormone) in lung cancer, without inducing a significant tumor response. They have also been shown to induce a statistically significant decrease in bone pain and increase in Karnofsky performance status in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Somatostatin analogs alone or in combination with other agents have only limited antitumoral effect in breast cancer. In gastrointestinal cancers, studies have not shown an objective tumor response to somatostatin analogs except in endocrine tumors of the liver with symptomatic and biochemical improvement. In neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal system and pancreas, very high symptomatic and biochemical response rates have been achieved with somatostatin analogs. Antiproliferative activity has been clearly shown in metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors.

Somatostatin receptors in non-neuroendocrine malignancies: the potential role of somatostatin analogs in solid tumors

Somatostatin receptors (sstrs) are G-protein-coupled receptors that mediate various physiological effects when activated by the neuropeptide somatostatin or its synthetic analogs. In addition to the well-documented antisecretory effects of sstr2-preferential somatostatin analogs octreotide and lanreotide, ligand binding to sstr initiates an inhibitory action on tumor growth. This effect may result from both indirect actions (suppression of growth factors and growth-promoting hormones [e.g., GH/IGF-1 axis] and inhibition of angiogenesis) and direct actions (activation of antigrowth activities [e.g., apoptosis]). As solid tumor cells express multiple sstrs, there is a rationale to evaluate the potential antitumor effects of pasireotide (SOM230), a multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analog with high binding affinity for sstr1–3 and sstr5. Pasireotide reduces systemic IGF-1 levels more potently than currently available somatostatin analogs and has been well tolerated in clinical trials.

The clinical role of somatostatin analogues as antineoplastic agents: much ado about nothing?

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin (SST) analogues represent a novel approach for the treatment of certain cancers. The objective of this article is to summarise the current knowledge on SST analogues in the treatment of cancer patients.

METHODS

Computerised (Medline) and manual searches were performed to identify publications on clinical trials published in the English-speaking literature between 1966 and 2000. Information abstracted included patients' pre-treatment status, histology, SST receptor (SSTR) evaluation, type of SST analogue, application schedule and dose, duration of treatment, side-effects, response criteria applied (i.e. WHO response criteria, biochemical criteria or symptomatic investigations) and survival.

RESULTS

Our search disclosed 22 case reports, five phase 1 and 47 phase II trials, and eight randomised clinical trials using SST analogues (octreotide, lanreotide and vapreotide) as antineoplastic agents. With regard to the phase II trials, conflicting results have been demonstrated in almost all tumour entities investigated. The few randomised studies published so far have shown an impact on survival in patients with hepatocellular cancer, while the effect attributed to treatment in patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas might well have been due to an exceptionally short survival in the control group. There appears to be evidence that SST analogues are able to enhance the therapeutic effects of hormonal intervention in patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer and probably pancreatic cancer. Interpretation of the findings, however, is complicated by the fact that patients were heavily pre-treated in some studies and response criteria have not been uniformly applied. In addition, most studies have not been designed to distinguish between receptor-mediated (direct) and indirect effects of SST analogues in tumour patients.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results obtained so far, there can be no doubt about the wide therapeutic index and the high efficacy of SST analogues in the symptomatic management of neuroendocrine tumours. Apart from these indications, the data do not justify recommendation of SST analogues as antineoplastic agents outside of clinical trials, as the optimal dose and schedule of application for antineoplastic activity has not been defined for currently used agents. Carefully designed clinical trials including investigation of SSTR status before treatment, evaluation of an indirect mechanism of SST analogues, and assessment of optimal combination of hormone therapy and chemotherapy with SST analogues are clearly needed in the near future.

A randomized, multicenter prospective trial assessing long-acting release octreotide pamoate plus tamoxifen as a first line therapy for advanced breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Long-acting release octreotide pamoate (OP-LAR) is a synthetic octapeptide that can be administered monthly and whose activity is similar to that of endogenous somatostatin. In vitro and in vivo data suggest that OP-LAR may act as a growth inhibitor or a modulator of growth stimulatory peptides. The potential mechanisms of action of somatostatin analogues in breast carcinoma include the suppression of insulin-like growth factor-1 (a putative tumor growth factor) and the binding to the somatostatin receptors expressed by breast carcinoma cells in order to induce apoptosis.

METHODS

This Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involved 203 patients (13% premenopausal and 87% postmenopausal) with locally recurrent (but unsuitable for local treatment) or metastatic breast carcinoma, 199 of whom were actually treated (99 patients with OP-LAR and 100 patients with placebo). All patients received TAM and were estrogen and/or progesteron receptor positive (receptor positivity was an eligibility criterion), and all had measurable or evaluable disease. Any patients who had received previous chemotherapy not given in an adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting were excluded.

RESULTS

At the time of the interim analysis, the tumor response rates (RR) were 20.2% (9 complete responses [CR] and 11 partial responses [PR]) in the OP-LAR arm and 21% (11 CRs and 10 PRs) in the placebo arm, and the median time to progression (TTP) was 25.0 and 26.9 weeks (P = 0.62), respectively. The adverse events experienced by 10% or more of the patients and attributed to octreotide were gastrointestinal in nature: diarrhea (53%), nausea (16%), and abdominal pain (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the similar RR and TTP in both arms, the trial was stopped at the interim analysis. The current data confirm there is no indication for adding somatostatin analogues to TAM in advanced breast carcinoma.

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer with somatostatin analogues--a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues appear to have antiproliferative effects in breast cancer by inhibiting various hormones. Several small phase 1 and 2 clinical trails have evaluated the efficacy of somatostatin analogues, but the results are varied. The purpose of this study was to use the technique of meta-analysis to determine the effect of somatostatin analogues on tumor response, toxicity, and serum hormone levels in women with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

All published and unpublished trials were reviewed. Meta-analysis was preformed by best linear unbiased estimate regression with observations weighted inversely to their variance. Significance was considered at P < .05.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (N = 210) were included. Positive tumor response was reported in 87 patients (41.4%). Mean duration of response was 3.9 months. Response was best when somatostatin analogues were given as first-line therapy (69.5% versus 28.5%, P < .006) and in patients with < or =2 metastases (45.0% versus 5.6%, P = .3). Mild side effects occurred in 47 of 185 patients (25.4%). Therapy was associated with a decrease in serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and an increase in growth hormone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with metastatic breast cancer, treatment with somatostatin analogues was associated with a tumor response of over 40% with few side effects. Best results were achieved when somatostatin analogues were given as first-line therapy.

The effects of insulin-like growth factors on tumorigenesis and neoplastic growth

Several decades of basic and clinical research have demonstrated that there is an association between the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and neoplasia. We begin with a brief discussion of the function and regulation of expression of the IGFs, their receptors and the IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs). A number of investigational interventional strategies targeting the GH or IGFs are then reviewed. Finally, we have assembled the available scientific knowledge about this relationship for each of the major tumor types. The tumors have been grouped together by organ system and for each of the major tumors, various key elements of the relationship between IGFs and tumor growth are discussed. Specifically these include the presence or absence of autocrine IGF-I and IGF-II production; presence or absence of IGF-I and IGF-II receptor expression; the expression and functions of the IGFBPs; in vitro and in vivo experiments involving therapeutic interventions; and available results from clinical trials evaluating the effect of GH/IGF axis down-regulation in various malignancies.

Phase II study of RC-160 (vapreotide), an octapeptide analogue of somatostatin, in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

RC-160 (octastatin/vapreotide) is a potent octapeptide analogue of somatostatin with growth inhibitory activity in experimental tumours in vitro and in vivo, including breast cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose RC-160, 3 mg day(-1) on week 1 increased to 4.5 mg day(-1) for weeks 2-4 and subsequently 6 mg day(-1) until the end of treatment, administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion in the management of 14 women with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. The age range was 37-80 years (median 58.5 years) and performance status 0-2. The treatment was well tolerated with no dose reductions being required. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were seen. Abscess formation developed at the infusion site in eight patients and erythema and discomfort was seen in a further three patients. A significant reduction in IGF-I levels occurred by day 7 and was maintained throughout the treatment. The lowest dose of RC-160 produced the maximal IGF-I response. Although there was no reduction in prolactin levels in patients whose baseline levels were normal, elevated prolactin levels found in three patients fell to within the normal range 7 days after commencing RC-160 treatment. A small but significant rise in fasting blood glucose levels was also recorded, the highest level on treatment being 7.6 mmol l(-1). No objective tumour responses were observed, all patients showing disease progression within 3 months of commencing treatment. These findings demonstrate that high-dose RC-160, administered as a continuous subcutaneous infusion, can reduce serum levels of the breast growth factors IGF-I and prolactin but is ineffective in the management of metastatic breast cancer. Encouraging preclinical anti-tumour activity and the favourable toxicity profile in patients suggest the merit of future studies combining RC-160 with anti-oestrogen, cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic agents.

Somatostatin and octreotide modulate the function of Kupffer cells in liver cirrhosis

In our previous studies we have shown that somatostatin and octreotide modulate the function of peritoneal macrophages and Kupffer cells in noncirrhotic livers. However, the effects of somatostatin on the Kupffer cells in cirrhotic livers are not known. In the present study, Kupffer cells, obtained from male rats with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhotic livers, were treated in vitro with somatostatin or octreotide and their effects on the release of nitric oxide, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and peroxide (H2O2) determined. At concentrations of 10(-13) or 10(-10) to 10(-6) M of somatostatin or 10(-12) to 10(-10) M, or 10(-6) M of octreotide, the amount of nitric oxide released by Kupffer cells was significantly suppressed relative to that of untreated cells. Kupffer cells treated with less than 10(-12) M or greater than 10(-12) M of somatostatin or octreotide released less TNF-alpha compared to the untreated controls. In addition, zymosan-induced H2O2 release by Kupffer cells treated with 10(-9) to 10(-7) M somatostatin or with 10(-15) to 10(-13) M and 10(-9) to 10(-7) M of octreotide was greater than that of the untreated controls. These findings demonstrate that somatostatin and octreotide modulate the release of nitric oxide, TNF-alpha and H2O2 by Kupffer cells in cirrhotic livers depending on the concentrations of hormones used.

Microencapsulated octreotide pamoate in advanced gastrointestinal and pancreatic cancer: a phase I study

Fourteen patients suffering from advanced colorectal (n = 7), pancreatic (n = 4) or gastric (n = 3) carcinomas received treatment with microencapsulated octreotide pamoate 90 mg i.m. every 4 weeks (n = 4), 160 mg i.m. every 4 weeks (n = 4) or 160 mg i.m. every 2 weeks (n = 6). Two patients had stable disease, one for 4 and one for 6 months. Plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I decreased by 49-53%, IGF-II by 27-37% and total IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 by 16-19%, whereas IGFBP-1 increased by 35-55%. Insulin and C-peptide levels decreased by 29-38% and 41-46% respectively. A non-significant decrease in urinary GH secretion and an increase in the ratio of fragmented to intact IGFBP-3 as well as IGFBP-3 protease activity was seen. The increase in IGFBP-3 fragmentation correlated negatively with alterations in IGF-I and IGF-II (P < 0.05). We conclude that microencapsulated octreotide administered in doses up to 160 mg every 2 weeks is well tolerated and has pronounced effects on several components of the IGF system in plasma. In addition, changes in IGFBP-3 protease activity because of cancer may contribute to alterations in IGF-I and -II, indicating the importance of measuring this parameter in addition to IGFs and IGFBPs when evaluating alterations in IGF-I.

Clinical uses of gut peptides

OBJECTIVE

The authors review clinical applications of gut-derived peptides as diagnostic and therapeutic agents.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

An increasing number of gut peptides have been evaluated for clinical use. Earlier uses as diagnostic agents have been complemented more recently by increasing application of gut peptides as therapeutic agents.

METHOD

The authors conducted a literature review.

RESULTS

Current experience with clinical use of gut peptides is described. Initial clinical applications focused on using secretomotor effects of gut peptides in diagnostic tests, many of which have now fallen into disuse. More recently, attention has been directed toward harnessing these secretomotor effects for therapeutic use in a variety of disorders, and also using the trophic effects of gut peptides to modulate gut mucosal growth in benign and malignant disease. Gut peptides have been evaluated in a variety of other clinical situations including use as adjuncts to imaging techniques, and modification of behaviors such as feeding and panic disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Gut peptides have been used successfully in an increasing variety of clinical conditions. Further refinements in analogue and antagonist design are likely to lead to even more selective agents that may have important clinical applications. Further studies are needed to identity and evaluate these new agents.

A dose-finding study of lanreotide (a somatostatin analog) in patients with colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Laboratory data suggest that insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) may stimulate the growth of different human tumors. At least in acromegalic patients, somatostatin (SMS) analogs, such as lanreotide, suppress the serum levels of growth hormone (GH) and IGF-1.

METHODS

To evaluate the tolerability and biologic activity of different doses of lanreotide in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, consecutive groups of 3 patients each were subcutaneous treated with lanreotide at doses of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 mg three times a day for 2 months. In the event of Grade 3 side effects, 3 additional patients were treated with the same dose before the next dose escalation. Serum samples were obtained on Days 0, 15, 30, and 60 for serum GH, IGF-1, and lanreotide assessment.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled and all were evaluable. Except for the 3 and 6 mg doses, for which the observation of a Grade 3 side effect required that an additional three patients be treated, it was sufficient to treat 3 patients at each dose. The overall incidence of side effects was as follows: changes in bowel habits, 83%; abdominal cramps, 79%; diarrhea, 17%; vomiting, 17%; nausea, 21%; steatorrhea, 78%; hyperglycemia, 35%; laboratory hypothyroidism, 39%; gallstones, 13%; and weight loss, 17%. No evidence of an increase in the incidence, intensity, or duration of side effects was observed with dose escalation. Serum IGF-1 levels were as follows: Day 15: 63%, 60%, and 67% of the baseline values for the low (1-2 mg), intermediate (3-4 mg), and high (5-6 mg) dose groups, respectively; Day 30: 63%, 59%, and 51%, respectively; and Day 60: 73%, 69%, and 47%, respectively. Serum lanreotide levels declined during treatment in all of the dose groups (90 ng/mL on Day 15, and 35 ng/mL on Day 60 for the 5-6 mg group; 10 ng/mL on Day 15, and 1.5 ng/mL on Day 60 for the 1-2 mg group). No antitumor activity or tumor marker reduction was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

No increase in toxicity was observed when subcutaneous lanreotide doses were escalated to 6 mg three times a day for 2 months. The highest doses seemed to maintain reduced serum IGF-1 levels; with the lowest doses, a "rebound" in serum IGF-1 levels was observed during treatment. Nevertheless, intermittent subcutaneous injections do not ensure constant serum drug concentrations over time.