Guo T, Nani A, Shonts S, Perryman M, Chen H, Shannon T, Gillespie D, Fill M. Sarcoplasmic reticulum K(+) (TRIC) channel does not carry essential countercurrent during Ca(2+) release.
Biophys J 2014;
105:1151-60. [PMID:
24010658 DOI:
10.1016/j.bpj.2013.07.042]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2013] [Revised: 06/17/2013] [Accepted: 07/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The charge translocation associated with sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) efflux is compensated for by a simultaneous SR K(+) influx. This influx is essential because, with no countercurrent, the SR membrane potential (Vm) would quickly (<1 ms) reach the Ca(2+) equilibrium potential and SR Ca(2+) release would cease. The SR K(+) trimeric intracellular cation (TRIC) channel has been proposed to carry the essential countercurrent. However, the ryanodine receptor (RyR) itself also carries a substantial K(+) countercurrent during release. To better define the physiological role of the SR K(+) channel, we compared SR Ca(2+) transport in saponin-permeabilized cardiomyocytes before and after limiting SR K(+) channel function. Specifically, we reduced SR K(+) channel conduction 35 and 88% by replacing cytosolic K(+) for Na(+) or Cs(+) (respectively), changes that have little effect on RyR function. Calcium sparks, SR Ca(2+) reloading, and caffeine-evoked Ca(2+) release amplitude (and rate) were unaffected by these ionic changes. Our results show that countercurrent carried by SR K(+) (TRIC) channels is not required to support SR Ca(2+) release (or uptake). Because K(+) enters the SR through RyRs during release, the SR K(+) (TRIC) channel most likely is needed to restore trans-SR K(+) balance after RyRs close, assuring SR Vm stays near 0 mV.
Collapse