Isoflurane anaesthesia in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus. Case report

Isoflurane treatment for refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus in dogs

Introduction

Resistant epileptic episodes, such as refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), are neurological emergencies that require immediate medical treatment. Although inhalational anesthetics, such as isoflurane (ISO), have been proposed as a means of seizure control in dogs, there is currently a lack of both experimental and clinical studies on this subject.

Study design

This is a retrospective clinical study.

Methods

Records of dogs that received ISO for the management of RSE and SRSE during their intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization at the Companion Animal Clinic of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki were included in the present study. The study period spanned from February 2013 to March 2023. Dogs were identified as responders (R) when RSE/SRSE ceased after ISO administration, and the dogs were successfully discharged from the ICU after ISO discontinuation. Dogs were identified as non-responders (NR) when RSE/SRSE ceased after ISO administration, but RSE/SRSE reoccurred after ISO discontinuation. Additional data about the number and time of ISO cycles, the time of ICU hospitalization, the side effects of ISO administration, and an additional administration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and anesthetic drugs were also recorded.

Results

A total of 20 dogs with 26 recorded RSE/SRSE episodes and 26 anesthetic cycles with ISO were included in the present study. The clinical termination of seizure activity was achieved 100% (26/26) in all episodes. In 73.1% (19/26) of the episodes, ISO administration resulted in successful RSE/SRSE treatment. Poor outcome was recorded in 26.9% (7/26) of the episodes because RSE/SRSE reoccurred after ISO discontinuation, and the dogs were euthanatized or died due to cardiac arrest. Inspiratory ISO ranged between 0.5 and 4.0%. The median time of the anesthetic cycles with ISO was 12.67 h (4.00-62.00). The median duration of the ICU hospitalization was 48.00 h (24.00-120.00). At least one ISO-related side effect was recorded in 23 out of 26 (88.5%) episodes.

Conclusion

To the authors' knowledge, this is the first clinical study that addresses the administration of ISO for RSE/SRSE treatment in dogs. The use of ISO may be beneficial in terminating RSE/SRSE; however, further prospective studies are necessary to confirm this observation.

Lidocaine for status epilepticus in adults

INTRODUCTION

Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of intravenous lidocaine in adults for status epilepticus (SE) and refractory status epilepticus (RSE) to determine its impact on seizure control.

METHODS

All articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, HealthStar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (inception to November 2014), and gray literature were searched. The strength of evidence was adjudicated using both the Oxford and GRADE methodology by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Overall, 13 studies were identified, with 11 manuscripts and 2 meeting abstracts. Seventy-six adult patients were treated for 82 episodes of SE/RSE. Patients had varying numbers of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), 1-12, on board prior to lidocaine therapy. During 69 of the 82 (84.1%) episodes of SE/RSE, phenytoin was on board. The dose regimen of lidocaine varied, with some utilizing bolus dosing alone; others utilizing a combination of bolus and infusion therapy. Overall, 70.7% of seizures responded to lidocaine, with complete cessation and greater than 50% reduction seen in 64.1% and 6.1% respectively. Patient outcomes were sparingly reported.

CONCLUSIONS

There currently exists level 4, GRADE C evidence to support the consideration of lidocaine for SE and RSE in the adult population. Thus there is currently weak evidence to support the use of lidocaine in this context. Further prospective studies of lidocaine administration in this setting are warranted.

Modern inhalational anesthetics for refractory status epilepticus

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of modern inhalational anesthetic agents for refractory status epilepticus and their impact on seizure control.

METHODS

All articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, HealthStar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (inception to March 2014), reference lists of relevant articles, and gray literature were searched. The strength of evidence was adjudicated using both the Oxford and Grading of Recommendation Assessment Development and Education methodology by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Overall, 19 studies were identified, with 16 manuscripts and 3 meeting abstracts. A total of 46 patients were treated. Adult (n=28) and pediatric patients (n=18) displayed 92.9% and 94.4% seizure control with treatment, respectively. Isoflurane was used in the majority of cases. Hypotension was the only complication described.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxford level 4, Grading of Recommendation Assessment Development and Education D evidence exists to support the use of isoflurane in refractory status epilepticus to obtain burst suppression. Insufficient data exist to comment on the efficacy of desflurane and xenon at this time.

Treatment of refractory convulsive status epilepticus in children: other therapies

Refractory convulsive status epilepticus occurs when seizures are not controlled with initial benzodiazepine therapy or a subsequent anticonvulsant drug. Typically drug-induced anesthesia is then pursued with midazolam or a barbiturate. This results in prolonged, intensive care, which requires meticulous attention to medical management to minimize complications. When seizures persist other options must be considered. These include (1) other medications, (2) surgery, (3) the ketogenic diet, (4) hypothermia, (5) inhalational anesthetic agents, and (6) immune modulating therapy. This review addresses the literature related to the use of the latter (4) treatment options. I will discuss the role of each treatment and review the evidence for it's use, along with possible side-effects.

Therapeutic applications and uses of inhalational anesthesia in the pediatric intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To review the physical properties, end-organ effects, therapeutic applications, and delivery techniques of inhalational anesthetic agents in the pediatric intensive care unit.

DATA SOURCE

A computerized, bibliographic search regarding intensive care unit applications of inhalational anesthetic agents.

MAIN RESULTS

Although the end-organ effects of inhalational anesthetic agents vary depending on the agent, general effects include a dose-related depression of ventilatory and cardiovascular function. With increasing anesthetic depth, there is a decrease in alveolar ventilation with a reduction in tidal volume and an increase in PaCO2 in spontaneously breathing patients. The potent inhalational anesthetic agents decrease mean arterial pressure and myocardial contractility. The decrease in mean arterial pressure reduces renal and hepatic blood flow. Secondary effects on end-organ function may result from the metabolism of these agents and the release of inorganic fluoride. Beneficial effects include sedation, amnesia, and anxiolysis, making these agents effective for sedation during mechanical ventilation. Bronchodilatory and anticonvulsant properties have led to their use as therapeutic agents in patients with refractory status asthmaticus and epilepticus. Issues regarding their delivery in the intensive care unit include equipment for their delivery, scavenging, and monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature contains reports of the therapeutic use of the potent inhalational anesthetic agents in the pediatric intensive care unit. Potential applications include sedation during mechanical ventilation as well as therapeutic use for the treatment of status asthmaticus and epilepticus.

Treatment of Status Epilepticus in Adults: Guidelines of the Italian League Against Epilepsy

Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical emergency which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality and requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. SE is differentiated into generalized or partial SE on the basis of its electro-clinical manifestations. The guidelines for the management of SE produced by the Italian League against Epilepsy also distinguish three different stages of SE (initial, established and refractory), based on time elapsed since the onset of the condition and responsiveness to previously administered drugs. Treatment should be started as soon as possible, particularly in generalized convulsive SE, and should include general support measures, drugs to suppress epileptic activity and, whenever possible, treatments aimed at relieving the underlying (causative) condition. Benzodiazepines are the first line antiepileptic agents, and i.v. lorazepam is generally preferred because it is associated with a lower risk of early relapses. If benzodiazepines fail to control seizures, i.v. phenytoin is usually indicated, though i.v. phenobarbital or i.v. valproate may also be considered. Refractory SE requires admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) to allow adequate monitoring and support of respiratory, metabolic and hemodynamic functions and cerebral electrical activity. In refractory SE, general anesthesia may be required. Propofol and thiopental represent first line agents in this setting, after careful assessment of potential risks and benefits.

[Refractory status epilepticus: diagnosis, therapy, course, and prognosis]

Status epilepticus (SE) is a frequent neurological emergency with an annual incidence of 10-20/100,000 individuals. The overall mortality is about 10-20%. Patients present with long-lasting fits or series of epileptic seizures or extended stupor and coma. Furthermore, patients with SE can suffer from a number of systemic complications possibly also due to side effects of the medical treatment. In the beginning, standardized treatment algorithms can successfully stop most SE. A minority of SE cases prove however to be refractory against the initial treatment and require intensified pharmacologic intervention with nonsedating anticonvulsive drugs or anesthetics. In some partial SE, nonpharmacological approaches (e.g., epilepsy surgery) have been used successfully. This paper reviews scientific evidence of the diagnostic approach, therapeutic options, and course of refractory SE, including nonpharmacological treatment.

The anticonvulsant effects of volatile anesthetics on penicillin-induced status epilepticus in cats

Volatile anesthetics may be used to treat status epilepticus when conventional drugs are ineffective. We studied 30 cats to compare the inhibitory effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane on penicillin-induced status epilepticus. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with one of the three volatile anesthetics in oxygen. Penicillin G was injected into the cisterna magna, and the volatile anesthetic discontinued. Once status epilepticus was induced (convulsive period), the animal was reanesthetized with 0.6 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of the volatile anesthetic for 30 min, then with 1.5 MAC for the next 30 min. Electroencephalogram and multiunit activity in the midbrain reticular formation were recorded. At 0.6 MAC, all anesthetics showed anticonvulsant effects. Isoflurane and halothane each abolished the repetitive spike phase in one cat; isoflurane reduced the occupancy of the repetitive spike phase (to 27%+/-22% of the convulsive period (mean +/- SD) significantly more than sevoflurane (60%+/-29%; P < 0.05) and halothane (61%+/-24%; P < 0.05), and the increase of midbrain reticular formation with repetitive spikes was reduced by all volatile anesthetics. The repetitive spikes were abolished by 1.5 MAC of the anesthetics: in 9 of 10 cats by sevoflurane, in 9 of 9 cats by isoflurane, and in 9 of 11 cats by halothane. In conclusion, isoflurane, sevoflurane, and halothane inhibited penicillin-induced status epilepticus, but isoflurane was the most potent.

IMPLICATIONS

Convulsive status epilepticus is an emergency state and requires immediate suppression of clinical and electrical seizures, but conventional drugs may be ineffective. In such cases, general anesthesia may be effective. In the present study, we suggest that isoflurane is preferable to halothane and sevoflurane to suppress sustained seizure.

Temporal changes in proton MRS metabolites after kainic acid-induced seizures in rat brain

PURPOSE

In situ 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was used to study temporal metabolic changes in a rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) by using kainic acid (KA).

METHODS

Rat brains were scanned at the level of the hippocampal body for MRS measurements. Relative ratios of N-acetyl groups (NA: N-acetylaspartate and N-acetylaspartyl glutamate), choline, and lactate (Lac) over creatine (Cr) were calculated.

RESULTS

NA/Cr ratios increased significantly during the ictal phase. During the postictal and interictal phases, the NA/Cr ratio decreased. There was a significant and prolonged increase of the lactate/Cr ratio in the hippocampi of rats that started 1 h after the onset of KA-induced seizure activity and persisted up to 24 h after the injection. The prolonged lactate/Cr increase in an area susceptible to neuronal damage (e.g., hippocampus) correlated with the onset of seizure activity but remained elevated thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

The ictal and early postictal increase in lactate ratios may reflect increased cellular activity and metabolism resulting from KA excitotoxicity. Assuming that the changes in NA/Cr ratios are due to NAA increase, we speculate that an activation of the N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) dipeptidase pathway may explain the ictal increase in NA/Cr ratios. The late postictal decrease in NA/Cr ratios is a reflection of KA-induced neuronal cell loss.

The intensive care treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in the UK. Results of a national survey and recommendations

Six hundred and ninety-four members of the Intensive Care Society working in the UK were surveyed by postal questionnaire between May and November 1993 to determine their management of convulsive status epilepticus resistant to initial therapy with intravenous diazepam and phenytoin. Four hundred and eight forms were completed and returned (58.8%). The survey revealed that, following failure of initial management, a benzodiazepine infusion (35%) or anaesthetic induction agent (32%) were the preferred second lines of treatment in intensive care units. In paediatric intensive care units, phenobarbitone (31%) was the agent of choice. Most respondents (57%) gave anaesthetic induction agents within 60 min of the start of status epilepticus, the majority choosing thiopentone (82%). Patients were usually monitored using clinical assessment only (45%), except in paediatric intensive care units and specialist neurological or neurosurgical units where the majority used a cerebral function monitor. Only 12% of the respondents were aware of a protocol for status epilepticus in their intensive care units. The most frequently used therapeutic and monitoring strategies in the management of refractory status epilepticus in the UK are insufficient and need re-evaluation.